User talk:AquaticFlipp

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
2	Spring Buds International Preschool (talk)	Add sources
48	Lankesh Patrike (talk)	Add sources
56	Mazagaon (talk)	Add sources
53	Chinchpokli (talk)	Add sources
170	Jamnabai Narsee School (talk)	Add sources
98	Kala Ghoda (talk)	Add sources
64	St. Mary's School, Mumbai (talk)	Cleanup
794	Navi Mumbai (talk)	Cleanup
13	Ekmat (talk)	Cleanup
19	Nagaland Post (talk)	Expand
201	Kharghar (talk)	Expand
56	Bhiwandi-Nizampur Municipal Corporation (talk)	Expand
97	Bhayandar (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
30	Rasayani (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
854	Thane (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
222	Super Cup (India) (talk)	Merge
127	Kolhapur district (talk)	Merge
9	Pirates at Ocean's Edge (talk)	Merge
138	Mira-Bhayandar (talk)	Wikify
59	Dabra, Madhya Pradesh (talk)	Wikify
250	Powai (talk)	Wikify
17	CBSE expression series (talk)	Orphan
44	JBCN International School (talk)	Orphan
8	The Universal School (talk)	Orphan
58	Sewri (talk)	Stub
78	Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation (talk)	Stub
18	Star of Mysore (talk)	Stub
44	Taloje Panchnad (talk)	Stub
18	Gujarat Mitra (talk)	Stub
8	Hiranandani Foundation School, Thane (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:22, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, AquaticFlipp! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! VickKiang (talk) 06:49, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mildred Katharine Ellis has been accepted

Mildred Katharine Ellis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tagishsimon (talk) 11:15, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Celestine Cook has been accepted

Celestine Cook, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Suitskvarts (talk) 22:33, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marian Hamilton Spotts (October 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Naraht was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marian Hamilton Spotts and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Naraht (talk) 13:48, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AquaticFlipp! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Naraht (talk) 13:48, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anne Pruitt-Logan (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not enough independent, significant coverage.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anne Pruitt-Logan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 07:29, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dorothy Yepez (November 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not quite enough independent, significant coverage.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dorothy Yepez and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 23:58, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Marian Hamilton Spotts

Hello, AquaticFlipp. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Marian Hamilton Spotts, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Anne Pruitt-Logan

Hello, AquaticFlipp. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Anne Pruitt-Logan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:05, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Dorothy Yepez

Hello, AquaticFlipp. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dorothy Yepez, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:07, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Marian Hamilton Spotts

Hello, AquaticFlipp. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Marian Hamilton Spotts".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:29, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dorothy Yepez

Hello, AquaticFlipp. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Dorothy Yepez".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:05, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]