User talk:Bk kartik21

Welcome!

Hello, Bk kartik21, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Muhandes (talk) 19:12, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Vidarbha has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Vidarbha was changed by Bk kartik21 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.856258 on 2017-09-09T19:02:49+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:02, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Muhandes. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Nagpur, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 20:19, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Hyderabad, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:13, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Marathi people

Hi, I believe the deepmal image you removed does not say what location it is from, and is of poorer quality than the one you replaced. I would be interested in your comments on topic. Thanks.Jonathansammy (talk) 16:27, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A picture speaks a thousand words

Hi, I saw that you removed the image of Renuka from Religion in Maharashtra. Is there a Wikipedia policy that says there are too many images in one section? Please forward me the link. Jonathansammy (talk) 20:23, 10 August 2020 (UTC)Also even if there is link, please discuss it first on the the Talkpage of the article to build up consensus on what should be removed.I hope you understand.Thanks.[reply]

Actually my issue was godess of mahur is not kuldaivi of most of Marathi families,there are many like tuljabhawani, kolhapur mahalxmi etc. Therefore I think only images of Ganesh and pandharpur palki is appropriate which has pan maharashtra devotees. I would like to know your opinion on this. Bk kartik21 (talk) 09:32, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Renuka of Mahur, Bhavani of Tuljapur, Mahalaxmi of Kolhapur. and Saptashrungi of Vani are the popular Kuldevis of Maharashtrian families.If you have statistics on each of them, then please forward them. Picture of Renuka was there as just an example of a family Kuldevi. If you think picture of one of the other three is better then go ahead. Being a varkari or being a devotee of Vithoba is a choice but a kuldaiwat comes with ones family, regardless of whether one has any special attachment to that deity.Finally, please have consensus before removing images.Your personal choice and opinions should not come into it. Thanks.Jonathansammy (talk) 15:50, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for removing image without making consensus. Sincere apologies Bk kartik21 (talk) 15:54, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No problem.Let us work on these projects together.Also check this link. It is about one community only but it should you give some idea of Kuldaiwats worshipped by different clans.[1] Thanks.Jonathansammy (talk) 16:04, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Will read it Bk kartik21 (talk) 16:20, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 15:36, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Only warning

These edits, changing sourced content, are highly disruptive. Wikipedia goes by reliable sources only; not by editors' opinions. Do something like that again and you will be blocked as not being here to build an encyclopedia. Bishonen | tålk 17:07, 9 January 2022 (UTC).[reply]