User talk:Benny8907

Welcome!

Hi Benny8907! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 18:24, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ledja Liku

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ledja Liku requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Ledja Liku. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sir MemeGod  20:43, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Alb0077 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Alb0077. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

RoySmith (talk) 23:05, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Benny8907 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia Administrators,

I am writing to respectfully request the unblocking of my Wikipedia account, which was blocked due to [insert reason for block, e.g., violation of editing guidelines, disruptive behavior, etc.]. I fully understand and acknowledge the actions that led to this decision and sincerely regret any disruption caused.

Since the block, I have taken time to thoroughly review the relevant Wikipedia policies, including (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Edit warring,ect). I now have a better understanding of the community’s expectations and the importance of adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines for constructive, neutral, and verifiable contributions.

I take full responsibility for my past actions and am committed to ensuring that my future contributions are in full compliance with Wikipedia’s rules. I am eager to collaborate positively with other editors, and I welcome any guidance or mentorship to improve my approach and avoid future mistakes.

I sincerely apologize for any issues my previous behavior may have caused and would greatly appreciate the opportunity to participate again as a constructive member of the community.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Best regards. Benny8907 (talk) 01:53, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We do not consider AI-generated requests. GPTZero score: 100%. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 02:00, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Benny8907 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been unblocked due to creating wikipedia Page for a person, and edited multiple times, it was not my intention to edit often ,but just to adding more sources, and that happend becouse not knwoing well how Wikipedia writing system works, saying this i ask if it's possible to unblock my account, i know Wiki Guideliness ,and have learned time by time more things.Thank you Benny8907 (talk) 02:06, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No, this is not why you were blocked. You were blocked for abusing multiple accounts. However, it does look like WP:CIR would also apply. Yamla (talk) 11:27, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock|

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Benny8907 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I appeal to be unblocked,becouse i know well now how to add or edit articles respecting Wiki Guideliness.I hope that i will be unblocked if yes this will be my only account here.Best regards and thanks. Benny8907 (talk) 16:14, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You seem to be saying that if you are not unblocked you will just create another account to evade the block. You don't adequately address your prior sock puppetry. We'll need more than your word that you understand relevant guidelines, you will need to show us. I would tend to agree that WP:CIR applies as well. I am declining your request; you'll likely only have one more on wiki chance, so make it count. 331dot (talk) 06:46, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Admin help

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

if it's possible to review my block please 🙏 Benny8907 (talk) 21:26, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wait your turn. You already wasted two unblock requests so expect it to take a while. Do not abuse the admin help template again. --Yamla (talk) 21:32, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

User:331dot , you misunderstood, i was saying even if my account will not unblocked... i keep this current account in every scenario..becouse i understand inportance of guideliness and wikipedia rules. Benny8907 (talk) 09:43, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. The rest of my statment stands. 331dot (talk) 13:50, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i hope i will be unblocked 🙏 Benny8907 (talk) 01:02, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TPA revoked.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:20, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]