User talk:Bekilicious

Welcome!

Hello, Bekilicious, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Amanda Chisom, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 08:25, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thanks. how do we get the page back? thanks for reaching out Bekilicious (talk) 12:56, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Amanda Chisom

Hello, Bekilicious. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Amanda Chisom, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:03, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Shulamite Ezechi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Shulamite Ezechi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GPL93 (talk) 16:30, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hello so what do i do? Bekilicious (talk) 14:08, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Amanda chisom

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Amanda chisom requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —C.Fred (talk) 04:55, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

why did you delete my page? you have gotten me blocked. what do i do Bekilicious (talk) 05:55, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have not been blocked. As noted, the page on Amanda chisom was deleted because she is not a significant or important person. —C.Fred (talk) 17:50, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shulamite Ezechi (September 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shulamite Ezechi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 19:28, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hello. the references added were newspaper publications. can you kindly assist with what you mean as independent references because asides from the link of her company, the rest are links speaking to her works and personality. Thanks. Bekilicious (talk) 07:42, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

From your response, I assume the issue is not with the article content but the references. Kindly confirm. Thanks Bekilicious (talk) 07:43, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bekilicious! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jamiebuba (talk) 19:28, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Muhydeen Okunlola Kayode (November 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Presented as a WP:ROTM real estate entrepreneur

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Muhydeen Okunlola Kayode and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:23, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
206	Urhobo people (talk)	Add sources
117	Igbo-Ukwu (talk)	Add sources
12	Uli, Anambra (talk)	Add sources
16	Loretta Ogboro-Okor (talk)	Add sources
501	Edo State (talk)	Add sources
9	United Nations Association – UK (talk)	Add sources
19	James Wilson Carmichael (talk)	Cleanup
162	Glasgow Caledonian University (talk)	Cleanup
48	Chike Obi (talk)	Cleanup
96	Chief Stephen Osita Osadebe (talk)	Expand
77	Student loans and grants in the United Kingdom (talk)	Expand
112	Eco (currency) (talk)	Expand
379	Nigerian Pidgin (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
22	Nigerian Tribune (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
46	Ijele Masquerade (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
61	African immigration to Israel (talk)	Merge
30	Nigerian weather and communications satellites (talk)	Merge
158	Feminist movements and ideologies (talk)	Merge
58	Water supply and sanitation in the United Kingdom (talk)	Wikify
16	Omobola Johnson (talk)	Wikify
34	Jesse Rae (talk)	Wikify
6	Redeemer Church (talk)	Orphan
8	Mary Dinah (talk)	Orphan
2	Aisha Buhari Foundation (talk)	Orphan
16	Michael Keating (political scientist) (talk)	Stub
88	Oliver De Coque (talk)	Stub
128	Osas Ighodaro (talk)	Stub
70	Bisola Aiyeola (talk)	Stub
39	Bukunmi Oluwasina (talk)	Stub
13	Journal of European Public Policy (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:19, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shulamite Ezechi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shulamite Ezechi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shulamite Ezechi (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mach61 (talk) 07:11, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:ANYiSO

Hello, Bekilicious. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:ANYiSO, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:07, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Fidellis Ozuawala

Hello, Bekilicious. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fidellis Ozuawala, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:06, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Emeka Nobis

Hello, Bekilicious. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Emeka Nobis, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:06, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:ANYiSO

Hello, Bekilicious. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "ANYiSO".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:41, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Fidellis Ozuawala

Hello, Bekilicious. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fidellis Ozuawala".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:03, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Emeka Nobis

Hello, Bekilicious. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Emeka Nobis".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:27, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Muhydeen Okunlola Kayode (April 8)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Currently does not pass the general criteria for a standalone entry. See WP:BLP and WP:ANYBIO.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:12, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hello Bekilicious. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Bekilicious. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Bekilicious|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 15:13, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Bekilicious, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Bekilicious|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. 331dot (talk) 15:44, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:ANYiSO

Hello, Bekilicious. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "ANYiSO".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:17, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]