User talk:Bsems

Welcome!

Hello, Bsems, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! IllogicMink ^{talk about it} 01:45, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Hello, I'm Agtx. An edit you recently made to Big Brother 17 (U.S.) seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Agtx (talk) 18:16, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to The Bachelor (season 20), contributed colours that were not WCAG AAA Compliant, causing problems for users that have accessibility issues, which must be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about this at WP:COLOR and Template talk:Infobox television season#Colour, which provide further information about contributing compliant colours to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 21:44, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Hello, I'm Dcirovic. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Fan death with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dcirovic (talk) 06:12, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Big Brother 18 (U.S.). Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 03:27, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Hello, I'm CCamp2013. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Big Brother 18 (U.S.) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Chase (talk) 17:45, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Big Brother 18 (U.S.) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Chase (talk) 17:46, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Big Brother 18 (U.S.) does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Chase (talk) 02:54, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Big Brother 10 (U.S.), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please stop changing the 2nd veto winner to Jessie, when it was Michelle. VietPride10 (talk) 14:22, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Big Brother 19 (U.S.)

Hello after seeing your recent edits to Big Brother 19 (U.S.) tonight prior to the live eviction I thought it would be a good time to remind you that Wikipedia is not a crystal ball TheDoctorWho (talk) 01:51, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Big Brother 19 (U.S.), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Continuous addition of unsorced information, reminder Wikipedia is not a Crystal Ball TheDoctorWho (talk) 23:07, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at The Voice (U.S. TV series). Continuing to add Kelly Clarkson to the infobox is in multiple violations of the MOS. Refrain from adding her again. livelikemusic talk! 13:13, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at The Voice (U.S. TV series), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. It has been explained why Clarkson cannot be added; this is your final warning before you are reported. livelikemusic talk! 20:52, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Bsems. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Dan Smith (singer). Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 03:14, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Hello, I'm Souravdas1998. I noticed that you recently removed content from Nikki Bella without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. SouravDas1998^{t@lk to me?} 10:09, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Souravdas1998. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Total Bellas have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. SouravDas1998^{t@lk to me?} 10:11, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at WWE Tough Enough. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. SouravDas1998^{t@lk to me?} 10:21, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you ~~vandalize~~ Wikipedia, as you did at Celebrity Big Brother (U.S. TV series). Please stop reorganizing HouseGuests unless consensus is found otherwise. Visit the talk page for more information. Everyone continues reverting to the version where Ariadna was evicted BEFORE mark. TheDoctorWho (talk) 19:10, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Meant to leave the template for disruptive editing but the above still applies TheDoctorWho (talk) 19:13, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SPI

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/9janedoe999. Thank you. TheDoctorWho (talk) 03:43, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Bsems reported by User:Alucard 16 (Result: ). Thank you. —♪♫Al ucard 16♫♪ 07:36, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Celebrity Big Brother (U.S. TV series)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 16:19, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Your recent editing history at WrestleMania 34 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. JTP ^{(talk • contribs)} 01:48, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

ew this is gross. Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Bsems reported by User:NotTheFakeJTP (Result: ). Thank you. JTP ^{(talk • contribs)} 02:02, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at WrestleMania 34. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Lord Roem ~ (talk) 05:36, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Celebrity Big Brother 1 (U.S.), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please do not change the positions of Mark and Ariadna again without having a discussion on the talk page first. The current order in the article was achieved by a discussion and should not be changed. This is the same type of edits you made earlier this year that lead to an edit war. ♪♫Al ucard 16♫♪ 06:38, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited World of Dance (season 2), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sam Smith and John Newman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.) It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Color design WoD season 2

You edited the season 2 WoD color according season 1. Don't you think it would be better re-desin season 1 with less aggressive colors? It doesn't make sense reuse bad design over less aggressive one in Wikipedia.

WoD placement division finals

There placements in season 2. If you canceling the row Place. How do you want to display the places of the contestants in divisions? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.63.252.115 (talk) 09:56, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on World of Dance (season 2). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Amaury (talk | contribs) 22:13, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Bsems reported by User:Amaury (Result: ). Thank you. Amaury (talk | contribs) 19:52, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Please explain your contributions using a descriptive edit summary. Changing information on Wikipedia (such as numbers and dates) without explanation, as you did at The Voice (U.S. season 15), may be confused with vandalism. Provide an accurate edit summary of every edit you make, especially when reverting (undoing) the actions of other editors. This is your third complaint about not leaving edit summaries and you're still not providing one. The summaries are helpful to editor's browsing an article's history. See also WP:UNRESPONSIVE. Isaidnoway (talk) 05:27, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Editing against consensus

Please stop assuming ownership of articles. Behavior such as this is regarded as disruptive, and is a violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Decisions on Wikipedia are primarily made by consensus, which is accepted as the best method to achieve Wikipedia's goals. The continuous, aggressive pursuit of an editorial goal is considered disruptive, and should be avoided. Failure to cooperate with such simple requests may be interpreted as evidence of a bad faith effort to exasperate or waste the time of other editors.

Do not add a dot to the day or to an abbreviated month

Unacceptable - Sep.

Acceptable - Sep

In addition, this RfC shows consensus in favor of using only the first three characters. If you would like to change the current consensus on abbreviated months, see WP:RFC, a process for requesting outside input concerning disputes, policies, guidelines or article content. Isaidnoway (talk) 06:02, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. located here Isaidnoway (talk) 09:31, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Contrary to what you think, you do not own any articles on Wikipedia, stop your disruptive editing. All Wikipedia content—articles, categories, templates, and other types of pages—is edited collaboratively. No one has the right to act as though they are the owner of a particular page Isaidnoway (talk) 23:41, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:26, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please see this discussion (permanent link) for an explanation. You need to stop reverting every edit that people make. Instead, discuss issues on article talk pages. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:35, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Bsems (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi NinjaRobotPirate! I've been a helper on The Voice (U.S. season 15) for the entire season. If there it vandalism I always revert it and do my best to make the page its best, as well as my other pages. I'm sorry for what I did wrong, but I want to continue to help the page and edit it. I'd love to be unblocked and will discuss in the future instead of reverting it right away. -thank you. (talk)~~~~

Accept reason:

I've unblocked you based on your agreement to collaborate and communicate. We all get a bit too carried away sometimes. Remember, if you get stuck, dispute resolution is always available. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:36, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you read about what kinds of edits are not vandalism. Given that you refuse to even allow anyone to change the colors on pages, I'd suggest you also read about article ownership. You can't just revert anyone who tries to improve the article in a way you dislike and treat it like vandalism. I'd suggest that you tell us, in your own words, what vandalism is. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 12:31, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism is malicious destruction of public or private property. I check the pages to see if people are changing the original ways. I try to keep by bias out of it but it seems to be showing. When I see malicious intents from people, I revert it. In the future, I will not be so harsh. If people are genuinely trying to improve the page, I'll respect it. Thank you (talk)~~~~

There's no need to put every reply in a new unblock request. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:45, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Boing! said Zebedee (talk) I just need to be unblocked by NinjaRobotPirate (talk) so I can continue to help out on my pages. I see information that needs to be added and all I meant to do from the first place is to help.

They are not your pages. This is part of the problem. Did you read WP:OWN? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:51, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I know that, and that wasn't right to say. I just put my best effort into the pages I contribute in and try to stop vandalism and add information when needed. After reading WP:OWN I know I'm not a single contributor, but have a group of people they are trying to help out the pages. I feel like I was well intended, but my actions were not correct NinjaRobotPirate (talk). This not only is teaching me a lesson on Wikipedia, but in life as well. Don't also be so controlling and let other people help you out.

Disruptive editing November 2018

You were just blocked for this sort of disruptive editing. Did you read WP:OWN? Did you read MOS:DATESNO? Did you read the consensus discussion I linked above on date formats? Wikipedia has our own manual of style and we use WP:MOS, not MLA. Our manual of style on months says: (Abbreviations for months, such as Feb are used only where space is extremely limited. Such abbreviations should use three letters only, and should not be followed by a period (full point) except at the end of a sentence.) Section headings are not a space that is extremely limited. I can understand using abbreviations in the tables, as it is a little tight. Do you understand this guideline we use? If you are having difficulty understanding our policies and guidelines, please acknowledge that you are, so someone can help you to understand. If you continue to edit against policies and guidelines, especially if you are doing so intentionally and persistently, you may be temporarily or indefinitely blocked from editing (again). I really don't know how I can explain this any better than I already have, like I said, if you are having difficulty understanding, please reach out to someone, so they can help you to understand. Isaidnoway (talk) 06:12, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Isaidnoway (talk)! Why do you keep changing the dates on The Voice (U.S season 15)? You have had no one confirmed your way of changing the date. The proper MLA format of dates is three letters then a period. That has been the way the dates have been since Season 1 of the voice. For you to be changing every single Voice page now seems helpful, but unnecessary. As you can see all the work I put into the Voice page, so you know I/m not here for trouble, but I'm curious to why you are changing all the pages when you have received no confirmation and changing its original way. User:Bsems User talk:Bsems 11:38, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Bsems. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bsems. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Hi TonyBallioni I am deeply sorry for what has occurred. My intentions were not to disrupt anything yet revert something that was unnecessary. I used a account that I had since I was on a new computer. It will not happen again, and again I am sorry for my actions. ~~~~}} below. TonyBallioni (talk) 04:52, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bsems (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi TonyBallioni I am deeply sorry for what has occurred. My intentions were not to disrupt anything yet revert something that was unnecessary. I used a account that I had since I was on a new computer. It will not happen again, and again I am sorry for my actions. Bsems (talk) 15:20, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Back in November of 2018, you were unblocked with a promise that you'd communicate and collaborate and refrain from edit wars. Instead, you set up sockpuppet accounts to continue your edit war. I think you should be justifying why on earth we shouldn't block you indefinitely for this, given you've shown we can't take you at your word and given that your edit warring and general collaboration is getting much worse, rather than improving. Yamla (talk) 16:27, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bsems (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You are completely right, in November I promised that I'd communicate and collaborate and refrain from edit wars. I was only reverting the edit because the user was adding the tables with no explanation and did not discuss it in the talk page. I only reverted it for a time being until it was discussed. Masem agreed that the tables should not be added until a consensus is made, which it wasn't. Onto the sockpuppetry, I was on a different computer and did not remember my password since I have it saved on my other laptop. I know I still went about it wrong, and for that I'm sorry. I will not be reverting the tables, or anything in that matter, until a consensus is made. I have been editing the Big Brother 21 (American season) and The Bachelorette (season 15) and would like to continue to help out. I'm sorrymfor everything that has went down, and completely understand why this occurred.Bsems (talk) 23:23, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Block has expired, closing request ST47 (talk) 12:21, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(For any admin reviewing, the forementioned statement to try to get consensus. No comments on the sockpuppetry issue. --Masem (t) 23:40, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note that this is a checkuser block. The request requires review by a checkuser. @TonyBallioni: courtesy ping. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 16:20, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Big Brother Newsletter – July 2019

As you just officially joined the project and this newsletter was just published less than twenty-four hours ago I'm personally delivering this one since it'll be about a month until the next publication. TheDoctorWho (talk) 02:40, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television#Big Brother season article format

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television#Big Brother season article format on whether we should use, abandon, or rewrite Wikipedia:WikiProject Big Brother/Structure of series or season articles. Jayab314 16:37, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for dis-disambiguating!

	Dis-disambiguation Barnstar
	Thanks for making the Voice a much more interesting show. Maccore Henni _{Mii! Pictochat Mii!} 05:29, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Big Brother Newsletter – January 2020

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:19, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Big Brother 22 (American season). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. As per WP:ACCESS, important information is not to be conveyed only by colour. Please find another way. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:27, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Bsems, I saw the edit Sportsfan 1234 made to bring the table in compliance with MOS:ACCESS and why reverted the edit (due to loss of information.) In order to satesfy both sides I completely reformatted the table in a way to retain that information but also make the table compliant with MOS:ACCESS. Hopefully this change will please both sides. Thank you!

Alucard 16_{❯❯❯ chat?} 02:17, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Voice (Series Overview Table)

First and foremost, I never said that the page was mine and I wasn't even editing the entire page, just the series overview table. Secondly, before making any edits to the page, I consult with other collaborators who I've known been editing and moderating the page for a long time. I do not do anything with getting the green light from them first because I recognize that editing public wiki pages should be a public group effort, not just what I think is best. Thirdly, on the Voice talk page, a comment was made about the table being too cluttered, which is the problem I was directly trying to fix:

"Just do a short table listing each coach, the winners, and the season they won. Someone just went table crazy on this page. No other reality show page is this cluttered."

As per Wikipedia's guidelines, the table is meant to provide an overview, not an in-depth review of each season. Hence, I got rid of the season air dates. If readers for some reason wanted the exact season air dates (which I doubt they will), they can easily access the individual season pages that are hyperlinked to the series overview table. Another reason why I got rid of the season air dates was to have all of the finalists' names on one line, as opposed to two.

Disney1024 (talk) 03:13, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well... I'm still trying to understand what you meant with "Alicia's colour should not overpower Blake's or Adam's"... Like, SERIOUSLY? Adam's and Blake's colours are SO faded! Literally every other darker colour (which are a lot of colours) will overpower them, including Shakira's purple, Miley's pink, Gwen's red, Kelly's blue, and John's green. That was a really dumb argument.

Disney1024 (talk) 16:10, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Another user (MarcioRob24) made this table on my talk page and I wanted to share it with you. This is what he thinks the table should look like, which I completely agree with:

*The Voice* series overview
Season	Winner	Runner-up	Third place	Fourth place	Fifth place	Winning coach	Host	Coaches (Chairs' order)
Season	Winner	Runner-up	Third place	Fourth place	Fifth place	Winning coach	Host	1	2	3	4
1	Javier Colon	Dia Frampton	Vicci Martinez		—	Adam Levine	Carson Daly	Adam	CeeLo	Christina	Blake
1	Javier Colon	Dia Frampton	Beverly McClellan			Adam Levine
2	Jermaine Paul	Juliet Simms	Tony Lucca	Chris Mann		Blake Shelton
3	Cassadee Pope	Terry McDermott	Nicholas David	—
4	Danielle Bradbery	Michelle Chamuel	The Swon Brothers						Shakira	Usher
5	Tessanne Chin	Jacquie Lee	Will Champlin			Adam Levine			CeeLo	Christina
6	Josh Kaufman	Jake Worthington	Christina Grimmie			Usher			Shakira	Usher
7	Craig Wayne Boyd	Matt McAndrew	Chris Jamison	Damien Lawson		Blake Shelton			Gwen	Pharrell
8	Sawyer Fredericks	Meghan Linsey	Joshua Davis	Koryn Hawthorne		Pharrell Williams			Pharrell	Christina
9	Jordan Smith	Emily Ann Roberts	Barrett Baber	Jeffery Austin		Adam Levine			Gwen	Pharrell
10	Alisan Porter	Adam Wakefield	Hannah Huston	Laith Al-Saadi		Christina Aguilera			Pharrell	Christina
11	Sundance Head	Billy Gilman	Wé McDonald	Josh Gallagher		Blake Shelton			Miley	Alicia
12	Chris Blue	Lauren Duski	Aliyah Moulden	Jesse Larson		Alicia Keys			Gwen	Alicia
13	Chloe Kohanski	Addison Agen	Brooke Simpson	Red Marlow		Blake Shelton			Miley	Jennifer
14	Brynn Cartelli	Britton Buchanan	Kyla Jade	Spensha Baker		Kelly Clarkson			Alicia	Kelly
15	Chevel Shepherd	Chris Kroeze	Kirk Jay	Kennedy Holmes		Kelly Clarkson			Kelly	Jennifer
16	Maelyn Jarmon	Gyth Rigdon	Dexter Roberts	Andrew Sevener		John Legend			John	Kelly
17	Jake Hoot	Ricky Duran	Katie Kadan	Rose Short		Kelly Clarkson		Kelly	Gwen	John
18	Todd Tilghman	Toneisha Harris	Thunderstorm Artis	CammWess	Micah Iverson	Blake Shelton			Nick
19	Carter Rubin	Jim Ranger	Ian Flanigan	DeSz	John Holiday	Gwen Stefani			Gwen

Take care and have a great rest of your day/night! :D

Disney1024 (talk) 20:15, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that all colour changes that were recently made on the series overview table (except for Team Alicia) were also implemented in the individual season pages. So that is not a valid argument against Team Alicia's new orange colour. I really don't see what's wrong with the brighter orange because it better complements Gwen's light red, Miley's pink, and Kelly's bright sky blue, thus making the page more aesthetically pleasing. Adam and Blake's colours are SO faded that literally every other darker colour (which are a lot of colours) will overpower them, including Shakira's purple, Miley's pink, Gwen's red, Kelly's blue, and John's green. I don't really see what's the problem with the brighter orange, assuming that that change is also implemented in the season 11, 12, and 14 pages. It's not like I'm drastically changing Team Alicia to purple or Team Blake to blue. It's literally the same shade of orange on the colour hex wheel, just a bit brighter. :)

Disney1024 (talk) 22:56, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021!

Hello Bsems, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021.
Happy editing,
Disney1024 (talk) 16:18, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Disney1024 (talk) 16:18, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Big Brother Newsletter – July 2020

User:TheDoctorWho (talk) 08:14, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Total Drama elimination tables' color key

Hi, I wanted to address your question about an "irregular elimination" regarding Leshawna in Total Drama Island. I understand the mechanic of her elimination is different, but that is one of the many methods of a regular elimination, which just didn't formally take place in the elimination ceremony.

Because eliminations can vary in Total Drama, it is important to maintain the wording as "eliminate," not "vote out."
By irregular elimination, it is implied that there was an evacuation, DQ, or quit.
- Therefore, since Leshawna was voted out by ~~a potential jury~~ eliminated campers (a twist that has been seen in other international versions of Survivor), it is not an irregular elimination — though I do agree that the method is irregular.

Freddy7GL (talk) 15:28, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]