User talk:Buffbills7701/Archive 5
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Buffbills7701. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | → | Archive 10 |
VisualEditor newsletter • 19 December 2013
VisualEditor's toolbar has a new drop-down menu that contains all character formatting: bold, italics, subscript, superscript, strikethrough, computer code, underline, and the ability to remove all formatting from text.
For more information about how to use VisualEditor, read the user guide.
Since the last newsletter, the VisualEditor team has worked on some toolbar improvements, fixing bugs, and improving support for Indic languages as well as other languages with complex characters. The current focus is on improving the reference dialog and expanding the new character inserter tool.
There have been dozens of changes since the last newsletter. Here are some of the highlights:
- Rich copying and pasting is now available. If you copy text from another website, then character formatting and some other HTML attributes are preserved. This means, for example, that if you copy a pre-formatted suggested citation from a source like this, then VisualEditor will preserve the formatting of the title in the citation. Keep in mind that copying the formatting may include formatting that you don't want (like section headings). If you want to paste plain, unformatted text onto a page, then use Control+⇧ Shift+V or ⌘ Command+⇧ Shift+V (Mac).
- Auto-numbered external links like [1] can now be edited just like any other link. However, they cannot be created in VisualEditor easily.
- Several changes to the toolbar and dialogs have been made, and more are on the way. The toolbar has been simplified with a new drop-down text styles menu and an "insert" menu. Your feedback on the toolbar is wanted here. The transclusion/template dialog has been simplified. If you have enabled mathematical formula editing, then the menu item is now called the formula editor instead of LaTeX.
- There is a new character inserter, which you can find in the new "insert" menu, with a capital Omega ("Ω"). It's a very basic set of characters. Your feedback on the character inserter is wanted here.
- Saving the page should seem faster by several seconds now.
- It is now possible to access VisualEditor by manually editing the URL, even if you are not logged in or have not opted in to VisualEditor normally. To do so, append
?veaction=editto the end of the page name. For example, changehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Randomtohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random?veaction=editto open a random page in VisualEditor. This is intended to support bug testing across multiple browsers, without requiring editors to login repeatedly.
Looking ahead: The transclusion dialog will see further changes in the coming weeks, with a simple mode for single templates and an advanced mode for more complex transclusions. The new character formatting menu on the toolbar will get an arrow to show that it is a drop-down menu. The reference dialog will be improved, and the Reference item will become a button in the main toolbar, rather than an item in the Insert menu.
If you have questions or suggestions for future improvements, or if you encounter problems, please let everyone know by posting a note at Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback. Thank you! Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 20:39, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement
 A typical Nepali meal
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Previous selections: Recorded history • Micronesia Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: Northamerica1000(talk) 22:37, 23 December 2013 (UTC) |
|---|
PHOX
I deleted the redirect that was in the way for you, if you want to finish handling Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/PHOX yourself. Cheers, Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 11:38, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 December 2013
- Recent research: Cross-language editors, election predictions, vandalism experiments
- Featured content: Drunken birds and treasonous kings
- Discussion report: Draft namespace, VisualEditor meetings
- WikiProject report: More Great WikiProject Logos
- News and notes: IEG round 2 funding rewards diverse ambitions
- Technology report: OAuth: future of user designed tools
recently declined submission
You recently declined my page for On Stage with Mantis. I have worked on this TV show for 5 years and feel it meets the criteria of notability more than hundreds of other shows that have pages. I have seen pages with only one vague reference. I have two news articles mentioning the show as references. I have seen other pages of prominent shows referenced to other pages. I think referring to the notable people that have been on the show offers status of notability. Unfortunately, most of what I have done in life is under confidentiality agreements. I think being a multi-book author and veteran of the music industry beyond a TV producer merits recognition. Perhaps being judged by those that have no significant past achievements is wrong. Having created a live concert series from nothing that has reached viewers in 145 countries is notable. Being one of the fastest rising non-commercial celebrities on IMDb is also notable. MantisKhiralla (talk) 17:19, 28 December 2013 (UTC)user:MantisKhiralla
you recently declined a duplicate submission I had accidentally made for Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Premier Pizza. I was wondering if you were also the one reviewing the main version Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Premier Pizza (2). My main concern is that the Premier Pizza (2) page also gets declined for being a duplicate (which is how it became Premier Pizza (2) in the first place and resulted in my creating another duplicate!!). Is there any way we can make a note on the Premier Pizza (2) page to let any reviewers know that it is not a duplicate, it is the only one meant for submission? i.e. simply making a note at the top of the page? (If this is the case there is no need for you to read the attached correspondence)
Below is some correspondence with another editor who helped me with this issue the first time it arose. Hopefully it will clear up the sequence of events and better enable you to offer advice.
Thank you in advance for any advice or help you can offer.
Tyler
" Greetings!
I recently ran into some interesting issues when attempting to post my first wikipedia article and was hoping you had some insights to share or advice to give. My article was declined due to it being a duplicate of a declined page you subsequently deleted for abandonment. I have since resubmitted my article under my original page as well as the page you deleted (I resubmitted the former before understanding the abandoned status of the latter) I believe this move may have confused the resubmission process or otherwise been a wikipedia faux pas.
I would greatly appreciate any help you would be willing to give. for more information and links to the pages in question please see the following correspondence I submitted to User:MatthewVanitas
Thanks! Tyler Scott
Hi Matthew,
I recently submitted an article on “Primier Pizza” (now titled Premier Pizza 2) for review to be published on Wikipedia. Unfortunately, my submission was declined by yourself due to there already existing a page with a similar or same title. I was referred to the following link, in order that I could request additions and edits to the page, or otherwise contact its author.
Upon following the link I found that the previously existing article had been deleted by User:Sphilbrick due to the page being "abandoned" (I have since submitted my content to the abandoned page). Before doing this however, due to my wiki naivety and because the original page had been deleted, I simply fixed the coding issues and resubmitted my article "Premier Pizza (2)" for review, per available instructions. So I now have the same article pending review under the abandoned page "Premier Pizza" as well as the duplicate (my original submission) now titled "Premier Pizza 2".
As a new user this is a rather confusing situation to be in and I was wondering if there are any other (preferably expedited) resubmission or appeal processes I should be considering, or if there are any other potential issues which may impede the publication of this article (i.e. should I delete one of the submissions, fix anymore coding etc...).
Any help or advice you would be willing to offer would be greatly appreciated.
Best, Tyler Scott
P.S. I will also be sending a copy of this contact to User:Sphilbrick in hopes he may have some insight as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tyler.tw. (talk • contribs) 18:44, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
Hmm, I'm not completely following the sequence. I have some thoughts, and will see if I can figure it out. Have a couple other things I need to check first and will return to in in an hour or so.--S Philbrick(Talk) 23:11, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘Here's what the sequence looks like to me:
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Premier Pizza Originally created 1 February (in user sandbox)
- Worked on and improved in February
- Moved from sandbox to AfC in March, then declined as not suitable for main space
- Abandoned with no edits between March and October
- Tagged as possible G13 due to lack of activity
- Deleted as G13 on 24 October
- Restored on 7 November. Not sure why
- On same day Premier Pizza (2) also created
The new version has more refs. I haven't looked closely at either, but suspect it is not yet ready for prime time. I think the best thing to do is:
Have Tyler.tw. confirm that Premier Pizza (2) is the better version If so, and no one disagrees, I'll delete the original, MatthewVanitas will withdraw the objection on the basis of duplication, and Premier Pizza (2) will continue the process, with a renaming if and when ready for main space.
I urge Tyler.tw. to ask for advice at Wikipedia:Teahouse, as it is unlikely to survive without some work.
Is this OK with you MatthewVanitas? --S Philbrick(Talk) 00:43, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi Sphilbick, Thank you for the detailed response! I was hoping to have gotten some input from MatthewVanitas by now so we could continue to move forward. However, according to his page he is on :vacation until December 1st. I understand this will delay the plan of action you proposed for continuing my submission along the publication process. It may be just a matter of patience at this point, :however if you have any more advice on navigating this process I would love the help.
Also, I will definitely look into Wikipedia:Teahouse for further information, and would greatly appreciate any input you may have as to the content of my submission.
Thanks! Tyler — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tyler.tw. (talk • contribs) 19:54, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
Tyler.tw., we shouldn't have to wait that long. I can't imagine that MatthewVanitas will object, we'll address that if it happens.
I added a note to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Premier Pizza indicating it is not the best version. I removed the declination on Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Premier Pizza (2), so go ahead and work on that.--S Philbrick(Talk) 20:06, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
Great! Thank you so much for all the help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tyler.tw. (talk • contribs) 21:49, 14 November 2013 (UTC)"
Tyler.tw. (talk) 17:31, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
Article Resque Squadron
If you'd like to do your WikiProject Report on Article Resque Squadron sooner, just let me know which week you'd like. Most of the stuff I've scheduled for the next two months are not set in stone. –Mabeenot (talk) 23:15, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
A beer for you!
|
I really appreciate that you revert a false positive from Cyderbot on Mike Morgan (broadcaster). Although I didn't see it, I read that you revered a false positive on my watchlist. Ashbeckjonathan (talk) 02:10, 29 December 2013 (UTC) |
Declined submission (2)
You recently declined my page for On Stage with Mantis. I have worked on this TV show for 5 years and feel it meets the criteria of notability more than hundreds of other shows that have pages. I have seen pages with only one vague reference. I have two news articles mentioning the show as references. I have seen other pages of prominent shows referenced to other pages. I think referring to the notable people that have been on the show offers status of notability. Unfortunately, most of what I have done in life is under confidentiality agreements. I think being a multi-book author and veteran of the music industry beyond a TV producer merits recognition. Perhaps being judged by those that have no significant past achievements is wrong. Having created a live concert series from nothing that has reached viewers in 145 countries is notable. Being one of the fastest rising non-commercial celebrities on IMDb is also notable. MantisKhiralla (talk) 17:19, 28 December 2013 (UTC)user:MantisKhiralla
- Yes, but this article still needs a lot of work. It needs inline citations, only has two references, and doesn't really show notability. Once you establish that, I'm sure it will be accepted, but right now, it needs a lot of work. buffbills7701 12:25, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Welcome to the 2014 WikiCup!
Hello Buffbills7701, and welcome to the 2014 WikiCup! Your submission page can be found here. The competition will begin at midnight tonight (UTC). There have been a few small changes from last year; the rules can be read in full at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring, and the page also includes a summary of changes. One important rule to remember is that only content on which you have completed significant work, and nominated, in 2014 is eligible for points in the competition- the judges will be checking! As ever, this year's competition includes some younger editors. If you are a younger editor, you are certainly welcome, but we have written an advice page at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Advice for younger editors for you. Please do take a look. Any questions should be directed to one of the judges, or left on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will make it to round 2. Good luck! J Milburn (talk · contribs), The ed17 (talk · contribs) and Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 17:32, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Happy New Year Buffbills7701!
.jpg)
|
|
| Hello Buffbills7701: Thanks for all of your contributions to improve the encyclopedia for Wikipedia's readers, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, Northamerica1000(talk) 04:35, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
|
The Signpost: 01 January 2014
- Traffic report: A year stuck in traffic
- Arbitration report: Examining the Committee's year
- In the media: Does Wikipedia need a medical disclaimer?
- Book review: Common Knowledge: An Ethnography of Wikipedia
- News and notes: The year in review
- Discussion report: Article incubator, dates and fractions, medical disclaimer
- WikiProject report: Where Are They Now? Fifth Edition
- Featured content: 2013—the trends
- Technology report: Looking back on 2013
Disambiguation link notification for January 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cordarrelle Patterson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antonio Brown (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Unjust accusation of making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia
Hi, a while ago you undid a change I made to the entry for the From Hell Letter in connection with the Jack The Ripper case. You wrote: ″Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at From Hell letter. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators can block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize. Thank you. buffbills7701 21:35, 8 January 2014 (UTC)″ — Please note, however, that the changes I made were corrections and not unconstructive edits at all. If you take 5 minutes to compare the transcript of the letter and the image that appears next to it, you will see that the transcript formerly contained several errors that I corrected, and which you now put back in there again... Thanks in advance for your attention. 164.77.245.34 (talk) 21:53, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
- I have taken a look at the source and have found that you are indeed correct. My deepest apologies. buffbills7701 22:10, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:15, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
re: Your submission at AfC Voice to skull was accepted
Thank you very much Buffbills7701 for taking the time and effort to review and accept my submission. It has been a long wait and you have made my day :). - Synsepalum2013 (talk) 22:42, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
- Concerning this article, after seeing a comment at Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard#voice to skull, I took a look at the article, and promptly removed a significant portion of it as unsourced hogwash and synthesis. In fact the whole thing looks like synthesis to me, and I can see no reason why it should survive an AfD. AndyTheGrump (talk) 01:02, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- It has now been sent to AfD (not by me). [2] AndyTheGrump (talk) 04:21, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 08 January 2014
- Public Domain Day: Why the year 2019 is so significant
- Traffic report: Tragedy and television
- Technology report: Gearing up for the Architecture Summit
- News and notes: WMF employee forced out over "paid advocacy editing"
- WikiProject report: Jumping into the television universe
- Featured content: A portal to the wonderful world of technology
VisualEditor newsletter for Janaury 2014
To add templates, go to the "Insert" menu and choose the "Transclusion" (puzzle piece) item. Enter the name of the template and click "Add template". If TemplateData exists for the template, then a list of possible parameters will appear. If not, you can add parameters yourself by typing the parameter name under "Add parameter". For unnamed parameters, use numbers ("1" for the first unnamed parameter).
Since the last newsletter, the VisualEditor team has worked mostly minor features and fixing bugs. A few significant bugs include working around a bug in CSSJanus that was wrongly flipping images used in some templates in right-to-left (RTL) environments (bug 50910) a major bug that meant inserting any template or other transclusion failed (bug 59002), a major but quickly resolved problem due to an unannounced change in MediaWiki core, which caused VisualEditor to crash on trying to save (bug 59867). This last bugs did not appear on any Wikipedia. Additionally, significant work has been done in the background to make VisualEditor work as an independent editing system.
As of today, VisualEditor is now available as an opt-out feature to all users at 149 active Wikipedias.
- The character inserter tool in the "Insert" menu has a very basic set of characters. The character inserter is especially important for languages that use Latin and Cyrillic alphabets with unusual characters or frequent diacritics. Your feedback on the character inserter is requested. In addition to feedback from any interested editor, the developers would particularly like to hear from anyone who speaks any of the 50+ languages listed under Phase 5 at mw:VisualEditor/Rollouts, including Breton, Mongolian, Icelandic, Welsh, Afrikaans, Macedonian, and Azerbaijani.
- meta:Office hours on IRC have been heavily attended recently. The next one will be held this coming Wednesday, 22 January at 23:00 UTC.
- You can now edit some of the page settings in the "options" dialog –
__NOTOC__and__FORCETOC__as selection (forced on, forced off, or default setting; bugs 56866 and 56867) and__NOEDITSECTION__as a checkbox (bug 57166). - The automated browser tests were adjusted to speed them up and bind more correctly to list items in lists, and updated to a newer version of their ruby dependencies. You can monitor the automated browser tests' results (triggered every twelve hours) live on the server.
- Wikipedia:VisualEditor/User guide was updated recently to show some new and upcoming features.
Looking ahead: The character formatting menu on the toolbar will get a drop-down indicator next Thursday. The reference and media items will be the first two listed in the Insert menu. The help menu will get a page listing the keyboard shortcuts. Looking further out, image handling will be improved, including support for alignment (left, right, and center) and better control over image size (including default and upright sizes). The developers are also working on support for editing redirects and image galleries.
Subscriptions to this newsletter are managed at Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Newsletter. Please add or remove your name to change your subscription settings. If you have questions or suggestions for future improvements, or if you encounter problems, please let everyone know by posting a note at Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback. Thank you! Whatamidoing (WMF) 20:05, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
Frank Rocholl
Thanks for extending: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Rocholl I´ve added a publications listing that verifies the guys expertise in typography, logo design and editorial design. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Silverhaze01 (talk • contribs) 14:46, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 15 January 2014
- News and notes: German chapter asks for "reworking" of Funds Dissemination Committee; should MP4 be allowed on Wikimedia sites?
- Technology report: Architecture Summit schedule published
- Traffic report: The Hours are Ours
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Sociology
This week's article for improvement
File:Oseberg ship head post.jpg Hello, Buffbills7701.
An animal-head post found in the Oseberg vikingship, an example of Nordic art
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Previous selections: Gopher (animal) • Meal Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: Evad37 [talk] 01:20, 20 January 2014 (UTC) |
|---|
Image help
 | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Can somebody revert to this version of File:ECCMap.png?
- I have taken a look and can see no difference between that version of the image and the current one. What exactly has changed? If those versions are identical, I'd prefer not reverting them. Huon (talk) 01:53, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
- Must have been my browser taking forever to purge. Sorry. buffbills7701 01:55, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for making that image in the first place. Huon (talk) 01:57, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
- Must have been my browser taking forever to purge. Sorry. buffbills7701 01:55, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 22 January 2014
- Book review: Missing Links and Secret Histories: A Selection of Wikipedia Entries from Across the Known Multiverse
- News and notes: Modification of WMF protection brought to Arbcom
- Featured content: Dr. Watson, I presume
- Special report: The few who write Wikipedia
- Technology report: Architecting the future of MediaWiki
- In the media: Wikipedia for robots; Wikipedia—a temperamental teenager
- Traffic report: No show for the Globes
This week's article for improvement
 The Low Countries as seen from space
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Previous selections: Nordic art • Gopher (animal) Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Evad37 (talk) 01:54, 27 January 2014 (UTC) • |
|---|
AfC
Hello I added two new references to my article for submission. can you please tell me if it is accepted? Did I correctly submit it ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Miray1 (talk • contribs) 22:06, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- If it is accepted, the article will not have the "Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/" title on the top. Right now, it hasn't been accepted. buffbills7701 22:09, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
WikiCup 2014 January newsletter
The 2014 WikiCup is off to a flying start, with, at time of writing, 138 participants. The is the largest number of participants we have seen since 2010. If you are yet to join the competition, don't worry- the judges have agreed to keep the signups open for a few more days. By a wide margin, our current leader is newcomer 
Godot13 (submissions), whose set of 14 featured pictures, the first FPs of the competition, was worth 490 points. Here are some more noteworthy scorers:
12george1 (submissions) and 
TropicalAnalystwx13 (submissions) were the first people to score, for the good article Tropical Storm Bret (1981) and its good article review respectively. 12george1 was also the first person to score in 2012 and 2013.
Sven Manguard (submissions) scored the first ITN points for 2014 North American polar vortex.
WonderBoy1998 (submissions) scored points for an early good topic, finishing off Wikipedia:Featured topics/She Wolf.
TheAustinMan (submissions) scored the first bonus points of the competition, for his work on Typhoon Vera.
Igordebraga (submissions) has scored the highest number of bonus points for a single article, for the high-importance Jurassic Park (film).
Featured articles, featured lists, featured topics and featured portals are yet to play a part in the competition. The judges have removed a number of submissions which were deemed ineligible. Typically, we aim to see work on a project, followed by a nomination, followed by promotion, this year. We apologise for any disappointment caused by our strict enforcement this year; we're aiming to keep the competition as fair as possible.
Wikipedians interested in friendly competition may be interested to take part in The Core Contest; unlike the WikiCup, The Core Contest is not about audited content, but, like the WikiCup, it is about article improvement; specifically, The Core Contest is about contribution to some of Wikipedia's most important article. Of course, any work done for The Core Contest, if it leads to a DYK, GA or FA, can earn WikiCup points.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email), The ed17 (talk • email) and Miyagawa (talk • email) 19:54, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 January 2014
- Traffic report: Six strikes out
- WikiProject report: Special report: Contesting contests
- News and notes: Wiki-PR defends itself, condemns Wikipedia's actions
- Arbitration report: Kafziel case closed; Kww admonished by motion
Invitation to join WikiProject Freedom of speech
There is a WikiProject about Freedom of speech, called WP:WikiProject Freedom of speech. If you're interested, here are some easy things you can do:
- List yourself as a participant in the WikiProject, by adding your username here: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Freedom_of_speech#Participants.
- Add userbox {{User Freedom of speech}} to your userpage, which lists you as a member of the WikiProject.
- Tag relevant talk pages of articles and other relevant pages using {{WikiProject Freedom of speech}}.
- Join in discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Freedom of speech.
- Notify others you think might be interested in Freedom of speech to join the WikiProject.
Thank you for your interest in Freedom of speech, — Cirt (talk) 14:35, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 6, 2014)
 The life sciences involve the study of living organisms
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Previous selections: Low Countries • Nordic art Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Evad37 (talk) 02:33, 3 February 2014 (UTC) • |
|---|
The Signpost: 29 January 2014
- Traffic report: Six strikes out
- WikiProject report: Special report: Contesting contests
- News and notes: Wiki-PR defends itself, condemns Wikipedia's actions
- Arbitration report: Kafziel case closed; Kww admonished by motion
Talkback
Message added 04:05, 4 February 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
GregJackP Boomer! 04:05, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
St. Louis Track Club
Hi.
My article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/St_Louis_Track_Club) was rejected.
I'm brand new to adding content to Wikipedia and was hoping you could translate the reason in plain talk for me:
'This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.'
1. What does it mean to improve the referencing?
2. How many new references do I need?
3. How close or far are we from meeting the notability requirement?
thanks! Anna — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anna Jones 28 (talk • contribs) 22:10, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
- First off, to improve the referencing you can find more sources. There is no officially specified "bar", but I think one or two sources might help. Finally, in question 3, the answer can be given through this link. Hope this helps getting your article published! buffbills7701 22:14, 4 February 2014 (UTC)