User talk:BKPATIL1234

Welcome

Hello BKPATIL1234, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations
The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

BKPATIL1234, good luck, and have fun. – PamD 09:30, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Onde Roopa Eradu Guna

Hello BKPATIL1234,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Onde Roopa Eradu Guna for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 06:58, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Anna Attige

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Anna Attige requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Night Fury (A good day to Die Hard) 11:36, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nee Thanda Kanike

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Nee Thanda Kanike requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Night Fury (A good day to Die Hard) 11:37, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Seethe Alla Savithri

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Seethe Alla Savithri requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Night Fury (A good day to Die Hard) 11:37, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Hosilu Mettida Hennu"

A page you created, Hosilu Mettida Hennu, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is a test page. Use the sandbox for testing.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. -- Rrburke (talk) 15:59, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

BKPATIL1234, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi BKPATIL1234! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:13, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bayasade Banda Bhagya

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Bayasade Banda Bhagya requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. EBY (talk) 17:16, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sose Tanda Soubhagya

A tag has been placed on Sose Tanda Soubhagya requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. EBY (talk) 17:43, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nagara Hole

A tag has been placed on Nagara Hole requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.), but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. EBY (talk) 17:49, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nagara Hole

Hello BKPATIL1234,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Nagara Hole for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Eurodyne (talk) 06:31, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sose Tanda Soubhagya

Hello BKPATIL1234,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sose Tanda Soubhagya for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Eurodyne (talk) 06:35, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sandharbha

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Sandharbha requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Night Fury (A good day to Die Hard) 07:34, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bayasade Banda Bhagya

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Bayasade Banda Bhagya requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Night Fury (A good day to Die Hard) 07:35, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chinna Ninna Muddaduve

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Chinna Ninna Muddaduve requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Night Fury (A good day to Die Hard) 07:38, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Film articles

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

It's important for you now to stop creating articles about films that contain only an information box. They are being deleted as fast as you create them, and this creates work for other editors and is considered "disruptive". It is essential to add at least a few lines of text, stating explicitly what the article is about, giving some references to confirm what you say, and showing why the film is important enough to be included in Wikipedia.

You are welcome to store incomplete articles in your userspace temporarily while you work on them. Here is a guide to starting an article, and I'd strongly recommend that you stop for a bit to look it over: Noyster (talk), 11:48, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Shani Prabhava

Hello, BKPATIL1234,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Shani Prabhava should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shani Prabhava .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 15:24, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Shrimanthana Magalu

Hello, BKPATIL1234,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Shrimanthana Magalu should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shrimanthana Magalu .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 15:27, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Seethe Alla Savithri

Hello, BKPATIL1234,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Seethe Alla Savithri should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seethe Alla Savithri .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 15:31, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Articles need text

Please note that an infobox is an optional extra for an article, but every article in the encyclpedia needs to have text. Sose Tanda Soubhagya and Sandharbha both need to have at the very least an opening sentence something like "Sandharbha is a 1978 Kannada-language film." Please stop creating new stub articles which have no text content. Thanks. PamD 16:59, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, BKPATIL1234, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Vijayareddy, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 220 of ^Borg 08:28, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of M. R. Vittal

The article M. R. Vittal has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:52, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Slow down

You appear to have created a large number of articles that, to at least some editors, are insufficient. Many have been spared speedy deletion, but they are still insufficient. A minimum Wikipedia article should consist of more than just an information box or a bare filmography with no context. In your rush to create a lot of articles, you are creating a lot of bad articles, and you are creating a lot of work of other editors to clean up behind you. Remember, there's no deadline. Take your time on each article to provide a minimum amount of actual content. If the article is about a film, write a paragraph or two about the film: who directed it, who starred in it, what it's about (briefly) and how it fared (critical reception, box office reception). If you can't at least provide that much information, what's the point of writing the article at all? WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:57, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of A. V. Sheshgiri Rao

The article A. V. Sheshgiri Rao has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Comatmebro ^{~Come at me~} 20:51, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bhagya Jyothi

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Bhagya Jyothi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Fortdj33 (talk) 13:57, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bhagya Jyothi

The article Bhagya Jyothi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No content, article consists of nothing but infobox and stub tag.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fortdj33 (talk) 14:37, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion rejected. Squinge (talk) 19:51, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nagakanye

The article Nagakanye has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No content, article consists of nothing but infobox and stub tag

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fortdj33 (talk) 15:29, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion rejected. Squinge (talk) 19:48, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nee Thanda Kanike

The article Nee Thanda Kanike has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No content, article consists of nothing but infobox and stub tag

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fortdj33 (talk) 15:30, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion rejected. Squinge (talk) 19:41, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Joe Simon (Director), you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. You have been told multiple times not to create these articles that contain a list of films and nothing else. These are causing extra work for other editors to look at them, nominate them for deletion and remove them. ~~Over 20~~ Some of your new pages have now had to be deleted. I'd much rather see you change course than get blocked, but that can't be far away now. With regards : Noyster (talk), 14:38, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Joe Simon (Director)

Hello BKPATIL1234,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Joe Simon (Director) for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Trivialist (talk) 17:07, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

BKPATIL1234: I have deleted the article, because all it had was a table listing his films. As you have been told above, articles must have text. I note that a previous article you wrote, V. Somashekar, was very similar, but in that case you yourself blanked it.

I note that Joe Simon is also a red link on the Kannada Wikipedia, for example here. Perhaps it would be better if you wrote the article about him in Kannada, on that Wikipedia? Yngvadottir (talk) 18:43, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Siritanakke Savaal

added a link pointing to Sampath

Vijayareddy

added a link pointing to Deva

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Nanna Rosha Nooru Varusha

Hi, I'm Xcia0069. BKPATIL1234, thanks for creating Nanna Rosha Nooru Varusha!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. You need to add some text and references to the page :)

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Xcia0069 (talk) 12:58, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Asadhya Aliya

The article Asadhya Aliya has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourced, article contains no text its only infobox

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Night Fury (A good day to Die Hard) 12:58, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion rejected. Squinge (talk) 19:41, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Driver Hanumanthu

The article Driver Hanumanthu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails Wikipedia:Notability_(films)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Winner 42 Talk to me! 15:01, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion rejected. Squinge (talk) 19:40, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rahasya Rathri

The article Rahasya Rathri has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails Wikipedia:Notability_(films)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Winner 42 Talk to me! 15:02, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion rejected. Squinge (talk) 19:39, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Biligiriya Banadalli

The article Biligiriya Banadalli has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails Wikipedia:Notability_(films)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Winner 42 Talk to me! 15:02, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion rejected. Squinge (talk) 19:38, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kaalinga

The article Kaalinga has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails Wikipedia:Notability_(films)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Winner 42 Talk to me! 15:05, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion rejected. Squinge (talk) 19:37, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Manini (1979 film)

Thank you for creating this stub article, but please remember two things:

Every Wikipedia article must include text. Not just an infobox. At the very least please always provide a sentence like "Manini is a 1979 Indian film." If someone finds the article in a list of Google hits or a Wikipedia search, they need this basic information - an infobox will not help them.
Every Wikipedia article needs sources: give references to the publications which provide the information about the subject.
If you create an article like this with a "disambiguation", you need to add it to the relevant disambiguation page (or, sometimes, add a "hatnote" to the single article at that name). I have updated the disambiguation page at Manini.

You have been told the first two points many times above. Please take note and stop adding such poor new stubs to the encyclopedia. Thanks. PamD 08:20, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the sentence "Manini is a 1979 Indian film", so problem solved? (And couldn't you have added it yourself while you were here, @PamD:?) Squinge (talk) 11:31, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Squinge: I've added similar sentences to many of this editor's stub creations, but the problem is not solved. The problem is that this editor is continuing to create unsourced stubs which don't have any text at all (apart from an infobox), despite having been repeatedly asked not to do so. I've raised it at WP:ANI. PamD 11:34, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps not the full solution, no, but surely adding the simple sentence at the same time as telling someone else they should have added it is more constructive and more helpful? Squinge (talk) 11:37, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In this case I spent plenty of time explaining the problems to the editor, and fixing the disambiguation page: I think I decided to leave the lead sentence for them to create themselves, rather than do everything for them. But it doesn't look as if they are reading their talk page. PamD 11:48, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Nan Hendthi Chennagidale, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Every Wikipedia article must contain text. You have created many stubs which only contain an infobox and you have been asked many times to include text. You have ignored this, including creating 6 new infobox-only stubs this morning. Please now take notice and stop. PamD 08:35, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Karmika Kallanalla. Your articles are inappropriately formatted, in that they contain no text. You have been warned about this repeatedly and you are still creating these infobox-only articles. This is disruptive editing: it will be reported to WP:ANI if it continues. PamD 09:07, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

You do not appear to be taking any notice of the requests and warnings on this talk page. PamD 09:38, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Onde Guri

Hello BKPATIL1234,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Onde Guri for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. — Abderrahman (talk) 11:41, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination clearly wrong, and removed. Squinge (talk) 12:00, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

After you added the article's header it no longer qualifies for speedy deletion. It's not enough for something to exist without providing an evidence of notability, and explaining why it is (or what it is). — Abderrahman (talk) 13:23, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It never qualified for speedy deletion in the first place, because lack of evidence of notability is NOT a valid speedy deletion reason - please go read the WP:CSD criteria. And why couldn't you have helped by constructively adding a single sentence rather than whining and bitching and destructively sticking a deletion tag on it? We're here to help build an encyclopedia, you know, not to see how quickly we can slap down newcomers who are trying to help but don't get things perfect first time! Squinge (talk) 19:32, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

whining and bitching. nice ones, with such high class and manners, I thank you for that. I would have tried to help, but the article didn't give a single clue what it was about, which is the reasoning for CSD. — Abderrahman (talk) 05:23, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. — Abderrahman (talk) 11:46, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In what way is someone creating articles about films starring notable actors and directed by notable directors being disruptive? You, @AbderrahmanNajjar:, should reconsider your aggressive stance lest you leave yourself open to sanctions. Squinge (talk) 12:03, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your tone seems a bit aggressive. Please assume WP:GF. The editor created numerous similar articles which have been speedy deleted, and continues to create articles in the same manner and style. — Abderrahman (talk) 13:14, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Abderrahman Can you name a few of those articles? Nearly all of his articles are staying. Bladesmulti (talk) 14:09, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bladesmulti: It seems a lot of the articles (and they are too many to count, look at this talk page) I've checked had their speedy deletion tag removed by Squinge after he added a header. My warning & notifications per the original state of creation still stand and are merited. The mere creation of an article with just the infobox and nothing else isn't basis for notability. This is an encyclopedia not a database (WP:INFO). — Abderrahman (talk) 14:27, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You don't really know about Wikipedia:INFO, it is not going to justify your above warning in any case. How about you contribute to his articles like Squinge? Warn only if the user is infringing the copyrights or making articles on non-notable subjects, none of them applies here. In this situation you can only tell this user to add something on those articles, you can't warn. Bladesmulti (talk) 14:33, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm replying to let you know I've read your reply and have nothing further to add beyond what I've already explained. — Abderrahman (talk) 14:55, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sahasa Simha

The article Sahasa Simha has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

notability, unsourced

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Night Fury (A good day to Die Hard) 12:37, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion rejected. Squinge (talk) 19:28, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Asadhya Aliya

The article Asadhya Aliya has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourced, lacking notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Night Fury (A good day to Die Hard) 12:41, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion rejected. Squinge (talk) 19:27, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Gandharva Giri

Hi, I'm Snowycats. BKPATIL1234, thanks for creating Gandharva Giri!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Your article is off to a great start! But, it does need to get expanded.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Snowycats (talk) 13:54, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gandugali Rama

Hello BKPATIL1234,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Gandugali Rama for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Loveoffood007 (talk) 14:07, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. Bladesmulti (talk) 14:39, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gandharva Giri

Hello BKPATIL1234,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Gandharva Giri for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Loveoffood007 (talk) 14:08, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. Bladesmulti (talk) 14:39, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Talli Kodukula Anubandham

Hello BKPATIL1234,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Talli Kodukula Anubandham for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Loveoffood007 (talk) 14:09, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. Bladesmulti (talk) 14:39, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Khaidi (1984 film)

The article Khaidi (1984 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No content, article consists of nothing but infobox and stub tag

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fortdj33 (talk) 15:24, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Fortdj33 You have used wrong speedy tag, this movie is notable and Khaidi actually exists. You can use other tag since this is a duplicate article and cannot be redirected to other page as the movie was released in 1983 not 1984. Bladesmulti (talk) 15:30, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

PROD rejected. Squinge (talk) 19:23, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Bladesmulti: No, it's not a duplicate: the 1984 Kannada film is not the same as the 1983 Telugu film. I've added the necessary hatnote at Khaidi. PamD 22:14, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I just found a imdb link to this movie and I have added it. Bladesmulti (talk) 22:45, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nanna Rosha Nooru Varusha

The article Nanna Rosha Nooru Varusha has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No content, article consists of nothing but infobox and stub tag

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fortdj33 (talk) 15:41, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

PROD has been rejected (not by me) Squinge (talk) 19:24, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Final attempt/warning--call it what you will

BKPATIL, it is clear that you are trying to improve Wikipedia's coverage of a poorly-covered area, and I thank you for it. However, the way in which you are doing this is clearly not well-received by many editors--editors of good faith who are also trying to improve the project. The problems are easily identified: a. simply creating an infobox is not deemed enough for many editors, which is why this page is full of speedy-deletion warnings. b. you are not communicating with those editors. Since this is a collaborative project, in which you are not just encouraged but required to work with other editors, I foresee great difficulties if you continue to create these stubs that are considered sub-par by many editors, without even deigning to discuss these problems. Now, you have just created Sardar Dharmanna, and that must be the last one to have nothing but an infobox. If your next article does not contain at least a sentence that identifies the topic and makes a claim about the importance of the subject, I will block this account, and it will not be unblocked until you can convince us that you will agree to collaborate with other editors.

In the meantime I urge you to take and seek the counsel of editors like PamD, WikiDan61, Bladesmulti, and NE Ent. You may also want to have a word with Dr. Blofeld, who has created thousands of articles on films. Thank you, and I hope I won't have to come back here as the bearer of bad news. Drmies (talk) 03:12, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies: BKPATIL, I see you have today created Karna (Kannada film), without any text until I added it: this was your version. Why are you ignoring all our advice, requests, and warnings? PamD 23:03, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And there are another five similar creations. PamD 23:05, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

All of which I've upgraded for the sake of our readers. PamD 23:30, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

PamD is right. BKPATIL, this has gone on for long enough: you will to start either writing content or talking to us. I will block you until you choose one of these two options. Drmies (talk) 01:03, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Watermarked posters

BKPatil, it is seen that you are on a watermarked poster uploading spree, all of which are taken from kannadamoviesinfo.wordpress.com. Please try to find and upload non-watermarked posters, adding a rationale. Also, please write sentences in the article that you edit, instead of just adding an infobox. There are hundreds of contributors to the pages related to Kannada cinema. Please co-operate or face blocking. Kannada123 (talk) 07:38, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Karmika Kallanalla

added a link pointing to Swapna

Talli Kodakala Anubandham

added a link pointing to Jandhyala

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kittu Puttu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tamil. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Drmies (talk) 01:04, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bangarada Gudi

The article Bangarada Gudi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No content, article consists of nothing but infobox and stub tag

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fortdj33 (talk) 20:58, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Devaru Kotta Vara

The article Devaru Kotta Vara has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No content, article consists of nothing but infobox and stub tag

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fortdj33 (talk) 15:08, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Manini (1979 film)

The article Manini (1979 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no assertion of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — xaosflux ^Talk 19:22, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Manini (1979 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Manini (1979 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manini (1979 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — xaosflux ^Talk 13:53, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hanthakana Sanchu

The article Hanthakana Sanchu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No content, article consists of nothing but infobox and stub tag

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fortdj33 (talk) 13:54, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Makkala Bhagya

The article Makkala Bhagya has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No content, article consists of nothing but infobox and stub tag

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fortdj33 (talk) 01:46, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mane Mane Kathe

The article Mane Mane Kathe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No content, article consists of nothing but infobox and stub tag

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fortdj33 (talk) 01:48, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Naaga kala Bhairava

The article Naaga kala Bhairava has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No content, article consists of nothing but infobox and stub tag

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fortdj33 (talk) 13:14, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rama Parushurama

The article Rama Parushurama has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No content, article consists of nothing but infobox and stub tag

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fortdj33 (talk) 14:04, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vijayareddy

The article Vijayareddy has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. GamerPro64 20:07, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Manimurugan

A tag has been placed on Manimurugan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GamerPro64 01:38, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Devaru Kotta Vara

Hello BKPATIL1234,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Devaru Kotta Vara for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Legacypac (talk) 04:54, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hosilu Mettida Hennu

Hello BKPATIL1234,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Hosilu Mettida Hennu for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Legacypac (talk) 04:54, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Hosilu Mettida Hennu

Hello, BKPATIL1234,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Hosilu Mettida Hennu should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hosilu Mettida Hennu .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Legacypac (talk) 05:04, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of A. M. Samiullah

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on A. M. Samiullah requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GamerPro64 17:42, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ugranarasimha

The article Ugranarasimha has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:BIO or WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 19:50, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nan Hendthi Chennagidale

The article Nan Hendthi Chennagidale has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DareshMohan (talk) 22:49, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Manini (1979 film)

Hello BKPATIL1234, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Manini (1979 film), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manini (1979 film) (2nd nomination).

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TimothyBlue}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

// Timothy :: talk 08:32, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]