User talk:Brujah7783

Welcome

Hello, Brujah7783, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 05:10, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging of NERO International

I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on NERO International. I do not think that NERO International fits any of the speedy deletion criteria because "Not-notable" is not a valid speedy deletion criterion.. I request that you consider not re-tagging NERO International for speedy deletion without discussing the matter on the appropriate talk page. And articles with at least one relevant reliable 3rd-party source cited inline are rarely valid targets for WP:CSD#A7, either. If you think this should be deleted, please go to WP:AFD. DES ^(talk) 00:24, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You wrote on my talk page: "I'm going to retag them for deletion, and keep doing so until they're removed" That kind of retalitory action is disruptive editing, and if you persist in it I will block you from editing completely. If you really think that the article in question honestly 9as opposed to in retaliation) should be deleted, then take the matte to WP:AFD where it can be discussed by all interested editors. DES ^(talk) 02:09, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do not continue this. DES ^(talk) 02:16, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your request for undeletion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that a response has been made at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion regarding a submission you made. The thread is Alliance LARP. JohnCD (talk) 10:57, 11 February 2014 (UTC) ][reply]

Regarding this, the arguments made by those proposing deletion were considerably stronger than those of you arguing for it to be kept. In particular, The Red Pen of Doom provided strong counter arguments that went unanswered and nobody was able to successfully dispute the claim that the general notability guideline wasn't met. As a result, I felt the consensus swang towards deletion. SmartSE (talk) 14:41, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]