User talk:Bibliomaniac15/Archive 5
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Bibliomaniac15. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | → | Archive 10 |
Extremely Lengthy Usernames
Hello, Bibliomaniac. Lucasbfr has started a discussion at WT:UAA#Extremely_lengthy_usernames to try to find a limit on when a username becomes obviously too lengthy. Seeing as how I've seen you participating at WP:UAA, I thought you might want to drop by. Happy editing! Yours sincerely, Eddie 20:27, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
- That's okay :-) Happy editing! Yours sincerely, Eddie 20:44, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Logo
I noticed that you are from West Ranch but Legally West Ranch is part of the Government just thought i let you know.(Sparrowman980 05:04, 6 July 2007 (UTC))
Yea if you know Mr.McBride he is the schools computer technician and he was telling me when i doing a job shadow that they are funded and ran by the government thats why are school has T1(Sparrowman980 05:07, 6 July 2007 (UTC))
I sent you a e-mail responding to your question?(Sparrowman980 05:29, 6 July 2007 (UTC))
Apology
Bibliomaniac15, I am terribly sorry about whatever my brother did in editing Wikipedia pages. He's only 13 years old and extremely immature; I'll be sure to make sure I log off the computer next time and teach him a lesson about manners. But thank you, though, for being a good supervisor.
Logo
Are you in a club at school?(Sparrowman980 20:35, 6 July 2007 (UTC)) I mean like i am president of the video game club.(Sparrowman980 21:07, 6 July 2007 (UTC))
Help on the way!
Sweetie, I noticed your comment at AIV - I have some time now, how can I help you? Love, Phaedriel - 17:26, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
Much thanks
Just wanted to stop by to thank you for your help in undoing many of those vandalism edits! That was about a days-worth of my WikiLife.... Thank you, thank you, thank you.... — MusicMaker 18:29, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
Of course! And happy vacation! :)
I'll be happy and honored, sweetie :) Not only that, I'll try and watch over your userpage like a hawk ;) Please, forget about Wikipedia for a while; seize the days, and have the most wonderful, relaxing vacation. And bring lots of pics! ;) Love, Phaedriel - 20:57, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
No problem
I'll watch and take care of anything that comes up. Have fun! DoomsDay349 21:09, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
Episode article review notice
The individual episode articles for Hannah Montana are now being reviewed according to episode notability guidelines. Please contribute to the discussion on Talk:List of Hannah Montana episodes#2nd episode article review. Thanks. -- Ned Scott 05:46, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
Spinosaurus
Hello, and belated thanks for your review of Spinosaurus! I hope your trip is going well. J. Spencer 23:11, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
Rfc
Hey Bibliomaniac, do you remember getting involved in the revert war at template:History of Manchuria? See Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Jiejunkong. (Wikimachine 03:17, 10 July 2007 (UTC))
Yes. The revert war is flaring up again at template:History of Manchuria. This time it is Cydevil38 who started it. Cydevil38 himself has personally agreed to to stop the revert war on 06:25, 29 June 2007 (see the edit history). Following that there is a little peace. But on 03:56, 9 July 2007 he decided to unilaterally revert the title again, with no proper reason other than feeling frustrated with the discussion. This has since started a series of retaliatory reverts again. I don't know what you can do to stop it other than protection. But protection in whatever version will make people feel right/wrong. Would it be possible to just blank out the title(maybe just a plain History) and then make a protection? That probably would make people feel more neutral enough to continue discussion. Thanks.Wiki Pokemon 06:02, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 9th, 2007.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 28 | 9 July 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:25, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
My RfB
 |
Thank you, Bibliomaniac15, for participating in my RfB, which ended unsuccessfully with a final tally of (80/22/3). |
Thanks
Thank you for your comments on my editor review. I appreciate the kind words. Unforunately, I've found that I'm just not that interested in other XfD discussions. And though I would like to become an admin, I'm not really willing to do something that I don't enjoy or find interesting just for that purpose. I don't mean to sound dismissive of your comments. They were just the kind of thing I was looking for and I certainly did find them helpful (CSD and the administrator noticeboards both interest me). And I will be keeping my eye on image and categories for discussion/deletion for opportunities to contribute, but it just doesn't look like something that I'll be prolific with.
Anyway, I just wanted to thank you for taking the time to help make me a better editor. -Chunky Rice 17:24, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
New Portal!
Dear Bibliomaniac15,
I recently began the building of a new portal, The Roman Empire Portal. It is nearing completion, but there is still a lot left to be done. I would greatly appreciate your help in the developing of the portal. Please feel free to leave any questions on my talk page.
Thanks, --Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor (ταlκ) 20:49, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 16th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 29 | 16 July 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 19:52, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Nice
Job at User talk:AssCheekz. Crazy vandals! Dfrg.msc 07:59, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 23rd, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 30 | 23 July 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:58, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
test6 template
FYI, the test6 template has been causing page problems. I've replaced a couple of your uses of it which were about a month old with the newer uw-block1 template, which cleaned up those issues. If you're still using test6, I recommend you move to one of the ones on Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace, like uw-block1 or uw-block2|time=whatever etc. Thanks! Georgewilliamherbert 00:58, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
- I don't know if test5 works; I haven't checked recently. I use the new templates pretty exclusively now. I suggest just using the new ones exclusively, but if some of the test-ones still work that's up to you. Thanks for your reply. Georgewilliamherbert 18:51, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Barnstar!
|
The Barnstar of Good Humor | |
| For you're hilarious subpages! Cheers, JetLover (talk) 00:44, 1 August 2007 (UTC) |
Johnny542
Hey man, its Johnny542. I was wondering if you can help me with installing forums on my talk page so I can make up articles about what I and other people want to talk about. If you read this, write back. Anyway see you later and have an nice day. Johnny542 22:58, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 30th, 2007.
Apologies for the late delivery this week; my plans to handle this while on vacation went awry. Ral315
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 31 | 30 July 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 23:38, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for August 6th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 32 | 6 August 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:26, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
Johnny542 Again
Oh thanks man. I got one question though. If you watch Dragon Ball Z, you might be able to answer this. Were Vegeta and Trunks Ascended Super Saiyans when they fought the Cell Juniors because their muscules look so big. Johnny542 00:30, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Oh sorry about that and thanks. Johnny542 01:03, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Concern over username blocking
I'm a little concerned by your blocking of User:Psychobitch69. Please see this thread on the talk page for reasoning and other comments. SamBC(talk) 04:38, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
WP:CVU status
The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 16:20, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
More Zoo Tycoon expansion goodness
Hi Bibliomaniac, sorry for the late reply, I've only just checked my own copy of ZT. For your reference, the previous discussions were here and here. Anyway, there are no dinosaurs in my copy of Marine Mania at all — even in Kid's Map. If I use the "Get New Items" screen and select to install, say, Plateosaurus, it still won't show up in game (even in Kid's Map). However, the trial contains both expansions, and so does your full version copy. I deduce from this that a kind of "Gold" version was released, containing just the two expansion packs, but it was also released singly. This page seems to corrobate that. So, how about we change part of Zoo Tycoon (series) to say something like this:
Marina Marina was also released in a special version that included the other expansion Dinosaur Digs, in a package called the Double Expansion Pack.
References would be a Microsoft press release, this Amazon page, and (perhaps) that Google cache result above.
I also feel that there is some duplication of material — (Zoo Tycoon has more information on the Zoo Tycoon series than the Zoo Tycoon (series) article, but I'll discuss my ideas for that on the article talk pages after this issue is sorted. 124.148.83.128 11:30, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
PS I should probably mention that I'm the same as User:124.148.42.23, but my IP address has changed — I'm not trying to sockpuppet or anything.
EFD
I have my affairs in order. I am prepared to make my final act of dissidence, at my EFD, before I am burned. ;) -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 05:02, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
Why did you block this user for one year, instead of indefinite? —Kurykh 00:51, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for August 13th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 33 | 13 August 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 19:55, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
Deduction board game
Of course not. Edit away. I'm not trying to keep it to myself or anything. It's just not ready for prime-time yet.
The source articles I'm working off of are this one: http://www.thegamesjournal.com/articles/DeductionGames.shtml and a Knucklebones article which is more about mystery themed games. -Chunky Rice 01:47, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
Mao: The Unknown Story
Hello Bibliomaniac15,
You protected Mao: The Unknown Story from all edits on May 16, 2007. Three months have past and not much has transpired on the talk page recently.
I wonder if we can unprotect this page now since I don't see much action from those that were in dispute over it?
Thanks.
WilliamKF 03:21, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Please re-register
Hello, Bibliomaniac15! You are receiving this notice because the Cleanup Taskforce has been inactive, as a result of this all active taskforce members are being asked to re-register.
For more information see: Wikipedia:Cleanup Taskforce/Not Dead Yet
If you do not re-register here within 15 days of receiving this notice your name will be removed from the membership list (if you were unable to reply to this notice in time, you can just add you name back).
Thanks
Thanks for removing me from WP:AIV. I don't know why someone reported me for no reason there. NHRHS2010 Talk 02:19, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- That user got mixed up when he accidentally reported me on AIV and said he was sorry about that. NHRHS2010 Talk 02:20, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks. I read that on your talk page. bibliomaniac15 Prepare to be deleted! 02:27, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for August 20th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 34 | 20 August 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 04:42, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Hey
Its me Pendo. Im just droping be to say hi to you.Pendo4 is here...Look around...hello???...I am here... 18:57, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Many thanks
Thank you for reviewing me at editor review! I really appreciate the feedback! Thank you so much, Neranei (talk) 02:26, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- O_o... are you Wikipedia's Big Brother? meaning, what??? :) (Sorry if that didn't make sense...) Neranei (talk) 02:30, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- You must be psychic! :) No really, what did that mean? O_o (Neranei is boggled!) Neranei (talk) 02:13, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Bibliomanic
If you ever wanted to get rid of the 15, User:Bibliomanic is WP:CHU/U usurpable. (btw...nice sig :] ) --(Review Me) R ParlateContribs@ (Let's Go Yankees!) 16:28, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Julius
The Siren calls you to her talk page! Clio the Muse 00:44, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
about 3RR
user Vonones who is in a pure anti-turkic personality attack the "turkic history" pages of wikipedia, (see the Huns page), he is an armenian user and hate all the turkish people(he always edit with no written source). he uses 3RR rule throug to his nationalist and racist ideals. how can i stop him? thanks.--hakozen 03:11, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
The Huns Article
Hi, just a note for your reference. The discussion on the edits started at Talk:Huns#Appearance before Hakozen and Vonones got into an edit war. All this was started when Hakozen changed "Mongoloid" to "Turanian" and added "Turkic-speaking" to the introduction. Neither editor has appeared willing to discuss the issue on the talk page so far. --Stacey Doljack Borsody 03:34, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
- No I have tried to on his talk, I revert his edits than he tells me to put references he obviously does not understand, he is not a good English speaker. Anyway he is being disruptive again adding irrelevant things and removing big sections with no reason: [1] and [2] --Vonones 19:13, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the ER
Thanks for your review, recently I ran for an RFA but unfortianatley I didn't get the vote. Here's the RFA if you'd like to see it. Cheers, JetLover (talk) 02:41, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
DYK
|
On August 27, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Julius Excluded from Heaven, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Well done. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 08:38, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for August 27th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 35 | 27 August 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:39, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
My RFA
Thank you for your constructive criticism on my RFA. I have now withdrawn at (8/7/1). Hope to see ya around. -FlubecaTalk 17:59, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
Vandal
Just got your message simultaneously while I retracted my concern. I see now, thanx for explaining that to me, and the fact that it is a shared IP of course doesn't warrant a block unless it is extremely severe (I would think). My fault.Taharqa 20:30, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
Argh
I don't like being block-conflicted. 
–Animum 00:15, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- "You have been blocked by Can't sleep, clown will eat me for the following reason:", I'd love to see that!
–Animum 00:23, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Smile!
Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor (tαlk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
:)
Good to be your secretary! :P -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 22:34, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- You traitor, pizza boy!!! --DarkFalls talk 04:43, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
202.76.131.2
Hi. Given the consistency of editing to Gippsland Grammar School over the contributions of this IP [3], I would guess that it is either an individual who attends the school or, more likley, an IP from the school. Either was it seems to be a static IP for a small number of individuals and, given its extensive block history, I wonder if we should consider a significantly longer anon-only block [4]. Would be good to hear your thoughts. Cheers TigerShark 00:30, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- I understand, do you think that a long block is unreasonable even if it is anon-only? I would consider that a block in terms of months is appropriate here, but I will not touch your current block if you do not concur. Cheers TigerShark 00:37, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- OK, I extended it to a month. Let's see what happens. Cheers TigerShark 00:46, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
WP:AAR
- ) Hee hee, thanks! Can't believe I put it off for so long. Shrumster 18:27, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Tea
Thanks for the tea! BTW, they beat you :-) Don't worry; I didn't accept. --Boricuæddie 22:07, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Vandal ??
User Votec has made more of 100 changes in article Jasenovac during last 8 hours and he is not stoping. I think that this is against rules of wiki ?? Rjecina 02:47, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- You have seen Votec answers on my question about his changes on discussion page of Jasenovac concentration camp ?? My intention is not to protect page but to block this serbian fundamentalist user which is in my thinking sockpuppet of somebody blocked forever. I will try to show you my questions and his answers.
- First question has been what are having Aloysius Stepinac words in march 1941 with Jasenovac. *Answer:He has supported Independent State of Croatia before or after state foundation (my comment:nobody has known in march that state will be created).
- My statement:"All sources from site 13.heritagewebdesign.com (you must visit Statement of Principles of this site)are bad faith sources because this is bad faith web page".
- Answer "Web page named 'Jasenovac research Institute' hardly can be 'bad faith Web page'due to the fact, that with the arrguments and names, elaborates the horrors of the human history". *Again about cp13.heritagewebdesign.com. My statement is that web page with goal of "To mobilize the Serbian people, and all progressive political forces worldwide, in a political struggle to end the war currently being waged against the Serbs."
- Answer is:"be so kind in your 'sweet' intention and do not quote 'goals of foundation' separately and without context"
- My statement "Average prisoners life expectancy in the camp was not longer then 60 days. There is no source because of which it is deleted".
- Answer:"data comes from the accumulated human knowledge and certanly not only that we should be addressing another web pages...otherwise Wikipedia would turn into the mediocre copy machine"
In his answers he has made personal attacks on me with words that I am holocaust denier (4 times), that only "sick-minded or genuine retards" persons do not understand importance of Stepinac words, screaming again that I am "GUARDIAN OF THE HOLOCAUST DENIAL" and playing with my user name (with his playing I am becoming little river). In the end I believe that you have here enough information so that this user can be blocked for long time. Sorry for taking so much place on your discussion page. Rjecina 14:52, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Hannah Montana protection
That's fine, I'll drop it to a bit over a month then. It's just that the user who requested it's protection at RFPP said to protect indefinitely, and I didn't think that was necessary, so 3 months seemed like a better time. However, if you think that's too long, I'll drop it now. Acalamari 02:51, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- I've set the expiry to the 10 of October. Is that a good date? If that's still too long, please feel free to change it. Thanks. Acalamari 03:16, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
You blocked User:Bandidopervert after a UAA report, and I have to contest your action.
- The report said nothing but "obvious reasons", which the text on UAA explicitly says is not a reason.
- I see no top-level criterion on WP:U that the name "Bandidopervert" violates.
- No attempt was made to contact the newbie.
I have unblocked Bandidopervert and replaced the template with the more appropriate {{UsernameConcern}}.
rspeer / ɹəədsɹ 06:37, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Advise and help, pls...
Hi Bibliomaniac15,
Kindly need your help. I am a new user here...tried to constructively add and help expanding some articles.
On the work with the article 'Jasenovac' concentration camp, my documented tribute is constantly and without arguments deleted by member Rjecina.( see relevant discussion too,pls )
I did have tried to ask for 'full protection' of the article, but unfortunately not been able to do it, due to my limited computer knowledge.
Kindly advise and help, how to 'full protect' the article at this stage, if you are having any time to spare.
--Votec 22:29, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Cheers Biblomaniac15,
thanks for your constructive help yesterday and kindly read and advise following 'the bellows'( just have been added with discussions of relevant article):
On Wednesday, September 5th I have requested the 'mediation' of the 'English speaking page administrator' due to the repeated vandalism and deliberate deletion of the chapters in this article( not only contributed by me, but in his vandalism, by everything what did not suite his fancy...deleation have happened twice and with his second deletion on September 5th at 23:35 user Rjecina deleted (-3034) contributions by me and other users by not giving the explanation!).
If you kindly look and follow mail exchange of user Rjecina with his fellow user Ante Perkovic( and on the profile of Ante Perkovic), you can simply find that they do claim that they are doing 'reversing wars'!!! In addition following their 'line of interest' ( which can easily be concluded following their discussions) they are 'single purpose members', and if I may use the therm 'sel-made quasi WP historians'!!! Following their malicious work they do not deserve to be the part of this vibrant community.
In addition, following the history of discussions with the article 'Jasenovac Concetration Camp' I am free to conclude that this article has been constantly vandalised ( most horrible example being...(kindly read relevant comment in dicussion)...statement added on the page by irrelevant user: 'Dear Catholic God, make all fucking Serbs die!!!"
This article is not about Serbs, Croats or Jews...it is about HOLCOAST and humans being exterminated in the horror of thier coexistence and as such should be adequately protected.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Once when I started added to the article 4 days ago, I found article to be genuine ruine: written in pour English, with obvious numbers of delations in the chapters by various members with their various 'interests'...which have made article hardly cosequent and readable. As well, due to the primitive involvements of the numbers of users from all sides, the 'most elaborated' chapter was about recounting the victims, but not about, for example, the conditions in the camp, human suffering, history, background. Shameful!!!
My editing on article was focused on conecting 'the bits and peaces' in one readable story. I did have added historical facts about Zagreb's WWII archbishop Stepinac( using the info's from the relevant WP article about him). Also I have added 29 photos and related informations from the two Web pages:
<<http://www.arhivrs.org/e_index.asp>> "Archive of Republic Srpska" which is listed on UNESCO Archives portals!!!...and...
<<https://cp13.heritagewebdesign.com/~lituchy/index.php>> "Jasenovac Researh Instite" which on its first page states: "The Jasenovac Research Institute is a non-profit human rights organization and research institute committed to establishing the truth about the Holocaust in Yugoslavia and dedicated to the search for justice for its victims. The JRI promotes research and activities designed to enlighten the world to the crimes of genocide committed at Jasenovacorganisation and wartime Yugoslavia against Serbs, Jews and Romas and provides assistance to all groups and individuals who likewise seek justice for these victims."... cause I do certanly find noble and justify.
Both Web pages being mentioned, have been attacked by user Rjecina in his malitious manner and informations concerned and relevant( including the pictures of children bing victims in camp DELETED by this vandal!!!).
As well I have deleted with explenation short sentence towards the end of the text, addressing the awards given, finding it inappropriate( reasons and notice for deletaion given at the end of my above comment, in section discussions ).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Following all above mentioned and the history of the article I do consider and kindly ask for this article to be fully protected. Certanly I do not expect, that version which is actuall now ( being last edited by myself and in my opinion still very poorly elaborating the subject) should be the protected one, but I do ask for your mediation in finding indepentent and prominent source ( for example, United States Holcoast Memorial Museums, which is having the info-s, certanly willinness to do so, and computer knowledge to contribute). After their contribution article should be fully protected.
I do respect Wikipedia philospohy of being the open information source, meant to built up the knowledge and share, but in the certain ocassion ( as I have noticed you have implemented it few times with 'difficult subject'...example 'Roma people' ) and this is certanly, in my opinion, the case ( due to the expolosion of primitive emotions accumulated and due to the wars in ex-Yugoslavia), I beleive that this would be the adequate solution.
If no, I am certain and positive that after this, or any other future conflict situation and mediations, this article will be repeaditly and repeditly vandalised and missused.
Holocaust thematic and Jasenovac as World Heritage Site do certainly ask for full protection.
Thanks for you readings and kindly advise with your point,
--Votec 17:26, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Ref: Advise and help, pls...
Kindly, if you can put the request as you have suggested, I would be grateful.
--Votec 23:01, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Much thanks.
--Votec 23:05, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Thank you! :)
Thank you, my dear Bibliomaniac! :) Just as it is incredibly beautiful to see you back from your vacation, even tho I missed your return - but hey, it's never too late to welcome you back as well ;) I watched over your page with zeal, but fortunately, nothing big happened in your absence. As a side note, before my vacation, I began working on a complex design for your userpage, based in the LotR theme. You'll get more news pretty soon, I hope ;) Lots of xxx, Phaedriel - 01:34, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Editor review
Thank you for your comment on my editor review, it is much appreciated, and I think I will follow some or perhaps even all of your advice. Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) - Review me! 07:20, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Opinion requested
Just made my first block and wanted to confirm appropriateness. User Ramrod1001 had a full set of warnings on his talk page and was actively engaged in vandalism. All edits from the account were vandalism. I blocked indefinitely, as that seems to be the proper course of action with this sort of vandalism-only account. Please let me know if I misstepped anywhere. Thanks. -Chunky Rice 17:21, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Signpost
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 36 | 3 September 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |||||||||||||
| Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. HermesBot 01:05, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Cheers
Cheers ;) Ryan4314 23:29, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- O, do u know Stan then? Ryan4314 23:35, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- lol, er ok Ryan4314 23:44, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Hello
Thank you for commenting on my editor review! I'll definitely take your advice into account. Ali (t)(c) 00:41, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Block Reviewed
Howdy, I reviewed an unblock template at User talk:Wanka. Cheers! Navou banter 20:06, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Sure. I was a little hesitant in blocking. Perhaps a notice on their page would serve to prevent anymore confusion next time. bibliomaniac15 Two years of trouble and general madness 21:22, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
block and more
thanks for blocking the IP that vandalised my page. there have been a few similar IPs vandalising my page in the past, is a blanket IP block such as 69.234.xxx.xxx possible? or is that likely to block legit wikipedians? or is it possible for me to protect my user page, so that only established users can edit it? anyway thanks for the initial block.Sennen goroshi 04:16, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
2,000,000th Article!
Great work everyone!Our edits ahave sontributed to reachiung a Wikipedi with 2,000,000 articles. It's been a pleasure working with you. A good effort all round, and a Party at my Place! Dfrg.msc 06:21, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Happy Birthday!
|
Just a happy Birthday message to you, Bibliomaniac15/Archive 5, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! |
06:58, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for September 10th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 37 | 10 September 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:28, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks!
|
My RFA | |
| ¡Hola! thanks for participating in my request for adminship, which ended with 51 supports, no opposes, and one neutral. I hope to accomplish what is expected of me and work to help those that lent me their trust. - Caribbean~H.Q. 00:41, 12 September 2007 (UTC) |
- Sure, though I already threatened [5] Deskana :) - Caribbean~H.Q. 00:50, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Hello
I notice we have much in common. I would like to work with you on this wonderful community. Cheers, Laleena 01:02, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
- Why yes, I am working with Phaedriel. But the reason I came to you to have a quick chat is because I can guess you love books, you are la-1, as am I for both of these. Happy editing, Laleena 12:41, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Question
I am a new user and I was wondering where I could put in requests for a new page
Thank You,
TobiTo Kakshi 19:47, 13 September 2007 (UTC), Proud member of Καμον
RFA Thanks
Dearest Bibliomaniac15,
Thank you for your participation in my RFA, which closed successfully with 96 supports, 1 oppose, and 3 neutrals. No matter if you !voted support, oppose, neutral, I thank you for taking the time to drop by. I'm a new admin remember, so if you have any suggestions feel free to inform me of them. I would like to give a special shout out to Hirohisat, Wizardman, and Husond, for there original co-nominations. Thank you once again and good day.
Credits
This RFA thanks was inspired by Phaedriel's RFA thanks. So unfortunatly this is not entirely my own design.
Block of User:66.35.127.0
Thank you. The endless trolling was getting on my nerves. --Calton | Talk 01:48, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion?
Would you mind deleting Category:Elementary Schools in New Jersey? By mistake, I made an unnecessary redirect. NHRHS2010 Talk 01:50, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
cleanup taskforce
There are three tasks on your desk. Please look at them and determine if they are ready to be closed, need more work or are outside your area of expertise and should be reassigned. If you aren't interested in any of them let me know and I'll reassign them and I can get you some new projects. Thank you. RJFJR 15:44, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
Fair use disputed for Image:Cthdps2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Cthdps2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:12, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for September 17th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 38 | 17 September 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 02:44, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Cleanup task force
Please take a look at Front side bus. I think it may be ready to be closed but I need a second opinion. Please leave a message on my talk page about whether you think it is ready to close. Thank you. RJFJR 16:04, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Dear Bibliomaniac...
My sweet, dear Bibliomaniac, you really went through my archives taking note of those beautiful old gestures? Sweetie, you really gifted me the broadest smile I've had in days, not only for the present of the memories I so dearly hold of each and every of them, but because yours is a wonderful sign of friendship in itself. I'm at a loss of words, which as you already know too well, is strange in me. Between the two of us, sometimes I go back to my archives and re-read them, and fondly remember those moments, cherishing the memories of those who decided to move on, and rejoicing in the words of those friends who still stay among us. I cannot truly tell you how deeply moved I am, and how much I appreciate this rare and unique gift you've granted me today, my friend :) Lots of love, Phaedriel - 23:07, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
CoD
I haven't actually played any of the games, but I might be able to take a look. What do you need done? Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 07:02, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
- I started work on CoD2 because it was tagged with {{fact}} - so this will certainly get to GA now :P I've watchlisted, and I'll do some work on it now. Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) (Drought) 02:18, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- I tried to remove some of the cruft in that section - it needs global work, but I'm not in "that" mood right now. Would be happy to go sourcing though - I'm on holidays so I have time xD Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 04:19, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
The now-traditional RFA thank-spam
Dear Bibliomaniac15,
Thank you for your participation in my RFA, which closed successfully with 83 supports, 1 oppose, and 0 neutrals. No matter if you voted (I mean, "!voted") support or oppose, I thank you for taking the time to drop by. I'm new, remember, so if you have any suggestions feel free to inform me of them, and if I do anything wrong, feel free to add to the permanent chorus of disapproval on my talk page. Special thanks to WaltonOne and Dihydrogen Monoxide for nominating me.
Credits
This design was brazenly stolen from inspired by Тhε Rαnδom Eδιτor's RFA Thanks, which in turn was inspired by Phaedriel's RFA thanks.