Jump to content

User talk:BurnDownBabylon/Archive 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Backgammon page

[edit]

You've been doing a great job on Backgammon. I think I'll just go ahead and change all "he"s to "she"s. I guess if anyone gets upset (and I doubt it), they can revert. As I change the pronouns, I'll copy-edit anything else I think I can improve. There's a fair bit of room for taste in issues of "style", I usually don't like to interfere too much, but since you ask so nicely ... ;)

Cheers (and good dice if you're a backgammon player :)

Alastair Haines 14:15, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NOW YET

[edit]

Okay I changed my signature to a short one line. The New Mikemoral

BgBlitz

[edit]

Hi Ptkfgs,

I regulary scan the net with search engines for websites mentioning BGBlitz or BGBlitz2go, so I stumbled over: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Backgammonexpert. You made my day ;) In a private communication I can tell you why. May I cite you from this page, the last sentence, beginning with "The software packages we have linked..."?

BTW I visit the BG page from time to time and the page gets better and better. Very good job!

ciao Frank Berger (frank at bgblitz dot com )

I would prefer that you not. Thanks! ptkfgs 16:57, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pokeman image deletion review

[edit]

You recently voted on a templates for deletion discussion on Template:PokeImageNR and several other templates. The result was for deletion. The matter is now before deletion review. Please comment if you would like, one way or the other. The users of the Pokeman Wikiproject believe that their case was not fully heard the first time the matter was up for deletion. So please review the situation if you would like. --WoohookittyWoohoo! 21:45, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Your criticism and the fact that you favor the Intellexual link into the Bose article has come to the point where I declare it a dispute for a couple of reasons: the link is outdated, Number one, it tests out a product that Bose no longer makes, number two; Bose's quality policies and manufacturing mistakes might have been rectified since then, number three; has a very strong anti-Bose bias, number four; promotes trolling and personal attacks in Wikipedia, number five; you used the link to attack UKPhoenix79 on a Bose article, number six.

From my point-of-view, that link needs to be denounced completely to alleviate the trolling, but if you want the link to stay and/or remain in the article, then it will be marked as a disputed link and this dispute needs to be brought up to the Bose corporation article's discussion.

And do NOT give me any harsh criticism anymore because if you do, then you will pay. — Mark Kim (U * T/R * CTD) 04:23, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not make threats. Editing disputes are more easily resolved without attacking other editors. ptkfgs 04:50, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OiNK

[edit]

Thanks for mass deleting everything I tagged with {{fact}}, I think if I'd done it myself a lot of suspicion would arise which wouldn't have helped with the AfD :P. -Paine 01:41, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

^5- Consider hopping in the oink irc chan and saying hi when you get a chance, too ;) -Paine 01:45, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, the DNS server is currently down, use the IP address.
Although if you'd prefer to wait til morning when the DNS server is working rather than trust some weirdo from wikipedia, I'll understand ;) -Paine 01:59, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cheese

[edit]

You said: "That's really about all we need. People have been mixing drugs unwisely for as long as they've been taking drugs at all. ptkfgs 19:08, 12 June 2007 (UTC)"[reply]

I say: No, that would be a terrible idea. "People have been mixing drugs unwisely for as long as they've been taking drugs at all." - But do all drug cocktails as Cheese get this much media attention? Surely not all drug cocktails ever invented had entire articles written about them by ABC News. WhisperToMe 20:50, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have a rule for you - I want you to read through all of the sources cited.

  • 1. The sources have been continuing to post stories for years
  • 2. Now national news organizations are writing stories about Cheese

Also, "drug fads" are encyclopedic topics, like it or not. Do not use faulty reasoning. Read Wikipedia:Notability. You may hate the topic, but that does not matter. WhisperToMe 22:33, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have been reading the stories as they've been published. There's no need to duplicate your posts from the talk page here, by the way. ptkfgs 22:43, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Was this edit made by you?

[edit]

After seeing stuff on the talk page, I wonder if you made this edit: [1] WhisperToMe 05:27, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I guess I should PGP sign it next time. ptkfgs 14:03, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Emory

[edit]

There are 4 secret societies at Emory, including DVS and the Order of Ammon. See here. Stop editing to the contrary. Thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.98.134.161 (talkcontribs).

RFC

[edit]

As you were previously involved I thought you may wish to take part Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Mark_Kim.--Crossmr 04:05, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

can you provide diffs of your attempts to resolve the dispute with him? That is all that is needed to move this to accepted.--Crossmr 12:42, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Not really, no. There are too many diffs on there as it is. These things never go anywhere anyway. ptkfgs 13:42, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I realize that, but its a necessary step before going to arbcom if the behaviour doesn't change. Arbcom won't take it if we don't demonstrate that we've tried other formal dispute methods.--Crossmr 14:12, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, well, I'm pretty sure what I've done is sufficient to vouch for your RfC. If not, we'll know within a few days and I'll see what I can come up with. ptkfgs 15:36, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Kim

[edit]

Unfortunately, I see no reasonable solution following an RFC. Sadly, I feel we have to resort to arbitration, so I have filed a case. — Selmo (talk) 00:34, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hehehehe

[edit]

Your funny we don't use those stupid trademark signs [...] argh! you used both! I can just see you there editing away on your computer and steam coming out of your ears :-) You make me laugh. Just thought that I'd pass that on! -- UKPhoenix79 05:25, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Block

[edit]

About your request to be blocked: why? We don't ordinarily block upon request. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:09, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

re: BOSS

[edit]

Sorry about that, I was under the impression that the corporation name was an acronym. Turns out there is another BOSS Corporation whose name is an acronym but it's unrelated. Your friendly and civil message was just the thing to make me see the error of my ways. Thanks! Bloodzombie 14:39, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:ZeframCochrane1.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:ZeframCochrane1.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ejfetters 06:52, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, then, delete it and don't trouble me with it. All I did was revert it to an earlier version. :-) ptkfgs 15:23, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Generations reformatting

[edit]

I posted to the Wikipedia:Templates for Deletion#Template:Generations a suggestion to reformat this awful table into a useful navigation box. I'd be interested in your thoughts at the tfd.  ∴ Therefore  talk   12:36, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To properly redirect a page, you have to type out "#redirect [[page title]]". The abbreviation "#redir [[page title]]" does not exist as a magic word, and will just produce "1. redir page title" instead of a redirect. Thanks, — Swpbtalk|edits 15:35, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 03:43, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! — Swpbtalk|edits 15:35, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 13:17, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pricing of drugs

[edit]

See the talk page about this :) WhisperToMe 05:53, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I found some good sources cited by a Slate article about Cheese. I think you will like what I found - A UT professor who studies illegal drugs wrote about Cheese. WhisperToMe 20:21, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Haditwiththesesnakes.JPG listed for deletion

[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Haditwiththesesnakes.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 23:18, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyfraud article

[edit]

I have only just begun.--Fahrenheit451 23:11, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I see that Old English interests you. I think Saxon and Friis are very interesting.--Fahrenheit451 00:16, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fender Wikiproject Proposal

[edit]

Hi, I have proposed a WikiProject for Fender Musical Instruments Corporation. If you are interested, please add you name here. Izzy007 Talk 03:25, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE REVIEW I am leaving you this message because you have participated in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sport (software) I have reduced the Sport (software) article to a stub with one valid assertion of notability which can be verified by a reliable source and is properly cited. From digging through the sources that Mr. Badger provided, I have concluded that the software has just made it under the wire to qualify as notable because it was the subject of a lecture at an international symposium of SmallTalk programmers just a week ago. I have tagged the article for Wikipedia:WikiProject_Free_Software and I have posted a note about the article on their TO-DO list. The article is not what Mr. Badger envisioned, but it might be worth keeping now. Mr. Badger has had many Wikipedians drill into his head warnings about the problems with his conflict of interest and unfamiliarity with Wikipedia standards and practices, and from direct email correspondence with him I am sure he will comply. Please let me know what you think of these changes. Thanks very much. OfficeGirl 00:26, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

one disadvantage of edit-warring is that thousands of eyeballs see your embarrassing spelling errors

[edit]

heh, good point. Thanks for fixing them. <<-armon->> 00:38, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Leeroy Jenkins

[edit]

You recently reverted the Leeroy Jenkins page. The information on it, was, in fact, factual...though I did agree with your statement that the chicken hadn't been referenced previously. As such, I mentioned the chicken earlier (when explaining that he was AFK) and reverted the ending. TrevorRC 14:44, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Emory shield.png)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Emory shield.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:22, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Emory shield.png)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Emory shield.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 03:18, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Justification of copyright infringement, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justification of copyright infringement. Thank you. LightSpeed3 (talk) 19:48, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]