User talk:Atotalstranger

Atotalstranger

October 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to List of Jewish chess players, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Epeefleche (talk) 03:31, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BLP violations and other poor sourcing issues

Hello, Atotalstranger. I was initially coming to your talk page to state that you need to stop (per WP:BLP) adding poor sources to articles of living persons, like you did here (though you removed that link soon afterward without removing the text) and here and recently at other articles. However, looking into your talk page history (scrolling down), I see that you have been warned about similar matters...but regarding deceased people. Because of the living person aspect, I am taking this topic to the WP:BLP noticeboard so that you may understand the WP:BLP policy. Also, even edits such this one to an article about a deceased person is unacceptable because the source is poor/unreliable. Flyer22 (talk) 20:12, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notification

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. AndyTheGrump (talk) 00:01, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Drmies (talk) 16:27, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sulphuri acid

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Sulphuri acid requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Rarkenin (talk) 17:23, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Hello, I'm Josh3580. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Cheryl Cole, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Josh3580_talk/hist 00:51, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to move pages to bad titles contrary to naming conventions or consensus, as you did at Gaia (spacecraft), you may be blocked from editing. W. D. Graham 16:01, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've deleted Game of Thrones (Video game). An article on the topic — if and when appropriate — should exist at Game of Thrones (2014 video game), the title that you previously used. I'm baffled as to why you responded to Masem's redirection to the developer's article by recreating the page under an ambiguous title with nonstandard capitalization. —David Levy 17:12, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Atotalstranger. You have new messages at WDGraham's talk page.
Message added 23:10, 20 December 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

W. D. Graham 23:10, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Atotalstranger. You have new messages at WDGraham's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

—David Levy 16:07, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:CalvinHarris.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:CalvinHarris.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Binksternet (talk) 06:34, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:CalvinHarris.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:CalvinHarris.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 16:47, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox UK settlement

Template:Infobox UK settlement has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. eh bien mon prince (talk) 19:23, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Eiffel Tower

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Eiffel Tower you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hchc2009 -- Hchc2009 (talk) 09:50, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Eiffel Tower

The article Eiffel Tower you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Eiffel Tower for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hchc2009 -- Hchc2009 (talk) 10:12, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Shard

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Shard you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HueSatLum -- HueSatLum (talk) 19:00, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Shard

The article The Shard you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:The Shard for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HueSatLum -- HueSatLum (talk) 16:20, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I notice you haven't been very active this month, but I was wondering if you could hop over to The Shard's GA review. If you're not going to have that time, you can withdraw the nomination and nominate again at your leisure when you have more time. Cheers, ~Hue Sat Lum 18:49, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Shard

The article The Shard you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:The Shard for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HueSatLum -- HueSatLum (talk) 16:12, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of L'Anse aux Meadows

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article L'Anse aux Meadows you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Madalibi -- Madalibi (talk) 06:00, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of L'Anse aux Meadows

The article L'Anse aux Meadows you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:L'Anse aux Meadows for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Madalibi -- Madalibi (talk) 09:10, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of L'Anse aux Meadows

The article L'Anse aux Meadows you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:L'Anse aux Meadows for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Madalibi -- Madalibi (talk) 11:32, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Skyfall

You are engaged in an edit war. Stop now. I have already told you to look at WP:BRD. Your Bold edit was Reverted. You now need to Discuss, and not edit war. Your edit was reverted partly because it is a poor, poor edit that introduces an error to the very first line of the article, and therefore is hardly considered an improvement. - SchroCat (talk) 13:54, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What sort of editor are you that you carry on trying to force your opinion into an article when someone has already told you IT CONTAINS ERRORS. It's a poor and petty route you are taking and you seem to be failing a basic competence test with such poor proactice. - SchroCat (talk) 14:30, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What is the error? I see no error in the edit I made, standard wiki film opening is "Film Name" "Year" "Country" "Genre", you'll see this in nearly every film you read about on wiki. To intentionally disregard it on this particular film is odd. Atotalstranger (talk) 14:34, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you lack understanding in a subject you really should not be edit warring over your preferred version. - SchroCat (talk) 14:46, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stranger, you need to stop edit warring right now. It was bad enough before, but you breaching WP:3RR, which can lead to a block. - SchroCat (talk) 14:56, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I see you have chosen to delete my warning. This doesn't altogether bother me, but unfortunately for you, this leaves a diff which has helped to contribute to this which you are now part of. Feel free to justify there as to why you have been so disruptive. Cassianto (talk) 15:21, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ben Lamb (actor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The White Queen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ben Lamb (actor) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ben Lamb (actor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Lamb (actor) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 23:52, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, it appears that you copied the text of this directly from User:Davidwr/Ben Lamb (actor). As a result, an administrator is going to have to come in and merge the histories of the two pages. Also, since there is essentially no new information there since the last AFD, it is likely that the page will be re-deleted unless it is improved in the next 7 days. In the future, instead of copying-and-pasting material from other editor's user-space drafts, consult with those editors to get the page improved BEFORE it becomes and article, then have the editor MOVE the page into the encyclopedia. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 23:56, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I thought it was removed because he was less notable at the time, but clearly he is more well known now after appearing in The White Queen and upcoming roles in blockbuster films Divergent and Insurgent.Atotalstranger (talk) 22:34, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also can you give me a valid reason why you keep deciding to delete this article?Atotalstranger (talk) 22:36, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

IMDB, user-generated sites and BLP

Please do not use IMDB and geneological websites such as houseofnames.com as sources in BLPs as they do not meet reliable sourcing criteria. There have been a number of BLP concerns regarding your edits raised on this page, so please do ensure you both read and understand the requirement for solid sourcing in biography articles. --Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 00:28, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Human, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Extant (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Murder of Meredith Kercher may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Meredith Susanna Cara Kercher (born 28 December 1985 in [[Southwark]], [[South London]]. Her mother is [[Indian people|Indian]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:27, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jim Chapman (vlogger)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jim Chapman (vlogger) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. TheLongTone (talk) 08:20, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ice Age Giants

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Ice Age Giants, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.atheistnexus.org/video/alice-roberts-ice-age-giants-episodes-1-2-3-of-3.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:49, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Your addition to Ice Age Giants has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:42, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ice Age Giants, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cave lion (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ship pronouns

Re: your changes to pronoun usage on the Queen Elizabeth-class aircraft carrier articles and its ship pages: Per WP:SHIPPRONOUNS, either feminine or neutral gender is acceptable in ship-related articles, provided the usage is consistent within each article. This usage has been challenged before and upheld, the latest discussion being at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Archive 159#. Thanks. - BilCat (talk) 23:37, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 5 February

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Conor McGregor page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:16, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of countries and dependencies by area

I undid you changes to List of countries and dependencies by area because you did not give an explanation of why you were making the change and the language there is already contentious so but that was agreed upon. I don't see how your edits were an improvement, please explain on the talk page and we can go from there. The US and China rankings are a pretty constant source of trouble on the site, hence why I reverted, not that your edits were trouble. XFEM Skier (talk) 22:16, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I was only trying to make the cause of the dispute more clear in the footnote. Atotalstranger (talk) 17:53, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yoel Romero's height

Hey brother, a much more recent source stating Romero's height is currently being used in the article. Reverting this would constitute as vandalism. WWE Batman131 (talk) 16:04, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

But that's clearly not his height as he was at least 4 inches shorter than Machida. If his height was listed as 7 foot when he's clearly not we just put that anyway? Atotalstranger (talk) 23:01, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

4 inches shorter is your opinion, which with all due respect is meaningless. UFC's official profile states 6 feet. This was measured upon Romero's UFC debut and before each of his UFC fights, which are much more up-to-date than his Strikeforce fights. WWE Batman131 (talk) 23:52, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Hello, I'm Vortiene. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Heavy metal music without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Vortiene (talk) 00:27, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Heavy metal music, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Vortiene (talk) 05:45, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

UFC 202

Please refrain from non-constructive edits like yours at UFC 202. That is pure vandalism showing up out of nowhere to remove content. Do it again and you'll be reported for such behavior. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 00:40, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Atotalstranger. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Hello, I'm Iryna Harpy. I noticed that you removed topically-relevant content from Panties. However, Wikipedia is not censored to remove content that might be considered objectionable. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 18:35, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Atotalstranger. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

— Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 05:07, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Atotalstranger. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Atotalstranger. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]