User talk:Barryls69

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rham! Records (December 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 78.26 was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rham! Records and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 18:38, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Barryls69, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 18:38, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Rham! Records concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Rham! Records, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Rham! Records

Hello, Barryls69. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Rham! Records".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:01, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Rham Records, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 07:20, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. The thread is Rham Records. The discussion is about the topic Rham Records. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 11:25, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest notice

Hello, Barryls69. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Rham Records, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 19:43, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

You are piping LatteLaz to user talk:Barryls69 which suggests you are user:LatteLaz. This is not in line with WP:CUSTOMSIG/P. It is wp:disruptive as it makes determining who wrote text more difficult. Please reset your signature probably by erasing/modifying it Preferences -> User profile / Signature. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 04:42, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... A page I have written is being vandalised by somebody. Please can you advise or lock the page for editing. [[1]] LatteLaz (talk) 14:57, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've drawn the situation to the attention of an administrator who has previously dealt with this page. It's nearly always best to try discuss the issue rather than continuing to revert. Local Variable (talk) 15:40, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for your reply. Your help is greatly appreciated. Unfortunately at the moment one individual editor is attempting to construct a legal claim against Rham Records by falsifying information on its' Wikipedia page in order to claim that the company no longer exists. There is very little chance of consensus with this individual at the moment. If Wikipedia is either able to protect this page from vandalism or alternatively remove the page completely that would be appreciated, as to perpetuate misinformation is surely in no-one's interests. Thank you. LatteLaz (talk) 10:26, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring

Your recent editing history at Rham! shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Adakiko (talk) 18:59, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Rham! while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 20:01, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rham! for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rham! is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rham! until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Adakiko (talk) 21:15, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]