User talk:Askkaty2write

Welcome!

Hello, Askkaty2write, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Airgo Music, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Toddst1 (talk) 02:43, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Airgo Music

A tag has been placed on Airgo Music requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Toddst1 (talk) 02:43, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Airgo Music

Hi there! Per your email, here's a copy of the article you created that was speedy-deleted. You can find it in your userspace at User:Askkaty2write/Airgo_Music where you can edit it away, add refs, etc before it goes live (if it does). Let me know if you've any questions or problems and I'll see if I can help. Have fun, and belated welcome to Wikipedia :) - Alison ^❤ 04:01, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Askkaty2write/AirgoMusic

Hello, Askkaty2write. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "AirgoMusic".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. DannyS712 (talk) 17:47, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tatum Lynn

The article Tatum Lynn has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability per WP:GNG or WP:NMUSIC.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 16:53, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tatum Lynn for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tatum Lynn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tatum Lynn until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ... discospinster _talk 17:01, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Center for Italian Modern Art (May 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://www.italianmodernart.org/fellowship-program/, http://ariah.info/CIMA.html, https://www.nyc-arts.org/organizations/95258/center-for-italian-modern-art. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Center for Italian Modern Art may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

A S U K I T E 04:24, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Askkaty2write! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! A S U K I T E 04:24, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Center for Italian Modern Art (May 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Center for Italian Modern Art may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

nearlyevil 665 07:21, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Please read the following regarding writing an article:

you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation or company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, logs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company or organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:

significant coverage in
independent,
multiple,
reliable,
secondary sources.

Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability. There is actually very little about the museum as such. We don't know who owns it, how it's financed, what it spends, how many people it employs, or what the collection consists of other than the featured exhibit

You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews. Most of your text seems to be promotional rather than factual. Most of the lead para is aims and missions, not facts promotes scholarly research and public appreciation... advocates for a deeper awareness... and the second paragraph is entirely cherry-picked quotes. CIMA's notability doesn't depend on whether people like it or not, and that just looks spammy. Also, despite the general lack of real info, you have masses of details about visiting arrangements.
There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections. That includes the link to the CIMA website.
You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient. With a copyright violation, there is nothing to discuss. Copied text can't be hosted here for any reason.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:37, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Center for Italian Modern Art (May 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The text is a close paraphrasing of sources 1 (NYC Arts, the Complete Guide), 3 (artandeducation.net), and 4 (CIMA's website). All three sources are primary, where 1 and 3 are based on the text from the centre itself in 4, and since they are written to promote the centre, it follows naturally that any text closely modelled on them will also be promotional. What is required is several independent sources discussing the centre itself in some depth (see this information). Sources 5 and 6 appear to be independent and source 2 might be independent, but none of them is primarily about the CIMA.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Center for Italian Modern Art and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Center for Italian Modern Art, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 08:39, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Center for Italian Modern Art has been accepted

Center for Italian Modern Art, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 01:23, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image licence?

Hi, you've added an image to Center for Italian Modern Art, which you uploaded to Commons as your 'own work', yet the file name says "photo by Walter Smalling Jr" — can you clarify which it is, or whether you and Mr Smalling are indeed the same person? Thanks, --DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:27, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creating autobiographies

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself, at Katy Krassner. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. 2A01:4C8:41:F1F7:81A5:6F86:A87:A965 (talk) 05:54, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This was not written by Ms. Krassner. I'm happy to Provide any links or citations needed. Thank you very much for your consideration. Be well. Askkaty2write (talk) 05:59, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Then please read WP:Conflict of interest, particularly the sections about declaring your connection, paid or unpaid, with Ms. Krassner. The article is written with a promotional tone, and contains unsourced personal information that implies a close relationship with the subject. Thanks, 2A01:4C8:41:F1F7:81A5:6F86:A87:A965 (talk) 06:17, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for the guidance. Will look over. I noticed mentions of her on two Wiki entries and did honest to god research. Will review and make changed Askkaty2write Askkaty2write (talk) 18:05, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Katy Krassner

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Katy Krassner, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 2A01:4C8:A9:88C4:F03C:8DDF:77C:6D31 (talk) 05:53, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Donald Ray "DJ" Johnson Jr. moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Donald Ray "DJ" Johnson Jr., is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CUPIDICAE💕 17:47, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thank you! I appreciate your advice. I know there are pages for his other band mates and felt he deserved one too (I love the band!). I thought the 6 sources I found were good - can you give me any advice? thank you !! Askkaty2write (talk) 17:51, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I was hoping you could give me some feedback on the changes I've made. it doesn't seem like this should be a page remaining as a draft. thank you! Askkaty2write (talk) 0:47, 16 April 2022 (UTC) Askkaty2write (talk) 04:47, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Donald Ray Johnson Jr. (April 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Siliconred was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Does not appear to meet WP:BANDMEMBER. None of the cited coverage is independent of the musician or ensemble itself. I'd recommend taking a look at WP:NMUSICIAN to see the specific requirements to demonstrate notability for a member of a musical group.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Donald Ray Johnson Jr. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Donald Ray Johnson Jr., click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SiliconRed (he/him) (talk) 20:29, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Hello, I'm SunDawn. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to Draft:Donald Ray Johnson Jr. because they seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:32, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SunDawn, Thanks for contacting me. It seems like you removed DJ's contribution to a Mac Miller release, which I think is important in establishing him as a musician in his own right. I actually can't understand why the drummer for a band as notable as Khruangbin doesn't have his own Wiki page but I was told to find information that established him away from the band. Which is why I added the Mac Miller credit. Can you please advice? thank you! Askkaty2write (talk) 03:38, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Donald Ray Johnson Jr. (July 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Missvain was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Khruangbin. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The citations here do not establish why the subject should have their own Wikipedia article. They appear to not be independently notable outside of the band they are in.

All of the citations are either primary sources (interview in Modern Drummer, Grammys.com, etc) or passing mentions of him in articles about the band he is in.

I do not believe the subject is eligible for their own article based on notability at this time.

I hope you will consider improving existing Wikipedia content about other subjects of interest!

If you have any questions please ask them at WP:TEAHOUSE.

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Donald Ray Johnson Jr. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Missvain (talk) 04:11, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I really appreciate you taking the time to comment even if it wasn't the reply I'd hoped for. I really don't understand how DJ's credentials as a member of an internationally famous touring group isn't enough to warrant his own wiki page, even if the breadth of his work isn't as extensive as his band mates. I have really seen so many unknown musicians who are part of larger bands with their own Wiki pages, I remain perplexed why DJ hasn't made the cut. Any more feedback you could provide would be appreciated! thank you! Askkaty2write (talk) 04:48, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Donald Ray Johnson Jr.

Hello, Askkaty2write. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Donald Ray Johnson Jr., a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Donald Ray Johnson Jr.

Hello, Askkaty2write. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Donald Ray Johnson Jr.".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:19, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Hello Askkaty2write. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Askkaty2write. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Askkaty2write|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Star Mississippi 18:44, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You’re mistaken. As you can see from my late response , I do not frequently check wiki at all. I’ve added things to pages I know about. Is there something that made you think I was paid to edit a topic? Thank you. Askkaty2write (talk) 20:16, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]