User talk:Augurr

Welcome!

Hello, Augurr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me or a helper Commander Keane on our talk page. Again, welcome!

If you want to tell me something or if you just want to say hi, leave your message under the Talk Section of | My Talk Page

Anonymous anonymous 23:18, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Small request

Before posting anything to The South End error log in the Talk page of the article, I would like to request that you please e-mail them about it first and wait at least a week. If you don't get a reply, then go ahead and post it. Thank you. Del arte 17:37, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Like, what-ever!

Thank you for experimenting with the page Anal sex on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Rsm99833 23:07, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

reply

I assume you are refering to an reversion done back on the 16th. The edit you made was a bit POV, and badly-worded ("Having said that"). Try revising what you wrote. Rsm99833 20:25, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good Edit

That wording is a lot better. Have a good week! Rsm99833 21:55, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CSD A7

See WP:CSD #7 under Articles. - CrazyRussian talk/email 21:14, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's A7, no assertion of notability. Being a porn star doesn't merit an article, unless they are a particularly significant porn star, and the writing indicates this is a fairly low key porn star, hence not notable. The Lynne Stopkewich article has a small indication of notability that she is particularly known for something, though this may not be enough in itself to keep the article. Tyrenius 03:09, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Like, thanks. Augurr 22:29, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Brandon

If you source it in the article, feel free to add it. I didn't really feeling like googling a porn star at work, so I just excised it under WP:LIVING WilyD 13:57, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

But maybe it would be better to have a second source for this anyway. Augurr 20:52, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yield sign.svg Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from List of male performers in gay porn films. Please be more careful when editing articles provide an edit summary, so that others will not revert it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thanks! A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. V60 ^{VTalk · VDemolitions} 21:25, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was my intention, trying to take care of the self-references thingy. Augurr 21:28, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/List_of_male_performers_in_gay_porn_films, and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible.

Request for Mediation

A Request for Mediation to which you are a party was not accepted and has been delisted. You can find more information on the mediation subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/List of male performers in gay porn films.

For the Mediation Committee, ^demon^{[omg plz]}

This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management. If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

This message delivered: 04:16, 22 March 2007 (UTC).

Jason Hawke

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Jason Hawke, by 72.76.88.16 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Jason Hawke fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

bio

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Jason Hawke, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Jason Hawke itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 01:51, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jens Hammer

I read your recent comment about being distracted looking at pictures while searching for sources for Jens Hammer. People aren't going to take you seriously if you keep that up (no pun intended). As I see it, the subject is not really notable, but if you can find sources that say he is I would hasten to add them to the article. Otherwise the article is bound to be deleted. --71.127.232.229 12:21, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Thomas Lloyd (porn star)

An editor has nominated Thomas Lloyd (porn star), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Lloyd (porn star) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:14, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dax Kelly

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Dax Kelly, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. David in DC (talk) 15:48, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My Talk

LOL, was your post serious or sarcastic? At first I thought it was sarcastic, then I saw your page, and said a 'mo wouldn't treat me like that! lol ;) CTJF83Talk 21:01, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm serious. Oh my You, You are talking to me! I'm gonna faint! Augurr (talk) 13:38, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

Your signature (such as used here) is missing a closing </font>. Please fix! — xaosflux ^Talk 23:16, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wasn't your sig, just a post you made, I've killed it. — xaosflux ^Talk 23:19, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michael Soldier for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Soldier is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Soldier until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. gnu 57 03:03, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Russell Moore (film editor)

The article Russell Moore (film editor) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable BLP

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 15:04, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chad Donovan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chad Donovan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chad Donovan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. gnu 57 05:00, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michael Brandon (pornographic actor) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Brandon (pornographic actor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Brandon (pornographic actor) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 19:34, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]