User talk:Another Believer/Archive 42
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Another Believer. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 35 | ← | Archive 40 | Archive 41 | Archive 42 | Archive 43 | Archive 44 | Archive 45 |
WikiCup 2023 May newsletter
The second round of the 2023 WikiCup has now finished. Contestants needed to have scored 60 points to advance into round 3. Our top five scorers in round 2 all included a featured article among their submissions and each scored over 500 points. They were:
Iazyges (1040) with three FAs on Byzantine emperors, and lots of bonus points.
Unlimitedlead (847), with three FAs on ancient history, one GA and nine reviews.
Epicgenius (636), a WikiCup veteran, with one FA on the New Amsterdam Theatre, four GAs and eleven DYKs
BennyOnTheLoose (553), a seasoned competitor, with one FA on snooker, six GAs and seven reviews.
FrB.TG (525), with one FA, a Lady Gaga song and a mass of bonus points.
Other notable performances were put in by 
Sammi Brie, 
Thebiguglyalien, 
MyCatIsAChonk, 
PCN02WPS, and 
AirshipJungleman29.
So far contestants have achieved thirteen featured articles between them, one being a joint effort, and forty-nine good articles. The judges are pleased with the thorough reviews that are being performed, and have hardly had to reject any. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:14, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 18, 2023)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
Administrators' newsletter – May 2023
Extended content
| ||
|---|---|---|
|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2023).
|
A cookie for you!
|
Here's a cookie for you, good luck 常陽温斗 (talk) 11:30, 5 May 2023 (UTC) |
- Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:11, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
hahahahaha
Extended content
|
|---|
|
I am just laughing at Sevilla (restaurant) and Los Hernandez and Pho 79, zip zip zip! :D Good to know someone else was convinced! Valereee (talk) 16:33, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
|
Nomination of Problématique (album) for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
 The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Problématique (album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. |
This week's article for improvement (week 19, 2023)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
The Signpost: 8 May 2023
- News and notes: New legal "deVLOPments" in the EU
- In the media: Vivek's smelly socks, online safety, and politics
- Recent research: Gender, race and notability in deletion discussions
- Featured content: I wrote a poem for each article, I found rhymes for all the lists; My first featured picture of this year now finally exists!
- Arbitration report: "World War II and the history of Jews in Poland" approaches conclusion
- News from the WMF: Planning together with the Wikimedia Foundation
Drag Isn't Dangerous archives
Extended content
|
|---|
|
Hey @Another Believer! So I tried to archive the sources for Drag Isn't Dangerous, and I tried it three times and it wouldn't archive it. Is there any way to fix it? — JuanGLP (talk + contribs) 04:38, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
|
File:Spanish–American War Memorial (Columbus, Ohio), 2018.jpg listed for discussion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
 |
DYK for Cathy Whims
On 10 May 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Cathy Whims, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Cathy Whims has opened several restaurants in Portland, Oregon, including the Nostrana, which has been described as "Portland's capital of the Negroni"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Cathy Whims. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Cathy Whims), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Aoidh (talk) 00:02, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Could we use the track listing template on "Rockstar"?
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
Hi there. I have started a topic on the talk page of "Rockstar" about if the track listing template may work better on the article because now there are writers next to the collaborators and it's kind of confusing. I saw you created the article so I just wanted to come to you directly to let you know. 120.17.117.109 (talk) 06:05, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
|
Nomination for deletion of Template:Drag Race Sverige
Template:Drag Race Sverige has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 10:54, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
- Booooooooooo ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:26, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Drag Race Belgique
Template:Drag Race Belgique has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 11:18, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Category:RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars contestants has been nominated for deletion
Category:RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars contestants has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 12:07, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
- sigh... ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:27, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: April 2023
Extended content
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
GA reviews
Extended content
|
|---|
|
Hi there. I couldn't help but notice that you have had 150+ articles reviewed at WP:GAN, but have done no reviewing at all yourself. Do you think it will be possible for you to do some—the backlog is very long at the moment, and the current article sorting system highlights and promotes those who have a favourable review/GA ratio. Thanks, ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:50, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
|
This week's article for improvement (week 20, 2023)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
Promotion of Cherry Valentine
- Congratulations on the FAC promotion! It is wonderful to see more LGBT+ representation in the FA space, and unless I am mistaken, this is the first Drag Race contestant to have a FA. I know that you have put a lot of time and work into this article so I just wanted to congratulate you on it. Aoba47 (talk) 00:18, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Aoba47 Thanks so much! Yes, I believe this is the first FA about a Drag Race queen. I hope the bio will serve as a model for similar entries. I'd love to see many more quality articles about drag queens and LGBT+ folks. ---Another Believer (Talk) 00:23, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
- Agreed. That would be wonderful. Maybe one day, I will try hand at an article. I am sure that it will be inspirational for other editors on here. Aoba47 (talk) 00:24, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
Like ---Another Believer (Talk) 00:29, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
- Agreed. That would be wonderful. Maybe one day, I will try hand at an article. I am sure that it will be inspirational for other editors on here. Aoba47 (talk) 00:24, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Aoba47 Thanks so much! Yes, I believe this is the first FA about a Drag Race queen. I hope the bio will serve as a model for similar entries. I'd love to see many more quality articles about drag queens and LGBT+ folks. ---Another Believer (Talk) 00:23, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 21, 2023)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
The Signpost: 22 May 2023
- In the media: History, propaganda and censorship
- Arbitration report: Final decision in "World War II and the history of Jews in Poland"
- Featured content: A very musical week for featured articles
- Traffic report: Coronation, chatbot, celebs
Nomination of List of Drag Race lip syncs for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Drag Race lip syncs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. |
Question
Extended content
|
|---|
|
The DragCon 2023 Queens Walk video is out on YouTube! Would it be copyright for screenshots from the video to be uploaded to the commons and used on queens’ pages? I figured you’d be best to ask, thank you! Cornmazes (talk) 23:19, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
Icesis Couture. That’s all Cornmazes (talk) 23:56, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
|
Books & Bytes – Issue 56
Extended content
|
|---|
 The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:03, 24 May 2023 (UTC) |
Archiving discussions
Extended content
|
|---|
|
@Another Believer: how do you archive discussions from the talk pages? — JuanGLP (talk/contribs) 19:21, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
|
WikiProject Women in Green June 2023 Good Article Editathon notification
Extended content
|
|---|
 Hello Another Believer: WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Editathon event in June 2023! We hope to see you there! Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 25 May 2023 (UTC) |
LGBT culture in Puerto Vallarta
Extended content
|
|---|
|
Unfortunately, since I've never been involved in GA reviewing at all, I'm not familiar with that set of standards — I've done AFC reviewing of drafts, but what's good enough to get a draft promoted to mainspace and what's good enough to get an article conferred with GA status are obviously two very different things. So I'll certainly take a look at it and let you know if I come across anything really obvious that jumps out at me, but I really couldn't give an authoritative assessment of whether it's GA-worthy or not. Bearcat (talk) 21:32, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
|
Your draft article, Draft:Cafe de Olla (restaurant)
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
 Hello, Another Believer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cafe de Olla". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 06:59, 26 May 2023 (UTC) |
Women in Red - June 2023
Extended content
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:14, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Deletion discussion about My Everything (Owl City song)
Extended content
|
|---|
|
Hello, Another Believer, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Nerd1a4i, and I thank you for your contributions. I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, My Everything (Owl City song), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Everything (Owl City song). You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top. If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.) |
- Courtesy ping to User:Shout4Serenity, who expanded the redirect. ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:54, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 22, 2023)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
Nomination of Statue of Elon Musk for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Statue of Elon Musk until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. |
I've requested a third opinion on this one. --woodensuperman 09:54, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Bistro Agnes
 | Hello, Another Believer. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Bistro Agnes at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 02:00, 31 May 2023 (UTC) |
- Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 02:03, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
Cherry Street Coffee House
| Hello, Another Believer. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Cherry Street Coffee House at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 20:37, 31 May 2023 (UTC) |
- Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:37, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
"The Idol, Vol. 1" listed at Redirects for discussion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
|
Merger discussion for Looking Good, Feeling Gorgeous (EP)
An article that you have been involved in editing—Looking Good, Feeling Gorgeous (EP)—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Ss112 13:36, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 23, 2023)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
The Signpost: 5 June 2023
- News and notes: WMRU director forks new 'pedia, birds flap in top '22 piccy, WMF weighs in on Indian gov's map axe plea
- Featured content: Poetry under pressure
- Traffic report: Celebs, controversies and a chatbot in the public eye
LGBT films from SIFF 2023 edit-a-thon
 Part of Wiki Loves Pride/2023 |
When: Saturday, June 17, 10am–3pm & Sunday, June 18, noon–5pm The schedule and details will be posted to the LGBT films from SIFF 2023 edit-a-thon page. Editors can respond there if they plan to attend. To unsubscribe from future messages from Wikipedia:Meetup/Seattle, please remove your name from this list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:34, 5 June 2023 (UTC) |
Administrators' newsletter – June 2023
Extended content
| ||
|---|---|---|
|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2023).
|
Guild of Copy Editors June 2023 Newsletter
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
Sent by Baffle gab1978 using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:38, 6 June 2023 (UTC) |
Nomination of Twisted Croissant for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twisted Croissant until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. |
Nomination of Horse Brass Pub for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Horse Brass Pub until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. |
- Obvious keep... ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:48, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Bipartisan Cafe for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bipartisan Cafe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. |
- Clear keep, IMO ---Another Believer (Talk) 01:08, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
Nominated for Good article status... ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:15, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Spella Caffè for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spella Caffè until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. |
Nominated for Good article status... ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:12, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Dockside Saloon and Restaurant for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dockside Saloon and Restaurant until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. |
Nomination of Skyline Restaurant for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skyline Restaurant until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. |
- @Woodensuperman I wish you would have reached out to me before nominating all of these articles for deletion. Working to expand all of these at once, especially under the pressure and short timeframe of AfD, is very difficult. Also, there is a history of hounding and inappropriately nominating Portland restaurant entries for deletion. In the future, please consider Talk page messages before jumping to AfD. ---Another Believer (Talk) 13:45, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
- The article has been there for well over two years. I'm not sure why you are on a mission to create a travel guide to Portland anyway! I think you will see plenty more nominations in the future. --woodensuperman 13:47, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Bri and Liz: Here we go again... ---Another Believer (Talk) 13:53, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
- The article has been there for well over two years. I'm not sure why you are on a mission to create a travel guide to Portland anyway! I think you will see plenty more nominations in the future. --woodensuperman 13:47, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
Nominated for Good article status ---Another Believer (Talk) 12:58, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
request for advice
Extended content
|
|---|
|
Hi AB, If you have time would you provide guidance? I want to write an article on Chicago LGBT Hall of Fame NGO inductee Open Hand Chicago. I came upon this topic while writing the short article on Lori Cannon. In 2011 the project became Vital Bridges Food Program. Do you think I should write the article for Vital Bridges Food Program with a redirect from Open Hand or vice-versa? Thanks for thinking about this. Best, WAU WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 16:33, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
|
This week's article for improvement (week 24, 2023)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
This Month in GLAM: May 2023
Extended content
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
This week's article for improvement (week 25, 2023)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
The Signpost: 19 June 2023
- News and notes: WMF Terms of Use now in force, new Creative Commons licensing
- Featured content: Content, featured
- Recent research: Hoaxers prefer currently-popular topics
Quick Question: Getting Locals Pages Made
Extended content
|
|---|
|
Hello Another Believer. I have seen you are an editor that takes pride in editing local pages in areas like Portland, Oregon. I've been trying to figure out, if there is a certain criteria for local pages to be made? A couple of local businesses are growing in size as in locations and are slowly becoming a name in the New England area. Yeahimaboss413 (talk) 23:50, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
|
Your GA nomination of Hotel Rose
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hotel Rose you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cherrell410 -- Cherrell410 (talk) 16:42, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:45, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Hotel Rose
The article Hotel Rose you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Hotel Rose for comments about the article, and Talk:Hotel Rose/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cherrell410 -- Cherrell410 (talk) 18:03, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks again! ---Another Believer (Talk) 23:50, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi @Another Believer: Share your thoughts regarding the album if you wish to. 183.171.122.164 (talk) 06:03, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 26, 2023)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
I just saw the link at WP:US50. In my own space I was developing User:Bri/Black Coffee Northwest, and I'll merge content into the new article later today, if it is appropriate. ☆ Bri (talk) 20:57, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
@Bri: I think I've resolved this issue on my own, hopefully in a way which meets your preferences. I moved my page into draft space, then moved your draft into main space. Then I re-pasted my page over yours. Essentially this now credits you for starting the article but now shows my expanded version. Does this solution work for you? If not, I can add back your histmerge request, but my understanding is that only works for copy-and-paste moves. ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:17, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
|
Women in Red July 2023
Extended content
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:42, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
,_2018.jpg){kind=link}
,_2018.jpg){kind=link}
Tips on fair use images
Extended content
|
|---|
|
I noticed the FAC image discussion for Cherry Valentine recently when I came back to activity (too late to comment on it, unfortunately), so I thought it might be useful to give some advice on fair use images now I've added one back to the article. They can be a little messy, especially at FAC, though honestly 99% of the time you can get away with less than this. The messiest of the criteria (and the one you were getting asked about at FAC) is 'respect for commercial opportunities'. This is basically "if some news org needs a photo, are they going to pay the rightsholders for one or just take what Wikipedia has?". For fair use images, because they aren't licensed in a way that the hypothetical news org can do that without infringing on someone else's copyright, we want to make sure they don't. For deceased article subjects, the big things to think about here are 1. other times an image has been used commercially (e.g. if it was used in ads for TV appearances) and 2. obituaries. Most obits use images that were provided to them by a corporate rightsholder, and have paid for the rights to use them. Similarly, any image that was used to advertise a person or a TV show or anything else is obviously being used commercially, so it's safer to stay away from them unless you really don't have alternatives. The safest route for someone like Cherry Valentine is using a selfie, like I did there. Selfies are rarely used commercially, the rights are held by the subject (so they generally go to the family after death, rather than being held by a company), and they're pretty easy to find for somebody popular on social media. Obviously this isn't doable for everyone, but the kind of subjects you write about tend to have a lot of them. Something you can consider for living subjects as well is that some people are willing to license a selfie with a Wikipedia-appropriate license if you ask -- there's a guide to the process for that here -- which can be a way to get free images of a living person with none. Once you've done that, you can really just fill in the blanks like I did here for the rationale. This is more in-depth than I'd usually do, because of the FAC argument, but here's another recent fair use image upload of mine with a similar one. For a subject like Cherry Valentine who had an article long before she died, it's generally not hard to demonstrate that there aren't free images -- the article would've had one already if there were. I hope this helps -- it can be a little tricky. Like I said, in most circumstances you can get away with a lot less than this, but this is how to really make sure the fair use rationale works, especially at FAC. It's also helpful when you get the occasional flare-ups of arguments around fair use images (I had an article subject die right in the middle of one, which resulted in an unusually long rationale). Vaticidalprophet 14:27, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
|
Italian Greyhound
Hi! You beat me to it here – I was editing to self-correct when I realised the edit had already been made. Apologies for the assertion that it was right before when actually it wasn't (and since it was I who added the Further reading section, I should really have remembered that it was there). Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:00, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
- All good! Thanks for the note. ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:04, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Celebration of Life by Alfred Tibor, Columbus, Ohio, 2018.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Celebration of Life by Alfred Tibor, Columbus, Ohio, 2018.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 27 June 2023 (UTC)