User talk:Badlucksuks

Constitution of India

The original constitution of India, as adopted on independence, did not appoint any language as official. However, the 2007 constitution specifies English and Hindi as official languages, with English to be phased out. JBW (talk) 10:02, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adding links to articles

I see that some of your edits have added links from one article to another, known as "wikilinks". Wikilinks can be very helpful, but it is a very common mistake among new editors to add too many wikilinks to articles. Generally speaking, a wikilink should be added only if it provides information which is likely to help readers of the article in which the link is placed to understand content of that article, or provide further information closely connected to content of that article. Linking to articles in other situations is not just unnecessary, it can actually be harmful, because research has established that the more irrelevant, or only slightly relevant, links there are in a page, the less likely readers are to find the ones which they might find useful. Thus, for example, nobody reading the article The Odyssey (Smith) is likely to need to consult the articles sound, wheel, or horse in order to understand what those words mean in order to understand content of the article The Odyssey (Smith) nor do those articles contain any information about Smith's "Odyssey", so linking those terms is not likely to be helpful. JBW (talk) 10:15, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

sure thing, I will be more careful Badlucksuks (talk) 15:23, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A couple of people have now given me answers to the question below, so I now understand what was happening, and I don't need any more explanation. JBW (talk) 12:07, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since I posted the message above, I have see that a number of relatively inexperienced editors have recently been adding links to the article The Odyssey (Smith) in many cases, though not all, unsuitable links. There is nothing unusual about new or fairly inexperienced editors overlinking: as I said above, it is a very common mistake. However, for so many inexperienced editors to all come along to the same article and all start making very similar edits is most unusual; in fact I don't believe I have ever seen it before. There must be a connection; maybe someone has been organising some sort of group editing and has encouraged editors to add links to that article, or something of the kind. Are you able to give me any information which may clarify for me what is happening? JBW (talk) 22:43, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since you posted to my talk page about this, even though you then removed your post, here are a few words about what I now realise happened. The problem with new editors adding too many links is largely caused by a well-intentioned but, in my opinion, badly implemented "suggested edit" feature, which encourages new editors to add new links without giving them the necessary guidance so that they understand how to do it. What was new this time was that for some reason the system kept directing new editors all to the one article, The Odyssey (Smith). I have never before known that to happen, so I thought there must be some connection among the various people who were doing it. It's really not a big deal; I wondered what was happening, but now I know. Thanks for the work you've been doing for Wikipedia, and I hope you will do much more over time. JBW (talk) 17:37, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
you're welcome Badlucksuks (talk) 07:05, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Sarasvati River, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 03:55, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Spring Drum

Hello, Badlucksuks. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Spring Drum, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:05, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Spring Drum (August 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Spring Drum and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 14:23, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Badlucksuks! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 14:23, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]