User talk:Ayyyple2

Welcome!

Hello, Ayyyple2!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 15:40, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! :) Ayyyple2 (talk) 15:44, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Estanislao Javier de Lugo-Viña Molina moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Estanislao Javier de Lugo-Viña Molina, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Endrabcwizart (talk) 18:04, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What do I have to do so it's suitable Ayyyple2 (talk) 18:05, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to José de Lugo-Viña y Molina. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 23:01, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know Ayyyple2 (talk) 23:05, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

José de Lugo-Viña y Molina moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, José de Lugo-Viña y Molina, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 07:31, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Teobaldo Power moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Teobaldo Power, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. David notMD (talk) 13:06, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ah I see, so I need to add it and then I can submit it so it's published Ayyyple2 (talk) 13:13, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you need to submit it so it will be reviewed. Experienced editors who have had many successes in the review process can be comfortable creating articles without review, but editors new to the process are bette served by going through AfC. David notMD (talk) 22:50, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Portrait

The description of the portrait appears to be a paraphrasing of a translation you did. The source must be made a reference.

That's odd, I actually took the Spanish article of him and translated it. It's been published for years I believe Ayyyple2 (talk) 13:08, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. The paraphrasing is OK. The alternative would be to provide an exact translation, in quotes, but only if you can confirm that the Spanish Wikipedia article has the wording of the original source. Either way, for English Wikipedia, the source of the description needs to become a reference. David notMD (talk) 13:12, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lugo-Viña moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Lugo-Viña. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Apostolicus (talk) 12:04, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Teobaldo Power (March 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I cannot access the two sources to evaluate notability, but there have been no improvements since being moved from mainspace, and tone still needs addressing (some perhaps as a result of translation). The lead is also unintelligible to me, and contains a Spanish date and misformed link, which need fixing.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Teobaldo Power and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 11:19, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ayyyple2! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 11:19, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Teobaldo Power (April 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Deb was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

English is not good enough to enable an English speaker to follow the meaning.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Teobaldo Power and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Deb (talk) 15:32, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help me on the granmar? Ayyyple2 (talk) 15:41, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I changed up the grammar Ayyyple2 (talk) 15:59, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Soybooru

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Soybooru requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 23:32, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Huh...? I spent long on it, can i atleast copy the last version of it? Ayyyple2 (talk) 16:48, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure @Bbb23 can provide you a copy, if he wants. I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 17:57, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, ill ask him, but why was my article deleted? No sources? I provived Sources? Grammar? Ayyyple2 (talk) 17:59, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ayyyple2 The article didn't state why soybooru was important. Source might've helped, if there was a statement as to why soybooru was important to begin with. I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 18:02, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh Alright, i could add that it is Important on Meme Culture ? Also i wrote Bbb23 an Emsil, ill update you on it. Ayyyple2 (talk) 18:06, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ayyyple2 You can write about it in meme culture, but if you try to recreate the article exactly as it was, it's going to get deleted again. I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 18:09, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ayyyple2, I don't reply to user e-mail. However, I can undelete the article and move it to draft space so you can work on it and get feedback from WP:AFC reviewers. I will do this, though, only if you agree to stick to the AFC process, meaning not moving the draft to article space yourself. Let me know here if you wish the page draftified and if you agree to my condition. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:21, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, i do agree to be a draft. Would you help me with the article too? Thanks Ayyyple2 (talk) 18:23, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Done: Draft:Soybooru. Sorry, I'm not at all interested in helping with the article. Reviewers will help some with their feedback, and some reviewers or other editors may help more than that, don't know.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:30, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, ill try my best Ayyyple2 (talk) 19:01, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Francisco Lugo-Viña Molina (July 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tutwakhamoe was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The first two cited sources are about "José de Lugo y Molina", with no mention of the subject. Many sections of this article are just unsourced. The blogspot sources aren't reassuring either, since they are usually not accepted as reliable sources. Overall some other significant coverage from reliable and independent sources would be needed to prove that the person is notable enough to pass WP:NBIO.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Francisco Lugo-Viña Molina and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tutwakhamoe (talk) 19:50, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:José de Lugo-Viña y Molina

Hello, Ayyyple2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:José de Lugo-Viña y Molina, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Estanislao Javier de Lugo-Viña Molina

Hello, Ayyyple2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Estanislao Javier de Lugo-Viña Molina, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:03, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Cristóbal Ponte

Hello, Ayyyple2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cristóbal Ponte, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:03, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lugo-Viña

Hello, Ayyyple2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lugo-Viña, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Teobaldo Power

Hello, Ayyyple2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Teobaldo Power, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:04, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Teobaldo Power

Hello, Ayyyple2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Teobaldo Power".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:00, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Alexandra Cristina Echavarri

Hello, Ayyyple2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Alexandra Cristina Echavarri, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:06, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Francisco Lugo-Viña Molina

Hello, Ayyyple2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Francisco Lugo-Viña Molina, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:05, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bryan Zampella

Hello, Ayyyple2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bryan Zampella".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 02:02, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Francisco Lugo-Viña Molina

Hello, Ayyyple2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Francisco Lugo-Viña Molina".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:15, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Soybooru

Hello, Ayyyple2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Soybooru, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:35, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Soybooru

Hello, Ayyyple2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Soybooru".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:55, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]