User talk:Bld175

Welcome!

Hello, Bld175, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! Fiddle Faddle 19:09, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:Bld175/sandbox (April 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bld175/sandbox.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

hmssolent^lambast _{patrol records} 01:20, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: High Strain Composite Structures (October 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:High Strain Composite Structures and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 19:08, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Bld175, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fiddle Faddle 19:08, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your Teahouse question from last month

Hi Bruce.

I ran into your Teahouse question from last month. Thought I might help be offering a few notes here:

I've added a link here to the conversation in the Teahouse, now in an Archive, as it does not appear you've made a contribution to Wikipedia since then (October 2014) and you may not be aware of all the substantive responses you received.
In reading through the comments you received, I think you will benefit from seriously engaging on that scholarly criticism.
Finally, I first ran into your username looking at another article, one that you created. Drag and Atmospheric Neutral Density Explorer. This too is an article with a very large amount of the article prose unsourced. I would love to see the DANDE article improved, closer to some of the material it had in, say, November 2013, a couple of months after it flew, rather than the reduced version now, where I and others have had to delete a fair amount of that uncited content. The bigger problem is that, even as the article currently exists today, there is a large amount of unsourced content, much of it challenged by other editors and unaddressed by any editor who wants the article to be improved sufficiently to fix some of its shortcomings. I would expect therefore that, left unaddressed, the DANDE article will be even smaller in the future as much of this unsourced prose is gradually removed over time.

If you are interested in becoming a better Wikipedia editor, I'd be happy to help guide you through some of the ropes. Just ping me on my Talk page. N2e (talk) 13:18, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I received your email. Glad to help you know the ropes, and learn to have a larger impact on Wikipedia. If you want, I could go through your draft article on and add some specific inline tags that would conceivably help you edit it so that, next time, it might be approved. Cheers. N2e

Your submission at Articles for creation: High strain composite structure has been accepted

High strain composite structure, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 00:12, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Coilable Truss, High Strain Composite Structures.png

Thanks for uploading File:Coilable Truss, High Strain Composite Structures.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 13:06, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Roccor for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roccor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roccor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Fayenatic London 08:34, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:RoccorLogo.png

The file File:RoccorLogo.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]