User talk:B9 hummingbird hovering

Note

Hi, you left me a message quite a long time ago. I'm not really active and haven't logged in for a long time, but I had a go at making a response in case this issue still concerns you. Cheers, Factchecker atyourservice (talk) 23:35, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of the section Tulpas as explanation for unverified creatures

Hi, I saw that you had removed a section I had written in the article Tulpa. Why did you do that? You left no explanation. Personally, I saw no reason why you should removed it, and I think it deserves to be there, so I restored it again (this time a little reduced from last time). If you remove a complete section again like you did in this article, please motivate why you are doing so. --Ediug (talk) 00:11, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ediug, I don't remember the particular edit to which you make reference. It would have been if I found the content uncited or considered it invaluable in the sense of fanciful and ungrounded. Which would have been very unusual if I had as I am quite a conservative editor and preserve content in articles rather than delete it as a matter of course. I will give it a read I haven't read it for a very long time. Thanks for your contribution B9 hummingbird hovering^{(talk • contribs)} 12:53, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Buddhafield

The article Buddhafield has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No third-party sources to establish notability of the article's subject.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SudoGhost 04:23, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for Thoughtform

An article that you have been involved in editing, Thoughtform , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Andrewaskew (talk) 01:22, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Thigle

The article Thigle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources, no evidence that this is a valid definition, and only a dictionary definition in any case.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 17:48, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Thigle

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Thigle requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Uberaccount (talk) 03:20, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

draconian cyber-bullying

I washed my hands of editing Wikipedia with the draconian cyber-bullying I experienced. If anyone wishes to dialogue with me you can pursue me via: https://twitter.com/B9Joker108 B9 hummingbird hovering^{(talk • contribs)} 08:40, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:B9 hummingbird hovering/Thoughtform

User:B9 hummingbird hovering/Thoughtform, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:B9 hummingbird hovering/Thoughtform and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:B9 hummingbird hovering/Thoughtform during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Magioladitis (talk) 07:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I would note that despite all the melodramatic promises that they are done here and don't care anymore, this user used an IP to evade their block and edit the above-referenced MFD [1]. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:07, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:B9 hummingbird hovering/Dzogchen Stuff

User:B9 hummingbird hovering/Dzogchen Stuff, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:B9 hummingbird hovering/Dzogchen Stuff and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:B9 hummingbird hovering/Dzogchen Stuff during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:11, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Purba listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Purba. Since you had some involvement with the Purba redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Sitush (talk) 10:34, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

thank you very much I will have a look... It might be of value to separate the Kila / Phurba Wikipedia articles/pages as they are related but different & distinct traditions as well as conflated but they are also of one family. It is actually very complex. I championed the same distinction with Chatushkoti (Sanskrit) / Tetralemma (Greek): they are related and iterated each other but also culturally distinct: keep apples with apples. B9 hummingbird hovering^{(talk • contribs)} 03:50, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

assistance required

Hi.I am not a regular editor.I was reading the article "astra' and found many factual inaccuracies,particularly the one where it says sudarshan chakra can be stopped by lord shiva.I tried to edit it,but some editor is reverting it,and i found in history that other editors have found this inaccurate too.I have found supporting links in google books,but don't know how to substantiate it.can you please look into it? 117.201.99.241 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 11:27, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, B9 hummingbird hovering. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hozhó listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hozhó. Since you had some involvement with the Hozhó redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 02:07, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tattvasamgraha

Hello, B9 hummingbird hovering. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

noychoH (talk) 15:34, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You wrote "I have secured by gracious Serendipity a complete digital copy of the Tattvasamgraha in romanized Sanskrit and in addition it is grammatically parsed and intent to make it available in Wikisource or in Wikibooks with an English translation. If anybody would like to work with me on this project contact me directly. B9 hummingbird hovering (talk • contribs) 12:52, 12 October 2009 (UTC)". I might really be interested. noychoH (talk) 15:34, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@NoychoH: Please not that this user has been blocked for nearly ten years, and last posted anything five years ago. It's unlikely they are still monitoring anything here. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:18, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Beeblebrox:. Thanks for your remark, yet I was aware of that while writing on their user talk page. It is not completely impossible however, so there is a chance I will get an answer one day, and I am REALLY interested in the topic, that's why I took a chance. When you buy a national lottery ticket it is also unlikely that you win, yet some people are desperate to buy. I am patient to wait. noychoH (talk) 17:26, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Canarese script" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Canarese script. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 10#Canarese script until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 🌸 1.Ayana 🌸 (talk) 12:36, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am not familiar with the issue at hand but as I have finally been able to login and reset my password and you brought this to my attention, I will apprise myself and contribute to discussion if I may. Thank you B9HH B9 hummingbird hovering^{(talk • contribs)} 01:11, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tapihritsa

The article Tapihritsa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article has no notability. It's been like that for seven years. An attempt to make a reference into a citation gets turned into a note by a "master" editor. Bots have done more work on this article in the last three years, than anybody else. Instead of beating it, it's time to bury this dead horse.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pibal373 (talk) 20:23, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tagzig Olmo Lung Ring for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tagzig Olmo Lung Ring is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tagzig Olmo Lung Ring until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:03, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Blazing Lamp

The article Blazing Lamp has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to contain anything not already comfortably covered by Seventeen tantras.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Moriwen (talk) 14:44, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Neural circuitry" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Neural circuitry has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 12 § Neural circuitry until a consensus is reached. _{too_much}curiosity (talk) 03:27, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]