User talk:Brutaldeluxe

If you leave a message here, I will respond here, unless you ask for a response on your talk page.

Note that comments by banned users, problem users and sock puppets are struck. Inanities, aberrations, absurdities, craziness, deliriums, delusions, derangement, distractions, follies, frenzies, hallucinations, hysterias, illusions, irrationality, lunacy, mania, preposterousness, psychopathy, senselessness, unreasonableness and witlessness may go unanswered.

Please comment on Talk:Serer people

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Serer people. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 10:17, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Continuation War

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Continuation War. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 23:15, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Katrina Kaif

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Katrina Kaif. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 12:16, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Veterans Day

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Veterans Day. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 01:15, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mass killings under Communist regimes

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Mass killings under Communist regimes. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 14:16, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:1953 Iranian coup d'état

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:1953 Iranian coup d'état. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 03:15, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Season's tidings!

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 02:30, 25 December 2011 (UTC).

Season's Greetings

		May you have a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year
		It's the festive time of the year, and I wish you a Merry Christmas and Happy New Year! If you do not celebrate Christmas, may it be a peaceful time for you, and may the New Year bring you new hopes and good luck. Season's Greetings --&レア (talk) 18:07, 22 December 2011 (UTC)|}

We may not have spoken for a long time, however, I felt this may have been the opportunity to pass by and wish you a season's greetings.

Please comment on Talk:Azad Kashmir

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Azad Kashmir. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 16:15, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Louis Renault (industrialist)

Can you please include a quote you are referencing in Yates book? This makes the offline ref more transparent.842U (talk) 13:48, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

I'm really not sure what you are referring to. Coordinates of place locations should not be so prominent in the main body of a biographical article, BTW. The mayor of Yurp (talk) 13:58, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

My question was a misunderstanding on my part; I thought you had added what turns out to be a ref that was already in the article. Sorry. BTW, do you have a reference for this: "Coordinates of place locations should not be so prominent in the main body of a biographical article." Is this your opinion or a Wikipedia guideline?842U (talk) 23:55, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Seems like common sense. Doing things the way they are normally done = sticking to consensus. If the article was about the chateau then it would be OK to include coordinates, but then they should go in the infobox anyway. The mayor of Yurp (talk) 01:06, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Bit of a circular argument: Coordinates should not go in the main body of a biographical article. Why. Because it seems like common sense. 842U (talk) 04:17, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Italy Biodiversity

Hello Brutaldeluxe I am thinking of reinstating (modified) the paragraph on biodiversity in Italy on that articles main page (see past discussion here [1].This would be in line with the Italian language page "Italia" and perhaps a translation of that part.And with no see alsos or that uninformative photo. I'll put it on my sandbox first and welcome any comment or suggestions. What do you think? All the best for the New Year Notafly (talk) 11:53, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Adding a biodiversity section would be fine. If you could give me a link to your sandbox I'll help you write it, but bear in mind that I'll be back at work next week so I won't have access to a computer until the weekends. BTW, the section on the Italian article includes a glaring mistake: coppicing (ceduazione) is not a harmful practice, it is rather a beneficial practice that artificially provides an ecotone which simulates the benefits of natural succession. Thank you for valuing my opinion and felice anno nuovo. The mayor of Yurp (talk) 23:43, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:1953 Iranian coup d'état

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:1953 Iranian coup d'état. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 04:15, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Taliban

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Taliban. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 17:16, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Highways

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Highways. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 06:15, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

In the part about Montenegro in YU role of 90's there is information about crimes against refugees, but it is not clear where these refugees come from? It would be fair to say that Montenegro accepted hundreds of thousnands of refugees from Croatia, Bosnia and Kosovo of all ethnic and religious groups. Only after that one could explain about certain crimes against refugees. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.161.109.193 (talk) 04:18, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:South Asia

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:South Asia. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 19:15, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Guardia di Finanza

Your edit summary: "they carry guns and they have massive machine guns on their boats= armed forces" is incorrect. The Guardia di Finanza is not part of the Italian armed forces. Chrisieboy (talk) 12:59, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:South Asia

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:South Asia. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 08:15, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Luciano Laurana

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Luciano Laurana. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 21:16, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Hunnic Empire

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Hunnic Empire. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 10:16, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Gopalanand Swami

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Gopalanand Swami. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 23:15, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:PNS Ghazi

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:PNS Ghazi. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 12:16, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Berlin

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Berlin. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 01:16, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Northern Ireland

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Northern Ireland. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 14:15, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Pakistan

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Pakistan. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 03:15, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Carlingford Lough

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Carlingford Lough. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 16:15, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Radical Right

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Radical Right. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 05:15, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Hello

Main article:User:Theologiae

See also:User talk:Theologiae

Dear Brutaldeluxe,

I don't know if you remember me, but I'm Theologiae - Italy/culture-based editor (jokes about the main article thing, I remember how you always criticised me about it :-)), worked circa 2 years ago. As a more regular contributor in recent times, I wanted to pass by and say a few things.

This message is halfway between a 'thank you' and a mere 'explanation'. Though we had our disputes, I wanted to clarify a few things and tie the loose ends of past discussions. I have no idea how you remember me (if you remember me at all), but that's irrelevant at the moment. What I most want to say is how I found and still do see Wikipedia as an extremely formative experience, a source of help to my knowledge and learning, yet also a place where I can understand myself and develop my character. One thing I know about myself is that I was, still am, and always will be a person who assumes good faith and acts in it; I realise the world is simply too full of negativity, and I try not to be burdened by it. IMO, the greatest form of good comes not from focusing on what's wrong, yet from acting benevolently and fairly - and that was always my main aim here. As an editor who was very young, a quick trip down memory lane will reveal to me a lot of issues with my past contributions (rushed, unchecked writing, over-doing things, pushing ideas, too many see alsos, seeing things as 'wrong' or 'right' without an ounce of compromise). The main point I would like to mention is that at Wikipedia, my goal was always to create a positive environment, spur energy within the areas that I was editing, and form a neutral outlook on knowledge. In the desperate search for fairness, objectivity and NPOV, perhaps these things were taken to extreme, to the extent where they lost their original value. Yet time goes on, people grow, ideas develop, environments change, and ultimately I can say that the best way to improve knowledge is to take the good from every other editor and blend it with controlled enthusiasm and a desire to build upon the bricks already lying somewhere.

I have to admit, I found it hard to accept your edits back then. As a 'yes and no' sort of person which I wasn't, yet appeared in word due to my relative lack of linguistic expressiveness (which came as a result of hectic lifestyles and rapid editing attitude), I felt your contributions were destructive rather than constructive. But with time, you realise that destructiveness isn't negative when what you're taking away is unnecessary, as was with many of my edits. Nevertheless, ultimately, I ought to express gratitude for the way in which you tried to cool down my immense passion for things without disposing of the good that I gave; as you may remember, I did tend to overdo things, either by stuffing the page with unnecessary images, information or those dreaded links! Your help, whether voluntary or not, was extremely formative and helpful in viewing perspectives as they should be. And will continue to be, seeing as growth is evolutionary and I still have much to learn.

Thank you,

Best wishes and happy editing!

--&レア (talk) 15:25, 16 April 2012 (UTC) (it's Theologiae, just that I've changed my signature)

Please comment on Talk:Anti-Pakistan sentiment

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Anti-Pakistan sentiment. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 18:15, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Controversies relating to the Six-Day War

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Controversies relating to the Six-Day War. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 07:15, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Nagorno-Karabakh

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Nagorno-Karabakh. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 20:15, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Georgian

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Georgian. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 09:15, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Season's tidings!

To you and yours, Have a Merry ______ (fill in the blank) and Happy New Year! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 15:53, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Undoing your edit on Jet engine

Hello Brutaldeluxe,

sorry I undid your edit to Jet engine! I read the changelog backwards, and I meant to remove the superfluous text, not add it back. =) User:Andy Dingley fixed this now. Ariadacapo (talk) 06:38, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Re: Trigeminal neuralgia#trigeminal_neuralgia

Agree, the original comment was not following talkpage guidelines and indeed made no mention of how to improve the article. I've just not come across anyone who would delete "talk page abuse" outright, and sure enough your actions aren't really supported by any policy when I searched. There are other options, hiding comments in a collapsible section, strikethrough etc. With IP's I feel it is cautionary to always assume good faith, some of these people might become future contributors, and they don't know the policies as well as more experienced editors. Having your edit reverted immediately is the number one reason we put potential editors off. Anyway food for thought. I will leave a comment in reply to the IP explaining the purposes of a talkpage, I was about to do this immediately after that undo, but I got distracted, sorry. Regards, Lesion (talk) 18:07, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Chuck Yeager may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• later, prompted the USAAF to alter its recruiting standards. Blessed with unusually sharp vision (with a [[visual acuity|visual acuity rated 20/10]], which once enabled him to shoot a deer at {{

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:33, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Glad Tidings and all that ...

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 23:46, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Revisions to My Changes; How to Use 'Talk' & 'User Page'

Hi

I m new to Wikip editing, but when I see an error I feel the need to correct it.

I recently did edits to An article on:

Scipio Africanus, UI see when some revisions were made to my changes, although the general tenor of my changes is still in effect. Can you please help me to understand how to:

1. See what revisions were actually done (I did not save the ones I made). This will also help me in the future.

2. I have made other changes but I have no messages on them. Does this mean no revisions were done?

3. How do I use this 'User page' & 'Talk' sections, or where I can I set a tutorial. Thanks Leecorp1 (talk) 15:35, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Merry Merry

To you and yours

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 16:20, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Dear Brutaldeluxe,
HAPPY NEW YEAR Hoping 2015 will be a great year for you! Thank you for your contributions!
From a fellow editor,
--FWiW Bzuk (talk)

This message promotes WikiLove. Originally created by Nahnah4 (see "invisible note").

The change in a meaning

After this edit of a page "Leaning Tower of Pisa", it's appeared that "The seventh floor was completed in 1319 ... by Tommaso di Andrea Pisano", which was not in a previous version of the text ))
The reason I became confused by this prase, is that his father, Andrea Pisano, was born in 1290. --Alogrin (talk) 04:44, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

The edit you are referring to does not seem to have any relation to the particular problem you have. It's a five year old copy edit, I suggest you may have to contact someone else about it. The mayor of Yurp (talk) 20:22, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Season's Greetings

File:Xmas Ornament.jpg

To You and Yours!
FWiW Bzuk (talk) 19:05, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 29 May

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Indianapolis Motor Speedway page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Citroen edits

I'm surpised of your edits. I suppose you question the fact I changed Citroën from subsidiary to marque (I added a source to that now), but you restored a lot of information that was actually vandalism or unsourced. 59.9 billion revenue for Citroën, really? And worst, 3148.00 billion profit! Do you say a caritative soul or all the large number of Citroën fanboys gave money so they could have a profit so much higher that the revenue? All PSA combined had a revenue of 54.090 billion in 2013 (see here: https://www.groupe-psa.com/en/document/registration-document-2013/), so if it were possible to count Citroën as a separate company, its revenue would stand on about 20 to 25 billion. The number of "production" was unsourced and it is actually number of sales. As I said (and you can see in PSA documents), there's no Citroën company actually assembling vehicles, they are assembled jointly with the Peugeot-branded vehicles by a division of Groupe PSA. The only thing that exists is sales subsidiaries of PSA called "Citroën", and that mostly in Western Europe and China, in the rest of the world are mostly plainly called PSA. --Urbanoc (talk) 09:00, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Brutaldeluxe. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Merry, merry!

From the icy Canajian north; to you and yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 03:27, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Brutaldeluxe. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Seasons' Greetings

...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 04:08, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Brutaldeluxe. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Queen's College, London, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page All Souls Church (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 24

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Turismo Carretera

added links pointing to San Jorge, Las Flores, Nueve de Julio, Henry Martin, Slant Six, Eduardo Ramos and Juan Gálvez

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:24, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Falloppio

I just only saw that you reintroduced the various errors that I had corrected. There is no evidence that Falloppio was born in 1523. We only know it was either 1522 or 1523. There is no evidence that he studied in Ferrara. He taught materia medica in Ferrara, not anatomy. He received his doctorate in the 1550s only. He was not superintendent of the Botanical garden. Is there any reason why you insist on the old very faulty version? Cardanus (talk) 15:54, 23 December 2023 (UTC)