User talk:Boosquet

License tagging for File:Isabelle Freidheim.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Isabelle Freidheim.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:30, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Athena SPACs for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Athena SPACs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Athena SPACs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Oaktree b (talk) 03:15, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please see issues fixed Boosquet (talk) 15:46, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Hello Boosquet. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Boosquet. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Boosquet|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:12, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Draft:Isabelle Freidheim, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Boosquet, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Boosquet|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:49, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Boosquet, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Ardenous (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:39, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Isabelle Freidheim (April 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Despite the ridiculous levels of refbombing (97 refs, really?), there is a lot of unreferenced content here.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Isabelle Freidheim and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:19, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please clarify which references are missing - everything seems to have a reference. 63.246.134.48 (talk) 14:12, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are you kidding me? I count at least ten paragraphs that haven't a single citation. Given that this is an article on a living person, per WP:BLP every material statement, anything potentially contentious, and all private personal details such as DOB must be clearly supported with inline citations to reliable published sources. Also, Wikipedia, PRNewsWire and SeekingAlpha are not considered reliable sources, therefore the information supported by those eight references is effectively unsupported. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:26, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, do you know what is wrong with the Bloomberg links? 63.246.134.48 (talk) 16:04, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, I don't.

But two things:

Please log into your account when editing (I'm assuming you're Boosquet?); and
Please respond to the paid-editing query (above, in the 'April 2023' section) – do not edit further, until you have done so.

Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:34, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am [unfortunately] not getting paid to create this article.

Also I am struggling to add a copyright tag for the image. Boosquet (talk) 14:50, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, so if you're not being paid to write this, how would you describe your relationship with the Freidheims, given that all your edits are somehow connected to them and/or their businesses? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:34, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm encouraged by the opportunities that Athena is creating for women in the capital markets. It's not so much about the Freidheims, although it's an interesting part of it. Boosquet (talk) 20:26, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Boosquet! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:19, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Isabelle Freidheim (April 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

As before.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Isabelle Freidheim and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:48, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Athena SPACs

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Athena SPACs, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
A "generic title" error. References show this error when they have a generic placeholder title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:42, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Isabelle Freidheim (May 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Newystats were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

If this was published, it would face similar problems to the Athena SPACs page, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Athena SPACs.

Why is the first all-woman SPAC important? Note that the intro section of SPAC article covers criticism of SPACs - there is no negative coverage at all in this article.

Could the author, on the talk page identify which references they think are independent, non primary sources, reliable sources in the wikipedia sense that establish notability. Looking through the first 10 in the current version of the article, I see;

1. SEC filing - primary, useful for article, but doesn't establish notability. 2. Magnifi - not independent - doesn't establish notability - since ref 1 is there, not needed, just put it in the external links section 3. Athena - not independent - doesn't establish notability - since ref 1 is there, not needed, just put it in the external links section 4. Forbes - Yes, this is the first ref that works towards establishing notability, don't drown it in other refs 5. Athena - not independent, duplicates the Forbes ref, not needed 6. repeat of 4 - see WP:CITE on how to correctly cite the same article twice. 7. Establishes facts in the sentence, so good, but does not establish notability of Isabelle Freidheim 8 and 9 repeat of 7 10 Google search - don't include google searches as refs

There is a better chance of publication, if the subject really is notable, with less references that are more like the Forbes ref, and not the other 8.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Isabelle Freidheim and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Newystats (talk) 22:33, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's is super helpful, thank you 63.246.134.48 (talk) 18:42, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Boosquet! Your additions to Scott J. Freidheim have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 23:56, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Isabelle Freidheim

Hello, Boosquet. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Isabelle Freidheim, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:07, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]