User talk:BusyWikipedian

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, BusyWikipedian! Thank you for your contributions. I am Tashif and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

Tashif (talk) 13:41, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 09:50, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

canvassing

I understand that you really want to win the Articles for deletion discussion about Dethcentrik but you should be aware that WP:CANVASSING you did here for votes is not allowed. I have also reverted your attempt to close the discussion early. Please wait for an admin to close the discussion. Also I would appreciate it if you would refrain from making accusations about me such as harassment. I am acting in good faith to resolve a problem here. Metal lunchbox ^(talk) 17:44, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1 of 3 warnings, all by the same user BusyWikipedian (talk) 22:49, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Burn (Havok album)

A tag has been placed on Burn (Havok album) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Metal lunchbox ^(talk) 17:49, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Time Is Up

A tag has been placed on Time Is Up requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Metal lunchbox ^(talk) 17:50, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Accusations of Vandalism

Please make yourself aware of the Vandalism guidelines before accusing another editor of vandalism. Just disagreeing with their edits is not enough. Also be aware that accusations can bite you back, unfounded accusations regarding a user you disagree with may be seen as gaming the system and cause you, not the subject of your accusation, to receive sanctions. Metal lunchbox ^(talk) 19:00, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2 of 3 warnings, all by the same user BusyWikipedian (talk) 22:50, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Closing AfD

Under no circumstances can an involved user (one who has edited the article or commented in the AfD) close an AfD. Under almost no circumstances may an AfD be closed earlier than 7 days (none of which come even close to applying here). Attempting to close an AfD early is extremely disruptive. Furthermore, none of those edits were vandalism. Wikipedia has a very strict definition of vandalism, which can be found at WP:VANDAL. The quick summary is that vandalism refers only to actions specifically intended to damage the project. Note, for instance, this paragraph: "Even if misguided, willfully against consensus, or disruptive, any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia is not vandalism. Edit warring over content is not vandalism. Careful consideration may be required to differentiate between edits that are beneficial, detrimental but well-intentioned, and vandalizing. Mislabelling good-faith edits as vandalism can be considered harmful." The policy gives a long list of specific examples of what are or are not vandalism.

So, can you please explain under what logic you were "closing" the AfD? Qwyrxian (talk) 01:11, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Im very interested in your answer to this too? As you accused me of vandalism when infact you did just that? And you also told a straight out lie at the Request for page protection.--BabbaQ (talk) 09:23, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize I did not know. I read the circumstances for a speedy keep, and I felt and still feel that the edits made by Metal.lunchbox are vandalism, not to mention that he is harassing me. I really feel that making false statements and failing to mention certain facts is never done with a good intention. I do feel like things said to me are harassment, why would the user reply to everything I say and rudely if he's so confident in his opinion? Also, duffbeerforme responded to an accusation of wikistalking by saying: "Nope, not stalking you, such a ridiculous accusation (stalking based on participating in one afd) is a personal attack. And when I get round to nominating Sektor 304 for deletion it will still not be stalking." I'm sorry if he really isn't tracking my every move why would he say that? He and Metal.lunchbox have both attacked multiple articles I have edited or created. I didn't lie, I really felt that vandalism was done, and I have been attack personally. Maybe I'm paranoid, but the evidence is there that certain editors are coming after me as an editor.BusyWikipedian (talk) 15:22, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Others as well as myself have warned you and your apparent puppets about accusations of lying, vandalism, and harassment. You have already tried to take this issue to Administrator intervention against vandalism and were told that my edits did not constitute vandalism. Consider this your last warning. If you continue with such personal attacks I will take the matter to ANI. see WP:HA#NOT Metal lunchbox ^(talk) 21:30, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

BusyWikipedian, Metal.lunchbox's edits are not vandalism. Vandalism is writing "I love JUSTIN BEIBER" or "poopoopoopoo" in an article. Or changing the height and weight of an athlete without any reason. Or adding intentionally false statements to articles. Nominating something for deletion basically cannot be vandalism. It could be disruption, but that only occurs when the person known that the article is legitimate but nominates it anyway. It is clear that Metal.lunchbox honestly believes that Dethcentrik does not meet our WP:BAND#notability guidelines for bands, based upon a claim that the sources provided either don't meet the reliable sources guidelines or don't speak about the band in depth. Now, I have not, nor will I be, actually looking into the accuracy of that claim. But the claim is made in good faith and thus is not vandalism. Also, if you have already raised the issue of stalking on ANI, and were told you're not being stalked, then you should drop the issue. Note that there is nothing wrong with saying "This person has written an article that doesn't seem to match our guidelines; I think I'm going to check on their history and see if that's true for other things they wrote"; the stalking policy, in fact, explicitly says that. Again, it's not "attacking" an article to be making sure that it meets our guidelines. Finally, one thing you should note is this, which is a problem I often see with fans getting heavily involved in writing articles on local bands that they like: the vast vast majority of bands in existence cannot have Wikipedia articles written about them, because they simply aren't notable in the sense that we define notability. This includes bands with great local followings, that play lots of gigs (sometimes even in multiple places across the country), sometimes even that release albums (depending on how the album is produced and released). This is just like the fact that the vast majority of companies are not notable enough for articles, and only a tiny percentage of people are notable enough for articles.

Having said all of that, if you want help in trying to get better at writing articles, let me know--I'd be happy to help. It sounds like what might be best is for you to do some work in your own userspace (creating drafts of articles) and having someone knowledgeable evaluating them before trying to put them into main space. This might help you avoid the pain of deletion discussions, by being told up front whether or not something is likely to survive such a process. Wikipedia needs the help of people with detailed knowledge of specific subjects, so if you need help channeling your energies and learning how our processes work, I can certainly do so. Qwyrxian (talk) 23:36, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tell you what, if any of the articles are in fact deleted, I would personally like them placed in my userspace, and I will edit them until they are worthy of placement on Wikipedia. I know there are more sources on the topic, and I would be willing to completely revamp the article. And I will consult you or other admins as to whether the sources are notable before using them. If the articles are kept I will try to expand them beyond "stub" form. BusyWikipedian (talk) 03:05, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, feel free to remind me once the AfD closes, in case I don't notice (I won't be the actual closing admin, as I could be seen as involved on the article/AfD). Qwyrxian (talk) 07:14, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Busy. A quick look at the edit history of and articles created by someone is not stalking, that is how I saw Sektor 304. Feel free to have a look at mine. I saw that Dethcentrik was nominated for deletin at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Bands and musicians and recognised it as an article I was considering afding before you started editing with your current account. You are the one that followed me into the other three afds we have both participated in (note that 3 is > 1 and I have not accused you of stalking). Your paranoia and persecution complex does not help your cause. Your constant unfound accusations reflect poorly on you. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:42, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Outing another user is a serious no-no

See WP:outing, your outing of user Slayer8899 is a form of harassment that is taken quite seriously. That you then added some of the offending material back after i removed it and the numerous personal attacks you have made previously show a willful disregard of the basic user conduct policies. I will be reporting this immediately to ANI, requesting that they block you and all associated IP addresses indefinitely. Your behavior is disruptive and unacceptable, especially in light of the numerous clear warnings you have received. - Metal lunchbox ^(talk) 22:26, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

By your logic him calling me "the Dethcentrik guy" is outing, so why aren't you mentioning it to him? It's because he sides with you is it not? As long as someone sides you you they can break Wikipedia policy correct? Something tells me you know he's lying and I am not and that's why you wanted me blocked, but if you feel so inclined go ahead and cheat the system to your favor go ahead. I've received most of my warnings from you, and I can look on your page and see how many warnings from how many users? BusyWikipedian (talk) 22:47, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

3 of 3 warnings, all by the same user BusyWikipedian (talk) 22:50, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You gave his full name, that was so blatant I could not let it slide. I considered removing his remarks but thought it just sounded like speculation based on your edits. Besides which, when you say "I" above, are you acknowledging that you are using multiple accounts? You made a mistake by responding with you IP account and then editing it to cover up. - Metal lunchbox ^(talk) 22:54, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't realize my IP had shown, I have been logged in, I seriously have been. And in fact, all comments that showed that IP have been re-signed by me, I owned them, and yes, I seriously have been signed in and it does that. If you want to accuse me of sock puppetry because you intentionally use Wikipedia to abuse it's policies, its users, it's articles, and everything it stands for go ahead. If you look at the pages there could be multiple comments from me, but not multiple votes. You realize I care enough about my integrity on here that I stay up late trying to resolve this? I have insomnia anyway, and yes, to the point I can't even read and am hallucinating, and you by all means knowing you're angering me which is why you persist. I honestly wish you had respect for other human beings, and didn't abuse power in your favor. You like to ruin people's health to get sick kicks knowing it physically and mentally hurts them, which is harassment. I'm sorry ruing people's lives here means so much to you, and I'm sorry that my integrity as an author means so much to me. Check my IPs, you won't see one that has voted more than once. You're attacking my integrity as a person, which is really the only reason I still debate with you, because you sink low and hit hard, and frankly I wonder why I worry what others think of me when I see your actions BusyWikipedian (talk) 23:05, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This was not an accident. you were clearly trying to convince other editors that you were two different voices why on earth would you have posted this encouragement/criticism of yourself otherwise. - Metal lunchbox ^(talk) 23:10, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I told you I was up late, and yes I have serious mental illness, which is evident, and you sir use it to make harassment so much more sweet for yourself. Guess what? The deletion discussion has my admission, and when I'm hallucinating I copy/paste and look up those users, you aren't harassing by Wikipedia standards, but by legal standards. And while no I can't take legal action because of what's done on Wikipedia, I hope you feel rotten for intentionally being hateful against a group of people. You notice this angers me, yet you persist. On purpose. I see no other reason you would do it. You are discriminating, using hate, and abusing Wikipedia policy. How many times have you lied to win your AfDs? Not to mention, Slayer8899 has been harassing me in real life since I "let" his band fall to AfD, which is part of why I mentioned knowing him. I know, that's really a matter for the police to handle and not Wikipedia BusyWikipedian (talk) 23:20, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

He called me every hour for a day when his AfD lost, now he's cyber bullying me. Do you know what that's like? I apologize if I'm taking this out on you. You know, I honestly thought you may have know him in person and he was sending you to yet another website I use think you would do his bidding, because I know he does this to people. I apologize, okay? BusyWikipedian (talk) 23:23, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's what kind of person Slayer8899 is he asks many favors of his friends, then when his friends don't deliver he sends other friends and his family to harass them. I am duly sorry for accusing you of such connections. And yes, it has kept me up at night to the point my insomnia has cause hallucinations, my paranoia has been extremely high, and I have been psychically sick. I apologize for accusations made against you, and I understand no matter who agrees with you or I, it's not necessarily personal. I do pride my knowledge in subjects and my ability to write about them, and I'm literally fearful Slayer8899 and his friends are going to attack anything I do just to hurt me. I will take a cool-down period to collect my head, is this fair to you? BusyWikipedian (talk) 23:40, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

BusyWikipedian, after looking at this discussion, I am very, very tempted to outright block you. You outed another editor; I suppose you can claim you didn't know that that is a problem, but now you should know that giving any real life information about anyone that they have not revealed on Wikipedia is strictly forbidden. Always. Furthermore, your admission above that you wrote a note to yourself as an IP to me makes it very hard to trust that you aren't editing as other IPs (for example, on the AfD). I understand about forgetting to log in, or even thinking your logged in but having the server log you out. But the encouraging edit to yourself looks like a clear attempt to distinguish between your 189... identity and your BusyWikipedian identity; anyone reading that comment is bound to assume that those are two separate editors. And, of course, there was your closing the AfD early; you say that you misunderstood the Speedy Keep rationale, but for me to believe that, I have to believe that you read and understood one very small, specific portion of the policy on deletion discussions, but misunderstood almost all of the rest. None of this damning evidence, but it all points to you willfully editing in poor ways. I know that this stems for your enthusiasm for the subject; what I can't tell is if your enthusiasm really is causing you to rush and make poor judgments, or if your enthusiasm is causing you to intentionally misconstrue policy and edit disruptively. At this point, consider this a final warning. Your behavior from now on needs to be impeccable, because you've about used up my good faith in your contributions to Wikipedia.

But let me take a different tone as well. If Wikipedia is causing or worsening real life problems (your self-identified mental illness, harassment from other people), then there's a very obvious solution: stop. Wikipedia is not going to collapse whether you stay or go. If these bands that you are working on are really notable, then, some day, they will have an article in Wikipedia. If they aren't, then trying to force through the issue by using dubious sources or sources that only barely mention them isn't going to help. There is never any reason for Wikipedia to harm your real life; this is a hobby, a volunteer project, not a job or a life and death situation. Please seriously consider whether your editing here is actually worth it for your health. I'm not going to block you because I think you're making a bad choice by doing something you know is hurting you, but I do think you should think long and hard whether this is the right thing for you. Qwyrxian (talk) 23:47, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I informed Metal.lunchbox that I will be taking a cool-down. I sincerely do want you to run a checkuser to prove all those edit are not in fact me. And the harassment will continue in real life regardless of Wikipedia use, which is why I mentioned this will be handled outside Wikipedia. I always take pride in my work, and with personal attacks actually occurring in real life, I am a little more inclined to feel personally attacked anywhere I go, in life and online. I do want to contribute knowledge, but you're right the consequences I'm paying right now are very severe. I have made what I feel are sincere points on AfD, but I also feel that if I do not take a break now I may make a fool of myself. If you can somehow block user:Slayer8899 from contacting me on Wikipedia, I would much appreciate it. I will take care of the real life harassment, as is my responsibility. I do want to thank you for all your help, and also hope to contribute later. BusyWikipedian (talk) 00:02, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the apology you have made on my talk page. I hope that your break is helpful. - Metal lunchbox ^(talk) 23:56, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I sincerely thank you for accepting to apology, and I hope to help you out on editing articles in the future. BusyWikipedian (talk) 00:02, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good to see things improving. BusyWikipedian, I checked Slayer888's contributions, and so far, xe has basically only contributed to two AfDs; while the comment towards you on the AfD is an assumption of bad faith, it's technically still within the bounds of a civil comment. I will attempt to monitor xyr contributions; however, if at any point there is on-wiki harrassment, please tell me immediately and I will do my best to make it stop. Going to xyr now, pre-emptively, would more likely make the situation worse, especially off-wiki. I hope your break helps you sort out your problems. Upon your return, you are welcome to ask me for help at any time. The truth is, Wikipedia is difficult, and has all sorts of idiosyncratic rules, so it takes time to get used to; it's easier with help. Qwyrxian (talk) 00:47, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Crucified Babies

A tag has been placed on Crucified Babies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. - Metal lunchbox ^(talk) 01:16, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Early Demos and Singles

A tag has been placed on Early Demos and Singles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. - Metal lunchbox ^(talk) 07:19, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Dethcentrik

A tag has been placed on Dethcentrik requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead recreating the page. Thank you. duffbeerforme (talk) 04:41, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dethcentrik for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dethcentrik is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dethcentrik (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:42, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In Dethcentrik, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page WLKS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:BusyWikipedian/Død Beverte has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Død Beverte, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 21:47, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Død Beverte for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Død Beverte is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Død Beverte (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:40, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Whatsuppaman. Thank you. duffbeerforme (talk) 08:18, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

More information needed about File:AlbumWhytheInnocentDieYoungcover.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:AlbumWhytheInnocentDieYoungcover.jpg. However, it needs some more work before it is okay to use on Wikipedia.

Please click here and do the following:

Add a description of where the image comes from (not what it is) and who the creator is. Please be specific, and include a link if you can.
Find the appropriate license from the list of free, non-free media, or public domain options. Copy the license template and paste it in the file's page, and save.

If you follow these steps, your image can help enhance Wikipedia. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the media copyright questions page.

Thank you for your contribution! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:05, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Why the Innocent Die Young, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Industrial (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. When you recently edited I Think You Got the Clean Version, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Industrial (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 03:33, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Electronic Saviors Volume 3: Remission (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Interface, Blank, Battery, Caustic, C2, Noir, Savior and Industrial

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Electronic Saviors: Industrial Music To Cure Cancer

Hello, BusyWikipedian. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Electronic Saviors: Industrial Music To Cure Cancer, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ColonelHenry (talk) 02:33, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Electronic Saviors Volume 2: Recurrence

Hello, BusyWikipedian. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Electronic Saviors Volume 2: Recurrence, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ColonelHenry (talk) 02:55, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Electronic Saviors Volume 2: Recurrence

Hello, BusyWikipedian,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Electronic Saviors Volume 2: Recurrence should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electronic Saviors Volume 2: Recurrence .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, ColonelHenry (talk) 08:30, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Electronic Saviors Volume 3: Remission

Hello, BusyWikipedian,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Electronic Saviors Volume 3: Remission should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electronic Saviors Volume 3: Remission .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, ColonelHenry (talk) 08:30, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Electronic Saviors: Industrial Music To Cure Cancer

Hello, BusyWikipedian,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Electronic Saviors: Industrial Music To Cure Cancer should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electronic Saviors: Industrial Music To Cure Cancer .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, ColonelHenry (talk) 08:44, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Electronic Saviors Volume 2: Recurrence, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Caustic, Lowe and New Day (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Electronic Saviors Volume 2: Recurrence, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Interface (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:WhytheGuiltyDieOldcover.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:WhytheGuiltyDieOldcover.jpg, which you've attributed to no source provided. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 00:37, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:WhytheGuiltyDieOldcover.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:WhytheGuiltyDieOldcover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:48, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:WhytheGuiltyDieOldcover.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:WhytheGuiltyDieOldcover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:22, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:WhytheGuiltyDieOldcover.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:WhytheGuiltyDieOldcover.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:22, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Blackhammer

Hello BusyWikipedian,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Blackhammer for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Upjav (talk) 01:54, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Distorted Productions

A tag has been placed on Distorted Productions requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jbh (talk) 02:07, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jim Semonik

A tag has been placed on Jim Semonik requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jbh (talk) 02:37, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Død Incarnate Records

A tag has been placed on Død Incarnate Records requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jbh (talk) 02:46, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Fill the Void (band)

Hi, I'm Jbhunley. BusyWikipedian, thanks for creating Fill the Void (band)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Needs better refs to show it passes WP:BAND

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Jbh (talk) 12:34, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blackhammer

Hey. Unfortunately your article was not yet suitable for the mainspace, as it met a criterion for speedy deletion (A7). As requested, I've moved it to User:BusyWikipedian/Blackhammer so you can continue to work on it. Let me know if you have any questions. Best, Swarm ^X 21:31, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dethcentrik for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dethcentrik is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dethcentrik (4th nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:58, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fill the Void (band) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fill the Void (band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fill the Void (band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:58, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Fourth Reich (album)

The article The Fourth Reich (album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is a not-notable self-published album from a not-notable band. It fails WP:GNG easily. It has been reviewed two or three self-published personal blogs and once in an online music zine called Vents Magazine. That is something, but it isn't enough. See WP:NALBUMS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - Metal lunchbox ^(talk) 15:56, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ElectronicSaviors3cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ElectronicSaviors3cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:13, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Fourth Reich (album) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Fourth Reich (album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Fourth Reich (album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jbh (talk) 13:45, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of I Think You Got the Clean Version for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article I Think You Got the Clean Version is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Think You Got the Clean Version until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jbh (talk) 13:45, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Why the Innocent Die Young for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Why the Innocent Die Young is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Why the Innocent Die Young until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jbh (talk) 13:45, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Early Demos and Singles for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Early Demos and Singles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Early Demos and Singles until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jbh (talk) 13:52, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Early Demos and Singles

A tag has been placed on Early Demos and Singles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jbh (talk) 00:38, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Why the Innocent Die Young

A tag has been placed on Why the Innocent Die Young requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jbh (talk) 01:09, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ElectronicSaviors1cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ElectronicSaviors1cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:28, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sektor 304 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sektor 304 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sektor 304 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:40, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Rust Punk Tribe

A tag has been placed on The Rust Punk Tribe, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CataracticPlanets (talk) 02:49, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Rust Punk Tribe

A tag has been placed on The Rust Punk Tribe, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CataracticPlanets (talk) 05:40, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you removed the speedy deletion tag from The Rust Punk Tribe, so I replaced it. Please keep in mind that it's generally considered inappropriate to remove such tags from pages you've created yourself. I left a message on the article's talk page and am happy to discuss further there with you why you feel the article should not be deleted. CataracticPlanets (talk) 05:45, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Rust Punk Tribe

The article The Rust Punk Tribe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CataracticPlanets (talk) 04:34, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:TRPT Basement2013.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:TRPT Basement2013.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:02, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Iniquitous (band)

A tag has been placed on Iniquitous (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 15:57, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Iniquitous (band), a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 16:10, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

According to WP:MUSIC a band consisting of two or more members of other notable ensembles is enough for notability, this band has more than twice that. It may not have been your intention, but you're attempting to circumvent a required AfD, I can remove the tag after fixing the article. You didn't even bother to check the edits-BusyWikipedian (talk) 16:19, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

BusyWikipedian, oh, sorry, I didn't respond to you earlier. You are correct that a criterion of WP:NBAND does establish Iniquitous as a notable band, hence, I am sorry for making it for speedy deletion. However, as a general advise, please don't remove CSD tags from articles that you have yourself created. Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 09:35, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mechanical Pleasures

The article Mechanical Pleasures has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 07:30, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, BusyWikipedian. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:ES3 albumart.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:01, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:ES4 albumart.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:05, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:ES1 albumart.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:08, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:ES4 albumart.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:ES4 albumart.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:ES1 albumart.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:ES1 albumart.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:

File:ES3 albumart.jpg

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chris Vrenna, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tweaker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retox: Remixes and Rarities moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Retox: Remixes and Rarities, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 14:23, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Retox: Remixes and Rarities (January 31)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Dan arndt was: undefined

Dan arndt (talk) 04:39, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BusyWikipedian! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 04:39, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stefan Klein, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 9News (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:13, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]