User talk:BullDawg2021
Your submission at Articles for creation: Caden Prieskorn has been accepted
[edit]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
94rain Talk 05:08, 1 January 2024 (UTC)Blue Cain
[edit]Hello, BullDawg2021. I saw that you have been to some Georgia Bulldogs basketball games recently. I went to the game against High Point on December 16, and noticed UGA's freshman Blue Cain bears a resemblance to my cousin. As a familial inside joke and a contribution to Wikipedia, I am drafting an article for Blue Cain that I wish to publish by seasons end or before. Unfortunately, I did not get a photo of Blue at the game. Would you happen to have a photo/be able to get a photo at an upcoming game you will attend? I don't need high quality or anything fancy, just enough to make out his face. If not, no worries either way. Happy New Year, and Go Dawgs!
TarheelBornBred Talk 12:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, TarheelBornBred. I would be more than happy to help you by taking a picture of Blue Cain. I am planning to attend the game against Tennessee on 1/13, so I will see if I can take a picture depending on how good my seats are. I can also help with the draft if you would like. Happy New Year, and Go Dawgs! BullDawg2021 (talk) 18:20, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- Great! Thank you very much, here is the link to my draft so far, make any corrections or improvements you see fit. * Blue Cain TarheelBornBred (talk) 20:05, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Ryan Puglisi has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Spinster300 (talk) 11:24, 18 January 2024 (UTC)2024 America East men's basketball tournament moved to draftspace
[edit]Thanks for your contributions to 2024 America East men's basketball tournament. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it may be too soon to create this article. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:07, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, Significa liberdade. To be quite honest, I do not understand this move. Every college basketball tournament has a Wikipedia page and sources usually aren’t required for this type of event. How else I am supposed to prove that this event is notable? If this isn’t notable, then you have a lot of college basketball tournament pages to move to drafts. BullDawg2021 (talk) 01:07, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Because I have the option to move it back, I will. Every America East tournament since 1980 has had a Wikipedia page, so there is no reason this one is not notable. Just because there is a lack of sources in an article about a notable annual tournament doesn't mean that it isn't notable. There have been no other issues with articles with the same quality of sources regarding annual conference tournaments. The article had also already been reviewed, so there should've been no issue.
- Cheers, BullDawg2021 (talk) 04:17, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Gramahawk has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Lopifalko (talk) 08:58, 21 January 2024 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Quinton Cooley has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Spinster300 (talk) 13:59, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Robbie Avila has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 17:56, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: 2024 MLB jersey controversy has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Utopes (talk / cont) 02:25, 4 March 2024 (UTC)DYK for 2024 Major League Baseball uniform controversy
[edit]
On 24 March 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2024 Major League Baseball uniform controversy, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that one Baltimore Orioles player compared the 2024 Major League Baseball jerseys to knockoffs from TJ Maxx? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2024 MLB jersey controversy. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 2024 Major League Baseball uniform controversy), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
—Ganesha811 (talk) 00:03, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
RaShawn Stores - DYK
[edit]I saw that you've had a few articles be nominated for DYK, and I was wondering if you could give me some feedback on whether my article on RaShawn Stores could be potentially applicable. I'm thinking the hook or whatever you would call it would be along the lines of him playing under, coaching for, and replacing Steve Masiello within a decade. If you have the time, could you review the article for content/sourcing/anything else that I might need to tweak for it to be nominated for DYK. Thanks, TarheelBornBred (talk) 21:15, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi, TarheelBornBred. After reviewing the article, I believe that it indeed could potentially become a DYK article. The article is free of plagiarism, is neutral, and has an interesting hook. However, I do not believe that the article would be accepted due to the sourcing. Most of the sources are fine, but the New York Post and primary sources such as the Manhattan and NJIT athletic websites will prevent the article from passing the 'adequate sourcing' portion of the process. For a hook, I would say something along the lines of "Did you know... that RaShawn Stores played for, coached with, and eventually replaced Steve Masiello all within one decade?" It's a very rough hook that could definitely be improved, but it's a place to start. You will also need a source to accompany the claim, which could be an issue. Overall, I think the article has a strong case to be nominated for DYK, but some sources need to be changed. I would be glad to help you find additional sources if needed. Just let me know. Sorry for the late response, and Go Dawgs! @TarheelBornBred: BullDawg2021 (talk) 02:49, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your feedback. If you are so inclined to find additional sources for me, I would be very grateful. This week I have a heavy school load so I might not exert much effort into the article for a little while, so apologies in advance if it seems I have pawned my responsibility onto you, but after this week I will be able to tweak the article myself as well. Thanks, and Go Dawgs! TarheelBornBred (talk) 13:31, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Terrell Burden has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Triptothecottage (talk) 04:09, 25 April 2024 (UTC)Mystik Dan
[edit]Please consider starting articles like Mystik Dan in the draftspace or in your sandbox. A Wikipedia page with no content besides the title is not useful to anyone, and is speedy deleteable per WP:A3. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 23:15, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
Sorry about that. I had to go away for a moment, and I wasn't able to immediately add content. That's why I added an under-construction tab. --BullDawg2021 (talk) 23:28, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
June 2024
[edit]
Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Grant Palmer (actor), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. see WP:DOB Waxworker (talk) 07:35, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Southeastern Conference starting quarterbacks navbox
[edit]
Template:Southeastern Conference starting quarterbacks navbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. UCO2009bluejay (talk) 23:03, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Haliey Welch has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
48JCL 12:49, 5 July 2024 (UTC)Nomination of Haliey Welch for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haliey Welch until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.UtherSRG (talk) 13:01, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Ani Notice
[edit]There is a discussion you are involved with in the Administrators notice board. You may view it here: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Copied/paraphrased draft posted to mainspace Comintell (talk) 19:23, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Your contributed article, Haliey Welch
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Haliey Welch. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Hailey_Welch. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Hailey_Welch. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.
If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Comintell (talk) 03:44, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- A draft isn't a page. Please stop BullDawg2021 (talk) 03:47, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- My draft existed before your draft. Two drafts on the same subject are not allowed. Yours was accepted by mistake. Therefore your draft, because it is not the original draft, DID qualify for speedy deletion. Hope this makes sense. Comintell (talk) 03:52, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- It doesn't. You are WP:Ididn'thearthat. I'm so sorry that you can't stand that my article got accepted. Even the administrators are telling you otherwise. BullDawg2021 (talk) 03:57, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- We'll see. Are you actually allowed to revert/undo a CSD? Is that not a violation of policy and potentially edit warring. We'll see how it turns out. I created and submitted the draft first, plain and simple. Yours was accepted by mistake. Had the reviewer known there was already a draft in submission, it likely would have been CSD'd. Comintell (talk) 04:02, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Please stop messaging me. BullDawg2021 (talk) 04:03, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Maybe my sourcing was better? All you've done is attack me. Accusing me of copying, intentional misspelling, and all kinds of things. Reporting me to administrators. Then you try to end a AFD without a consensus. Then you try to speedy delete it. My question is, why do you care so much? It's just an article about a meme. I'm so sorry that we happened to write articles about the same subject around the same time. BullDawg2021 (talk) 04:07, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Please stop messaging me. BullDawg2021 (talk) 04:03, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- We'll see. Are you actually allowed to revert/undo a CSD? Is that not a violation of policy and potentially edit warring. We'll see how it turns out. I created and submitted the draft first, plain and simple. Yours was accepted by mistake. Had the reviewer known there was already a draft in submission, it likely would have been CSD'd. Comintell (talk) 04:02, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- It doesn't. You are WP:Ididn'thearthat. I'm so sorry that you can't stand that my article got accepted. Even the administrators are telling you otherwise. BullDawg2021 (talk) 03:57, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- My draft existed before your draft. Two drafts on the same subject are not allowed. Yours was accepted by mistake. Therefore your draft, because it is not the original draft, DID qualify for speedy deletion. Hope this makes sense. Comintell (talk) 03:52, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:2 days into college
[edit] Hello, BullDawg2021. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2 days into college, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:05, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Josh Green
[edit]You're honestly a f***ng idi*t for reverting the fact that he was traded to the Charlotte Hornets when it was literally confirmed by NBA.com and both teams. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.122.115.248 (talk) 09:11, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- It was actually a reported trade and not confirmed by either team. Cry about it lol BullDawg2021 (talk) 17:00, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Brooke Huckaby
[edit]I finished the article for Brooke Huckaby. I have noticed that although she was elected months ago, it seems that the revelation that she is the US' youngest female mayor is just now coming to light. As such, as I was creating the article, new sources were being created simultaneously. I am going to monitor these to see if there is any new information to add, but I thought I'd let you know in case you found something new and wanted to add something yourself. Once again, thanks for the suggestion, and Go Dawgs! TarheelBornBred (talk) 19:19, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Sourcing looks good and I think it is a good candidate for DYK. I don't know if its long enough, but I think a potential hook would be considered interesting. I'll add the article to my watchlist and add any new information if I see it. Go Dawgs! @TarheelBornBred BullDawg2021 (talk) 19:29, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
July 2024
[edit]
Your recent editing history at Hawk Tuah Girl shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Seasider53 (talk) 18:55, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:2 days into college
[edit]Hello, BullDawg2021. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "2 days into college".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:20, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Quincy Olivari
[edit] Hello, BullDawg2021. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Quincy Olivari, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:07, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 19 November 2024 (UTC)