User talk:Burgundian Feudalism

This user may have left Wikipedia. Burgundian Feudalism has not edited Wikipedia since April 2, 2022. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

[User:Burgundian Feudalism|From Burgundian Feudalism ]] (talk) 19:25, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, Burgundian Feudalism, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made to Allied invasion of Italy seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Introduction and Getting started
Contributing to Wikipedia
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 02:12, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Battle of Austerlitz, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dirkbb (talk) 23:10, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Joachim Murat, you may be blocked from editing. Dirkbb (talk) 23:13, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Jean-Baptiste Bessières. Dirkbb (talk) 23:19, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Totally uncalled for threats, those edits were in good faith. Prins van Oranje 20:24, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Burgundian! I see you intensively edited the 18th division page. Be mindful though that this is a copy-paste of the 15th for now (except for the listings below). I'll write the story today. You can copy paste your edits in the 15th Division page using the editing history. Epicurus BE (talk) 13:33, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. I did just that. Burgundian Feudalism (talk) 14:26, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

1st Cavalry Division (Belgium) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 1st Cavalry Division (Belgium), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ashley yoursmile! 16:34, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. I just started on that page today. Burgundian Feudalism (talk) 17:25, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2nd Cavalry Division (Belgium) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2nd Cavalry Division (Belgium), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Roller26 (talk) 19:32, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

14th Infantry Division (Belgium) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 14th Infantry Division (Belgium), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 19:08, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Hello, Thegreatsoldiers (talk) 18:20, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Burgundian Feudalism, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:54, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse replying

Given that you are new to what goes on at Teahouse, I suggest you only observe for a while, and perhaps also peruse past Q&As before attempting to answer questions. There are experienced hosts who keep up with answering queries. Your inserting a reply that is vague, incomplete or even in error, does not help. This does not mean you should not aspire to be a host, just get a better understanding first. David notMD (talk) 18:43, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

1st Light Regiment Gendarmerie (Belgium) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 1st Light Regiment Gendarmerie (Belgium), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:33, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I can see that you've moved the article from drafts back to mainspace. However, the sources and citations (which was the reason for draftifying it) are exactly the same — two sources, with one citation of each — so essentially nothing has changed in that respect. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:18, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I know you want to keep Wikipedia clean. When you deleted that article, I was putting in the last touches. But still, I respect your choice. One of the reasons this page was made, was to help resolve the orphanage problem over at the 2nd Light Regiment Gendarmerie page.

also I couldn’t find any other sources as no one is interested in writing a page about a battle that lasted for only 18 days*

From Burgundian Feudalism (talk) 19:25, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 1st Light Regiment of the Gendarmerie (Belgium) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1st Light Regiment of the Gendarmerie (Belgium) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1st Light Regiment of the Gendarmerie (Belgium) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Eagleash (talk) 19:54, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copy attribution is required

Thanks for your recent work on 4th Hussar Regiment (France). Please note that any content that you copy from other Wikipedia articles or translate from foreign Wikipedia articles must be attributed to the source article,. This is a hard rule, based on Wikipedia's licensing requirements. There are a few ways of fulfilling this obligation; for translations, the easiest of these is hyerlink attribution, which involves adding as statement in the edit summary of the article you are creating or adding to; see WP:TFOLWP for a copy-paste model you can use for the edit summary.

If you forget to add it at the time you made the original edit, then you have to go back and add it later; a model for this is given at WP:RIA. In addition, it's helpful to use the {{translated}} template to the talk page of the article; in this case, you only need one for each source article you translated from. Hope this helps! Mathglot (talk) 02:50, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! From Burgundian Feudalism (talk) 12:48, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So, copy attribution is *still* required. I notice in this edit, you added it directly to the body of the article, but that's not how it's done, so I reverted that change. Please see WP:RIA for a copy-paste model you can use, and for instructions how to use it. If you need help with that, let me know. (please

mention me on reply; thanks!) Mathglot (talk) 06:15, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe I didn't sufficiently express the seriousness of this before. This is serious. I see that you have dozens of edits since my last message about this, and you still haven't taken care of it. Please stop whatever else you are doing on Wikipedia, until you have added the required copy attribution for 4th Hussar Regiment (France). If you don't understand this message, or what it is you have to do, please have a look at WP:RIA. If you still don't understand, please reply below with your question(s), and I will help you. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 09:19, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I’ll check WP:RIA. From Burgundian Feudalism (talk) 14:42, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

8th Infantry Division (Belgium) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 8th Infantry Division (Belgium), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:21, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:22, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

3rd Hussar Regiment (France) moved to draftspace - unsourced

An article you recently created, 3rd Hussar Regiment (France), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:21, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 3rd Hussar Regiment (France) (April 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:3rd Hussar Regiment (France) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:3rd Hussar Regiment (France), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 20:14, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 3rd Hussar Regiment (France) (April 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This page has been moved back from article space to draft space. Please read the comments by the draftifying reviewer and address them. Do not resubmit this draft without addressing the comments of the previous reviewer. If you do not understand why this article was sent back to draft space, ask the reviewer rather than simply resubmitting.

You may ask for advice on how to improve this draft at the Teahouse or on the talk pages of any of the reviewers. (The declining reviewers may advise you to ask for advice at the Teahouse.)

If this draft is resubmitted without any improvement or with very little improvement again, it will almost certainly be rejected, and it may be nominated for deletion, or a partial block may be requested against further submission by the responsible editor.

This draft has been resubmitted without any visible improvement, or with very little improvement. If you do not know what is needed to improve this draft, please ask for advice rather than making minor improvements and resubmitting.

You may ask for advice on how to improve this draft at the Teahouse or on the talk pages of any of the declining reviewers. (The declining reviewers may advise you to ask for advice at the Teahouse.)

If this draft is resubmitted without any improvement or with very little improvement again, it is likely to be rejected, and it may be nominated for deletion, or a topic-ban may even be requested against further submission by the responsible editor.

Wikipedia may not be used as a reference. See the policy against circular references. References to Wikipedia may and should be converted to in-line links. Although links do not take the place of references, which are required, links will facilitate the evaluation of this draft by providing context.

This draft should be revised and resubmitted with valid references and without using Wikipedia as a reference. You may ask for advice about references and/or links at the Teahouse.

French Wikipedia may not be used as a reference. Neither may English Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:3rd Hussar Regiment (France) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:3rd Hussar Regiment (France), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:46, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to 4th Hussar Regiment (France). Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 17:43, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marshal of the Empire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Krasny. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Talk pages, etc.

Re: edits like this; that's not how Wikipedia works. Almost anyone can edit almost any article at any time. I also noticed that each time you create an article, you also create the talk page with an open plea that the article not be touched until you are finished it. Again, not how WP works, and also not what talk pages are for. You can take a look at WP:TPG, or just any article, you will never see a post like that by the creator. If you're really concerned about this, I would suggest creating articles in your sandbox or in draft space (which can be accessed via your sandbox, I added a information template there for you). I take it the content you are adding is be8ng translated? While adding content is good, the writing quality needs improvement. If you go through WP:AFC, you can get assistance with that. Anyway, this is just friendly advice, not criticism, don't let this stop you from creating articles! It's great that you're adding new content. Keep it up. - wolf 20:17, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that’s like a month ago. I’ve had a better understanding in Wikipedian ‘society.’ From Burgundian Feudalism (talk) 20:19, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that's good to know. Meanwhile, if you have any questions, you can ask them at them at the Help Desk. Also, the Teahouse is a good resource for new users, if you haven't already, you should check these pages out. - wolf 22:01, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. From Burgundian Feudalism (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 12:45, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 13:29, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but for this time being, I am actually on a mobile device. From Burgundian Feudalism (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 14:02, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please use the first listed method then. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:06, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks. From Burgundian Feudalism (talk) 14:10, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, after I manually typed in the time, it just automatically scripts the time for me.From Burgundian Feudalism (talk) 14:12, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You don't need to manually enter your username or the date, just type the four tildes (~~~~) at the end and both your name and the timestamp will be automatically added for you. It shouldn't matter that you're on a mobile device, the tilde should be on your keyboard (many people, including myself edit from mobile devices and have no issue with signatures). Also, please indent your talk page posts (just add an increasing number of colons : at the beginning of your post). Thank you - wolf 17:54, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

From Burgundian Feudalism (talk) 17:57, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to able to add you signature now. How about giving indentation a try? Your signature is the beginning (level 0), and this reply is level one. - wolf 20:59, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And this is level two. - wolf 20:59, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And three. - wolf 20:59, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Four. Now you try level five. - wolf 20:59, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:58, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nomination period closing soon

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are still open, but not for long. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! No further nominations will be accepted after that time. Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:42, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election voting has commenced

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Appropriate questions for the candidates can also be asked. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:37, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting period closing soon

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche will be closing soon. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:3rd Hussar Regiment

Hello, Burgundian Feudalism. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:3rd Hussar Regiment, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Survey about History on Wikipedia

I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.

If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 (talk) 09:37, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations opening soon

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:50, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting opening soon!

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:25, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Correction to previous election announcement

Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I (Hog Farm) didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:40, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting closing soon

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring here If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:12, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:3rd Hussar Regiment

Hello, Burgundian Feudalism. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "3rd Hussar Regiment".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:20, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]