Jump to content

User talk:BellaNYork

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, BellaNYork!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.


The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.


The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips
  • Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
  • It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
  • If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
  • Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
  • When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
  • If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
  • Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Speedy deletion contested: Chandrakant Lahariya

[edit]

Hello BellaNYork. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Chandrakant Lahariya, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. Thank you. BangJan1999 11:57, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Surprised that you find this notable. Plenty of examples of this nature which are rejected as per wiki standards. What is the motivation please? BellaNYork (talk) 16:58, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Dakshina Kannada Bus Operators' Association, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:39, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Dakshina Kannada Bus Operators' Association, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:32, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Akua Sena Dansua

[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Akua Sena Dansua, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:28, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bajal (October 5)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Maliner was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Maliner (talk) 09:38, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, BellaNYork! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Maliner (talk) 09:38, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
High Commission of the Gambia in New Delhi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:23, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bajal (January 29)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 17:22, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bajal (February 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Qcne (talk) 17:43, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BellaNYork,

I hope you are well. I was just wondering what led you to this draft and to edit it? There are tens of thousands of drafts sitting in Draft space and I'm just wondering how you came across this one to make an edit to it. Thank you for any explanation you can provide. Liz Read! Talk! 06:41, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sneha Mordani (March 31)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 16:17, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BellaNYork, I'm sorry to say I've reverted the addition you made at Prostate cancer about the research correlating hand patterns and prostate cancer. Prostate cancer is a big field with lots of papers, textbook chapters, et al. written about it. Part of our policy on maintaining a "neutral point of view" is a section called "Due and undue weight", which advises that we should describe theories/claims/aspects of a topic in roughly the proportion that those theories/claims/aspects are described in reliable sources. The claim about hand size and prostate cancer risk isn't mentioned at all by the other sources, which are recent reviews from major medical institutions and major scientific journals. If those authors' claims are solid, I'm sure their finding will eventually be replicated and amplified by others, reflected more broadly in sources, and then we'll reflect it in our article here. Until then, it's unduly highlighting those authors' findings to report them here. If you'd like more opinions on the matter, you can certainly post at the talk page or at the medicine WikiProject to find other interested editors. Best, Ajpolino (talk) 16:50, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Irfan Nooruddin (May 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by User4edits was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 10:05, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hi BellaNYork! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 10:06, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aimee La Joie (May 30)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Superboilles was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Superboilles (talk) 20:04, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Irfan Nooruddin has been accepted

[edit]
Irfan Nooruddin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TheNuggeteer (talk) 03:34, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Bajal

[edit]

Information icon Hello, BellaNYork. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bajal, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:07, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bajal

[edit]

Hello, BellaNYork. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Bajal".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:34, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sneha Mordani

[edit]

Information icon Hello, BellaNYork. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sneha Mordani, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:06, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NCIN

[edit]

Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Indic)#Titles and honorifics is not restricted to namespace. It is to be followed everywhere throughout Wikipedia for a given article subject since the honorific pre/suffix form part of the name of the individual and is bound by the WP:COMMONNAME policy, also tied to MOS:HON. There is a reason why Mahatma is used as an honorific-prefix in the Mahatma Gandhi article's infobox because the WP:COMMONNAME itself is Mahatma Gandhi. Notable examples include Joe Biden Kamala Harris, etc. Secondly, there are consensus at WP:INB agaiunst the use of such honorifics in "India-related" articles particularly. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 08:46, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sneha Mordani (September 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 08:01, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amitabh Anand (September 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 12:18, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello BellaNYork! Your additions to Cyclone Fani have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License is not a compatible license. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 12:21, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kumar (September 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 12:07, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I thought District Magistrates are by position notable as per WP:OUTCOMES ! Could you please help me understand the reason why you felt it is not notable at this point ? BellaNYork (talk) 16:47, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]