User talk:BeypanahDrama

Welcome!

Hello, BeypanahDrama, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page List of programs broadcast by Zee TV did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Ravensfire (talk) 14:50, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Kesari Nandan.png

Thanks for uploading File:Kesari Nandan.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:30, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Chahat Tewani moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Chahat Tewani, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 07:47, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jaat Na Poocho Prem Ki moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jaat Na Poocho Prem Ki, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GirthSummit _(blether) 13:00, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Shruti Sharma(actress)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Shruti Sharma(actress). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Shruti Sharma. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Shruti Sharma. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Wgolf (talk) 02:24, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Jaat Na Poocho Prem Ki

Please stop asking for Draft:Jaat Na Poocho Prem Ki to be reviewed. It requires far more information before being eligible to be moved to mainspace. Please look at other articles and MOS:TV to see what is expected in an article. The fact that the series has not even aired also reduces the chances of it being moved. Asking for the article to be reviewed at this time is just wasting the time of reviewers. --AussieLegend (✉) 14:19, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Shruti Sharma (actress) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Shruti Sharma (actress), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ravensfire (talk) 16:19, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chahat Tewani (May 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CAPTAIN MEDUSA were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please provide at least three reliable sources, and expand the article little bit to give more context to the readers.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chahat Tewani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Chahat Tewani, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 14:17, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BeypanahDrama! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 14:17, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Gathbandhan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Rajiv Kumar

Hamari Bahu Silk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Rajesh Kumar

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Yesha Rughani.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Yesha Rughani.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ravensfire (talk) 01:41, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Generally, you cannot use fair-use for an image of someone that's alive. Since they are alive, a replacement image could be found by someone taking a picture of them and uploading it, which fails criteria 1 of the fair use policy "no free equivalent is available ... or could be created", emphasis on the last part. Ravensfire (talk) 02:11, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

inappropriate moves

Please do not move articles unless absolutely necessary. Your unexplained move of RadhaKrishn (TV series) to RadhaKrishn (2018 TV series) has been reverted because there was no need to move it in the first place. We only disambiguate when necessary and it was not necessary. --AussieLegend (✉) 14:00, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You've done the same thing at . PLEASE read WP:Naming conventions (television). If you keep moving pages incorrectly like this combined with the concerns about notability, it's starting to raise doubts of your ability to effectively contribute to Wikipedia. Please don't do any moves for a while, use the WP:RM and request moves on the talk pages and get agreement before the page is moved. Ravensfire (talk) 14:28, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mallika Singh

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mallika Singh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ravensfire (talk) 14:11, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mallika Singh

When you go to a page and see that the article as been deleted as part of a deletion discussion (see WP:Articles for deletion/Mallika Singh), do NOT try to recreate it, especially when it obviously fails notability criteria. Don't do that again, it's starting to look like you're being paid to edit, which is allowed, but you need to read WP:PAID if you are and make some disclosures. Nearly every article you've created has been moved to draft space or deleted, you really need to read and get a better understanding of WP:NACTOR for actors/actresses and WP:GNG for general notability as your current understanding is lacking. If you keep doing this, the next step is to request a ban on you creating articles except in draft space and then waiting until someone else accepts and moves them. Ravensfire (talk) 14:16, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious sock

Given your contributions, you're pretty obviously Drama panchi editing under a different name after that account was blocked. As you already know, that's called sockpuppetry and is not allowed. Ravensfire (talk) 14:31, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Ed (Edgar181) 17:36, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Etretr.webp listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Etretr.webp, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BeypanahDrama (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

starting days i don't know how's do editing on wikipedia but slowly i know all the guidlines of wikipedia

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui ^雲 _水 07:46, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Non-free rationale for File:Jaat na Poocho Prem Ki.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Jaat na Poocho Prem Ki.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 02:41, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Etretr.webp

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Etretr.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 00:49, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]