User talk:Batuhanozatar

This is Batuhanozatar's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Purple Bronze Discovery (November 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by QuantumRealm was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Lithium molybdenum purple bronze instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Purple Bronze Discovery and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Quantum^Realm (meow • pawtrack) 14:21, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Batuhanozatar! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Quantum^Realm (meow • pawtrack) 14:21, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Six-planet resonance has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Six-planet resonance. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:44, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Six-planet resonance has been accepted

Six-planet resonance, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:44, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. You must not claim copyright images as your "own work". Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:56, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Magnetic monopoles on hematite (December 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ratnahastin was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Magnetic monopoles on hematite and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ratnahastin (talk) 13:20, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of World's First Logical Quantum Processor

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on World's First Logical Quantum Processor requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://phys.org/news/2023-12-logical-qubits-quantum-errors.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. A412 (Talk • C) 08:17, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: First Logical Quantum Processor (December 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:First Logical Quantum Processor and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 10:07, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of World's First Logical Quantum Processor

The page World's First Logical Quantum Processor has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done for the following reason:

WP:G12; my mistake, the rest of it is copyvio/WP:close paraphrasing from https://www.techexplorist.com/first-programmable-logical-quantum-processor/78343/ or similar

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:16, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Antibiotics discovery with deep learning (December 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bilorv was:

This submission appears to be a news report of a single event and may not be notable enough for an article in Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#NEWS and Wikipedia:Notability (people)#People notable for only one event for more information.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This reads like a news story rather than a Wikipedia article. Think: what will people need to know about in 10 years time? Some information or references could be added from this draft to Halicin or Abaucin.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Antibiotics discovery with deep learning and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Bilorv (talk) 17:08, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Antibiotics discovery with deep learning

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Antibiotics discovery with deep learning requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.news-medical.net/news/20231220/Deep-learning-unlocks-new-antibiotic-classes-revolutionizing-the-fight-against-resistance.aspx, https://news.mit.edu/2023/using-ai-mit-researchers-identify-antibiotic-candidates-1220, and https://scitechdaily.com/revolutionizing-antibiotic-discovery-the-power-of-explainable-deep-learning/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Bilorv (talk) 17:13, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

One more warning on copying

I have been examining your editing history, and it is evident that most if not all of the material you have posted to Wikipedia has essentially been copied from other websites. I say "essentially" because in some cases you have attempted to hide the fact that you are copying by minor rewording. Slight changes in wording, while still leaving it obvious that what you post is substantially copied, is not enough to satisfy Wikipedia's copyright policy. Furthermore, it is clear that in making such changes in wording you have been more concerned with trying to make a copy that doesn't look like a copy than with thinking about the meaning of the text and ensuring that you retain that meaning. This has resulted in your making alterations to wording which significantly change the meaning, in some cases absurdly so, as for example when you replaced the word "monopoles" with "monopolies", and when you replaced "test whether the theory held water" with "test whether the theory involves water". If you don't have enough understanding of idiomatic English to realise that referring to a theory as holding water is nothing to do with whether the theory "involves" water, then you probably should not be trying to create articles in an English language encyclopaedia. Please change your approach to contributing to Wikipedia; if you don't, you will very soon be blocked from editing by an administrator. More than three quarters of the edits you have made have been deleted; that alone should alert you to the fact that there are serious problems. JBW (talk) 20:03, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) Batuhanozatar, I've blanked Draft:Purple Bronze Discovery and listed it at WP:CP for clean-up – it contains content copied from at least two non-free sources. Please take notice of the warning from JBW immediately above this – editors who persistently fail to respect our copyright policy are likely to end up without editing privileges here. Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:14, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The draft mentioned by Justlettersandnumbers provides an excellent illustration of what I meant above by "Slight changes in wording, while still leaving it obvious that what you post is substantially copied". Copying text while changing "with just a small change of temperature" to "with just a small temperature change" and "even light exposure" to "even exposure to light" does not avoid copyright problems. JBW (talk) 22:08, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Further problems

I have just read User:Batuhanozatar/sandbox. You have posted a strange mixture of statements about minicomputers and statements which absolutely don't apply to minicomputers, but appear to relate to some later, much smaller computers, perhaps notepads. For example, you refer to minicomputers as "portable" and say that they "can be carried". I suggest you look at the picture at the top of this page (which you yourself cited as a reference in the draft). It shows a PDP-8 minicomputer. You can't actually see the whole computer, as it extends off both the top and the bottom of the picture, but you can see enough to get an impression of how portable it is, and how easily it can be carried. You also state that minicomputers are "cheaper than desktop computers". Look at the same page again, which you cited as a reference. You will see that the PDP-8 initially cost $18,500, which the author says is "equivalent to approximately $150,000 in today's currency". I don't think that a typical desktop computer toady costs even $18,500, let alone $150,000.

It seems to me that the root cause of the problems with your editing is probably that you are in a rush to create new articles, so that you cobble together pages out of bits and pieces that you find, without taking the necessary time and trouble to check that what you are doing is right. You need to slow down, and do more checking. Above all, actually read the references you post, and make sure that they really do support the information that they are supposed to be references for. Creating new articles is one of the most difficult tasks in working for Wikipedia, and can be successfully done only with a significant amount of experience of how contributing to Wikipedia works. My advice to new editors is that it is best to start by making small improvements to existing articles, rather than creating new articles. That way any mistakes you make will be small ones, and you won't have the discouraging experience of repeatedly seeing hours of work deleted. Gradually, you will get to learn how Wikipedia works, and after a while you will know enough about what is acceptable to be able to write whole new articles without fear that they will be deleted. Over the years I have found that editors who start by making small changes to existing articles and work up from there have a far better chance of having a successful time here than those who jump right into creating new articles from the start. JBW (talk) 20:40, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Antibiotic discovery with deep learning (December 24)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Pbritti was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Please see WP:NOTNEWS. This scientific work can be referenced in other articles.

Pbritti (talk) 22:45, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Robotics

Hello, Batuhanozatar. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Robotics".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:00, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]