User talk:B.S. Lawrence

Isaac L. Rice ranting

Hi, "Mr." Lawrence: I will eventually get around to revealing the true character of this Jewish chessplayer, financier and patent guru who went by (the name) Isaac L. Rice. Let me just say that Mr. Rice (had ulterior motives) and somehow ended up with William Woodnut Griscom's patents - as Griscom did not want to part with them... and refused to sell his patents to Rice - but died a "mysterious" death in an "accident" while hunting and hiking outdoors. (Bigfoot appeared today). Mr. Rice ended up with these patents anyways - as he stopped at next-to-nothing to get what he wanted. Mr. Rice also somehow ended up with the majority of John Philip Holland's patents as he profited (enormously) with ill-gotten gains - acquried largely through the hard work and innovations of others - who founded The Electric Boat Company/General Dynamics... i.e. John Philip Holland/Arthur Leopold Busch etc... This company was not founded by Rice as they continue to insist to this very day! Company archives and records do not reflect on the true events that transpired during their heyday and initial success selling submarines to any nation that wanted them - so long as it was lucritive to the new management under Rice and Frost... (Elihu B. Frost).

Rice was brought to federal court (several times/for several reasons/by several disgruntaled former employees over company mismanagement and fraud) but simply could not recall the events that led to Holland's demise within his own company, not to mention how he ended up with most all of Holland's patents! Rice quickly took refuge in very poor memories - in front of a New Jersey State Judge - as they looked the other way... as they were being bribed by this pettifogger who practiced in chicanery in the process. Corruption ran amuck at this time. Politicians on Capitol Hill were prone to taking bribes from people like Rice. This is something (that is) not mentioned by today's Electric Boat.

Plese check the International Directory of Company Histories article about General Dynamics, as the company is well known to have been steeped in scandals and run by "accumen" in an unscrupleless manner. Also see the one just published under General Dynamic/Electric Boat Corporation. Published July 2007, by St. James Press, pp.136-139.

Also see: The Defender, The Story of General Dynamics, by Roger Franklin Harper&Row which is now Harper-Collins. The book focuses on John Holland's company and is not afraid to tell it like it was - in our politically corrected approach where the truth is not always mentioned or discussed - because of the offensivness of those who are easily prone to being offended.

The Electric Boat Company continues to "brush-off" many crucial events that led to the success of "their" company back when it was being founded - and by whom?

See article in Naval History Magazine entitled: Who Built Those Subs? Published by The United States Naval Institute, Annapolis, MD. 1998 Sept-October 125th issue. The man in this article (about Arthur L. Busch) and (his) key role pioneering Electric Boat's first submarines at Navy Lt. Lewis Nixon's Crescent Shipyard located in Elizabeth, New Jersey. Sadly, Mr. Busch was never acknowledged, credited (or respected in any way) for any of the vital contributions that he made to Electric Boat. He was also never compensated with (his share) of company stock for (all of) his hard work while building the Imperial Japanese Navy's first fleet of submarines in Japan. This was accomplished at the Yokosuka Naval Arsenal in 1905. ["Typical/Stereotypical viewpoint of "these types" of people who like to conceal there identities and "hide" behind an "assumed" name etc...] "This is" no thanks to Rice or any of his corrupt cronies who took EB over... including: Frank Taylor Cable, Elihu B. Frost, Lawrence York Spear - and others... some of which continue to behave the same way today to this information.--Middim13 (talk) 22:12, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Grabass Charlestons

A tag has been placed on Grabass Charlestons requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 22:55, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revert on Voltaire

Hi! I notice that you recently reverted a problematic edit on Voltaire. Unfortunately, this user had actually made four edits in quick succession, and you only fixed the last one. I appreciate your effort, but it had the unfortunate consequence of making the other errors slower to be detected and a little harder to fix. I've patched it up now and everything's fine, but I'm dropping you this note on the assumption that you'd prefer to know that this happened so you can remember to double-check the next time. Cheers, Bovlb (talk) 06:11, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

Hello, B.S. Lawrence. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding a possible topic or community ban of Middim13. The discussion is about the topic WP:ANI#Topic or community ban needed. Thank you. ---MBK₀₀₄ 02:24, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That guy who keeps changing the Good Ole Song article

Would you do me a favor and put a vandalism admonition on the talk page for user 24.148.19.179 (I think it should be at User talk:24.148.19.179)? The guy obviously won't stop with the "not gay" addition to the Good Ole Song lyrics, and I'd like to get his IP address blocked, but having admonitions from multiple established users would be helpful in that cause. Thanks in advance. 1995hoo (talk) 14:35, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DONE. --B.S. Lawrence (talk) 19:12, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, B.S. Lawrence. You have new messages at Talk:Bhajji.
Message added Srinivas (talk) 15:35, 25 August 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello B.S. Lawrence! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 139 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

David N. Levinson - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:07, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Albemarle County Project

Hello,

I noticed your edit over at the Albemarle County project. Obviously, it is still a work in progress and I would welcome any collaboration on it. Perhaps you would be interested in displaying {{Template:User WikiProject Albemarle County}} the userbox on your page? WikiManOne (talk) 17:10, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join WikiProject Albemarle County

Hello! WikiProject Albemarle County, an outreach effort supporting development of Albemarle County and surrounding area related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been started. As a user who has shown an interest in related topics I wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the project. If you are interested please visit our page (currently under construction) and add the user badge to your talk page. Thank you!!!

- WikiManOne (talk) 19:47, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I visited your user page. I saw you have visited two states of India. Which are those? I have started wikipedia editing just now. I saw your editing in today's most featured article. Your tips are most welcomed.AshishDandekar7 (talk) 14:48, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

talkback from 78.26

Hello, B.S. Lawrence. You have new messages at 78.26's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Death (protopunk band) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Da Capo Publishing, Inc. | work=Seven Days |date=October 6, 2010 |accessdate= March 4, 2013)}}</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:38, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited East Ironbound, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St. Margarets Bay (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sno-ball may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| main_ingredient = [[Water]], cane syrup, flavoring)

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:05, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oops! Fixed. -- B.S. Lawrence (talk) 17:11, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A cookie for you!

Thanks for adding the infobox to Sno-ball, which improved the article! Northamerica1000^(talk) 19:57, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ljungstrom rig

New one on me. Thanks for sharing. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 18:21, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Latin and Greek words commonly used in systematic names, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Virginiana (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Virginiana which v. that

Hi B.S. Lawrence. What you did is exactly what I wanted to do, but held back as I thought other editors might think that it needed a "that"/ "which". So I limited myself to changing it to "that". I also searched for other occurrences of "species indigenous", found 62 occurrences, far more than "species that are indigenous", 4 occurrences and "species which are indigenous", 3 occurrences. So, against my better judgement, I opted for the second best option, as there are far too many full-time reverters about, who do nothing but monitor recent changes HOPING to find stuff to revert. As the son of a botanist, I applaud people like you who actually add knowledge, unlike the hundreds who fight over what to say and not say on the pages of celebrities. Thanks Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 14:54, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Owls Head, Lunenburg County, Nova Scotia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Southwest Cove, Nova Scotia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Charlottesville Festival of the Photograph

The article Charlottesville Festival of the Photograph has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't appear to meet the notability guideline for organisations or events or the general notability guideline

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 16:26, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Fletcher B. Cherington may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

((DEFAULTSORT:Cherington, Fletcher B.}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:46, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, B.S. Lawrence. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, B.S. Lawrence. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Leslie Cockburn (U.S. politician)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Leslie Cockburn (U.S. politician) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 15:40, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Leslie Cockburn (U.S. politician) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leslie Cockburn (U.S. politician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leslie Cockburn (U.S. politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. reddogsix (talk) 23:11, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Leslie Cockburn (U.S. politician)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Leslie Cockburn (U.S. politician). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Leslie Cockburn. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Leslie Cockburn. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. reddogsix (talk) 23:48, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, B.S. Lawrence. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

B.S. Lawrence (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #24929 was submitted on Apr 26, 2019 14:40:46. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 14:40, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]