User talk:Bj94

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Bj94! Thank you for your contributions. I am Mentoz86 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Mentoz86 (talk) 15:28, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Papa Alioune Ndiaye

The article Papa Alioune Ndiaye has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. JetBlast (talk) 15:32, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Adeccoligaen-players

Hi there. Thank you for creating a couple of articles about footballers today. I want to let you know that footballers need to play in Tippeligaen to be considered notable on the English Wikipedia, (per WP:NFOOTBALL) and that those footballers you've created that only played in 1. divisjon are in danger of being deleted. So next time you create an article about a Norwegian footballer, you should create about a player that've played in Tippeligaen. Mentoz86 (talk) 21:23, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ulrik Berglann regarding eigth of your articles that you might want to participate in. Mentoz86 (talk) 02:26, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bj94, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Bj94! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Writ Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:15, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ulrik Berglann

The article Ulrik Berglann has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Charmlet (talk) 01:58, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. ~Charmlet ^-talk- 16:42, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jean Alassane Mendy

The article Jean Alassane Mendy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Never played in Tippeligaen, or another fully pro league, which means ot fails WP:NFOOTY.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mentoz86 (talk) 18:40, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Steevan dos Santos

The article Steevan dos Santos has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:46, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ole Kristian Langås

The article Ole Kristian Langås has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:47, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cut and paste article creation

The problem with cutting and pasting the same lede into all your articles is that when you have a typo in one, you keep copying it to the rest. You have written the phrase "x is a Norwegia football player" in your last several article creations. I suspect you wanted to say "x is a Norwegian football player". Please correct. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:44, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Håvard Lysvoll

The article Håvard Lysvoll has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mentoz86 (talk) 12:22, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alexander Sørloth

The article Alexander Sørloth has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article is about a footballer that hasn't played in a fully pro league or in a cup-match between two teams from fully pro leagues, which means it fails WP:NFOOTY.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mentoz86 (talk) 20:52, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Creation of non-notable footballers

Hi there. You have created a whole lot of footballers the last week, but you should read WP:NFOOTBALL, which is the notability guideline for footballers. Then you'll learn that footballers in Norway has to play a match in Tippeligaen to be considered notable, and in other words: you shouldn't create article on footballers before they've made their debut in Tippeligaen. Keep up the good work. Cheers, Mentoz86 (talk) 20:55, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

What are your sources for career stats, such as for Bjørn Strøm? Geschichte (talk) 22:33, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Simon Larsen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Defender (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Osita Henry Chikere for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Osita Henry Chikere is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Osita Henry Chikere until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:02, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Elisabeth Jeppesen

The article Elisabeth Jeppesen has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:15, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ane Sund Walsøe

The article Ane Sund Walsøe has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:16, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Marita Holmen Iversen

The article Marita Holmen Iversen has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:16, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Thomas Lehne Olsen

The article Thomas Lehne Olsen has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:17, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alexander Sørloth

The article Alexander Sørloth has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:17, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tom Erik Nordberg

The article Tom Erik Nordberg has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:18, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alexander Sørloth for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alexander Sørloth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Sørloth until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:30, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ivar Furu

The article Ivar Furu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article is about a footballer who fails WP:GNG, and hasn't played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mentoz86 (talk) 12:19, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Vegard Lysvoll

On 18 July 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Vegard Lysvoll, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Vegard Lysvoll scored 30 goals in the same season that his club set a new Norwegian record when he scored their 100th goal? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Vegard Lysvoll. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:02, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ane Sund Walsøe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Defender

Fredrik Oldrup Jensen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Norwegian

Ivar Furu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Defender

Mathias Fredriksen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Norwegian

Niklas Gunnarsson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Norwegian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Aleksander Solli

On 25 July 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Aleksander Solli, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Norwegian footballer Aleksander Solli did not want to celebrate his match-winning goal against Vålerenga, his former team? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Aleksander Solli. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 05:04, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Anders Karlsen

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Anders Karlsen, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:27, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ane Sund Walsøe

The article Ane Sund Walsøe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article is about a footballer who fails WP:NFOOTY, as she hasn't represented her country at senior level or played in a fully pro league

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mentoz86 (talk) 12:30, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Magnus Nikolaisen

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Magnus Nikolaisen, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Mentoz86 (talk) 12:56, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox dates

Hi, when updating infobox stats you need to update the |pcupdate= or |club-update= parameter by adding five tildes (~~~~~), which generates the specific time the update was made. Cheers, Mattythewhite (talk) 16:15, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And could you update the dates for the career stats tables, too? Cheers, Mattythewhite (talk) 16:19, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This needs doing for every article you update, not a few here and there. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:52, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Luis Suárez, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:48, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Anderson Luís de Abreu Oliveira. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:30, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Phil Jones (footballer). Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:33, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ashley Young, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:41, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Footballer infobox stats

Hello. When you update footballers' infobox stats, please wait until after any match they're playing in has finished, and then update the correct-as-of timestamp to a date/time after the last match included in the stats. The timestamp is the parameter called |club-update= (some pages still use the old name, |pcupdate=) and the easy way to update it is to replace the contents with five tilde characters ~~~~~, which the software automatically converts to the current date and time. Letting the as-of date get out of sync with the stats, or updating during a game, means the reader can't tell whether the stats are right, wrong, up-to-date or not.

I think you've been told about this before. Please don't ignore it. Thanks for listening, Struway2 (talk) 18:03, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As a lot of other people told you already, please update also the |club-update= or |pcupdate= parameter when updating Footballer infobox stats. --Jaellee (talk) 19:09, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stats should not be updated while matches are still in progress, per ‎WP:LIVESCORES. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:15, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please wait until matches are over before updating stats, you've been told this already and continue to ignore, so your edits are now being considered as disruptive. Please stop. JMHamo (talk) 17:41, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Luiz Suarez, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You have been updating stats on far too many footballers without updating the datestamps. This has to stop. Mentoz86 (talk) 15:35, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent disruptive editing, as you did at Andrew Johnson (English footballer). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:33, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Alessandro Matri. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:57, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tom Cleverley, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mattythewhite (talk) 11:48, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Jermain Defoe, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:19, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent disruptive editing, as you did at Craig Bellamy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:26, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Grant Holt. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:22, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Samuel Eto'o, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:28, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Javier Hernández Balcázar, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:43, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mentoz (talk) 10:00, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I blocked you, is because you are still forgetting to update the datestamps in both the infobox and career statistics when updating footballers stats, and because you keep forgetting the datestamp when you aren't logged in, like you did at Ben Davies with this edit. When your block is over, you are again welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, but you need to start follow the advice from other editors. Mentoz (talk) 10:07, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Adnan Januzaj. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:21, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Cristian Tello, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Edit in question made using this account: 95.34.140.240 (talk · contribs). Mattythewhite (talk) 20:37, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Alan Smith (footballer born 1980), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Edit in question made using this account: 95.34.140.240 (talk · contribs). Mattythewhite (talk) 13:03, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mattythewhite (talk) 13:22, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Callum McManaman. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Please see User talk:Bj94#Infobox dates. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:30, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Thomas Kind Bendiksen, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please see User talk:Bj94#Infobox dates. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:48, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Raheem Sterling. TIMESTAMP QED237 (talk) 13:39, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Kenneth Sola, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please see User talk:Bj94#Infobox dates. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:41, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Hannes Þór Halldórsson, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please update timestamps as you have been told so many times QED237 (talk) 19:46, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistent disruptive editing, as you did at Olav Dalen. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:07, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pål Alexander Kirkevold

The article Pål Alexander Kirkevold has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:37, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pål Alexander Kirkevold, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Re. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Erlend Robertsen

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Erlend Robertsen, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:44, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Emil Dahle

The article Emil Dahle has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:45, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Kristoffer Ajer

Hello, Bj94,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Kristoffer Ajer should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kristoffer Ajer .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Wgolf (talk) 20:43, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kristoffer Ajer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Defender. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ludvig Rinde, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Defender. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Andreas Vindheim, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Defender. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:03, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox dates

You have been told before. Dates MUST be updated, which you missed at Danny Welbeck.QED237 (talk) 15:53, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Emil Nielsen

The article Emil Nielsen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:05, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Viljar Nordberg

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Viljar Nordberg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:06, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox dates, part two

Hi, when updating club stats in the infobox you should update the |pcupdate= or |club-update= parameter by adding five tildes (~~~~~), which generates the specific time the update was made. Not that you should need reminding, yet again. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:49, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Sergio Agüero. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Per User talk:Bj94#Infobox dates, part two. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:38, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Olivier Giroud. Per User talk:Bj94#Infobox dates, part two. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:39, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fitim Azemi

The article Fitim Azemi has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Wgolf (talk) 18:23, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Daniel Edvardsen

added a link pointing to Defender

Martin Pedersen (born 1995)

added a link pointing to Defender

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stats in football players' infoboxes

Hi, when you update the stats in football players' infoboxes please remember that you should also update the |pcupdate= (or |club-update=) parameter. This shows when the stats were last updated and prevents editors from accidentally updating the stats again. Thank you. --Jaellee (talk) 09:44, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jean Alassane Mendy

The article Jean Alassane Mendy has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Wgolf (talk) 18:25, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pål Alexander Kirkevold

The article Pål Alexander Kirkevold has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:42, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Theo Walcott, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please refer to User talk:Bj94#Infobox dates, part two. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:39, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:04, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Martin Pedersen (footballer, born 1995)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Martin Pedersen (footballer, born 1995), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:09, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Table dates

Hi, please update the dates accompanying career stats tables. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:55, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep this in mind. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:18, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bent Sørmo

The article Bent Sørmo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this footballer meets WP:GNG or has played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. C 679 07:36, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vajebah Sakor

The article Vajebah Sakor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:23, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Malaury Martin. Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Per #Table dates. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:42, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Lene Mykjåland. Per #Table dates. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:54, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jens Kristian Skogmo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Defender. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mathias Rasmussen

The article Mathias Rasmussen has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. joe decker ^talk 00:01, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jens Kristian Skogmo

The article Jens Kristian Skogmo has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. joe decker ^talk 00:07, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Statistical updates

Five blocks later and you still don't seem to get it. When you update statistical tables or infoboxes of footballers, like with this edit of yours for example, you must also indicate up to what date the statistics are accurate. The fact that this has been explained to you as often as it has and yet you continue not to do this makes me questions whether or not you have the required competence to edit Wikipedia. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:37, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bendik Bye

The article Bendik Bye has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:01, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Benjamin Stokke

The article Benjamin Stokke has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:01, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tom Erik Nordberg

The article Tom Erik Nordberg has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:03, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Bj94. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Fred (footballer), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please refer to User talk:Bj94#Infobox dates, part two. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:43, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Daouda Bamba

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Daouda Bamba, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:32, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Benjamin Stokke

The article Benjamin Stokke has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:47, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mjøndalen IF, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ulrik Arneberg. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Håvard Nordtveit.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Per #Infobox dates, part two. Mattythewhite (talk) 13:02, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Alexander Tettey. Per #Infobox dates, part two. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:31, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Kwesi Appiah, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Per #Infobox dates, part two, Mattythewhite (talk) 20:21, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:28, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Loaned out players

In squad templates, please comment out loanplayers instead of deleting them. You use this markup to comment something out:  Geschichte (talk) 13:55, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Adam Larsen Kwarasey article, but I have found one and added it for you. Please try and remember to include sources yourself with future edits. Please let me know if you have any questions. Giant Snowman 15:22, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Hello, I'm Seany91. Your recent edit(s) to the page Norway women's national football team appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Seany91 (talk) 20:57, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Waren Kamanzi

The article Waren Kamanzi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY as the Icelandic team he appeared against does not belong to a fully professional league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Usedtobecool ☎️ 08:11, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Honours

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your recent changes. If you have a reliable source please let me know and we can change the article. Please let me know if you have any questions. Giant Snowman 22:01, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lars Henrik Andreassen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lars Henrik Andreassen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lars Henrik Andreassen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 15:15, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of William Frantzen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article William Frantzen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Frantzen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 17:50, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Håkon Kjæve for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Håkon Kjæve is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Håkon Kjæve until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:46, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Faroe Islands national football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gunnar Nielsen. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Charlie Savage (footballer), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:05, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Matěj Kovář article, and I couldn't find one either. If you have a reliable source please let me know and we can change the article. Please let me know if you have any questions. Giant Snowman 18:05, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Magnus Brøndbo moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Magnus Brøndbo. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 21:03, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Magnus Brøndbo

Hello, Bj94. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Magnus Brøndbo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:40, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Magnus Brøndbo

Hello, Bj94. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Magnus Brøndbo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:03, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]