User talk:Another Believer/Archive 38
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Another Believer. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 35 | Archive 36 | Archive 37 | Archive 38 | Archive 39 | Archive 40 | → | Archive 45 |
WikiCup 2022 July newsletter
Extended content
|
---|
The third round of the 2022 WikiCup has now come to an end. Each of the sixteen contestants who made it into the fourth round had at least 180 points, which is a lower figure than last year when 294 points were needed to progress to round 4. Our top scorers in round 3 were:
Between them contestants achieved 5 featured articles, 4 featured lists, 51 good articles, 149 DYK entries, 68 ITN entries, and 109 good article reviews. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article nomination, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. WikiCup judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:50, 3 July 2022 (UTC) |
This week's article for improvement (week 27, 2022)
Extended content
| |
---|---|
|
Administrators' newsletter – July 2022
Extended content
| ||
---|---|---|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2022).
|
This week's article for improvement (week 28, 2022)
Extended content
| |
---|---|
|
This Month in GLAM: June 2022
Extended content
| |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Trivia
Extended content
|
---|
Why do you insist on including absolute trivia in articles? E.g. on Raygun Lounge, why should we include the statement that they served beer or organised a trivia night? Fram (talk) 13:51, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
|
This week's article for improvement (week 29, 2022)
Extended content
| |
---|---|
|
Extended content
|
---|
I respect your work, but I have listed my several questions on Talk:List of restaurants in Seattle. It would be good to write notabilty guidelines regarding restaurants. Xx236 (talk) 08:44, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
|
Nomination of Pikachu (sculpture) for deletion
Extended content
|
---|
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pikachu (sculpture) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pikachu (sculpture) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. |
what happens when an impatient new editor asks for a review of their draft and you don't chase them off?
Extended content
|
---|
I noticed that you had responded to an off-topic post at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Council. I have found it more helpful to revert those messages per WP:NOTAFORUM and warn the editor involved. Responding to requests only encourages more of same. I find Twinkle and other semi-automated tools to be of great help in this regard so that those of us longterm contributors can focus on contributing. Typing out a well-thought answer pointing to new editor to a better talk page is friendly and useful to them but it's not optimal for us, unless you just prefer being kind. I declined their draft, which is ultimately solving the problem. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:18, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
|
Simple images
Extended content
|
---|
Hello! For an image to be non-free it has to meet the threshold of originality of the country where it was created. If it doesn't, then it can't be copyrighted. A file's Wikipedia license should of course reflect this. Please think about if a file really meets the TOO before you automatically mark it with a non-free license. For example File:The Triple Door logo.png probably doesn't even meet the TOO anywhere in the world and I hence retagged it with {{PD-simple}}. For files that are below the TOO in both the country where it is from and the US then licenses such as {{PD-simple}} (for non-logos or logos without text) and {{PD-textlogo}} (for logos with text) are good. For files that are above the TOO in the country where it's from, but below the TOO in the US, please use {{PD-ineligible-USonly}} and have the country where it's from as parameter 1, see for example File:Podravka logo.svg. If you don't know the TOO, often Commons has a good page, see c:COM:TOO US, c:COM:TOO UK, c:COM:TOO Sweden etc. If you're totally unsure then it's better to guess that it's non-free but just don't do it automatically please. Anyway, happy editing! Jonteemil (talk) 01:19, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Carlos Hank González (businessman) has been accepted
Extended content
|
---|
Carlos Hank González (businessman), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .Thanks again, and happy editing! Atlantic306 (talk) 22:36, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
|
This week's article for improvement (week 30, 2022)
Extended content
| |
---|---|
|
Extended content
|
---|
The article Hilton Seattle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing |
Extended content
|
---|
The article Renaissance Seattle Hotel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing |
Extended content
|
---|
The file File:MedMen logo.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing |
Extended content
|
---|
The article Gabriel Pascuzzi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing |
Extended content
|
---|
The article Sara Hauman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing |
Speedy deletion nomination of Batterfish
Extended content
|
---|
A tag has been placed on Batterfish requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. A loose necktie (talk) 00:41, 28 July 2022 (UTC) |
Batterfish moved to draftspace
Extended content
|
---|
An article you recently created, Batterfish, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " |
- Hello, Another Believer,
- Like you, I am sweltering in PDX right now. I moved Batterfish to Draft space as it was tagged for speedy deletion for a lack of notability and I thought the tagging was reasonable for the article at the time I reviewed it. I didn't believe I could legitimately remove the tag so moving the article to Draft space was an alternative to deletion. I realize that you are a very experienced editor and I didn't mean to disrespect you and your contributions to the project and to articles on Oregon. But the draftification was a response to a speedy deletion tagging. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 01:27, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Liz No worries at all! I was not bothered by the tag or the move, I was just answering User:A loose necktie's questions in the section below. Stay cool in PDX and happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 01:30, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Batterfish?
Extended content
|
---|
The article on Batterfish, which still strikes me as an advertisement for this business, was moved to draft space by Liz, and you singlehandedly recreated it as a regular article, with no oversight and no one checking your work? Wow. You know how to make it happen. I guess there is no rule you are flouting by doing this (that I know of). Might have been more appropriate to recreate the article via the WP:AfC process, though. And why not? Because it is overburdened, backlogged, and might have resulted in the article being rejected? Maybe. All good reasons, no? Just, wow. A loose necktie (talk) 19:51, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
|
You get history wrong to prove a point
Extended content
|
---|
You deleted the Rosa Parks statue from the National Statuary Hall template despite it being part of the collection and a donation by Congress to all fifty states...? Do your research, kemosabe. Editors like you who assume they're always right even when they're blatantly wrong is part of why this website is going down the crapper.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.31.201.105 (talk) 17:31, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
|
Women in Red in August 2022
Extended content
| |||
---|---|---|---|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:57, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Nomination of Gabriel Pascuzzi for deletion
Extended content
|
---|
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gabriel Pascuzzi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabriel Pascuzzi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
|
This week's article for improvement (week 31, 2022)
Extended content
| |
---|---|
|
The Signpost: 1 August 2022
Books & Bytes – Issue 51
Extended content
|
---|
Books & Bytes
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:45, 1 August 2022 (UTC) |
Administrators' newsletter – August 2022
Extended content
|
---|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2022).
|
Alcoa Care-free Homes
Extended content
|
---|
I notice that you have not been informed of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alcoa House (Portland, Oregon). Draft:Alcoa Care-free Homes has been created. A redirect/merge of Alcoa House (Portland, Oregon) would be appropriate if the article actually existed. Would you mind taking a look and adding what you can? Thanks.Djflem (talk) 10:49, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
|
Nomination of Henry_Thiele_Restaurant for deletion
Extended content
|
---|
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Henry_Thiele_Restaurant is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henry_Thiele_Restaurant until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
|
Nomination of Sara Hauman for deletion
Extended content
|
---|
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sara Hauman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sara Hauman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
|
This week's article for improvement (week 32, 2022)
Extended content
| |
---|---|
|
This Month in GLAM: July 2022
Extended content
| |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Flawless Shade
Hello, Another Believer. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Flawless Shade at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 02:07, 9 August 2022 (UTC) |
- Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 02:35, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Drag Race Mexico
Extended content
|
---|
Hi, So I am yet still, new, in Wikipedia. But, I just wanted people to know that there’s a draft for Drag Race Mexico. Whenever I create a draft for Wikipedia, there’s someone who created in the mainspace and my draft article just ends up useless. How can I let people know there’s a draft? JuanGLP (talk) 23:04, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Yep no problem! Thank you! JuanGLP (talk) 23:43, 9 August 2022 (UTC) |
This week's article for improvement (week 33, 2022)
Extended content
| |
---|---|
|
This week's article for improvement (week 34, 2022)
Extended content
| |
---|---|
|
Your GA nomination of Bolivia Carmichaels
Extended content
|
---|
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bolivia Carmichaels you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 13:02, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
|
Your GA nomination of Bolivia Carmichaels
The article Bolivia Carmichaels you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bolivia Carmichaels for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 15:22, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks again! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:22, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
Congrats!
Saw you just got your 150th GA. Congratulations! Always a fan of your contributions Armadillopteryx 23:22, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
- Plus one. Congrats! ☆ Bri (talk) 23:29, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Armadillopteryx @Bri Like Thank you, both! ---Another Believer (Talk) 23:37, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Douglass Cemetery for deletion
Extended content
|
---|
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Douglass Cemetery is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Douglass Cemetery until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. |
Your GA nomination of Flawless Shade
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Flawless Shade you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 19:42, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:49, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Flawless Shade
The article Flawless Shade you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Flawless Shade for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 20:41, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
- Done ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:32, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Flawless Shade
The article Flawless Shade you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Flawless Shade for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 22:42, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Categories
Extended content
|
---|
If you sincerely believe that the Category:Public art in Austin, Texas is a duplicate of Category:Outdoor sculptures in Austin, Texas, then you should merge the two categories.BuffaloBob (talk) 23:52, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
|
Editing news 2022 #2
Extended content
|
---|
Read this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter The new [subscribe] button notifies people when someone replies to their comments. It helps newcomers get answers to their questions. People reply sooner. You can read the report. The Editing team is turning this tool on for everyone. You will be able to turn it off in your preferences. |
Extended content
|
---|
The article Statue of Sebastian de Aparicio has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:01, 27 August 2022 (UTC) |
This week's article for improvement (week 35, 2022)
Extended content
| |
---|---|
|
Nomination of Evelyn Garcia (chef) for deletion
Extended content
|
---|
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Evelyn Garcia (chef) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evelyn Garcia (chef) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
|
Women in Red in September 2022
Extended content
| |||
---|---|---|---|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:34, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
The Signpost: 31 August 2022
- News and notes: Admins wanted on English Wikipedia, IP editors not wanted on Farsi Wiki, donations wanted everywhere
- Special report: Wikimania 2022: no show, no show up?
- In the media: Truth or consequences? A tough month for truth
- Discussion report: Boarding the Trustees
- News from Wiki Education: 18 years a Wikipedian: what it means to me
- In focus: Thinking inside the box
- Tips and tricks: The unexpected rabbit hole of typo fixing in citations...
- Technology report: Vector (2022) deployment discussions happening now
- Serendipity: Two photos of every library on earth
- Featured content: Our man drills are safe for work, but our Labia is Fausta.
- Recent research: The dollar value of "official" external links
- Traffic report: What dreams (and heavily trafficked articles) may come
- Essay: Delete the junk!
- Humour: CommonsComix No. 1
- From the archives: 5, 10, and 15 years ago
Administrators' newsletter – September 2022
Extended content
|
---|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2022).
|
WikiCup 2022 September newsletter
Extended content
|
---|
The fourth round of the WikiCup has now finished. 383 points were required to reach the final, and the new round has got off to a flying start with all finalists already scoring. In round 4, Bloom6132 with 939 points was the highest points-scorer, with a combination of DYKs and In the news items, followed by BennyOnTheLoose, Sammi Brie and Lee Vilenski. The points of all contestants are swept away as we start afresh for the final round. At this stage, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. For the remaining competitors, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them, and importantly, before the deadline on October 31st! If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. The judges are Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:43, 3 September 2022 (UTC) |
This week's article for improvement (week 36, 2022)
Extended content
| |
---|---|
|
Nomination of List of restaurants in Cincinnati for deletion
Extended content
|
---|
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of restaurants in Cincinnati is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of restaurants in Cincinnati until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. |
Nomination of List of restaurants in Baltimore for deletion
Extended content
|
---|
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of restaurants in Baltimore is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of restaurants in Baltimore until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. |
This week's article for improvement (week 37, 2022)
Extended content
| |
---|---|
|
"Sister (upcoming film)" listed at Redirects for discussion
Extended content
|
---|
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Sister (upcoming film) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 12#Sister (upcoming film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 03:35, 12 September 2022 (UTC) |
This Month in GLAM: August 2022
Extended content
| |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Burly Abe
Researching the discrepancy on Lincoln statues is interesting. I found two books that contradicted each other on the Anna Hyatt Huntington statues, which there appear to be at least three of. But I have to put it on hold for now. ☆ Bri (talk) 23:13, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Please leave the article in the long-standing status quo ante version while a consensus discussion takes place. You know better than to change to your preferred version from a long-standing version. Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:42, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
- I'll move on to other things. The large images look ridiculous but whatever. ---Another Believer (Talk) 01:43, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 38, 2022)
Extended content
| |
---|---|
|
WikiProject Women in Green October 2022 Good Article Editathon
Extended content
|
---|
Hello Another Believer: WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Editathon event in October 2022! We hope to see you there! Alanna the Brave (talk) & Goldsztajn (talk) 23 September 2022 You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:35, 25 September 2022 (UTC) |
Redirects for discussion
"Arvin Vohra presidential campaign, 2020" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Arvin Vohra presidential campaign, 2020 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 25#Arvin Vohra presidential campaign, 2020 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. TartarTorte 13:42, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
"Ken Nwadike Jr. presidential campaign, 2020" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Ken Nwadike Jr. presidential campaign, 2020 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 25#Ken Nwadike Jr. presidential campaign, 2020 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. TartarTorte 13:42, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
"Michael E. Arth presidential campaign, 2020" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Michael E. Arth presidential campaign, 2020 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 25#Michael E. Arth presidential campaign, 2020 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. TartarTorte 13:42, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
"Robby Wells presidential campaign, 2020" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Robby Wells presidential campaign, 2020 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 25#Robby Wells presidential campaign, 2020 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. TartarTorte 13:42, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 39, 2022)
Extended content
| |
---|---|
|
Deletion review for Plastique Tiara
Extended content
|
---|
I see that you have already found the review, and commented there. I have also informed everyone else who participated in the deletion discussion, except two indef-blocked accounts and an IP address which last edited two years ago, in case they would like to contribute to the deletion review. The instructions for deletion review tell one to inform whoever closed the discussion, but I don't see why other participants shouldn't know about it too. JBW (talk) 22:02, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
|
Women in Red October 2022
Extended content
| |||
---|---|---|---|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 14:58, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Extended content
|
---|
The article Napoleon Jinnies has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing |
Nomination of Napoleon Jinnies for deletion
Extended content
|
---|
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Napoleon Jinnies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Napoleon Jinnies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. |
Books & Bytes – Issue 52
Extended content
|
---|
Books & Bytes
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:20, 30 September 2022 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 30 September 2022
- News and notes: Board vote results, bot's big GET, crat chat gives new mop, WMF seeks "sound logo" and "organizer lab"
- In the media: A few complaints and mild disagreements
- Special report: Decentralized Fundraising, Centralized Distribution
- Discussion report: Much ado about Fox News
- Traffic report: Kings and queens and VIPs
- Featured content: Farm-fresh content
- CommonsComix: CommonsComix 2: Paulus Moreelse
- From the archives: 5, 10, and 15 Years ago: September 2022
Administrators' newsletter – October 2022
Extended content
|
---|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2022).
|
Britannia Pub
I have nominated Britannia Pub for deletion for the reasons stated at Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_deletion#Britannia_Pub 217.42.50.155 (talk) 22:43, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- Tag has been removed. ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:24, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Britannia Pub for deletion
Extended content
|
---|
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Britannia Pub is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Britannia Pub until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. |
Orphaned non-free image File:Britannia Pub logo.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Britannia Pub logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Johnj1995 (talk) 03:45, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Restaurant speedy deletions
I've been tagging several of your recent restaurant article creations as WP:A7s. Please see my contribs for a full list. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 23:44, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- I've promoted ~50 articles about restaurants to Good status. I think I know what I'm doing... ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:04, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 40, 2022)
Extended content
| |
---|---|
|
Restoring edits by a banned editor
Extended content
|
---|
While WP:BANREVERT allows for the restoration of edits made by banned editors, you need to have independent reasons for doing so (it's not a "vote") and you are taking full responsibility for the entirety of the content being restored. This globally-banned sockmaster has a history of adding unsourced and poorly sourced material, including blatant BLP violations, into articles, so you need to check every piece of information in the article to ensure that it is supported by a source meeting WP:RS. In addition, encouraging and supporting this sockmaster, who has made numerous threats of harm against multiple editors, is totally on you. If you believe there should be an article on any of the redirects I've reverted, Wikipedia would be better served if you wrote it yourself instead of supporting an abusive banned editor.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:59, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
|
Extended content
|
---|
The article Disney Fab 50 Character Collection has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing |
Nomination of Disney Fab 50 Character Collection for deletion
Extended content
|
---|
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Disney Fab 50 Character Collection is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disney Fab 50 Character Collection until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. |
"Michael E. Arth 2020 presidential campaign" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Michael E. Arth 2020 presidential campaign and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 4#Michael E. Arth 2020 presidential campaign until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jay 💬 18:37, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Hippo Hardware and Trading Company
Extended content
|
---|
A tag has been placed on Hippo Hardware and Trading Company requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Persia ☘ 17:04, 6 October 2022 (UTC) |
Sigh, lemme guess, now over to AfD, where it'll be kept... ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:15, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
- @JBW: Please restore the page as soon as possible, at least to draft space. There's very clearly coverage. Thank you. ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:05, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
October 2022
Extended content
|
---|
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Hippo Hardware and Trading Company. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Bbb23 (talk) 17:18, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
|
Nomination of Hippo Hardware and Trading Company for deletion
Extended content
|
---|
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hippo Hardware and Trading Company is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hippo Hardware and Trading Company until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. You knew this was coming, as you mentioned it in one of your edit comments. I actually hope you survive this. UtherSRG (talk) 18:00, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
|
This Month in GLAM: September 2022
Extended content
| |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
This week's article for improvement (week 41, 2022)
Extended content
| |
---|---|
|
Full linguistic katsu circuit
You might be interested to know the origin of the term katsu is derivative of "cutlet", probably French. So a "katsu burger" is a cutlet-burger, or in other words, a cutlet cutlet, I guess? ☆ Bri (talk) 22:05, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- Hah, interesting! Thanks to you (and User:SounderBruce) for making article improvements! I plan to work on many other Seattle restaurant entries in the near future. ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:13, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- FYI [2] a burger joint on par with the Space Needle for Ontarians at The Hamilton Spectator! ☆ Bri (talk) 22:14, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks, I've posted on the talk page so doesn't get lost here. ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:16, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- No problem. The Everett Herald has become a more reliable source for restaurant news as of late thanks to some new hirings, but the region is definitely lacking in good sources overall. Eater doesn't seem to cover much of the lower-income suburban ring. SounderBruce 22:16, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- @SounderBruce Good to know, thanks! I'm using Eater Seattle and other outlets like Seattle Metropolitan, Thrillist, and The Seattle Times to at least get the ball rolling on lists of notable restaurants. There's quite a content gap w/r/t Seattle's food and restaurant scene. ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:25, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- FYI [2] a burger joint on par with the Space Needle for Ontarians at The Hamilton Spectator! ☆ Bri (talk) 22:14, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
I had processed your request at WP:RM/TR, then came to realise that you have page mover and autopatrolled rights. You can process such moves by yourself in the future. I also mistakenly unreviewed the article thinking that it was my autopatrolled rights that marked the article as reviewed. I have reinistated the reviewed status. – robertsky (talk) 14:24, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:30, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
Requesting outside opinions on Bentinho Massaro
Hello! This may seem out of the blue, but I am requesting some outside opinions from experienced editors on the Bentinho Massaro article that I created - in particular as questions of neutrality and tone. Any help would be appreciated -- QueenofBithynia (talk) 21:30, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors' October 2022 newsletter
Extended content
| |
---|---|
|
Re: Jewish Delis
Hello. Just curious about the removals of many of the Jewish deli listings on List of Jewish delis. I understand removing the pages that don't have Wiki links but there are currently more Jewish delicatessens listed in California than New York and the pages listed there did a good job expanding the article without being overdone. Examples include Sarge's and B+H which don't necessarily need their own page but were needed for this page. KoRoBeNiKi Medical Coder, chess specialist, retired SSBWiki rollback, hi? 21:01, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
- @KoRoBeNiKi Lists of restaurants generally only include notable establishments, meaning those with Wikipedia entries of their own. ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:06, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Loyola Hall (Seattle University) for deletion
Extended content
|
---|
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Loyola Hall (Seattle University) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loyola Hall (Seattle University) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. |
This week's article for improvement (week 42, 2022)
Extended content
| |
---|---|
|
Extended content
|
---|
The article St. Anne's Chapel (Marylhurst University) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing |
Drag Race Italia season 2
Extended content
|
---|
Please wikipwdia is based on the sources. An Italian user (who on wikipedia italia declares to come from Rome) is changing all the biographies and eliminating the official sources. Curiously, the user writes that the drag comes from Rome. This is localism. The program's official sources and online videos state more (and it's verifiable online 151.57.23.14 (talk) 18:44, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
|
- Please help me, the user left a post on my page. The user mistook wikipedia for a blog. read here [3]--151.57.23.14 (talk) 19:18, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
- The page has been protected and you need to discuss this on the article's talk page. Please do not post here on my talk page again, thank you. ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:19, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
- Just because I say facts about it, since both @Another Believer: and I have faced the same situation before, doesn't mean we use the platform as a blog. Since it was found that there are similar cases in the same source, but you have focused exclusively on only one of them, going against your own position imo. --- « Ðømīnīk • Cåpuån » 18:36, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
- I'm going to ask you both to keep this discussion on the article's talk page, please. There's no reason for us to have another thread to follow here on my talk page. ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:25, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
- Please help me, the user left a post on my page. The user mistook wikipedia for a blog. read here [3]--151.57.23.14 (talk) 19:18, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Invitation to collaborate
Thought User:Bri/Noe Valley public toilet might interest you after our 2017 (wow!) collab on Portland Loo. ☆ Bri (talk) 21:03, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Bri Thanks! Maybe, we'll see, I'm hyper focused on Seattle restaurants and Pike Place Market right now. Soooo many new entries needing to be created! ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:29, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
- I noticed, LOL. Hope you're enjoying the great sunsets. ☆ Bri (talk) 21:34, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Ghost Alley Espresso
Nomination of Ghost Alley Espresso for deletion
Extended content
|
---|
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ghost Alley Espresso is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghost Alley Espresso until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. |
---Another Believer (Talk) 15:51, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Ghost Alley Espresso
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ghost Alley Espresso you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ThadeusOfNazereth -- ThadeusOfNazereth (talk) 22:41, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Ghost Alley Espresso
The article Ghost Alley Espresso you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ghost Alley Espresso for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ThadeusOfNazereth -- ThadeusOfNazereth (talk) 21:02, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 23:20, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 43, 2022)
Extended content
| |
---|---|
|
Nomination of Performing Arts Building for deletion
Extended content
|
---|
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Performing Arts Building is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Performing Arts Building until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. |
Nomination of Daily Dozen Doughnut Company for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daily Dozen Doughnut Company until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Reywas92Talk 15:54, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Reywas92 Would you please consider sharing notability concerns on an article's talk page before jumping straight to AfD? It feels like you are following me and nominating articles for deletion as a form of punishment or something, which requires me to drop things I'm working on just because the AfD clock is ticking... ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:57, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
- You should know how notability works and that nothing but one- or two-sentence listicle entries is not adequate. You are a great contributor to topics and places I am also interested in and this insinuation is wrong, but I believe that our notability standards are important and that articles should not be made without significant sources that extend beyond minor and routine local listings. I don't really buy the "dropping things" when you've had time to make over two dozen articles in the last week and you know that if there are barriers to finding sources within a week it can be relisted multiple times. There is no rush to have articles for every single local business at the Market before showing each is notable under GNG and NORG. Reywas92Talk 16:08, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Reywas92 You clearly follow my Wikipedia work. You say I'm a great contributor. But you're not giving me the benefit of the doubt or assuming good faith. I'm asking you nicely to please lay off the nominations. Your nominations are starting to feel targeted. Ghost Alley Espresso is another example of an unnecessary nomination, which forced me to fully expand an entry just because of AfD. Acknowledging we have slightly different goal posts re: notability on Wikipedia and you have every right to nominate pages for deletion, again, I'm asking you to please slow down. It takes me a lot more time to expand an article than it does for you to flag a page. ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:16, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
- "forced me to fully expand an entry". Why does expansion have to be done under duress? You really are a tireless contributor, but it can feel like quantity over quality. These aren't targeted, but you're the only one making so many pages on typical local businesses or one-liners that statues or buildings exist. Reywas92Talk 17:44, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Reywas92 Well, I'm asking you to trust my judgment a bit more. Ghost Alley Espresso and Daily Dozen Doughnut Company are likely being kept, so there's some discrepancy with how you assess sourcing compared to other editors. You're under no obligation to comply with my request, but you're causing me a lot of stress so all I can do is ask you to try to make my editing experience easier. Thanks, ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:06, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
- "forced me to fully expand an entry". Why does expansion have to be done under duress? You really are a tireless contributor, but it can feel like quantity over quality. These aren't targeted, but you're the only one making so many pages on typical local businesses or one-liners that statues or buildings exist. Reywas92Talk 17:44, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Reywas92 You clearly follow my Wikipedia work. You say I'm a great contributor. But you're not giving me the benefit of the doubt or assuming good faith. I'm asking you nicely to please lay off the nominations. Your nominations are starting to feel targeted. Ghost Alley Espresso is another example of an unnecessary nomination, which forced me to fully expand an entry just because of AfD. Acknowledging we have slightly different goal posts re: notability on Wikipedia and you have every right to nominate pages for deletion, again, I'm asking you to please slow down. It takes me a lot more time to expand an article than it does for you to flag a page. ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:16, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
- You should know how notability works and that nothing but one- or two-sentence listicle entries is not adequate. You are a great contributor to topics and places I am also interested in and this insinuation is wrong, but I believe that our notability standards are important and that articles should not be made without significant sources that extend beyond minor and routine local listings. I don't really buy the "dropping things" when you've had time to make over two dozen articles in the last week and you know that if there are barriers to finding sources within a week it can be relisted multiple times. There is no rush to have articles for every single local business at the Market before showing each is notable under GNG and NORG. Reywas92Talk 16:08, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
For being one of the hardest working editors contributors to the US 50,000 Challenge and the enormous quantity of content you've contributed here!! You are much appreciated! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:40, 26 October 2022 (UTC) |
- @Dr. Blofeld Why, thank you! I don't always feel appreciated (see discussion immediately above), but posts like this help restore my appreciation and enthusiasm for Wikipedia. Much appreciated! --Another Believer (Talk) 16:43, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red November 2022
Extended content
| |||
---|---|---|---|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:32, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
This week's article for improvement (week 44, 2022)
Extended content
| |
---|---|
|
The Signpost: 31 October 2022
- From the team: A new goose on the roost
- News from the WMF: Governance updates from, and for, the Wikimedia Endowment
- Disinformation report: From Russia with WikiLove
- Featured content: Topics, lists, submarines and Gurl.com
- Serendipity: We all make mistakes – don’t we?
- Traffic report: Mama, they're in love with a criminal