This is an archive of past discussions about User:Bruxton. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
DYK for Great Kentucky Hoard
On 2 August 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Great Kentucky Hoard, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a man found 700 gold coins on his own land in an undisclosed part of Kentucky? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Great Kentucky Hoard. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Great Kentucky Hoard), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Hello, Bruxton. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Still-ife with earthen jug, fish and fruits, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
On 9 August 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Trade-dollar locket, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the trade-dollar locket(example pictured) has also been referred to as an opium dollar? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Trade dollar locket. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Trade-dollar locket), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Didn't want to post to the closed DYK, so I'll drop it here. In this DYK you noted that she didn't personally herd cattle. This didn't raise a flag with me, because I've always used the term "herd" to have two meanings, the verb that describes what a shepherd does, ie "herding", but also as "someone who owns a herd of cattle", like "I herd cattle for a living". Looking at the article on herding I see only the former version. Am I alone in using this second version? Google is of no help. Maury Markowitz (talk) 17:46, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
For what it's worth, per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Clothing, fashion is not copyrightable in the US. The photos were taken in Canada, where fashion is also not copyrightable (see for example this). Finally, the clothing is by a British designer, and clothing is also generally not copyrightable in the UK (these two articles have some information on that). It's liable to come up again considering I plan to create articles about all his collections. ♠PMC♠ (talk)05:43, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
I was too slow, sorry, - while I responded to a ping you acted already. I invite you to read what Storye book explained about the wording of that critic quoted in the only hook N. finds acceptable, and that I find unacceptably tasteless, especially about a person who just died. You'll have to scroll, or look for "British humour often delights in other types of puerile vulgarity concealed among ultra-sophisticated material." - Imagine you are her daughter, perhaps. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:46, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
The correct place to discuss would have been the nomination, but that was closed. I wonder why the rejection of ALT0a was accepted, but my rejection of ALT1 was not. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:20, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
@Gerda Arendt: I think because it was not your nomination and Gerda you have to know how tiring it is for DYK editors to have controversy on so many opera nominations. To control the nominations going forward it may be best if you make your own nominations. All of us thought that ALT1 was interesting. Bruxton (talk) 23:32, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
Ready to learn: how is ALT1 interesting and for whom? To me, it looks just like a (slightly indecent) pun, and says nothing specific related to the achievements of a great woman? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:43, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
@Gerda Arendt: I see nothing indecent and I do not see this as a pun - and this is exhausting. "Resonant bottom extension" is clearly a compliment on her vocal chops and it is linked to vocal range. I fear you are not going to let this go. Bruxton (talk) 00:05, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
@Narutolovehinata5: I was prudish about the circumcision angle and over 45 years it did not seem all that impressive. 577 circumcisions a year. If you really want that one I can change it. Bruxton (talk) 01:39, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
I was thinking more of the thousands number but I'll leave the decision to you. I'm fine with ALT1 as I thought it was a nice pun, I just thought ALT0 was the more eyecatchy hook personally. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 01:46, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
577 circumcisions per year seems impressive to me. For comparison, David only needed 100 foreskins to marry a princess; this mohel is averaging five times that per year--that's a lot, even when taking into account historical foreskin inflation. Levivich (talk) 01:00, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
I do think it's a cute hook and it also made me learn what a Mohel is, but I don't know. The hook is already promoted and I'm not objecting to the choice in hook given that it was already a punchy hook on it's own, I was just giving my thoughts as to why I thought ALT0 was better. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 08:34, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
If ALT1 isn't used it will be a crime against humanity (but please, not in the picture slot). Paging David Eppstein since, ya know, he's a nice Jewish boy. EEng17:31, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Actually, I'm not Jewish. (The name is, but it's all on my father's side.) Despite that, I do know what a mohel is, so I think ALT1 is good enough for a general audience. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:38, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
History will recall that it was at this point that things truly went from bad to worse: [1][2][3]. Creepiest sentence (and this was a very hard choice to make): "When my wife Diane asked me to prepare her placenta to eat because she was experiencing a difficult pregnancy, I got excited." EEng22:44, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi Bruxton, thanks for the very speedy promotion of the hook. The online sources may be somewhat skimpy about his involvement in the war, but one 1993 article in the Straits Times (cited in the article) does intimate that Tay performed surgery at the hospital. (It mentions that Tay split 12-hr shifts "with the only other eye surgeon" in the hospital, at least.) So I think it would be accurate to say that he served in the war as an eye surgeon. Cheers, KINGofLETTUCE 👑🥬03:24, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Out of the blue but I encountered some of your work in the wild shortly after chatting with you about the same DYK as mentioned above: I just wanted to say that I'm astounded at the volume of work you've done for Wikipedia and to specifically thank you for making the coin slab article. I simply can not believe that did not exist until last month and I'm glad I finally have something to direct friends to when they come up (which is surprisingly common for me!). Thank you for being a kind and highly productive editor! ~ Pbritti (talk) 05:46, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
I would suggest putting the two SOHA hooks for September 1 in the following prep, since they’re both US-focused, and the current prep placement means many Americans will see “today” as August 31. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:33, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Bruxton. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Still-ife with earthen jug, fish and fruits, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:42, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Baltimore Gold Hoard and Talk:Baltimore Gold Hoard/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 09:43, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
; see Talk:Binion hoard for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vaticidalprophet -- Vaticidalprophet (talk) 15:41, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
