User talk:Arqamkhawaja

June 2020

Hello, I'm Nyook. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Neelum District have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Nyook ^✉ 09:37, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Neelum District. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ProcrasinatingReader (talk) 15:22, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Linking articles to your userpage

Please stop linking articles to your userpage, as you did here. If a page is not in the article space you cannot link to it.--Jac16888 ^Talk 16:16, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Arqamkhawaja, you appear to have created a draft article on your user page. It's alright to have a draft on your use page, but if you would like to publish it, so that it can be treated as an actual article and, for example, linked from other articles, you need to either 1) move it to an article title (like Dosut, Azad Kashmir), or 2) re-create it an article title. – Uanfala (talk) 16:58, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dosut, Azad Kashmir moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Dosut, Azad Kashmir, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~ Amkgp 💬 05:10, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dosut, Azad Kashmir (July 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

no sources and non neutral content.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dosut, Azad Kashmir and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dosut, Azad Kashmir, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 13:16, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Arqamkhawaja! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 13:16, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dosut, Azad Kashmir (August 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Eagleash were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Nothing done to address the issues raised at the previous declinature. There is little if any, point in re-submitting a draft without improving it. Please do not re-submit unless made more acceptable to the encyclopedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dosut, Azad Kashmir and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dosut, Azad Kashmir, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 12:20, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Submission for Article Dosut, Neelum Valley

Please approve this article... Because it is village in Neelum Valley... People search for it Arqamkhawaja (talk) 09:38, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Adhere to a WP:NPOV, provide sources and add categories. Do not remove maintenance tags unless you have addressed the issues raised. Thanks. Kleuske (talk) 10:10, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dosut, Neelum Valley

The article Dosut, Neelum Valley has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not neutral, needs rewrite, draft already exists.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kleuske (talk) 10:11, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dosut, Neelum Valley moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Dosut, Neelum Valley, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Roller26 (talk) 11:23, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dosut, Neelum Valley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kashmiri. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Please do not add inappropriate images to Wikipedia, as you did to Faisal Mosque; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Idell (talk) 22:36, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Daiyusha (talk) 10:42, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Azad Kashmir, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 09:34, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Khawaja Mansoor Ahmed

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Khawaja Mansoor Ahmed requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Dtt1^Talk 07:05, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Arqam Khawaja

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Arqam Khawaja requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Dtt1^Talk 07:13, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dosut is always with Kashmir & Pakistan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dosut is always with Kashmir & Pakistan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Daiyusha (talk) 07:59, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shahid Afridi Foundation moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Shahid Afridi Foundation, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 21:04, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Aamir Khan. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 14:06, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jubin Nautiyal, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diffs: [1] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:08, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Genius (2018 Hindi film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hindustani.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Radhe (2021 film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ab207 (talk) 07:18, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome + a litle advice

Hello, Arqamkhawaja, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Introduction

5 The five pillars of Wikipedia

How to edit a page

Help

Tips

How to write a great article

Simplified Manual of Style

Fun stuff...

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! NSH001 (talk) 19:44, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate that you are very young, and a newcomer to Wikipedia. I strongly recommend that you read and consider all the links above before any further editing. Good luck! --NSH001 (talk) 19:44, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Khawaja Mansoor Ahmed

Hello, Arqamkhawaja. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Khawaja Mansoor Ahmed, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:03, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Maulana Tariq Jamil Foundation moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Maulana Tariq Jamil Foundation, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon (talk) 17:29, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Maulana Tariq Foundation

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Maulana Tariq Foundation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DMySon (talk) 17:32, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maulana Nematullah Azmi (August 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NSCHOLAR - requires inline citations referencing independent secondary sources - see WP:REFB

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maulana Nematullah Azmi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Maulana Nematullah Azmi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 02:07, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maulana Tariq Jamil Foundation (August 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

It is well explained and may be well sourced at Tariq Jamil. It doesn't qualify for a stand-alone article. I have made numerous edits to Tariq Jamil's article and I know this article has received press coverage extensively, but none of the sources are independent and thus fails to satisfy WP:NCORP

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maulana Tariq Jamil Foundation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Maulana Tariq Jamil Foundation, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 07:03, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article. It is not your place to decide whether Ahmadiyya are or are not Muslims. DMacks (talk) 07:04, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Who are you to tell me Ahmadiyya are Muslims, All Muslims include Shias and Sunnis declare them as Non-Muslims. Arqamkhawaja (talk) 07:09, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No branch, sect, or religion has authority over any other branch, sect, or religion. DMacks (talk) 08:11, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I know but they called themselves Muslims, they are not Muslims. Arqamkhawaja (talk) 08:13, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are entitled to your opinion, but it has no place in Wikipedia articles. Should you continue to disrupt Ahmadiyya related articles, I will be asking for sanctions to be applied (which you have been notified of below). FDW777 (talk) 08:16, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You mean they are not Muslims according to other Muslims? That's exactly what I just said Wikipedia will not condone (and that you yourself said you know). Wikipedia is not governed by religious authority, so it's up to them how they call themselves. That's a widespread consensus on this website. DMacks (talk) 08:17, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Shivaji Satam. DMacks (talk) 18:19, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shivaji Satam was born on April 1950.it was true Arqamkhawaja (talk) 06:22, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions notification

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

FDW777 (talk) 07:38, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage

Please amend your userpage, in particular removing all the content you have copied from User:DMySon, since you have not created the aticles you claim to have. FDW777 (talk) 12:38, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi FDW777, Thank you for the notification. @Arqamkhawaja, Please do not copy paste content from someone else user page as you copied from my user page. However i have removed the copied content. DMySon (talk) 13:02, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry! I will never do it again. Arqamkhawaja (talk) 14:09, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shahid Afridi Foundation (August 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please see WP:NORG and introduce sources accordingly.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shahid Afridi Foundation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Shahid Afridi Foundation, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 07:19, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration enforcement

See Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. FDW777 (talk) 09:08, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kashmir Premier League

I do not know what the blanking of this pge was about (you left no edit summaries to explain), bu it's not a good way of contributing. Please don't do that again. Kleuske (talk) 10:56, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maulana Tariq Jamil Foundation (August 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is written from the viewpoint of the organization, focusing on what the organization says about itself. Corporate notability or organization notability is based on what independent reliable sources have written about the subject.

Not every organization, and not every organization with 501(c)(3) status (or its equivalent in other countries) is notable, and this draft does not establish organizational notability. You may ask for advice about organizational notability at the Teahouse.

This draft does not contain enough information to warrant a separate article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maulana Tariq Jamil Foundation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Maulana Tariq Jamil Foundation, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 14:56, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Then delete it Arqamkhawaja (talk) 15:51, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Maulana Tariq Jamil Foundation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maulana Tariq Jamil Foundation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maulana Tariq Jamil Foundation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Kleuske (talk) 09:16, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Callanecc

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement § Arqamkhawaja. There is currently a request that administrators review your contributions and determine whether or not you need to be restricted from editing in certain areas. One of the things that will help determine whether these restrictions are needed is going to be whether or not you participate and show that you are willing to engage and to understand the issues. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:40, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked from editing

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for tendentious editing including non-neutral editing & page moves, and not communicating.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:09, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Arqamkhawaja (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will make edits in future according to Wikipedia rules, I will make no mistake againArqamkhawaja (talk) 12:52, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please specifically describe what you have done incorrectly, what steps you will take to change your behavior, and what edits you wish to make. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 13:28, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I make no mistake in my knowledge. I am Blocked. I have read the guidelines of wikipedia and I will act on them. Please Unblock me Arqamkhawaja (talk) 16:28, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me from Wikipedia

{{unblock|I had make no mistake, I have read the guidelines of wikipedia and I will act on them. Please Unblock me}} Arqamkhawaja (talk) 02:42, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm procedurally setting this one aside as I had already declined the nearly identical other one in the next section. Only one active request at a time. DMacks (talk) 19:12, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request for unblocking

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Arqamkhawaja (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

As I said earlier that I have read the guidelines of wikipedia and I will act on them in future. I will not make any edit that is against Wikipedia rules. So, kindly unblock me and give me a chance. Arqamkhawaja (talk) 13:19, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Not surprisingly, posting essentially the same unblock request that was denied previously (by User:331dot) will be denied again. Add WP:CIR to the lack of appropriate communication as a problem with this editor. DMacks (talk) 19:10, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Okay, I am blocked then add block expiry date Arqamkhawaja (talk) 00:41, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock or add block expiry date

{unblock} Arqamkhawaja (talk) 02:15, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking Request

{unblock | I have earlier said that I will not make any mistake again, Please Unblock me or add block expiry date} Arqamkhawaja (talk) 02:16, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Arqamkhawaja (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

unblock me or add block expiry date

Decline reason:

No. See WP:GAB to understand how to craft an acceptable unblock request. Note also that you abusively had FOUR (!!!) open unblock requests. One at a time, please. Yamla (talk) 10:28, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Concern regarding Draft:Shahid Afridi Foundation

Hello, Arqamkhawaja. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shahid Afridi Foundation, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am block from editing, and no time for block is add, unblock me and i will do edit Arqamkhawaja (talk) 11:27, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Arqamkhawaja (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

unblock or add unblock time please

Decline reason:

This is going nowhere. I have revoked talk page access. PhilKnight (talk) 12:01, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

PhilKnight (talk) 12:01, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

English does not appear to be your primary language; you may feel better editing the Wikipedia of your primary language. 331dot (talk) 12:06, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Maulana Tariq Jamil Foundation

Hello, Arqamkhawaja. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Maulana Tariq Jamil Foundation, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:02, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sock

I have blocked ArqamKoshur as a WP:SOCK account. You, you as a person, are not allowed to edit wikipedia. Stop digging yourself deeper into a hole by violating additional of our site policies. DMacks (talk) 13:27, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Maulana Tariq Jamil Foundation

Hello, Arqamkhawaja. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Maulana Tariq Jamil Foundation".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:29, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Arqamkhawaja (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This user has been block since a year with no limit of block. He agrees all wikipedia guidelines. Please lift block.

Decline reason:

Third party unblock requests are not accepted- and even if they were, it's pretty obvious that you are this user. Evading your block to request unblock is never a good strategy and will count against you for any future unblock request. You will need to make further appeals under your account via WP:UTRS. 331dot (talk) 09:33, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.