User talk:BrayoOnyango

BrayoOnyango, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi BrayoOnyango! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the invite. BrayoOnyango (talk) 16:20, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Beyond Zero (March 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from http://www.afromum.com/44th-edition-concours-delegance-support-maternal-healthcare/, http://www.dsw.org/en/2014/12/dsw-lends-support-first-ladys-beyond-zero-campaign/, http://www.unaids.org/en/resources/presscentre/featurestories/2014/january/20140130beyondzerocampaign. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Beyond Zero may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SITH (talk) 17:40, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Beyond Zero has been accepted

Beyond Zero, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 20:32, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: SmartBuyGlasses Optical Group (August 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SmartBuyGlasses Optical Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:SmartBuyGlasses Optical Group, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Praxidicae (talk) 13:23, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing

Thank you for disclosing your paid editing status. As per WP:Paid, please provide links on your Wikipedia user page to all active accounts at websites where you advertise paid Wikipedia-editing services e.g. your Upwork account etc. Thank you. GSS (talk|c|em) 13:27, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

BrayoOnyango, you have not yet responded to my message above. Please note these requirements are not optional and you have to disclose before making any further edits. GSS ^💬 13:38, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,GSS I mainly get clients from referrals although I have an active Upwork Account.I will include the information.Thank you. - BrayoOnyango (talk) 13:51, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The dates of jobs on your Upwork account, plus the userbox on your userpage, indicate that you have edited Wikipedia in the past. Please disclose your prior accounts. Yunshui ^雲 _水 10:54, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yunshui ^雲 _水 The upwork account belongs to PETER K. he refers clients to me and I work under him. I can only disclose the tasks I have handle in person, and I have done so fully. The earlier edits he might have done them personally or contracted other freelancers. - BrayoOnyango (talk) 22:21, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, what you are doing is called MEATPUPPTERY, editing on behalf of a possibly blocked user and you should be blocked on that ground. BTW how a freelancer on Upwork get to know about you? Also, can you please disclose your account on Fiverr? GSS ^💬 02:45, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GSS The chances of working for a blocked account are very rare because I engage with the clients directly, I have direct access to the account although I am subcontracted, I communicate, make arrangements and everything else in person directly with the client, PETER only takes a percentage of the earning being the account owner. How a freelance came to learn about me ? - we are friends from campus and I now work in his office. My Fiverr has already been terminated and Fiverr banned any advertisement for paid wikipedia gigs, I didn't see any more need to include it but I can include it if needed. - BrayoOnyango (talk) 08:12, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Per your comment that I have direct access to the account please name the articles associated with Wikipedia related adverts on your Upwork account. GSS ^💬 10:34, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    The articles associated include:- 
    * The I.V Doc
    * SmartBuyGlasses Optical Group - second contract
    * SmartBuyGlasses Optical Group - First Contract
    * MB Salone
    * John Oakes
                                                      - BrayoOnyango (talk) 22:40, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

With the exception of Draft:SmartBuyGlasses Optical Group, you have not edited any of the above articles with this account. It seems that you are working as part of a farm of paid editors, which means you are in violation of Wikipedia's policy on the abuse of multiple accounts. I am therefore blocking this account from editing. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:31, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yunshui ^雲 _水 The block is unfair. I indicated clearly I have only worked with the Upwork account since January and since I was contracted, I manage the account personally and deals with the client directly. I have only been paid to tackle the SmartBuyGlasses Optical Group and The I.V. Doc piece - which is currently ongoing and I had even declared this on The I.V. Doc article and its talk page before it was deleted. Tasks completed before January 2019 (MB Salone & John Oakes pieces) are not my work and were done before I was contracted to manage the Upwork account and it's true they were not edited using this Wikipedia account. Your bases of accusation clearly show you are not familiar with Upwork Agency where more than one freelancer can work under the same account. Please familiarise yourself with how Upwork Agency works and review the block. BrayoOnyango (talk) 20:48, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your response clearly shows that you are not familiar with Wikipedia's policies on paid editing and multiple accounts, which regards multiple individuals (freelancers) making edits to the same articles as an abuse of multiple accounts. Yunshui ^雲 _水 21:00, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am well aware of Wikipedia's paid edit policies. But I am not sure how my case is related to multiple individuals (freelancers) making edits to the same articles or how you came to that conclusion. The two articles I have been paid to tackle are SmartBuyGlasses Optical Group and The I.V Doc. SmartBuyGlasses Optical Group which is still a draft has only been edited by two people. The I.V Doc piece is an ongoing piece and I had not made even a single edit and had just declared I was contracted and was going to work on the piece in accordance with Wikipedia terms. The I.V DOc piece and the other pieces ([MB Salone] & [John Oakes]) listed have already been deleted and am not sure how you retrieved the information on the individual/ multiple individuals who worked on the pieces from deleted drafts/articles to come up with the conclusions. From what I can retrieve there is no individual or multiple individuals we have edited the same articles with whether paid or unpaid articles - BrayoOnyango (talk) 22:18, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

BrayoOnyango, I looked at the articles you mentioned above and I can't link them to adverts on your Upwork. What article was connected to this, this and to an advert titled HTML Specialist- to update Wikipedia Artices? GSS ^💬 16:44, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GSS The first link is the The I.V Doc, which, I had just been contracted to tackle when you requested I shouldn't handle any edit before disclosing. This is still an open current contract I haven't made any edit nor has any payment been made. The second link was for the article on John Oakes. The HTML Specialist contract was for the MB Salone piece. - BrayoOnyango (talk) 11:50, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:31, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BrayoOnyango (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I got the block on claims of sockpuppetry of using more than Wikipedia account from on the ground that I declared I was only paid for 2 Wikipedia articles via Upwork whereas I declared 5 different Wikipedia articles contracts related to the Upwork account. I have not misquoted myself self and I wish to put it straight that Upwork Agency allows more than one freelancer to work under the same account, as a result, it is possible to have different Wikipedia pieces done by two or more freelancers under the same Upwork account. I have fully declared the two articles I have been compensated to tackle and clearly indicated the other pieces are not my work and were done before I was contracted to work for the said Upwork Account. It should also be clear that an Upwork client can hire more than one freelance at the same time to work on a project on Upwork and as a result, it is possible to have more than one freelancer contracted to work on the same Wikipedia article. I have not used multiple accounts I only own this account and wish to have this decision of blocking my account reviewed

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 13:06, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.