User talk:Brandmeister (old)/Archive 7

Archive 1

←

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Archive 8

Family trees, only for the elite?

Hi, i am wondering if i can post the tree of a decent middle class family of artists and professionals. Please let know if there are limitations, Adrian Comollo (talk) 15:05, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

If they conform to the WP:N, yes. Of course there is no need to check out all relatives. --Brand спойт 16:03, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

DYK

On 26 April, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Tea in Russia, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thank you for your contribution. Best, Fvasconcellos (t·c) 15:56, 26 April 2008 (UTC) Perhaps you could expand this with info on tea production in the country? ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ ^$1,000,000? 16:09, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

I will within the next few days. --Brand спойт 18:13, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

DYK for Bagration flèches

On 8 May, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bagration flèches, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Daniel Case (talk) 12:56, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

WikiCookie

Just stopping by with wikicookies for those editors who started new articles today. --Rosiestep (talk) 19:01, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Battle of Strasbourg

Since when has the Battle of Strasbourg another name that is more common in English? Please provide sources for that claim. Wandalstouring (talk) 09:09, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

We should stick to historical place names, for example Siege of Leningrad, not Siege of Saint Petersburg. --Brand спойт 09:20, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

It is a very clear rule that the most common name in English should be used and nothing else. Read the policy if you have the leisure to cite it. Wandalstouring (talk) 09:46, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

I requested a move for the article. Discussion is here. Wandalstouring (talk) 10:07, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:T. Kirven and S. J. Love.jpg

Could u tag any copyright status?. Thx--Sanandros (talk) 08:23, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Pornography in the United States GA Sweeps Review: On Hold

As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria and I'm specifically going over all of the "Culture and Society" articles. I have reviewed Pornography in the United States and believe the article currently meets the majority of the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. In reviewing the article, I have found there are several issues that need to be addressed, and I'll leave the article on hold for seven days for them to be fixed. I have left this message on your talk page since you have significantly edited the article (based on using this article history tool). Please consider helping address the several points that I listed on the talk page of the article, which shouldn't take too long to fix with the assistance of multiple editors. I have also left messages on the talk pages of a few other editors and a related WikiProject to spread the workload around some. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. --Nehrams2020 (talk) 03:22, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Atlantis Reef

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Atlantis Reef, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Donald Albury 15:12, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Re: RD/E

Yes, I have the version of My Immortal that happens to be the same as in the video, which I downloaded on LimeWire. It depends on where you downloaded your version, because both are on LimeWire, although I would think if it's on iTunes it wouldn't be hard to find the version you're looking for. --Crackthewhip775 (talk) 19:43, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanx. --Brand спойт 19:47, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

NP. :) --Crackthewhip775 (talk) 20:04, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Hi

People want to delete this article, Siege of Gordium, because virtualy no sources exist for the event. Please go to the deletion page of this article, and explain to them why it should not be delete, because I checked and found out. You added Siege of Gordium to Alexanders battles template (therefore you are the original creator), I created it by adding a sentence from the unsourced sentence in the Gordium article. If you have any sources for this siege, now is the time to display them on the article, I tried to find sources, and I could not find any either, thank you.--Ariobarza (talk) 00:20, 17 November 2008 (UTC)Ariobarza talk

Anderson maps

Hi Brand, given this award you gave to Adil Baguirov, especially for the talkpage of NK, I think it is safe to affirm you find what he wrote in the talkpage which was dismissing Armenian history and turning anything Armenian as Albanian, worthy of an award. If you are so concerned with accuracy, you'll stop using dubious sources like using the Azerbaijan Soviet Encyclopedia to add claims on Wikipedia which are contradicted by official sources. Here for instance, not only you are at fault in translating the title of the source used as if it was published in English but you even claim him having received the Jawaharlal Nehru Award in 1969. From the awards official site in 1969 it was Mother Teresa who received it. Obviously this was fixed, but reverted by Grandmaster who claimed that maybe there was more than one awardee, when there is indeed only one awardee per year. This is one example of the inaccuracies you perpetuate on Wikipedia and I just had the occasion to tell it to you to show you that you are in no position to question the credibility of the sources when you seem to use worst quality but given the amount of articles you create about Azerbaijan it is almost impossible to follow them and correct them.

As for that quote from Anderson, this is what Britannica writes: A few native Armenian rulers survived for a time in the Kiurikian kingdom of Lori, the Siuniqian kingdom of Baghq or Kapan, and the principates of Khachen (Artzakh) and Sasun. The New Encyclopedia Britannica by Robert MacHenry, Encyclopaedia Britannica, inc, Robert MacHenry, (1993) p.761. Those are still there, word by word in the 2008 Ultimate edition DVD. Several other sources have been provided. Grandmaster is actually not denying this, but is claiming that the Meliks were not totally independent to justify its removal. The map is therefore not inaccurate for the purpose of its use, which is to show where those principalities were. All this debate is a total waste of time. - Fedayee (talk) 23:28, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

It's not about turning anything Armenian to Albanian, but what is actually Albanian to Albanian. Show me other inaccuracies if you think I prefer indiscriminate refs. It's apparently a rare case but the source can't be challenged because it's not English. The source was translated to show which reference was actually used and I see no fault here. All in all I would rather give credit first to ASE and then to Andersen. Though I didn't question the existence of principalities, even Meowy confirmed some inaccuracies in map, so we can't name it flawless. As such it's to be removed and we had a long thread indeed. --Brand спойт 13:15, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

History of the fire service worldwide

I saw your interest in developing such work. Do you feel it would fit better under a language project or on its own fork? I think it would be a very interesting project. Do you feel there would be enough contributors for it? We could easily set something up on our site thefirewiki.org. Leave me a message on my talk page. --Mfinney (talk) 05:51, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the Barnstar!

I hope to get Azerbaijan into suitable shape before year-end. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 18:47, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Fire in the Winter Palace

There are messages for you at the end of [[|Giano's talk page]]. --Hans Adler (talk) 13:40, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Discussion of theFireWiki

Great to hear! Take a look and see what your thoughts are. As well, any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Your ideas, that you've posted on here, sound very interesting. Can you give me some ideas of what direction you wanted to go?--Mfinney (talk) 13:55, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Foreign policy of the George W. Bush administration

Hi Brandmeister You might want to take a look at this [1] talk page entry at Talk:Foreign policy of the George W. Bush administration. --The Magnificent Clean-keeper (talk) 20:46, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Re: NK revert

While I agree Capasitor has engaged in some tendentious editing practices, I am not willing to sign off on such a mass revert. If you feel Capasitor is making bad faith edits, either to the article or the talk page, there are places to go to air your grievance. But I strongly suggest against starting any kind of edit war or system of mass reversions. --Golbez (talk) 22:32, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

"Shine, Shine, My Star"

Hello! Your submission of Shine, Shine, My Star at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

Heydar Aliyev International Airport

Dear Brandmeister, thank you for your changing in the page. But the reason for "undo" of your edits is Wikipedia:Picture_tutorial - any "faces" in tha page must "look" to the center of the page, not to the left or right margin. Пожалуйста, не обижайтесь! --Ds02006 (talk) 03:33, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXV (January 2009)

The January 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:13, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Deleting pages you created

Just to let you know, if you want to remove a page that you added by mistake, you can tag it {{db-g7}}. No need to go for a full deletion discussion in those cases. Stifle (talk) 21:13, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, will bear in mind. --Brandспойт 09:49, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Baku-Gazakh motorway minibus crash

I have nominated Baku-Gazakh motorway minibus crash, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baku-Gazakh motorway minibus crash. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. VartanM (talk) 05:10, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Mirza Khazar

Hello! Your submission of Mirza Khazar at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Todor→Bozhinov 09:12, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Mirza Khazar

On March 6, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Mirza Khazar, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Dravecky (talk) 08:08, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 13 March!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:15, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Baku massacre.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Baku massacre.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:35, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. We will be selecting coordinators from a pool of eighteen to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on Saturday, 28 March! Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:19, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Multiple reverts

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.

Hi Brandmeister. I ask you to be more careful with reverting articles. I think you made recently some reverts which were not justified. In the NK article you twice ([2][3]) removed information which was based on reliable sources and which you or any other user never contented (even after you moved them, at least you should bring up your consideration to the talk page). Then you reverted my edits in the Artsakh article ([4]), however I participated in the discussion about the ancient population of Artsakh beginning from August 2008 and my last edits were explained at great length. You never participated in that discussion, yet you revert my edits without even mentioning why you don't agree with them, instead you should first familiarize yourself with the relevant discussions, then explain your opinion in the talkpage and wait for the opinion of other users. Just now you reverted my last edits in the Panah Ali Khan article with the edit summary let's discuss first, and again you don't clarify why and what you think needs discussion. Such obscure reverts are and result in edit warring and they are harmful and do not combine to build consensus. Thank you for you understanding. --Vacio (talk) 16:44, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Peacekeeping forces of Azerbaijan

On April 26, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Peacekeeping forces of Azerbaijan, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Shubinator (talk) 19:16, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

ITN for Azerbaijan State Oil Academy shootings

On 1 May, 2009, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Azerbaijan State Oil Academy shootings, which you created. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 02:02, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

your edits

Can you clarify please why you delete every mention of republic of Azerbaijan's linkage to Iran or Iranian culture? I do not understand anti-Iranism among the team of editors from the republic of Azerbaijan.--Babakexorramdin (talk) 14:41, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Generally because the linkage is dubious or biased, for example the Persian origin of the Maiden Tower in Baku is not confirmed universally. But it still depends on each particular case and indeed there are still some remains of Iranian heritage in Azerbaijan. brandспойт 16:23, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

do you deny that republic of Azerbaijan was Iranian territory? --Babakexorramdin (talk) 16:37, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Originally it was not, but has been such intermittently as the result of conquests. brandспойт 12:21, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Here lies your bias. the territory of what is the republic of Azerbaijan has been for more than 2000 years an integral part of subsequent Iranian empires, untill Russians conquered it in 18012 and 1828. There were even movements from within the your society to reunify it with Iran. Now you hate Iran so much despite the shared history, culture, religion and language, while you are so in love with Turkey who has committed genocide on Azeris in the course of history. Anyway what you say is illogical, what conquest? in that sense was transcaucasia not much different than any other part of Iran, such as Khuzestan, Fars, Khorasan, Mazandaran etc... in fact the territory of republic of Azerbaijan has been for more continous time part of Iran than for instance Khorasan, yet no one questions the Iranian character of Khorasan.Remember you are an Iranian country and not an Ottoman or Russian. Your whole history and culture is deeply Iranian. Actually Iranians do not give the label Iranian to many peoples, so you may regard it as an honor!--Babakexorramdin (talk) 12:47, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

The word empire speaks for itself. I don't hate Iran, but restrain Iranian claims similar to your nationalist statement Remember you are an Iranian country. brandспойт 13:43, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

There is nothing nationalistic in it. That is a cultural fact. It is like to say that Sweden is a Nordic country. But it is your guys who claim Iranian territory, funnily when 20% of your republic's territory is occupied by a smaller country (which was also part of Iran any way). On the other hand Turkey did all it wanted with you and even wanted to assasinate your president, and even demanded that you speak istanbuli Turkish. And of couyrse it is Iran that is bad and Turkey it is good, moreover Russia is a liberator. What a funny world. Any way to be clear: no claims on Iranian history and territory will be tolerated and at the moment you have power of numbers on Russian wikipedia, but that will change soon. So it is better that your team peacefully reverts all those chauvinistic lies there. Your team has its hand full with the problems they have with Armenians. A problem with Iranians is bad for you, because there are 10 times more Iranians than you.--Babakexorramdin (talk) 14:25, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

First of all, I would like to inform that I edit in Ruwiki extremely seldom, just check the contribs. Secondly, your country of 20% is unrecognized internationally, including Armenia and Iran. Regarding Iranians, don't worry, I don't care whether they are 10 times or 20 times more. brandспойт 17:15, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Fine it is claer that you have some aversions against Iranians and you kept quite about Turkey. And you are honest that you did not deny that many people from your country including the team of editors in wikipedia do have territorial claims on Iranian territory. And I did not understand what has international recognition to do with it? What I said is that your nationalism is destructive to your country. When a former province or lets say Armenia occupies 20% of your territory it is extremely ridiculous to claim territory from a country which is at least ten times more populous and militarily and economically stronger than your country. It is not fine for your people, who I any way regard as co-Iranians and wish them well.--Babakexorramdin (talk) 22:00, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

I appreciate your help against Pan-Turkists, but don't have any claims to Iran. I even don't recall the official Azerbaijan having such claims since its independence from the Soviet Union. Thanks for wishing well anyway. brandспойт 11:48, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Ganja

Hi please use the talkpage to give your rational. I gave my rational. The Persian name was there a year ago. If the Russian name is there, then the Persian name should be there. Again any word that has etymologically Persian root or probable Persian root and has been used extensively in Persian literature (and it has been since more than a 1000 years) is valid. This has nothing to do with your argument with Babak, but please use the talkpage. Note the Azeri language did not exist for some articles (say Nezami or others) but I have allowed it to be there with its latin script. So it is best to be inclusive here and not exclude names based on narrow nationalist criterion. In this case the criterion is etymologically of the word which is Iranian and has been used long before the Russian or even the existence of the Azeri-Turkish language. Thanks. --Nepaheshgar (talk) 23:43, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Nepaheshgar, In fact all placenames in the republic of Azerbaijan that existed before 1930s should be written in Iranian-Azeri script, because they used that alphabet themselves in the republic of Azerbaijan before the imposition of Cyrlic and Latin on them by Russians and Turks. On the other hand in Iran Latin and Cyrlic were never used.--Babakexorramdin (talk) 11:18, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

As to 1930s, see Azerbaijani alphabet, from 1918 till 1939 Latin letters were used. There was no imposition by Turks of Latin alphabet, it was adopted in Azerbaijan to get rid of Soviet pattern and be close to European alphabets. brandспойт 11:26, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

No see your banknotes from the times of Rsaulzadeh and the early Soviet times, they are written in in Iranian-Azeri alphabets. Only in the end of 1920s were Latin introduced, but it was a different type of Latin as it is today. After the indepedence Elchibey wanted to abolish the Azeri language and Turks were pushing to replace your language with Istanbuli Turkish. he didnt succeed but could anyway impose a Turkish-alike Latn Aphabet. It is clear that you hate Iran and do not want to admit your Iranian heritage, so you vioalte the history with regard to Iran. But at least be sincere to your own history.--Babakexorramdin (talk) 13:40, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Please do not delete Persian names for etymologies that are Persian. This is an Encyclopedia and I am not here to make political claims. Just like we do not delete the Turkish name in Tabriz even though the name is not Turkish. But anything that has relavance is inserted and the more names , the better. Thanks. --Nepaheshgar (talk) 16:39, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Orly airport attack

On 11 May, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Orly airport attack, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 10:55, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Andrey Kistyakovsky

Hello! Your submission of Andrey Kistyakovsky at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Jamie^☆S93 17:23, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Template:Future at Eurovision Dance Contest 2009

Hello. I've removed the template again from Eurovision Dance Contest 2009, per the new guidelines to be found at Template:Future. They're still under discussion, so if you disagree (or agree) with them, feel free to comment at Template talk:Future#Guidelines. --Conti|✉ 15:29, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Andrey Kistyakovsky

On May 29, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Andrey Kistyakovsky, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dravecky (talk) 08:21, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Vladimir Muravyov (translator)

On May 29, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Vladimir Muravyov (translator), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dravecky (talk) 08:21, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Your edits

Hi, and thanks for your contributions. I noticed that you linked some dates in Paulinus of York recently. This practice is now deprecated. Please see WP:LINKING and WP:MOSNUM. Furthermore, there is an temporary Arbcom injunction on mass linking/delinking of chronological elements, although this is no suggestion from me that you are in breach whatsoever. I'm happy to respond to any inquiries you may have about the matter. Thank you for your attention. Dabomb87 (talk) 00:08, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Note

Someone mentioned you by name at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azerbaijan–Spain relations. Sincerely, --A Nobody^{My talk} 17:33, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

your question

I think we have had discussed this already. From the sources oit is obvious that 1- the territories of these Khanates were Iranian territory 2- they were of predominantly Turkicspeaking Shia background, so there is a continuity with the people of the republic of Azerbaijan rather than with Armenia 3- These Khanates were to various degree self-governing depending to the political context of time and the mode of governance of the Iranian empire. In this sense they were no more or less different than other parts of the Iranian empire. All these are obvious from the sources. --Babakexorramdin (talk) 14:28, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

They were not Iranian territories in terms of incorporation, but had a varied degree of independence, as you outlined. The Baku Khanate in particular was independent, as confirmed by majority of sources I cited. Iranian POV there should be dealt according to WP:UNDUE. brandt 14:33, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

The sources say exactly as I said. Please do not push your POV.--Babakexorramdin (talk) 14:40, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

It is not my POV, the issue is addressed at Baku Khanate's talk. brandt 14:48, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Bax brand, mushkulun nadir? Bu Arazi Iranain arazisi iddi. This is what the sources say. Think good, it is not bad at all for the interests of the republic of Azerbaijan visavis Armenia! Please do not make a conflict about these obvious things--Babakexorramdin (talk) 15:00, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Karim bey Mehmandarov

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Karim bey Mehmandarov, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No assertion of notability. Simply being a doctor does not meet the notability guidelines for inclusion.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Dawn Bard (talk) 19:05, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

WP:AE

Hi, please be aware of this report: [5]. Fedayee (talk) 19:43, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Restriction

Brandmeister, pursuant to Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2#Amended Remedies and Enforcement, and for the reasons given in the AE thread above (permalink), you are sanctioned as follows: For six months, you are restricted to one revert per page per seven-day period with respect to any article related to the region of Turkey, Armenia, Azerbaijan and Iran, and the ethnic and historical issues related to that area. Reverts of obvious vandalism are exempt.  Sandstein  07:34, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

DYK for The Virgin of the Navigators

On June 15, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Virgin of the Navigators, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Royalbroil 11:28, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Просьба

Здраствуйте Brandmeister. В русской вики вы создали Шаблон:История Азербайджана. Не могли бы создать в русской вики Шаблон:История Ирака, я затем дополню и оформлю его. Заранее спасибо.

Сделал. Brandt 19:15, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:RFCN#AzeriTerroru

Hi there. I have closed this RfC because there has not yet been any attempt to discuss the concern with the user, as per the instructions on WP:RFCN. -kotra (talk) 00:15, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

WP:AE

Hi, please be aware of this report: [6]. Fedayee (talk) 19:43, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Статьи

Здрасте. Статья ru:Азербайджанский сепаратизм на удалении, если можете, то выскажитесь. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.141.114.204 (talk) 06:52, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

June 2009

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the revert restriction imposed at [7] as described in the WP:AE thread here. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.  Sandstein  21:52, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Brandmeister (old) (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The edits provided are not reverts as specified in WP:RV. The current version of the disputed place in the article represents consensus, achieved by me and Babakexorramdin via proposed phrasing whilst the talk page indicates that it was me, who started to seek consensus. I believe the current block is a violation of good faith, WP:PILLAR, WP:BOLD and WP:IAR.

Decline reason:

Those edits were reverts and therefore you have clearly violated your editing restrictions. Ice Cold Beer (talk) 09:55, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Review

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Brandmeister (old) (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Honestly, I did not expect my request would be declined and hereby would like to ask for review. Reverting is explained in WP:RV, not WP:3RR, which deals with three-revert violation (which I have not breached) and as per WP:REVEXP I explained my edits. In my opinion the decision applied is a one-sided interpretation of the definition as if is the only one existing. Additionally, as in AA2 final decision, the sanctions are expected to be imposed only when a warned editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. I have wrote in the report, that my last second edit ultimately resulted into consensus pursuant to the then-ongoing discussion and edit summaries, instead I was speedily blocked with "further violations will lead to longer blocks and/or restrictions" as if I am the one specified in the aforementioned decision or an edit warrior. Besides, there was no undoing of edits by others - the only one I was talking to is Babakexorramdin (talk · contribs). :The decision on such issues should depend on some knowledge about the disputed subject and/or involvement in discussion and can not be settled through selective sanctioning. It is unnatural when someone discusses to build a consensus, but the other one cherry-picks to report, especially "in order to prevent escalation of edit warring" and in terms of existing AA2 remedies. There should be no place for witch hunt in Wikipedia and current editing atmosphere becomes unhealthy. Brandt 11:08, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I concur with the other admins, this was legitimate application of ArbCom enforcement. In addition, I advise that an ArbCom enforcement block can only be overturned by consensus, not by a single admin. PhilKnight (talk) 21:30, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

DYK for Capitulations of Santa Fe

On June 20, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Capitulations of Santa Fe, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Jamie^☆S93 14:35, 20 June 2009 (UTC)