User talk:Black roses124

Black roses124, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Black roses124! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like MrClog (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020

Hello, I'm Bagumba. Your recent edit to the page Serge Ibaka appears to have added premature information about a reported sports transaction, so it has been removed for now. The transaction is based on anonymous sources and/or awaiting an official announcement. If you believe the transaction has been completed, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 01:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wind power in Iran. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. warmly, ezlev. talk 03:39, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Blake Griffin. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 01:25, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Engr. Smitty. Your recent edit to the page Javale McGee appears to have added premature information about a reported sports transaction, so it has been removed for now. The transaction is based on anonymous sources and/or awaiting an official announcement. If you believe the transaction has been completed, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 15:03, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sources and edit summaries

Pls review WP: contributing to Wikipedia.Moxy- 00:30, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Jason Kidd‎‎, you may be blocked from editing. —Bagumba (talk) 18:30, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Nikola Jokić, you may be blocked from editing. Docholliday11 (talk) 22:03, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Bagumba (talk) 15:51, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, one of your edit summaries said "Wiki foreign coaches says ...". However, the policy WP:CIRCULAR says: Do not use articles from Wikipedia (whether this English Wikipedia or Wikipedias in other languages) as sources since Wikipedia is considered as a user-generated source. You'll need to cite a source, which can be one that another WP article cites, if it is approporiate.—Bagumba (talk) 16:24, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Nikola Jokić, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 01:01, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I apologize it was my discussion and I got an answer so I deleted it didn’t know that I should’ve left it Black roses124 (talk) 01:03, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at OG Anunoby. FMSky (talk) 18:10, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

National team coaches

Hi Black roses124, please see Template:Infobox basketball biography#cite_ref-3 regarding national team coaching stints in infoboxes and the relevant discussion if required. There is no consensus to include them. The articles you listed as examples have had national team stints added recently and will be removed. Thank you. CalDoesIt (talk) 15:58, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Neil Young. - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 03:57, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making edits on Wikipedia pages such as those you made to Will Arnett, without first discussing your changes on the article's talk page, Your edit(s) require discussion to establish consensus as this is considered a type of change that other editors should be allowed to comment on. Your edits do not appear to have been discussed and have been reverted. Thank you. - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 17:56, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

BLP discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:54, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Will Arnett. Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 16:41, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Russell Westbrook. - FlightTime (open channel) 16:48, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 18:29, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at LiAngelo Ball. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Bagumba (talk) 14:42, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at OG Anunoby. FMSky (talk) 04:20, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jorge Soler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cuban. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Footballer nationalities

There is consensus at WT:FOOTBALL that where a player was born in one country but has played for another, the lede omits nationality. Giant Snowman 11:37, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Kyrie Irving, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Specifically per MOS:SURNAME, refer to people by their last name on subsequent mention, not their full name. —Bagumba (talk) 05:24, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. EvergreenFir (talk) 20:09, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anthony Black for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anthony Black is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Black until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 21:08, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Links.

the links in the article. List of most-streamed songs on Spotify they are not complete and they are also very poorly added--Tirso Gutiérrez (talk) 14:28, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Farhan Zaidi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Bell.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Red Grit

The article Red Grit has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only source I can find for this is Reddit. The three sources listed don't mention "Red Grit", and no other good sources either.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 10:17, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well thing is it’s a real faction just no articles have given said faction an actual name I put Red grit to mirror Blue Grit article Black roses124 (talk) 17:39, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Government of Canada email

In this diff, you are sharing the content of a correspondence you received from a person or organization that took issue with the content in this article. Can you please disclose the identity of this person or organization, along with the email address that sent it? Mottezen (talk) 05:12, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mottezen Sure I contacted member of parliament Nathaniel Erskine-Smith‘s office his email is Nathaniel.Erskine-Smith.A2@parl.gc.ca they contacted somebody at the foreign affairs ministry and they told me the message they got the original message was

“Hello Nathaniel,

Thank you for following up and my sincere apologies for the delay.

Consideration of potential accession to the Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture (OP-CAT) is ongoing. Canada values independent oversight of conditions in places of detention, which plays a crucial role in improving conditions and preventing ill-treatment.

As our federal-provincial-territorial (FPT) consultations on OP-CAT have revealed, Canada has many well-established, robust domestic mechanisms in place to ensure that detainees are treated in accordance with international standards.

A number of these bodies have the level of independence envisioned by the OP-CAT, and also currently perform functions similar to those envisioned in the OP-CAT, by carrying out visits to facilities on a proactive basis. However, the core focus of the great majority of existing independent bodies is on addressing individual complaints, rather than preventing mistreatment on a systemic basis.

To date, the consultation process has involved extensive consultation with provincial and territorial governments, and also within the Government of Canada. While we recognize that this process is taking longer than expected, further consultations and analysis are required to find an effective and efficient approach to building a system of independent monitoring in Canada’s federal system.

Despite all of this, there are a range of policy and implementation issues and additional consultations that still need to be undertaken (such as the assessment of the legislative, financial and operational implications of different implementation models, and consultations with municipal government stakeholders, Indigenous partners, and civil society organizations). Nevertheless, we remain committed to delivering on our commitments on this issue.” Hope this helps Black roses124 (talk) 05:32, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the info. It's good to hold the government accountable on these issue. Good job! Mottezen (talk) 05:45, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Black roses124 (talk) 05:48, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pascal Siakam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cameroonian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Tommy Fury. – ².O.^Boxing 20:47, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment with the page Rapp Snitch Knishes. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use your sandbox instead, as someone could see your edit before you revert it. Thank you. Faster than Thunder (talk | contributions) 20:35, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FIBA Basketball World Cup Rising Star moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to FIBA Basketball World Cup Rising Star. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 21:55, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FIBA Basketball World Cup Best Defensive Player moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to FIBA Basketball World Cup Best Defensive Player. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 21:55, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: FIBA World Cup Best Defensive Player (September 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:FIBA World Cup Best Defensive Player and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 19:42, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: FIBA World Cup Rising Star (September 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:FIBA World Cup Rising Star and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 19:42, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Olivier Rioux moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Olivier Rioux. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:31, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. JASWE (talk) 04:08, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:FIBA World Cup Best Defensive Player

Hello, Black roses124. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:FIBA World Cup Best Defensive Player, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:07, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:FIBA World Cup Rising Star

Hello, Black roses124. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:FIBA World Cup Rising Star, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:08, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Olivier Rioux

Hello, Black roses124. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Olivier Rioux, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:06, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Selfstudier (talk) 00:22, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Olivier Rioux

Hello, Black roses124. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Olivier Rioux".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:09, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]