User talk:Bipolarbear22

Welcome!

Hello, Bipolarbear22! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 06:12, 15 October 2014 (UTC) Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Proposed deletion of Methylenedioxypyrrolidinohexiophenone

The article Methylenedioxypyrrolidinohexiophenone has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references to reliable sources, fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jinkinson talk to me 12:34, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Methylenedioxypyrrolidinohexiophenone

As the Propose Deletion template was not removed for seven days, I have deleted this article. Pages deleted in this way will be automatically restored on request, to me or at WP:Requests for undeletion; but this one would then be nominated at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute.

You wrote: "There won't be reliable sources until the general public is made aware of its existence" and "Working with a credible American laboratory to publish information on the compound", but the point is that Wikipedia is not the place for first announcement. The role of an encyclopedia is to summarise information which has already been published in reliable sources. This is expressed in the policies WP:Verifiability: "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source" and WP:No original research which includes:

"If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article about it. If you discover something new, Wikipedia is not the place to announce such a discovery."

Linked to those is the inclusion criterion called Wikipedia:Notability, which looks for evidence of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject."

The time for a Wikipedia article will be after the product has been announced and has been discussed in independent sources like scientific journals. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 17:58, 23 October 2014 (UTC)