User talk:Bibsomania

25th July 2015

Hi Bibsomania I wanted to let you know that you forgot to correct the life time business of Kick (2014film) to 355 crore to 377 crore and the domestic collection too 212 crore to 233 crore. Sources :http://www.koimoi.com/box-office-verdict-bollywoods-top-worldwide-grossers/

copy paste of wrong segment

Box office[edit] See also: List of highest-grossing Bollywood films Kick made a final worldwide gross collection of ₹3.55 billion (US$56 million)[51] Revised figure after the film released in Poland on 7 November 2014 and collected Rs.8 crore.[52] Box Office India declared Kick a "Blockbuster" while putting domestic nett. gross of Kick at ₹212 crore (US$33 million).[53][54]

October 2014

Hello, I'm Rsrikanth05. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Malaika Arora Khan because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 21:01, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Prem Ratan Dhan Payo

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change, adding peacock terminology. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Onel5969 (talk) 21:37, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bibsomania, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Bibsomania! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:30, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Daisy Shah. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Daisy Shah was changed by Bibsomania (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.938486 on 2014-10-13T19:35:49+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:35, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 21:55, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

bajrangi bhaijaan

Hey u forgot to add bajrangi bhaijaan in top grossing bollywood movies Jannat khalsa (talk) 13:45, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indicine.com is a blog and is not considered a reliable source here. It's inappropriate to use here as there is zero evidence that they are not just making this up. I started a discussion at [[Talk:Bajrangi_Bhaijaan#Indicine.com], please comment there. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 09:44, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:51, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Salman Khan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Being Human. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Bollywood 100 Crore Club with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — MusikAnimal ^talk 14:52, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of films released by Yash Raj Films

added a link pointing to Sultan (film)

Salman Khan

added a link pointing to Eid

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:19, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Prem Ratan Dhan Payo. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Diff: [1] This change is not consistent with the reference, which looks an awful lot like you deliberately attempted to add incorrect information. If that is not the case, please explain. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:29, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Hero (2015 Hindi film), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. TJH2018 talk 16:16, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have given references TJH2018 for the edit done on Hero (2015 Hindi film)

July 2016

Hello, I'm Nairspecht. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Sultan (2016 film) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please provide a valid explanation if you do. Mr. Nair Talk 07:14, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Bibsomania. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blogs as references

Hi there, re: this, please don't use blogs as references. Anyone can start a blog and call himself an expert on a subject. We only care what reliable published sources with established reputations for fact-checking and accuracy have to say about any subject. Please see WP:UGC. Additionally, only cosmetic changes, like typographical fixes, addition of punctuation, wikilinks, etc. should be marked as minor. Lastly, please don't remove the estimation template as you did. Per community consensus achieved at WT:ICTF, gross figures should be marked as estimations, on account of all gross values in Indian cinema being estimations. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:37, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Raees (film), without citing a reliable source using an inline citation that clearly supports the material. The burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diff: [2] You have previously been educated that blogs are insufficient as references. I'm not sure what you think bollyarena.net is, but unless you are prepared to argue that you know who's behind the site, and you can demonstrate they're experts in the field, it just seems like yet another flimsy blog/faceless portal. Please don't submit content submitted by an insufficient source again, and if you're not clear on what sort of references are acceptable for Indian film articles, please see WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 07:14, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

More referencing issues

Re: this edit, Koimoi is not considered reliable by Wikipedia's Indian cinema task force. Please familiarise yourself with the site of sites that are and are not reliable. Some guidance can be found at WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:20, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Tiger Zinda Hai. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Diff: [3] You've provided no reference to support your claim that the trailer is "the most liked trailer in the World on YouTube". You've provided a link to the trailer, but that doesn't prove that a record was broken. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:25, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and please don't mark non-minor edits as minor. Minor edits are ones that couldn't possibly be the subject of dispute, like typo fixes, grammar fixes, punctuation fixes, and other cosmetic changes. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:29, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Bibsomania. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources

Hi there, I have reverted your recent edit. As I explained in March 2017 on your talk page above, Koimoi is not considered a suitable source for financial figures at Wikipedia. See WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources for a general list of sources that are, and are not, suitable for inclusion. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 07:51, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tiger Zinda Hai. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Diffs: This change clearly doesn't match the reference in the article. Thus, your change is indistinguishable from vandalism. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:51, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources

Last warning about this. Re: this edit, Koimoi is not a valid source for financial data. Stop using it and other poor sources. See WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources for a general list of sources you can and should not use. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:39, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:13, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

For this, where you again cite Koimoi, despite being told that it is not a proper reference, as well as your other financial changes, which do not match the existing article sources, and which are indistinguishable from vandalism. If you wish to open an unblock request, be prepared to convince a reviewing administrator that you understand our reliable sourcing guidelines, that you've also familiarised yourself with WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources, and you will need to demonstrate that you understand the issues raised. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:15, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Bibsomania. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]