User talk:Mark Kim

This editor has decided to leave Wikipedia.

Leaving Wipedia

I noticed. Sorry to see you go. I think you did good editing work, as long as it didn't require you to deal with other editors. Maybe you should just take time off and see what happens at the arbitration case, before you decide to leave permanently.--Atlan (talk) 13:37, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am leaving Wikipedia without any strings attached. Officially, and FOR GOOD. — Mark Kim (U * T/R * CTD) 15:34, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but I'm adios

Sorry but after 2 years, I'm voluntarily adios. The fact that you got involved in a conspiracy to place me under arbitration is the last straw. Therefore go to another editor if you want various articles to be edited. I don't have any time to waste with Wikipedia anymore. I leave Wikipedia with this one warning: there will be even more fragile editors like myself and soon there will be opposition to Wikipedia's oppresive rules that y'all will have to think things. I don't care about those articles anymore and nobody cared about my edits anyway. Sorry, but I'm voluntarily finished here. — Mark Kim (U * T/R * CTD) 12:57, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think that last message is very telling of what exactly is wrong with your attitude... There's no conspiracy nor are we, or have we ever, tried to oppress your content on Wikipedia articles. If anything, your edits to the articles were more than good for most editors I've seen around here. The entire point of all this was to get you to recognize that you are not the only person on Wikipedia and therefore you need to interact more respectfully with others. That's it. Somehow you keep seeing this as an attack on your edits but it seriously isn't... not remotely. What rule did you exactly find so oppressive? How have we treated you in a mean or vindictive manner? In either case, life will move on here with you here or not, no need for such warnings of doom. Sasquatch t|c 15:56, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I explicitly stated that it wasn't an attack. I'm only trying to lend a hand in solving the problem. You're a good editor; just have a bad attitude. — Selmo ^(talk) 18:12, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vesther, you're one of the editors I look up to. You've been contributing to The Apprentice articles and I've learned a thing or two from it. Actually, a lot more than that. I hope you'll change your mind and come back, because you're one of the Wikipedians that make up Wikipedia. --Sli723 23:46, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hope to see you Soon!

Sorry to see you go! After all its nice to have someone watch my back when I needed some help! I hope you don't mind but I put the Barnstar I gave you back on your user page... Since I think you still deserve it :-) Your pal Phoenix! -- UKPhoenix79 05:16, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of VSSE

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on VSSE, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because VSSE is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting VSSE, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 08:10, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]