User talk:BorisAndDoris

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, BorisAndDoris, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Ubi Dwyer, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 01:38, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ubi Dwyer

The article Ubi Dwyer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Person with no real evidence of notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 01:38, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BorisAndDoris. You have new messages at RadioFan's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

London Free School

This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of London Free School, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://en.ekopedia.org/London_Free_School.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) VWBot (talk) 21:22, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ekopedia entry

http://en.ekopedia.org/London_Free_School is an entry I made some months back on another wiki site at a time when I was not ready to raise the article to wikipedia standards. Earlier today I came across it in a web search and have tried to add a few references and sort out some links, but it is a work in progress. If it is not public domain (as I intended when created) then it is not copyright as I have not created it as such (I use the same name on other wiki sites - hopefully this can be checked).

The London Free School is an important piece of history, but I may not have the skills to make this article survive wikipedian scrutiny - perhaps a way could be found that crude article writers (like myself) have some time to find help with meeting standards before deletion. BorisAndDoris (talk) 22:00, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nicholas Albery

The article Nicholas Albery has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. role^player 23:35, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to the page Category:Counterculture Festivals. Blank pages can confuse readers, and are overall not helpful to the Wikipedia project; furthermore, blanking a page is not the same as deleting it.

If the article you blanked is a duplicate of another article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalized, please revert it to the last legitimate revision. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please use the appropriate deletion process. — $Jeff G. ツ$ 17:26, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Username legality

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, BorisAndDoris, may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it it appears to be an account for more than one person. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may file for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account and use that for editing. Thank you. — $Jeff G. ツ$ 17:30, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

BorisAndDoris is a name related to fictional characters who supposedly "organised" free festivals in the UK during the '80s - the unknown authors of that ruse faced a similar problem to the development of wikipedia - as the society around them became more rule-bound they found more imaginative ways to keep the original spirit alive - there is an assumption here that two people are using the same account and therefore the user can be banned on the basis that innocence has not been proven, rather than innocent until proven guilty - a large number of editors have become concerned with controlling others and I believe it is killing the spirit of "the encyclopaedia that anyone can edit" - contributors of information new to wikipedia used to be encouraged - rather than being deterred by dealing with pedantic application of rules. I am a single user - the use of no gaps in the name indicated it was a moniker rather than two people - if the problem persists, then maybe the problem is with a rule that has not been considered properly or has been applied too rigorously. BorisAndDoris (talk) 00:25, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock-un|BorisDoris}}

I've lifted the block. There are some absurd username blocks being put in place, and this is one of them. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 16:21, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rocket Festival Spain

I reverted your edit as you did not address the issues, nor provide any edit comment, nor explain on the talk page Widefox (talk) 22:18, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

London Wikimedia Fundraiser

Good evening! This is a friendly message from Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry, inviting you to the London Wikimedia Fundraising party on 19th December 2010, in approximately one week. This party is being held at an artistic London venue with room for approximately 300 people, and is being funded by Ed Saperia, a non-Wikipedian who has a reputation for holding exclusive events all over London. This year, he wants to help Wikipedia, and is subsidising a charity event for us. We're keen to get as many Wikimedians coming as possible, and we already have approximately 200 guests, including members of the press, and some mystery guests! More details can be found at http://ten.wikipedia.org/wiki/London - expect an Eigenharp, a mulled wine hot tub, a free hog roast, a haybale amphitheatre and more. If you're interested in coming - and we'd love to have you - please go to the ten.wikipedia page and follow the link to the Facebook event. Signing up on Facebook will add you to the party guestlist. Entry fee is a heavily subsidised £5 and entry is restricted to over 18s. It promises to be a 10th birthday party to remember! If you have any questions, please email me at chasemewiki at gmail.com.

Hope we'll see you there, (and apologies for the talk page spam) - Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 18:07, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alfie Meadows for deletion

The article Alfie Meadows is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alfie Meadows until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.--Joshua Issac (talk) 18:38, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Clare Solomon for deletion

The article Clare Solomon is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clare Solomon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Off2riorob (talk) 20:35, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Darcus Howe

Thanks for [1]; sources are clearly disagreeing as to whether it was a policeman or a barrister. It's puzzling, as Howe's own statements as reported in the Guardian and Independent are at variance with the statement at the time in Race Today, whose editor he was. Could we discuss this further on the article talk page? Cheers, --J N 466 20:40, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Selwyn Baptiste

The article Selwyn Baptiste has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I don't believe this person is notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zzaffuto118 (talk) 01:33, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Brighton Voice

Hi. Just to let you know I have expanded the article on the Voice. I also put some photos in but Wikimedia deleted them all on the grounds that they were copyright, although I am unsure how something published anonymously could be copyright. Roundtheworld (talk) 17:27, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Clare Solomon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clare Solomon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clare Solomon (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bosstopher (talk) 18:06, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Previously Unreleased, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Twink and The Deviants. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rivington Pike, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Here and Now. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Arts lab logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Arts lab logo.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:05, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, BorisAndDoris. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, BorisAndDoris. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Ginger Man (Play)

Hello BorisAndDoris,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The Ginger Man (Play) for deletion in response to your request.

If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Xx236 (talk) 06:56, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Katie Swan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Monzon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:10, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maia Lumsden (September 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bkissin was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is a great start for an article! Unfortunately, I looked over our notability requirements for tennis players and Maia does not yet meet those standards.

According to WP:NTENNIS:

Tennis figures are presumed to be notable if they

Are a member of the International Tennis Hall of Fame, either in the contributor or player category
Have competed in one of the international team competitions: Fed Cup, Davis Cup, Hopman Cup or World Team Cup.
Have competed in the main draw in one of the highest level professional tournaments:
- Grand Slam tournaments (the Australian Open, the French Open, Wimbledon, or the US Open).
- Men: ATP World Tour tournaments (the ATP World Tour Finals, ATP World Tour Masters 1000, ATP World Tour 500, or ATP World Tour 250).
- Women: WTA Tour tournaments (the WTA Premier, the WTA International, or the WTA Tour Championships).
Have won at least one title in any of the ATP Challenger tournaments.
Have won at least one title in any of the ITF Women's $50,000–$100,000+ tournaments, or any of the WTA 125K tournaments. Until 2007, the notability threshold shall be winning a $25,000 tournament based on the lowest payout for a men's challenger tournament in the same year.
Hold a tennis record recognized by the International Tennis Federation, ATP or WTA.

Junior players are presumed to be notable if they have won at least a junior Grand Slam title, have been in the top 3 of the junior ITF world rankings or can be shown to meet the wider requirements of WP:GNG.

This guideline applies equally to singles and doubles players.

More detailed tennis notability information can be found at WikiProject Tennis/Article guidelines.

I looked over a lot of her accomplishments and didn't see anything there that would meet the above requirements. I know that she will go on to do great things, and when she meets any of the above requirements, go ahead and resubmit! :)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maia Lumsden and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Maia Lumsden, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bkissin (talk) 13:54, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BorisAndDoris! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bkissin (talk) 13:54, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Extinction Rebellion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MEP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, BorisAndDoris. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Vague listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tom Vague. Since you had some involvement with the Tom Vague redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 19:15, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Extinction Rebellion

For your information, see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category_talk:Extinction_Rebellion
Betty Zongola (talk) 19:11, 27 November 2018 (UTC).[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Greta Thunberg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gary Cohn (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please support the Sustainability Initiative!

Hello BorisAndDoris, I saw that you are one of the authors of Greta Thunberg article. Because I am looking for ways to reduce the environmental impact of Wikipedia itself, I wanted to ask you to check out the Sustainability Initiative and to add your name to the list of supporters so that I can show that many community members are behind this effort. Thanks! --Gnom (talk) 08:38, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @Gnom: thanks for calling my attention to this worthy effort! NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 21:31, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

So... did I?

Hi Boris/Doris... at Talk:Greta Thunberg, did I do an adequate job cleaning up the chaos I created when I floated preliminary "what if" about merger in the middle of the WDHT discussion? I moved my own first comment to where others disucssed it, and gave that combination a heading apart from the WDHT discussion. I think that was yours or Robbies idea in the first place. Anything else I can do to clean that up? NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 11:46, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

NewsAndEventsGuy I have reverted Talk:Greta Thunberg back to before my intervention, in which I only intended to clarify that discussion had taken place with no intent of changing the meaning or context, but realise now that I did change the nature of the discussion by inserting a title of my own choosing and inadvertantly emphasised what had not been before. Apologies for any problems I have caused, I am hoping this does not interfere with the constructive dialogue I feel we have established over various Talk pages. BorisAndDoris (talk) 14:34, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, it's hard enough working through article content disputes we don't need to bicker over housekeeping! NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 14:43, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rosetta Barnstar

		The Rosetta Barnstar
		For supplying abundant translated quotations at School strike for climate NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 14:13, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Day o fweek

An IP raised on the talk page the interesting observation that our article title, and the scope defined in the first lead paragraph, explicitly say skipping class (or equivalent). Because of this, its an interesting question whether student actions after the end of the school day or on a holiday or weekend qualify for being added to the article. WHile this discussion is underway it does seem a bit WP:POINTY to add "day of week" to the table and I am glad you reverted. But I would be grateful for some of your brain power on how to deal with the larger substantive issue presented by the IP's criticism. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 15:18, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@NewsAndEventsGuy: Thanks for your heads up on this. I was having computer problems at the time of reversion and still can't work out how I had to revert myself. I am suspicious of IPs who know how to work WP and with their one day history try influence change - as school strikes become more effective there may be many more attempts to control the wikipedia page. I'm glad that we can work together on this. BorisAndDoris (talk) 19:21, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Re IPs me too of course. But on the upside, repeated attempts to tear down cool shit does keep us honest. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 19:41, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Beanfield

Hi! Thanks for doing some more work on the pics I've recently added to Battle of the Beanfield, I've been intending to do for a while as the story of what happened at Beanfield needs to be told and illustrated. Altcurrents (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 17:02, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

PutItToThePeople listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect PutItToThePeople. Since you had some involvement with the PutItToThePeople redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. B dash (talk) 06:47, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tim Malyon listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tim Malyon. Since you had some involvement with the Tim Malyon redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 07:32, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hidden histories

Hello I'm hoping to revive WikiProject Squatting, I was wondering if that is something that you would be interested in? (Because I was recently working on Centro Iberico and saw your edits there). Cheers! Mujinga (talk) 19:16, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Extinction symbol

Hi BorisAndDoris. I just edited the Extinction symbol page to better reflect reality. If you need more info then please contact me on x@extinctionsymbol.info Cheers! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goldfrog23 (talk • contribs) 20:06, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if you care, or if it bothers you, but see the talk page at Extinction symbol.

Your advice appreciated. Thanks --82.132.241.252 (talk) 19:39, 7 June 2019 (UTC). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.132.223.204 (talk) [reply]

Radical Think Tank listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Radical Think Tank. Since you had some involvement with the Radical Think Tank redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:45, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi BorisAndDoris,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikipedia and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 16:00, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi BorisAndDoris,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:38, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi BorisAndDoris,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:39, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Festival Welfare Services

The article Festival Welfare Services has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. StarM 22:33, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]