User talk:Berry stark

May 2022

Hello, I'm Ab207. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Prashanth Neel, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Don't remove reliably sourced content without discussion, and don't add new information without sources -- Ab207 (talk) 14:35, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi Berry stark! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Prashanth Neel several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Prashanth Neel, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war.
Please don't add self-publised sources like Tamil funda and Answeregi etc, see WP:ICTFFAQ. Ab207 (talk) 16:30, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Berry_stark reported by User:Ab207 (Result: ). Thank you. Ab207 (talk) 17:17, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Prashanth Neel shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - Arjayay (talk) 17:49, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

May 2022 - again

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Prashanth Neel, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Raghu Veera Reddy, you may be blocked from editing.
Please stop deleting reliably sourced information and adding unreliably sourced claims - Arjayay (talk) 17:53, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy, as you did with this edit to Prashanth Neel. ~RAM (talk) 04:50, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Prashanth Neel while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 06:25, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jayron32 12:07, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Blocked again

I have upgraded the block on this account from 1 week to an indefinite block, due to you creating a new account, User:NS9280, to dodge the block on this account. Do not do so again. --Jayron32 15:06, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Berry stark. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Girth Summit _(blether) 11:38, 31 May 2022 (UTC)