User talk:Bakhtar40

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Bakhtar40, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:49, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Smartkas

Hello, Bakhtar40. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Smartkas, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:50, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. At least one of your edits on the page Sajjan Jindal, while it may have been in good faith, was difficult to distinguish from vandalism. To help other editors understand the reason for the changes, you can use an edit summary for your contributions. You can also take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. As per the Wiki etiquettes', I am letting you know why I removed the "Rape allegation" text from Sajjan Jindal's page. I did so in line with WP:BLPCRIME because Sajjan Jindal is not directly a public figure, falling under the "Eminence, but Low-Profile" subsection. According to this guideline, editors should be cautious about including material that implies someone has committed a crime unless there's a conviction. If you wish to put forward your opinion about your edit, then I invite you to discuss this at article's talk page. Mmccaea (talk) 09:03, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are removing well cited info. Bakhtar40 (talk) 11:35, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It seems you are intentionally avoiding reading and understanding WP:BLPCRIME. I kindly ask you once more to review it, engage in discussion on the article's talk page, and then proceed accordingly. Mmccaea (talk) 11:48, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain your contributions using a descriptive edit summary. Changing information on Wikipedia (such as numbers and dates) without explanation, as you did at Sajjan Jindal, may be confused with vandalism. Please confirm that you have received and comprehended the previous message regarding your recent edits at Sajjan Jindal. We would greatly appreciate your participation and input on the article's talk page. Mmccaea (talk) 11:46, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bakhtar40 WP:3RR could have gotten both of us blocked. Though our friendship began on the wrong foot, let us stay in touch and support each other in our wiki edits. Thank you once again. Mmccaea (talk) 12:47, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure Mmccaea, we are friends now. Today, i have leant a great lesson from this edit warring. I will be in touch and looking forward to help each other. Bakhtar40 (talk) 17:49, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Hello, I'm AgisdeSparte. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Shovana Narayan, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. AgisdeSparte (talk) 11:26, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't be so impatient to revert edits on Wikipedia. Give time to contributors to complete their task. I just un-do your edits following the addition of reliable references. Bakhtar40 (talk) 11:34, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CK Birla Group Changes

Hi Bakhtar40, I have noticed the changes in the article CK Birla Group were incorrect. The owner's name was inaccurate and then it was semi-locked. By checking the references and the historical details, I have corrected them. (Old version) -- VKG1985 (Talk | E-Mail | Contrib) 17:45, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lanka Tiles

You edits appear unconstructive. Please read WP:LEAD for a start. Chanaka L (talk) 06:47, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this is constructive. The paragraph i removed either promotional or already covered in history. Bakhtar40 (talk) 06:49, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:LEAD, Duplicating info containing body in lead section is the point of lead section. Chanaka L (talk) 06:51, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss, major changes before making them, including removing cited info Chanaka L (talk) 06:52, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the page created by you and it promotes the subject somewhere. You are adding promotional content. And the introduction para is absolutely not in Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. Bakhtar40 (talk) 06:54, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is true that I created the page. I am afraid I disagree with you saying I added promotional content. Lanka Tiles is one of the most valuable brands in Sri Lanka. It is fact, nothing promotional there. Please refer [1]. Chanaka L (talk) 06:59, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not agree with you. You are adding puffery and peacock words backed with not reliable references. Bakhtar40 (talk) 07:03, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you say what exactly are the puffery and peacock words, I am willing to discuss and remove them. Chanaka L (talk) 07:05, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We have a List of most valuable brands BTW. Chanaka L (talk) 07:06, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Hi Bakhtar40! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Cremastra (talk) 07:39, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Cremastra, I appreciate the notification. I apologize for using Tehouse instead of Dispute Resolution Center for the discussion posting. Bakhtar40 (talk) 07:47, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hinduja Tech moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Hinduja Tech. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Youknow? (talk) 08:52, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Youknowwhoistheman, There is no COI with this subject. As far as concern for notability, i am not agree with you. I am going to take this page in main space. You can take it for afd. Thank You. Bakhtar40 (talk) 17:13, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please! Youknow? (talk) 17:34, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bachan Singh Arya has been accepted

Bachan Singh Arya, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 08:22, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hinduja Tech for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hinduja Tech is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hinduja Tech until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

J. P. Fridrich (talk) 07:38, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hello, I'm Cooldudeseven7. I noticed that you recently removed content from Kotak Mutual Fund without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Cooldudeseven7 (Discuss over a cup of tea?) 11:54, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]