Talk:Tapihritsa

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

This page was proposed for deletion by Pibal373 (talk · contribs) on 2 May 2021.

Tibet Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tibet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tibet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TibetWikipedia:WikiProject TibetTemplate:WikiProject TibetTibet articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Buddhism Low‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Proposed deletion

I am pleased this article was not deleted as a Wikikin had opined it should on my discussion page.

B9 hummingbird hovering^{(talk • contribs)} 15:19, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A Prayer to Tapi[hrih]tsa

Still no notability

Editor's note: adding more general references under "Further reading" doesn't negate the fact that the subject of this article still has no notability and doesn't fix the fact that the article requires more INLINE CITATIONS. I wonder who put that template in there? Hmm? --Pibal373 (talk) 22:21, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't even try to find more sources before prodding the article. But there are sources, and the subject is notable. If you think otherwise, then nominate the article for deletion, which will alert the various Buddhist project groups...

In any case, the adding of Further reading to show that there are more sources is standard procedure. Some of us don't have as much time as you seem to have. This is a joint effort, and bringing new sources to light is part of the process. There is no requirement that the editor who provides the sources be the one to expand the article. The fact is, you don't have any idea whether the subject is notable or not. Cheers! Skyerise (talk) 12:54, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Removed notability template

Non-notable people don't get their works translated into English by two different translation teams, now do they? Skyerise (talk) 13:55, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]