User talk:Asiaticus

Starting my talk page: 4/29/2006

Welcome!

Hello, Asiaticus, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Миборовский ^{U|T|C|M|E|Chugoku Banzai!} 02:15, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the Military history WikiProject!

Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
The announcement and open task box is updated quite regularly. You can watch it if you're interested; or, you can add it directly to your user page by including {{WPMILHIST Announcements}} there.
The project has a monthly newsletter; it will normally be delivered as a link, but several other formats are available.

There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

Starting some new articles? Our article structure guidelines outline some things to include.
Interested in working on a more complete article? The military history peer review and collaboration departments would welcome your help!
Interested in a particular area of military history? We have a number of task forces that focus on specific nations or periods.
Want to know how good our articles are? The assessment department is working on rating the quality of every military history article in Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the project coordinators, or any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Kirill Lokshin 11:32, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese military history task force

I can't believe I forgot you... Anyway, after some deliberation the Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Chinese military history task force has been started, and we'd really appreciate your expert knowledge in this field... please add your name to the list of participants and join in the discussions! -- Миборовский ^{U|T|C|M|E|Chugoku Banzai!} 01:24, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I will. Best insurance against a disc crash.:^) Asiaticus 06:17, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Added to the Qingdao page, an edit on the comment on the Tsingtao Campaingn of WWI and a link to a good webpage [1] Tsingtao Campaign by Colin DenisAsiaticus 06:15, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Been adding to the 2nd Sino-Japanese War battle articles as time permits. A major add of the Chinese Winter Offensive of 1939-40. Also correcting and adding bios for some of the generals and other minor tweeks. Asiaticus 07:49, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Wuhan

hey!

Nice work on Order of battle of Battle of Wuhan!!! I will try help with the Battle of Wuhan section, as it's one of the most stirring battle of the era. AQu01rius 20:10, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Id say so. It was a huge campaign and a lot going on. 2nd Army coming in from the North and the 11th Army coming up the Yangtze. There is a lot of naval and air action too. BTW who are you. You didnt sign your post. Asiaticus 19:58, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I always forget to sign my name.. AQu01rius 20:10, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

I extensively expanded the Battle of Wuhan.. check it out! :) (and check my probably massive errors.. I wrote & translate those in two days)

--AQu01rius 17:24, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

translation

Yeah I do.. I'll help on that page later.. don't worry about it

can you help me to check my translation on 中原大戰 in Battle of Central Plains to see if it's ok. I couldn't believe there was no article for that and have been working on it today.

--AQu01rius 02:30, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Ok sure. I see the article on the subject on the Chinese Wikipedia. Interesting name they have "Area south of Yellow River war". :^) Kinda clunky, I like yours better.Asiaticus 03:46, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man

Your translation pace is amazing :o

Want to help me a little bit on Xinhai Revolution ? I am almost done with it (self-translated everything from "History of the development" to very bottom. AQu01rius (User | Talk | Websites) 21:55, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be happy to help if I can. I am using the Alta Vista translator to do what translating I do. Its kinda lame and I have to do some guess work or consultion of other sources. Nice article BTW Asiaticus 11:10, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rosetta Barnstar

		The Rosetta Barnstar
		For your extensive translation on articles of History of the Republic of China and Second Sino-Japanese War. Great work! AQu01rius (User • Talk) 04:38, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I thought this was a barnstar for contributions in Ancient Egypt areas until I read the description =P AQu01rius (User • Talk) 04:38, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, its been interesting finding out about the warlord era. Asiaticus 03:22, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Japanese forces in Kuriles & South Sakhalin, 1945

Am trying to sort out what Japanese forces faced the Soviets when they invaded there. Was there an Area Army or Army responsible for those regions? Thanks Buckshot06 (talk) 21:08, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Its all listed there on the Wikipaedia entry for August Storm. Asiaticus (talk) 06:41, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

From my reading of the entries, the Japanese force in Karafuto/South Sakhalin & the Kuriles appears to have been the Japanese Fifth Area Army, rather than the Kwantung Army. Does that sound right? Buckshot06 (talk) 06:56, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nuts. You're correct. I am confused with his hard back book:

Soviet Operational and Tactical Combat in Manchuria, 1945: August Storm (Cass Series on Soviet (Russian) Military Experience, 8) (Hardcover) by DAVID GLANTZ (Author). The last two chapters added since the Levenworth Paper version cover the operations there. Asiaticus (talk) 07:15, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you've got that book, can you check what was the composition of the Soviet force that captured the Kuriles - it's a bit unclear to me? Cheers Buckshot06 (talk) 07:41, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sadly I dont have that version, just know it exists. You might ask on the Axis History forum in the Pacific War or the The Soviet Union at War 1917-1945 forums. Someone there probably will have your answer. Asiaticus (talk) 07:53, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Honggor

Hi, a while ago you created an article on this place on WP, including its coordinates. Do you remember where exactly the coordinates and the Chinese characters were from? The problem is that there are a number of places with that name in Inner Mongolia, and that they may have different characters representing them (one 红格尔 sum in Siziwang Banner of Ulanqab, one 洪格尔 in Sonid Left Banner of Xilin Gol League, another place named 洪格尔 in the Sonid Right Banner of the same League, possibly some more), and it is hard to determine which of these places your coordinates refer to. Yaan (talk) 19:56, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I found the place IDed as Hongge'ertu, 红格尔图, by Guo Rugui in 第二部分：从“九一八”事变到西安事变日本侵绥的战备企图和中日 was modern Hobor and put that in my article on the Suiyuan Campaign (1936).Asiaticus (talk) 13:05, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But what exactly is your reason to believe 红格尔图 (which looks more like a transcription of Hongort, i.e. something like the locative case of Hongor) refers to modern-day Hobor (quite a different name, actually) and not to, say, the 红格尔图镇 in Chahar Right Back Banner?

I also could not easily find any 红格尔图 on this or this map, but maybe I just did not hard enough. Could you give me the coordinates?

Best regards, Yaan (talk) 16:49, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I Did not have any coordiantes on 红格尔图, it was just the name of the battle given in Guo Rugui's account. According to Guo Rugui, 第二部分：从“九一八”事变到西安事变日本侵绥的战备企图和中日 2, "红格尔图属绥远陶林县". Hongge’ertu was the Suiyuan town of Taolinxian 陶林县 or T'ao-Lin according to the period topo map: Chi-Ning nk49-9. It is currently called Hobor in Inner Mongolia. It had a stategic position linking Shangdu to the advance base at Bailingmiao and was in a pass along the route for the Mongolians intended advance south to take Baotou and Jining.Asiaticus (talk) 21:44, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I still could not find any place called Hung-ke-erh-t'u or 红格尔图 (or something similar) near Taolinxian. I have no doubt that Taolinxian is identical to Hobor, the question is whether 红格尔图 is the same as Taolinxian. An automatic translation of "红格尔图属绥远陶林县，为千余人口的小镇，西距县城80公里，南离集宁90公里，东距敌伪盘踞的商都30公里，为绥、察交界之要冲，是绥东北的门户，是商都通往百灵庙的必经之地。驻守这里的是骑兵第1师彭毓斌部的3个连。" (from http://www.wehoo.net/book/wlwh/a30012/04580.htm seems to indicate that while 红格尔图 was part of 陶林 county of Suiyuan province, Honggort was in fact located about 80 km east of the county center, 90 km north of Jining, and only 30 km from Shangdu (and had only about(?) 1000 inhabitants). In other words, Taolin(xian?) city and Honggort are two different places, 80 kms apart, and Honggort is not so far from Shangdu. I am of course no sure how god your Chinese is (mine is close to non-existent), but maybe this is just the kind of question to ask at WP-project China? Regards, Yaan (talk) 19:37, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure why not. Maybe someone else can figure it out.Asiaticus (talk) 21:07, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alright then. Yaan (talk) 13:47, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just found a Hung-ko-erh-t'u at about 113°15'E, 41°40'N. It is on the northwestern road from Shangdu (which, just in case, is not to be confused with that other Shangdu), according to the map it is walled and the distance to Shangdu is 33km. But also according to the map, it is located in Chahar, not in Suiyuan. Yaan (talk) 13:56, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pinacate/Perris contribs

Cool entries! It made me go back into the article on the OERM (which I originally did anyway) and split off an article on one of its historic diesels. Haven't been to the place in years, but I may go soon. Thanks for the inspiration! Regards, --PMDrive1061 (talk) 04:28, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese Winter Counteroffensive

Hi Asiaticus, how're you doing? I was wondering if you know which of the big battles (會戰) does the 1939-40 Chinese Winter Counteroffensive belong in? Thanks man. Blueshirts (talk) 04:47, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Acording to the source I had, the 1939–1940 Winter Offensive was its own Offensive, an attempt by the KMT to roll back the effects of the Japanese Wuhan Offensive and subsequent offensives gains, on he basis that the Japanese were spreading out their forces for occupation and were vulnerabls using guerilla attacks as shown in the Battle of Changsha (1939). It only seemed to work well in Battle of Wuyuan and later in Battle of South Guangxi/Battle of Kunlun Pass but it did tie up the Japanese for a while undoing it elsewhere.

I think the Red Chinese may have done the Hundred Regiments Offensive because some of them came to think the Japanese were vulnerable or at least thought they needed to initate that offensive to look like they were holding up their part of their United Front with the KMT. They had obstructed or attacked KMT forces operations in or near their base areas during the offensive according to Hsu Long-hsuen. I beleve Mao was not in favor of it, and he seemed to have been right, as it provoked the Three Alls counteroffensive against the Reds that did a lot of damage to them. (BTW I think an expanded article on the counter insurgency campaigns of the Three Alls Policy would be a good addition to the Second Sino-Japanese War).

See the sources, most of the account comes from the condensed English translation of a multi volume histoy, Hsu Long-hsuen and Chang Ming-kai, History of The Sino-Japanese War (1937–1945) 2nd Ed., 1971. I imagine the multi volume work in Chinese would be a hell of a lot more informative.Asiaticus (talk) 07:18, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Belleville, California

On November 23, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Belleville, California, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page _{(here's how)} and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 13:21, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:44, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Great Flood of 1862

On 7 October 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Great Flood of 1862, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 00:03, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Indian Wars

I see you added California as a belligerent in the Indian Wars. Is there any reason why you think it should be listed separately, instead of a part of the United States of America? Note that unlike Texas, California has not been an independent state during any period of time, so I don't think it should be listed as a separate belligerent. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.87.1.167 (talk) 02:01, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

California was an independent belligerent in many cases. Between 1850 and 1854 the gold rush caused many of the the few U. S. Army troops in the state to desert in great numbers and then drove wages and prices up so that there was great difficulty recruiting or retaining them or supplying them. Before the railroads, California was economically isolated from the rest of the U. S. by the costs involved in sending goods from the East and dependent on local goods.

California organized large numbers of militia troops mainly to put down bandits and Indian uprisings, mostly because U. S. Army troops would not or could not act against them. It was a political issue no governor could ignore in a state with a large mostly young male population that demanded and expected action and were quite capable of doing it on their own if need be and making the offending governor or party pay at the next election or sooner, as did the 1856 vigilace commitee in San Francisco. There were a number of campaigns against the Indians fought with California Militia from the time of statehood up thru the Civil War. Many of the Volunteers were former California militiamen who joined the ranks during the Civil War. California volunteers fought Indians all over the Pacific slope of the U. S. and New Mexico Territory during the Civil war. A couple of serious wars that Federal troops did not have much involvement, (only a little in 1861 in the Bald Hills War) or no involvement, (in the Owens Valley Indian War). Note the U. S. Army makes no mention of these in their list of Army campaigns vs the Indians, because they were basically California military affairs even if carried out technically as U. S. Army operations, California officers and troops carried them out at the behest of California governors. The Bald Hills War was won by a Mountain Battalion of former local California Militiamen especially recruited to fight that war.Asiaticus (talk) 09:30, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bear River Massacre

I want to thank you for your bold actions in regards to User:$1LENCE D00600D and what was done to modify the Bear River Massacre article. While it was an interesting theory to try and link several military actions together, I do consider that to be original research as it is unsupported by reliable sources or scholarly research by established historians.

Essentially, you deserve a barnstar for that action:

		The Original Barnstar
		For being bold in defending Wikipedia

The Great Arkansas Barnstar

		The Great Arkansas Barnstar
		Thanks for your efforts at expanding and improving the article Arkansas in the American Civil War Aleutian06 (talk) 19:22, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1st Battalion of Native Cavalry, California Volunteers

Asiaticus,

Article: 1st Battalion of Native Cavalry, California Volunteers.

I personally would like to encourage you to expand the above article further. You have done a good job so far ... However, there are still some unreferenced sections in the article, which I have marked for you. The Coordinators at WikiProject Military History would like to see users such as yourself do a good job with articles which are highly assessed. Hope to hear from you in the near future. Please do not hesitate to post on my Discussion page. Adamdaley (talk) 13:35, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tejon Pass

Very interesting additions at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tejon_Pass&action=historysubmit&diff=460577925&oldid=459767310. Do you have any citations? Thanks very much. GeorgeLouis (talk) 13:57, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

		The Geography Barnstar
		For very interesting work on the Tejon Pass

1st Regiment Nebraska Volunteer Cavalry

Asiaticus,

Article: 1st Regiment Nebraska Volunteer Cavalry.

I'm only asking did you add the additional information about the above article? I mean it seems like the Battles and sentences run into each other. I've seen this quite alot in the articles among the American Civil War. Do you know who would it be? It would be appreciated if you gave feedback. Adamdaley (talk) 12:06, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It was added early on it seems, not by me. Somehow whoever added it managed to avoid an edit entry in the Veiw History. It is probably a cut and paste of the Dyers Compendium entry on the service of this unit on this website of Civil War units:Union Regimental Histories, Nebraska Should be referanced in notes and can be cleaned up for better understanding of the service of the unit, Link to locations, battles etc. Or expand into a section on the history of the units service. I did that for some California units pages I have done. Asiaticus (talk) 20:14, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Antelope Valley

Hello, Asiaticus. I just wanted to let you know that I've recently become aware of you and your edits, especially those concerning things to do with the Antelope Valley. As a current AV resident, I've found a lot of it to be quite interesting. It's my plan to improve the articles about the Antelope Valley, Palmdale, Lancaster, CA and a few others. I've already started at User:Matthewedwards/AV, but it's a slow process! :p Best, Matthewedwards : Chat 06:57, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I got started on what I have been doing with California history subjects from improving the History section of the Wikipedia artice for my hometown of Lake Elsinore, California. Turned out a lot of history linked into it in my local region and elsewhere, so I gradually spread out into other related topics.Asiaticus (talk) 07:30, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar for you

		The California Star
		Especially for those contributions related to the Inland Empire! They are noted and greatly appreciated. – S. Rich (talk) 02:44, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks its nice to be appreciated. 03:02, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Fort Baker location

Thank you for starting the Fort Baker (Humboldt County) page! I was wondering if you have put a geolocation for that site? Thank you. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:21, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I put up the coords on it. Its a general location as the actual site has been obliterated by flooding over the last 150 years. Asiaticus (talk) 18:54, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Super!! Thank you! By the way you might find this page useful for Google books references it's the Google Book Citation creator. For other citations there is a helpful application Wikipedia citation generator. You just put in the URL of whatever you're citing and you get the framework at least of the citation. For mapping, the most useful things I've found is a page which lets you find Latitute/Longitude from addresses or locations. To put that lat/long into Wiki format, just paste what you got from the first one into this map tool. Cheers!! Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:58, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the links, they will be useful.Asiaticus (talk) 01:17, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 114th Division (Imperial Japanese Army) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 114th Division (Imperial Japanese Army) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/114th Division (Imperial Japanese Army) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sven Manguard Wha? 18:25, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Creation of Tule River War

Hi, Asiaticus! Thanks for your creation of Tule River War! Keep it up :D Upjav (talk) 01:17, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Global account

Hi Asiaticus! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to ping me with {{ping|DerHexer}}. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 23:01, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for work on California steamboats

Thank you for your work on California steamboats, especially Steamboats of the Colorado River. This topic long needed addressing.Mtsmallwood (talk) 15:28, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, high praise it seems, seeing what you have done. Not yet done with the Colorado River article, took a pause on it recently. Playing some catchup on doing related links and some other stuff. Want to expand the main California Steamboat article similarly to the Colorado one. A lot there to do. Asiaticus (talk) 18:54, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello Asiaticus. Not sure if you remember me but my username was AQu01rius. Anyway it is nice to see you still around and doing amazing work as usual. Alex Shih ^Talk 15:16, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I sure do remember you. Long time no hear from!:^) I see from your page you have been busy in the real world. I on the other hand have been retired for a few years. I keep puttering away on Wikipedia but not on China history but more on our local history things related to 19th century California history, people, trails and old wagon and stage roads through southern California, and the southwest USA. Also the steamboats in the state especially on the Colorado River. Also have some things coming on conflicts here with a bandit gang in San Luis Obispo County, the native people and especially one between factions in old San Bernardino before the American Civil War that seems was never correctly understood by local historians. Asiaticus (talk) 23:27, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for creating Calabasas, Arizona. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:21, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alturas, Nevada for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alturas, Nevada is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alturas, Nevada until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cxbrx (talk) 05:10, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"List of coastal islands of the Californias" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect List of coastal islands of the Californias. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 17#List of coastal islands of the Californias until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Andrew🐉(talk) 15:14, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Wingate Bar, California for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wingate Bar, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wingate Bar, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. // Timothy :: talk 14:25, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lincoln County, New Mexico, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Placitas, New Mexico.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:41, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mariposita, California for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mariposita, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mariposita, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. aNubiSIII ^{(T / C)}20:25, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject Newcomer and Historian of the Year awards now open

G'day all, the nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject newcomer and Historian of the Year are open, all editors are encouraged to nominate candidates for the awards before until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2020, after which voting will occur for 14 days. There is not much time left to nominate worthy recipients, so get to it! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" closing

G'day all, voting for the WikiProject Military history "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" is about to close, so if you haven't already, click on the links and have your say before 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:34, 28 December 2020 (UTC) for the coord team[reply]

Nomination of Llanada, California for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Llanada, California, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Llanada, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Newton's Crossing, California for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Newton's Crossing, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newton's Crossing, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Hog Farm _Bacon 22:12, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Willard, California for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Willard, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mangoe (talk) 05:05, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bayoreca, Sonora

The article Bayoreca, Sonora has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a settlement per WP:GEOLAND, only a ranch/locale. Doesn't meet the minimum.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:12, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Davis's Ferry

The article Davis's Ferry has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GEOLAND. Only references are GNIS, which is known to be unreliable, and a single mention in a list of places.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Proposed deletion of Chimehuevis Landing, California

The article Chimehuevis Landing, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Literal river landing fails WP:GEOLAND, single source is only a handful of passing mentions that say nothing other than that this was an old river landing.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm _Talk 04:57, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I object to the deletion of this article on this old settlement like many on the Colorado River that were necessary for the operation of the steamboats that made settlement of that are possible.Asiaticus (talk) 06:09, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

objection to deletion of this article.

These landings were the centers of local settlement and key places along the river for feuling steamboats, the most significant connection with the outside world for the Colorado River area until 1878 and 1883.Asiaticus (talk) 06:30, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chimehuevis Landing, California for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chimehuevis Landing, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chimehuevis Landing, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Hog Farm _Talk 17:46, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sawmill Flat

The article Sawmill Flat has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

only one article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Pontificalibus 10:22, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:22, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Piute Spring

In case you haven't spotted it on a watch list, see Wikipedia_talk:Disambiguation#Piute_Spring. PamD 15:01, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of McCloud Bridge Campground

The article McCloud Bridge Campground has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability of generic campground not established with substantive independent sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92^Talk 00:15, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXXII, June 2021

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Nick-D on RAAF aircraft, Hawkeye7 on mission command and nuclear secrecy

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:06, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXXIII, July 2021

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Peacemaker67 and Nick-D on World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:29, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXXIV, August 2021

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 on Commonwealth armies and an Australian spy, Nick-D on the American Revolutionary War and RAAF mine laying
Op-ed: RobDuch on United States coastal defenses

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:48, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:58, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nomination period closing soon

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are still open, but not for long. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! No further nominations will be accepted after that time. Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:42, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election voting has commenced

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Appropriate questions for the candidates can also be asked. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:38, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXXV, September 2021

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 on Australia and the UK in Iraq and Afghanistan
Op-ed: Nick-D on writing about military procurement

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:58, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXXV, September 2021

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 on Australia and the UK in Iraq and Afghanistan
Op-ed: Nick-D on writing about military procurement

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:02, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bakers Crossing, Texas for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bakers Crossing, Texas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bakers Crossing, Texas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

wizzito | say hello! 00:54, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting period closing soon

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche will be closing soon. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXV, October 2021

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Nick-D on British conscription and German warship raiders

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:51, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVI, November 2021

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 on Canadian junior officers in World War II

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:25, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Survey about History on Wikipedia

I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.

If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 (talk) 10:59, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVII, December 2021

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Nick-D on the Franklin–Nashville campaign
Review essay: Military History Wikiproject Coordinators' reading list

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:09, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVIII, January 2022

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Nick-D on the Australian Army in Somalia
Review essay: Hog Farm on American Civil War sites in the South and Midwest

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:44, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVIV, February 2022

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D on World War II in Europe

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:22, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVII, March 2022

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Nick-D on Hitler as a military leader

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:14, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVIII, April 2022

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 on military logistics and rebuilding Nagasaki

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:22, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXCIII, May 2022

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 on a World War II summit and the American space program

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:54, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXCIV, June 2022

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at four recent works

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:42, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXCVI, July 2022

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 on Falklands War artillery and Nick-D on the Battle of the Ruhr

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 20:27, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lower Salmon Falls for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lower Salmon Falls is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lower Salmon Falls until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FrederalBacon (talk) 20:55, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Upper Salmon Falls for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Upper Salmon Falls is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Upper Salmon Falls until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FrederalBacon (talk) 21:18, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXCVII, August 2022

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 on the Falklands War

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 08:57, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations opening soon

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:50, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting opening soon!

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:26, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Correction to previous election announcement

Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I (Hog Farm) didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:40, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting closing soon

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring here If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:12, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXCVIII, September 2022

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 on Australian military leadership and Nick-D on the First Crusade's Byzantine connection

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:30, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXCVIII, October 2022

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Recent external reviews
Op-ed: Meet some of the project coordinators

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:37, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXCIX, November 2022

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Nick-D on the 1991 Gulf War air campaign
Op-ed: Meet some more of the coordinators

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:31, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CC, December 2022

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Nick-D looks at British Territorials in India
Interview: On turning 200 (issues of the Bugle!)
Review essay: Coordinators' 2022 reading list
Op-ed: Meet some more of the coordinators

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:55, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 201, January 2023

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 on the key contributions of two Australian scientists in World War II
Review essay: Nick-D reports on his recent visits to British military sites

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 19:44, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 202, February 2023

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 on translation and Eisenhower's armies
Review essay: Catlemur on military museums in Athens

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:26, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 203, March 2023

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hog Farm on the Trans-Mississippi Theater of the American Civil War

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:28, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 204, April 2023

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Nick-D on the Australian War Memorial and the South China Sea raid, Hawkeye7 on the 1999 East Timor intervention

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:29, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 205, May 2023

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 on the Western Allied invasion of Germany
Op-ed: Hawkeye7's tips for writing articles on military logistics

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:33, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 205, May 2023

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 on the Western Allied invasion of Germany
Op-ed: Hawkeye7's tips for writing articles on military logistics

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 08:04, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 206, June 2023

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D review three recent works

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 18:29, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tippett, Nevada for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tippett, Nevada is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tippett, Nevada until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–dlthewave ☎ 17:58, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 207, July 2023

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Nick-D on alleged Australian war crimes and Hawkeye7 on the 1944–45 Philippines campaign and the Australian Signals Directorate

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 19:57, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 208, August 2023

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Recent external reviews
Op-ed: Adam Cuerden on finding and using images

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:28, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:04, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 209, September 2023

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Recent external reviews
Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on the Oppenheimer biopic

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:35, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tequesquite Creek

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tequesquite Creek requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 23:16, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 210, October 2023

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 on an American general and the first female astronauts, Nick-D on Roman fortifications

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 19:24, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 211, November 2023

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at English Civil War logistics and Peacemaker67 at Austro-Hungarian torpedo boats
Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on how WP:SIZE matters

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 18:17, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People of the District of Columbia in the American Civil War has been nominated for merging

Category:People of the District of Columbia in the American Civil War has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 16:02, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 212, December 2023

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Nick-D looks at the Russian invasion of Ukraine
Op-ed: Nick-D on writing Rhodesian military articles

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:59, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023 is now open!

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 213, January 2024

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at three diverse works
Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on the state of the Wikiproject

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 18:31, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Black Bear, California

The article Black Bear, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable location. No information found, and the cited sources are insufficient to establish notability. Satellite image shows just a single isolated ranch. Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG; GNIS and post office do not count toward notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 03:02, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Witch Creek, San Diego County, California

The article Witch Creek, San Diego County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable location (GNIS does not establish notability). No information found; satellite view just shows a field with a couple of farmhouses in the area. Fails WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:35, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 214, February 2024

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 and Pickersgill-Cunliffe review four books

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 19:08, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 215, March 2024

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at four recent works

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:56, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Campaignbox Bald Hills War

Template:Campaignbox Bald Hills War has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 17:27, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 216, April 2024

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7, Nick-D and Pickersgill-Cunliffe discuss six (count 'em, six!) works comprising eight volumes
Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on a lecture by the Australian official historian

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:08, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 217, May 2024

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at a diverse range of works
Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on the "center of gravity"

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 20:19, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of George T. Fulgham

The article George T. Fulgham has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article does not contain any clear evidence supporting its subject's notability. Furthermore, it lacks citations and consists of a single sentence.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 19:24, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Order of battle for campaign of northern and eastern Honan 1938 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Order of battle for campaign of northern and eastern Honan 1938 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Order of battle for campaign of northern and eastern Honan 1938 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

SilverStar54 (talk) 23:16, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 218, June 2024

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at the Tokyo war crimes trials

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:42, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{subst:proposed deletion notify|1=Corral Hollow Pass|concern=No content except for description of route and prior original research on naming history, redundant with [[Corral Hollow]}} Mrfoogles (talk) 21:26, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Corral Hollow Pass

The article Corral Hollow Pass has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No content except for description of route and prior original research on naming history, redundant with Corral Hollow

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 219, July 2024

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Recent external reviews

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:07, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 220, August 2024

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at two works on logistics and one on the Battle of Arnhem

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:16, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 221, September 2024

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hog Farm looks at the bayou battles for Vicksburg

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:56, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 222, October 2024

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Hawkeye7 on US Army divisions in the Pacific War, Nick-D on the First Indochina War

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:02, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]