User talk:Arnoldasarny

This is Arnoldasarny's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: TARDZA (November 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pbritti was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Some of these sources, if reliable, might mean this subject could pass GNG. However, I'm inclined to believe that the references are generally not reliable and fail to establish this vehicles's notability. In any case, this needs to be rewritten in an encyclopedic tone and with citations.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:TARDZA and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pbritti (talk) 16:42, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Arnoldasarny! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Pbritti (talk) 16:42, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: TARDZA (November 24)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Sorry, but I'm going to go out on a limb and say that this is not notable. The world is full of restoration projects like this. Some of them get publicity in fandom and enthusiast media, and technically might reach the WP:GNG threshold, but let's not forget that notability is only ever presumed (or not), not guaranteed. At the end of the day this is just one individual car, and it's not like it's Hitler's Mercedes 770K, or the car JFK was shot in. I really don't see any encyclopaedic value in this draft (and not least because it consists of all of one sentence).

DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:49, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tardza Recycled Porsche (November 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is a prime example of WP:CITEKILL. Instead we need one excellent reference per fact asserted. If you are sure it is beneficial, two, and at an absolute maximum, three. A fact you assert, once verified in a reliable source, is verified. More is gilding the lily. Please choose the very best in each case of multiple referencing for a single point and either drop or repurpose the remainder.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tardza Recycled Porsche and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 14:32, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have corrected and updated all the references. Sorry for my lack of practice in the beginning! Arnoldasarny (talk) 15:57, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Arnoldasarny. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Tardza Recycled Porsche, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:29, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, yes, sure. So my employer is not related to the object at all anyway. And Pawel Kalinowski is not my client and I do not do it for money and not receiving any money for it.

And more over that car project is not about money first of all, it is a social project, they participate in shows for educations purposes. I just want people to find this information because they google that fascinating car. And no, it is not just another build. It has a story and it is an art project first of all.

I have followed every comment of yours and your colleagues. I have learned on this and I appreciate all the feedback received.

Are you not happy with my latest edition of the page? If not, then please approve it. Arnoldasarny (talk) 15:52, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tardza Recycled Porsche (November 24)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Pbritti was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Per the previous rejection, I am going to put myself firmly in the "referenced but non-notable" camp. If this subject receives continued coverage over the next couple years, I'll be proven wrong. In the meantime, merge content to Paweł Kalinowski.

Pbritti (talk) 15:47, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, next couple of years? Who are you to decide this? It has been covered ever since the 2020 regularly. The latest one is 1-2 month old (from 2023), so it has been already 3 years of track record - have you checked all the references in my submission? Arnoldasarny (talk) 15:55, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:TARDZA

Hello, Arnoldasarny. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:TARDZA, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:05, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]