User talk:BrightenRichardsDraper

Welcome!

Hello BrightenRichardsDraper! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 06:16, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Useful templates • Categories • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Tools • User scripts

October 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Rob Scallon has been reverted.
Your edit here to Rob Scallon was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed () is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 06:16, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Bob Dylan, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 13:11, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Freddie Mercury, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.

Please review Help:Referencing for beginners - FlightTime (open channel) 10:49, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - FlightTime (open channel) 10:51, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I believe this is unfair as i am simply trying to fix my mistakes, the Wikipedia editing style is difficult to figure out so please forgive me, as has been stated everybody else is aloud to have an opinion about my edits why cant i do the same? BrightenRichardsDraper (talk) 11:57, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Dr. Dog, you may be blocked from editing. When adding content, you must use reliable sources. Additionally, Wikipedia is not a collection of facts and appearances on a YouTube program is trivial unless expressly discussed in secondary media. ~ Pbritti (talk) 00:42, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you do BASIC RESEARCH you can find that the cover easily does exist, you are trying to claim that it doesn't, I have added correct Sources to prove that it infact DOES EXIST but you continue to be an ignorant editor with the overarching untrue hirachy that you have at all any power, i have requested to Wikipedia that they block you from editing the dr dog page as you are tarnishing their name by removing reliable sources and basic parts of their careers, trivia is factual at the end of the day like it or not, so i ask that you please refrain. BrightenRichardsDraper (talk) 00:48, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I never claimed that the cover does not exist. As I mentioned in our discussion on Talk:Dr. Dog, Wikipedia is not a collection of trivia. Additionally, just because something exists doesn't mean that it merits reference (see also Wikipedia:Existence ≠ Notability and Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill). If the cover has accrued notability and reference in reliable, secondary sources, then it should bear mention. However, my limited research has yielded no indication that this is the case. If you have questions about this, please feel welcome to reply here or on the article's talk page. ~ Pbritti (talk) 01:00, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Hello, I'm EmilySarah99. An edit that you recently made to Tim Reynolds seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The birth name parameter is only to be used if different from the name. See Template:Infobox person. parameter. EmilySarah99 (talk) 10:06, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm EmilySarah99. I noticed that you recently removed content from List of Escape the Fate band members without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. If you are going to be updating information, you must add a source. EmilySarah99 (talk) 10:10, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at LeafyIsHere, you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:23, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

He has literally stated in previous videos he turned 21 on August 18th 2016, then again you wouldn't know or even care to do some basic research BrightenRichardsDraper (talk) 06:17, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

William Shakespeare

Hi - not sure what you were trying to do there, so have reverted. The name is William Shakespeare, son of John Shakespeare, in Latin. It’s not any different to his actual name. KJP1 (talk) 09:27, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hi. There was a source listed, you can go take a look for yourself, it's on the official Shakespeare.org webilsite, can get more legitimate than that https://www.shakespeare.org.uk/explore-shakespeare/blogs/birth-and-burial-records-william-shakespeare/#:~:text=According%20to%20the%20Church's%20register,William%20son%20of%20John%20Shakespeare). BrightenRichardsDraper (talk) 09:28, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That is not his name. Johnuniq (talk) 09:36, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But as Johnuniq points out, it’s not his name - it’s just “William, son of John Shakespeare”, given in Latin. As the source makes clear. The name is William Shakespeare. KJP1 (talk) 09:42, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]