User talk:Arjayay/Archive 34

Archive 30

←

Archive 32

Archive 33

Archive 34

Amazon

Review the additional matter that I have added. I added the matter from www.amazon.com site. Is it not a reliable source..?? International Scientist (talk) 07:18, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

No Amazon is a sales site, its purpose is to sell things, not provide independent, verified, information (see WP:RSPAMAZON). The fact that something or someone exists, does not make it/them WP:Notable enough for inclusion in our articles.
Furthermore, your addition at English Wikipedia was solely vandalism, even if you had cited a WP:Reliable source - Arjayay (talk) 09:32, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

Grootslang

Why did you remove my example. - Patagomaia 09:33, 25 Sepetember 2014 (UTC)

Hi Patagomaia - as my edit summary stated "Unsourced + unlinked" - the reader has no idea if it is true or not, and cannot look at a reference, or click on a link to another article to obtain further information. - Arjayay (talk) 08:37, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

Redundant pleonasms

Thank you for your edit summary, introducing me to the the word pleonasm. _signed, Willondon (talk) 21:09, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

No trouble Willondon - are there any other words that that you would like an introduction to ? ;-) - best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 21:12, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

About mehsi

I updated the details in complete sections but you revert all the changes... please revert to my version as it was most updated 46.185.168.59 (talk) 22:51, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Your additions were totally unsourced and malformatted, so cannot be re-added. - Arjayay (talk) 22:54, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

How it is malformed??

Can u give examples? 46.185.168.35 (talk) 22:57, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

You can do one thing keep all the data which i updated and make the formatting correct 46.185.168.35 (talk) 22:59, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

I belong to that place and what i write it's all in a book and present in that location 46.185.168.35 (talk) 23:00, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

I could correct all your misused text size, bold etc. but there is no point until your additions are properly referenced. - Arjayay (talk) 23:03, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

How you can say that my additions are not properly referred, i only corrected the way and explained that ,if u need to verify the distances u can use google maps ,if u need to verify the area u can use the eastchamparan official website or bihar government websites. Or if u even can't verify anything let me know which point u want to know i will provide you the exact reference for that

But you will revert my all changes 46.185.168.35 (talk) 23:08, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

No, IP from Jordan, as I have already explained, your additions were totally unsourced, so cannot be re-added to the article. Your edits deleted 4 references and added none whatsoever.
Wikipedia is not interested in who you are, where you are from, what you "know", or even what you have found out.
Wikipedia is only interested in what has already been published in reliable, independent sources published by a body with a reputation for fact-checking - No blogs, no self-published sources, no bodies with a conflict of interest, no promotional sites.
These sources must be properly cited in order to support any information added to, or changed in our pages, so the information can be verified as true in the future.
It is NOT up to me, any other editor, or the reader, to find sources, or add references for you. The responsibility for providing citations is solely on whoever adds or changes any information.
You failed to do this, which is why your edits have been, and will continue to be, reverted, until you do add proper references.
Please see Help:Referencing for beginners for the "how to" guide. - Arjayay (talk) 10:26, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!

thank you for your contributions!! :D xRozuRozu (t • c) 03:54, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

external opinion on edit

Hello Arjayay, I've noticed you corrected a spelling error on the latest NewJeans section. Thank you. If you have the time I would like to know your opinion in the current discussion regarding that very section. Cinemaandpolitics (talk) 16:04, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Sorry Cinemaandpolitics, after getting involved at Ladies' Code and Shinee, I have deliberately steered clear of K-Pop and J-Pop discussions. Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 16:32, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Fair enough, thank you for answering. Cinemaandpolitics (talk) 16:35, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Need quick assessment *Ranjit Singh

Hey may LubanaPB02 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) have been recently involved in the manipulation and extreme case of vandalism in a well planned organised manner can you please try to revert his latest edit specifically on Ranjit Singh thanks in advance if your received my message!! 14.192.211.11 (talk) 20:42, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

anway if you can add better source interpretation its more than enough to prevent any possible caste based intervention indeed, hopefully your receive my message asap@Arjayay 14.192.211.11 (talk) 20:46, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi IP from Malaysia, LubanaPB02 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) has been blocked indefinitely, and almost all his edits have been reverted. There have been a large number of major edits, with additional references, to Ranjit Singh since then. I hope the problem(s) have been resolved. If not please bring them up at Talk:Ranjit Singh, so other editors can join in. Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 16:43, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Article description correction

Thanks for informing me about article descriptions--that no description is preferable when the title is sufficiently descriptive. I was editing on mobile and so could not see the comment. Now I know not to add redundant descriptions in the future. Voyaging^talk 11:30, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

Clarification on the use of Sri Vijaya Puram instead of the colonial 'Port Blair'

I agree that we must use the Common name for places and not the official name. However, the aforementioned 'common name' is one which has direct colonial origins. In order to promote inclusivity, and self-determination, we must recognize native names. Given Wikipedia's cultural status, a change to the native name (official name) will allow it to become the common name. SubtoTechyLox (talk) 03:07, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

TechyLox, please do not change your user-name immediately after asking a question.
I am glad you "agree that we must use the Common name for places and not the official name", as WP:COMMONNAME is part of Wikipedia:Article titles which is a policy, not just a guideline, so there is nothing for us to discuss.
As for your attempt to sidestep the policy, Wikipedia is not the place for "Righting great wrongs" as WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS states "You might think that Wikipedia is a great place to set the record straight and right great wrongs, but that is absolutely not the case." - Arjayay (talk) 11:13, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

How could you do this?

You wrote on 173.63.0.217's talk page: "if you vandalize Wikipedia again,... you may be blocked from editing without further notice." If you look at 173.63.0.217's talk, you'll see that they are non-responsive to repeated threats to block their editing for cause. I think the time has come for this, but I don't know how to do it, or I would have. Would you please?

They need to create an account, learn how to edit, and behave as appropriate for a Wikipedia editor. Larry Koenigsberg (talk) 22:04, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

Notable White Mountain Artists

Why are you deleting Notable White Mountain Artists from White Mountain Art? You deleted one of the best known, Frank Henry Shapleigh. And, why are you removing external links from those who do not have Wiki pages? What do you know about this subject? JJ (talk) 16:20, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

Hello User:JohnJHenderson
Wikipedia is not interested in what you "know" about a subject, nor even what I "don't know" about that subject, only what has already been published by independent, reliable sources with an established reputation for fact-checking
Looking at your talk page - you state "Please see my site at http://whitemountainart.com/." you have, therefore, a clear conflict of interest in promoting your own website, by adding links to that website, promotional links which I deleted. Furthermore, Wikipedia does not allow External links in body text in any case, please see WP:EL specifically WP:ELLIST.
You also added a totally unacceptable statement "Please don't add names to this list without "talking" to JohnJHenderson at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:JohnJHenderson" " - Nobody WP:OWNS an article, and nobody needs your permission to edit it, so I deleted that as well.
Only "notable" people should be added to lists, hence the hidden text statement "Please review guidelines for Notable people at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_%28people%29" and the standard method of proving that someone is "notable" is their having a Wikipedia article. There is a standard warning template Template:Uw-badlistentry which covers contraventions of this, and there is a standard hidden text for use in the article, which I have just added, along with deleting the entries without articles.
Given your conflict of interest (see above) please do not edit that article again, but suggest changes, with references to WP:Reliable sources (not your website) on the articles talk page.
If you think there are artists that meet Wikipedia's article inclusion criteria and "deserve" an article, please create these and have them accepted before re-adding their names to that page , Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 19:04, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

Edit

Brother, you messaged my talk page. I want you to edit that draft Hill Top Educational Institute as I am in ammature editor and I don't know a lot about wiki Syed Shahzaman1 (talk) 15:45, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Syed Shahzaman1 There are more than 1.5 million schools in India,, and very few of them have a Wikipedia article, because most are not WP:Notable, in Wikipedia's meaning of the word.
The first thing you must do is show that the school is WP:Notable. To do that you must provide three different sources of information about Hill Top Educational Institute that are:-

1. Extensive - not just passing mentions or inclusions in lists, but extensive coverage - a lengthy newspaper article, a magazine article, or several pages in a book
   And
2. Independent - not anything published by the school, or anything based on press releases issued by the school, or based on the schools website or social media
   And
3. Reliable - published by a body with a recognized reputation for fact-checking

Please note all three sources must meet all three criteria
If you can provide three such sources, to show that the school is notable, we can look at creating an article, but until then, there is nothing to base an article on - Arjayay (talk) 16:12, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Where to upload those Syed Shahzaman1 (talk) 16:15, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

https://stackschools.com/schools/01191101803/hiltop-educational-institute

Hi Syed Shahzaman1 provide the links at Draft talk:Hill Top Educational Institute, making sure they meet all three criteria. - Arjayay (talk) 16:20, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Can we consider this link

This school is affiliated with govt of India under UDISE NO. 01191101803 Syed Shahzaman1 (talk) 16:20, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

That is not a link, and AFAIK it is just a government list, not extensive coverage from an independent source. - Arjayay (talk).

References