User talk:Anna Lincoln/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

Creating my talk page. Any comments you post here are welcomed. —Anna Lincoln 21:45, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks Anna

Thanks for welcoming me. You are very kind, it is great that people like you bring some humanity to Wiki. Adrian Ponce —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adrianponce (talk • contribs) 08:43, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome. Have a nice day! --Anna Lincoln (talk) 08:46, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

One more thank from --Renessaince (talk) 12:18, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks and I really need some help

Anna, I'm SO pleased to hear from someone, even if you aren't a catwrangler (I have eight cats!). I am trying to find out why an entry was deleted within the last couple days, and I am so new at this that I can't track down the deleter. It appears to me that deleting >Thomas Wm. Hamilton< violates the rules, since he is listed in the >List of former child actors<, and if the red color means what I assume, he is now just about the only one who does not have an article. But Tom is also a former journalist (see >Liberation News Service<), astronomer/professor/planetarium show writer, and politician.AnitaFL (talk) 15:52, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Hi, Anita. The community decided to delete the article here, and the decision was reviewed and endorsed here. Some of the reasons given there for the deletion were:

• notability (is the person famous enough?)
• neutral point of view (is the article neutral about him?)

Some reasons for keeping the article were also given, but they were overturned by the reasons against it. Maybe you think that this is a wrong decision, and you may be right or wrong, but Wikipedia is not perfect and sometimes articles which are in the keep/delete border are deleted.

If you are interested in rewriting the article in such a manner that it will not be deleted, addressing the concerns given in the two reviews above, and having read the two guidelines pointed out, you should wait some days and then recreate the article, giving independent, reliable, third-party sources on it which support the statements of the article. (Say in the talk page of the article that you are rewriting it from scratch).

I wish you good luck! Let me know if you have any problem or need help. --Anna Lincoln (talk) 16:42, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Anna--Thank you. I've read the discussion, and got a big laugh out of the suggestion that Tom is a hoax. I will admit, though, that sometimes he has been, shall we say, highly improbable. Actually, the tone of the discussion strikes me as being that for someone so diverse and talented, he should be better known. No doubt he would endorse that statement. However, if you look at the former child actors list, you will see people with but one show to their names who still got a write up. Surely if you want to delete the rest, his acting should be given as much of an article as the others. Otherwise this begins to look like prejudice (a former student he gave a low grade works for wikipedia? Or someone who thinks he should be deleted for his off the wall political opinions?) And looking for ISBN numbers for books published in the 1960s is simply anachronistic ignorance. I've never published anything and I know that much. (I have to admit, I admire the tenancity of the person who dug out the NY Times article from over 20 years ago.) I'm not sure if I want to bother pursuing this further, but Tom has been making himself a nuisance bombarding everyone who knows him with propaganda about a science fiction book he's written that is being published, he says, next month. Will people claim his book is a hoax, like "I Libertine" was? AnitaFL (talk) 02:39, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Dear Anita, whether you pursue your cause further or not, it's difficult thay you will have many chances in succeeding if nobody can cite a book, a magazine, a web page, a paper encyclopedia, or whatever (any source) which talks about the actor, which would show everybody that he is important enough to have an entry on Wikipedia.

That the actor is included in the former child actors list is not a very persuasive argument: he may be removed from the list.

If you really want an article about him here, you may go to a public library and try finding material there to cite. Maybe a book about history of the cinema.

And don't be upset: that Thomas Hamilton does not appear in Wikipedia now doesn't mean that he is not a great and important actor to you. Maybe in the future you will come across some sources, you will share them with us, and a great article about him will be written. --Anna Lincoln (talk) 21:52, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Well, Anna, he is mentioned in a book called 50 Years of American Drama, which one of his students seemed to have listed, and there was the stuff from Variety and from PM newspaper. If someone was able to dig out a NY Times piece from the early '80s, I'm sure a book and Variety shouldn't be too hard (PM, though, is probably a lot harder). I'm sort of sorry I ever got involved. Oh, and people could check with a college professor from (I think) Kansas State U, Philip Nel. He wrote most of the wikipedia entry on Crockett Johnson, and has done or is doing books on him. Johnson was the original author on Barnaby, the role Tom played first. AnitaFL (talk) 03:32, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Ok, then you got some sources about Thomas, a book and two newspaper articles. Do you know the exact title, author, editorial, etc. of the book? Do you know the date, page, newspaper title, article title, etc. of the articles? It is very important that you can give full citations for sources that are not on-line.

Regarding the college professor who wrote about him, bear in mind that relationships do not confer notability. You should now read the inclusion policy for actors (and the inclusion policy in general). Does he met the requirements listed there? Be honest, if you lie (to yourself), everybody will know and the case will be easily lost.

If you can make a solid argumentation proving that the requirements are met, maybe the case could be opened again and his inclusion be discussed for a third time. I paste the most important requirements here:

• Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television, stage performances, and other productions.
• Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following.
• Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment.

Now you should prepare a piece of text where you explain how he meets the general and actor's specific requirements, fully citing your sources. If you cannot prepare an upright argumentation, it's better to stop here, because opening the case for the third time without having a sound argumentation can be considered bad manners. Please paste the argumentation you prepared below, so that I can see if it is convincent or not. Regards, --Anna Lincoln (talk) 15:13, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Fantastic work on Spanish Literature

Thanks for the extensive (massive really) work you've done on Spanish Literature. It clearly is an effort of dozens of hours of work and also careful writing. I've made some minor changes to the formatting: the names of people should not be in italics, and I've removed them. The names of plays should be in italics, and, therefore, I've left them in that format. Interlingua ^{talk email} 13:55, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Oh, thank you very much! People like you make it worth writing about anything! You made me feel really appreciated with your message! I like literature :-> Anna Lincoln 21:14, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

And I just realized while removing italics I inadvertently removed some of the text you'd written. I'm glad you caught my mistake and fixed it. Interlingua ^{talk email} 16:41, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

I am gifted with the power of diff :) Anna Lincoln 08:35, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

I appreciate the kind comments. It's been a while since I did any editing. Tonight I just edited the article on Labrador Retrievers. I'll be going back to Spanish Lit, particularly 19th century. I am still somewhat adjusting to formatting on Wiki. (galdos) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Galdos (talk • contribs) 00:41, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Yes, Spanish literature in general still needs a lot of work, if you compare to English or French literature. See you, --Anna Lincoln (talk) 07:33, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Como Estas?

Don't you think the Sagrada Familia aricle is too short?--Tamás Kádár 08:55, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Yes, maybe when I get around some sources I may extend it a bit. I think that the photos can also be improved. --Anna Lincoln 09:01, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Tirso de Molina

His name is verified. Please see the talk page on the El Burlador de Sevilla page.Die4Dixie 05:03, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. --Anna Lincoln 15:05, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Hola!

Hi Anna, just dropping a line to thank you for the WikiWelcome ;) Dr Benway 06:51, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Pleased to meet you guy --Anna Lincoln 07:20, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Signing Question

A couple of weeks after your welcome and offer to help me out, let me say thank you and then take advantage of your offer. I have signed most of my discussion contributions with the four tildes as recommended. However, I made an adjustment to my signature making it appear without a hyperlink to my profile. Would this explain why one of my recent contributions had a 'signbot' automatically sign my name after I had already done this?

Thanks again. AnthroGael 23:53, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Sorry for the delay. Yes, I think that a signature is expected to have a link to the user page. If yours doesn't have, most automated scripts will think that your message was not signed. I recommend you to sign some messages and wait. If signbot or other bots continue signing what you wrote, then your signature needs the link for sure. Happy editing! --Anna Lincoln (talk) 19:02, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks Anna!

Thank you for fixing the problem with the image on my user page. :) --Loremaster (talk) 16:28, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome Loremaster --Anna Lincoln (talk) 08:19, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

IP reverts on List of countries by GDP (nominal)

What can we do in respect to the IP that is repeatedly changing EU data into something that can only be wrong? I see you left a message on the talk page, but probably this message will not even be noticed, will it? Do I have to watch out for 3RR, when reverting what appears vandalism to me? Regards, Tomeasy_talk 14:45, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi, Tomeasy. Watching for 3RR is difficult. Best thing we can do is seeing him vandalizing, then we revert and give him some warnings, and after this happens some time, then we post the case on WP:AIV. And remember, don't play with him; the reverts don't need to be inmediate. --Anna Lincoln (talk) 07:34, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Vestopia?

I am new to creating/editing wikipedia pages. You proposed that Vestopia.com be deleted immdediatley but it is no different than Covestor? Can you provide me with an explanation? Thanks

Nikosey5 (talk) 14:05, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi, Nikosey5. I have not proposed that page to be deleted, maybe you should look into the article's deletion log to know who really did it. --Anna Lincoln (talk) 14:11, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Create new article

Dear Anna --- I tried to start a stub for an article on Complaint systems. I do not know what happened to it, or how to post it as an article stub. I keep trying to read the instructions but I have not yet grokked how to create an article. Rainsound (talk) 20:37, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi! To create an article, in the Wikipedia search box on the left, type the title of your article, then click Go. If the Search page reports "No page with that title exists" then you can click the red link "Create the page" to start editing your article. Please also read Wikipedia:Your first article and bear it in mind so that your article is not deleted. Good luck! --Anna Lincoln (talk) 07:34, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Pat Fry

So you watch F1 then!?!? Pat Fry is quite an important person at McLaren. Chubbennaitor 17:07, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

I'm afraid I don't watch F1 :-) I don't know Pat Fry. Anyway, he's important for sure :-) --Anna Lincoln (talk) 19:26, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Rollback

Hi Anna Lincoln, I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. Acalamari 23:39, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Thank you sooo much for trusting me, this makes me very happy! :-D I humbly accept the rights, I hope I will not disappoint you. I am open to recall in case you think I don't deserve them any more :) Again, thank you, Acalamari! --Anna Lincoln (talk) 08:37, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome! Don't worry about "rollbackers open to recall": as long as you use the rollback feature for reverting vandalism, no one will take it from you and you'll be okay. :) Best wishes. Acalamari 16:38, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Okay then, see you, --Anna Lincoln (talk) 07:17, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Your note

Hi Anna Lincoln, just a notice to say that I did respond to your message on my talk page the other day. :) Acalamari 18:19, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

I know, I was watching your talk page. --Anna Lincoln (talk) 10:49, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

RE: Thanx

No problem! :) —Sean Whitton / 11:08, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Thank you

Thanks for welcoming me. Espero poder trabajar con vos mientras esté aquí. Saludos, Jamás arrodillado (talk) 10:16, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome! Being a novice user, I see that you are quite skilled warning vandals and undoing their actions. --Anna Lincoln (talk) 11:14, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Electro Homeopathy

I've done some work on this page with is currently an AfD. Nonsense though the science behind the topic almost certainly is, it does have some interesting history and might be saveable. Have a look at the rewrked page and see if you think there's the basis for an article there. thanks Brammarb (talk) 20:21, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

I changed my vote to keep. Congratulations for your work! --Anna Lincoln (talk) 16:13, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Re: Questions on User talk:Acalamari

Hello, I saw your questions posted on Acalamari's talk page. Since he has not responded to them yet, I will give the answer to one of them:

Question:

1. Sometimes people say: "Delete and salt". What does the salt mean?

My Answer:

Sometimes, if a page is re-created several times against consensus, or if it has been discussed at deletion discussions a certain number of times, administrators, like Acalamari, may SALT them, which means to protect an article from recreation.

I'm sure that your second question will be answered soon. I decided to give out this answer because I first discovered the questions, and I know what salting is. SchfiftyThree 01:08, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Thank you very much for helping me. --Anna Lincoln (talk) 07:02, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Comments like "Snowball delete" or "Snowball keep" or "Snow whatver" refers to Wikipedia:Snowball clause which states that if an issue being discussed, whether XfD, RfA or whatever, doesn't have a "Snowballs chance in hell" of succeeding then there's no need to go through the whole process for the sake of the process. You will often see it referred to in XfD discussions and RfAs as a reason to conclude the discussion as a SNOW if the result is plainly obvious and there is no need to wait for the full time to pass. RfAs are usually only SNOW closed if the person is new to Wikipedia and obviously has no chance of passing, but we never SNOW successful RfAs as they must be left to run the full period in case some pertinent piece of information only comes to light at the end of the discussion. Salting refers to the practice of salting the earth so nothing will grow and, as Schfiftysays, it just means protecting an article from recreation. See Wikipedia:SALT#Creation_protection. Sarah 17:55, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, I understand its meaning now. --Anna Lincoln (talk) 07:30, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

• Hi Anna Lincoln, I apologize for not answering your questions. I've been inactive for the last few days, and didn't get to respond to you. I'm glad your questions were answered, and again, I'm sorry I didn't get to respond to them. Best wishes. (Acalamari from alternate account.) Bellatrix Kerrigan 20:50, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Don't worry, take your time, Wikipedia is not a full-time job. --Anna Lincoln (talk) 14:17, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Hello Anna

Hi, how are you? Could you please help improve this interesting article in the English language wikipedia? Thank you very much, AlarconGirl (talk) 14:41, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Okay, I will try to do something when I have some free time. See you, --Anna Lincoln (talk) 14:16, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Recent edit on Various Ava Nieves...

The comment of "Delete, but allow the user to move the stuff off-site." However, since I hae moved a majority of the aricles onto my INNewsCenter Wiki, I do need help on that site.

• Aeverine Frathleen Nieves 12:50, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Ok, just tell me what can I do for you. --Anna Lincoln (talk) 14:05, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

2deseptiembre

Thank you for your warm welcome, Anna, I'm too interested in Spanish literature, and I love cats, too. I hope my contributions will be useful for this project.--2deseptiembre (talk) 14:55, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

I'm sure you will be a valuable contributor. I wish you a happy editing. --Anna Lincoln (talk) 15:00, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks :-)

Thank you for welcoming :-)--Henrykus ^talk 09:51, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

No problem! --Anna Lincoln (talk) 09:52, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

THX

Thanks for your welcome! I hope I can be of use. gnomeselby (talk) 08:16, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

I've got no doubt :) --Anna Lincoln (talk) 13:59, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Thank you Anna

I appreciate your warm and helpful welcome! If I have a quick question, where do I go? Just for future reference. IMC.esq (talk) 09:05, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Hi! You can go to Wikipedia:Help desk. Pleased to meet you, --Anna Lincoln (talk) 09:07, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Jmustafa

Thank you, Anna, for welcoming me. And thank you for appreciating that I just want to add depth to the "The Tenants" entry. I believe that I am objective, but if you and the other editors feel otherwise, I accept your criticism/edits. I edit from tie to time, but I try not to exceed the bounds of community knowledge and worth: I use Wp everyday, but if I don't feel that I have something essential to add, I refrain (and I accept that my idea of "essential" may not be what a WP entry needs). Thanks again for the message. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmustafa (talk • contribs) 09:08, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome. I see that you are aware that consensus is a very important part of the process of building Wikipedia. --Anna Lincoln (talk) 09:13, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanx

Thank you for your welcome. But I am a little longer an Wikipedian - only allmost working in the german Wikipedia. However: Thank you for your nice Welcome.--Kriddl (talk) 10:34, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Didn't know. See you. --Anna Lincoln (talk) 10:35, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

See you - may be one day in de:? --Kriddl (talk) 10:49, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Maybe. I speak some German: Ich spreche ein bisschen Deutsch ;-) --Anna Lincoln (talk) 10:52, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Of course - you wrote this on your user-page ;-) --Kriddl (talk) 10:55, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks Anna

Hello Anna,Thanx for Welcoming me.Well i am not new on Wikipedia. I was there in Wikipedia before but unfortunately my Old Account was Blocked by Unconsiderate People.This was related to a Article which took a complete ugly and racist turn. Hope i don't have to face people like these ever. Take Care Dear.......SAYONARA (Druid.raul (talk) 13:21, 1 October 2008 (UTC))

I wish you good luck. Remember that getting engaged on edit wars doesn't benefit anybody. --Anna Lincoln (talk) 14:00, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Re: My signature.

Okay. I've trimmed it down to minimize the number of bytes reverted to the default one. User:Alexius08 (talk) 08:32, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Ok, it's just that Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions looked like an assertion or statement, rather than a signature, and it made readers wonder, "who is this Alexius who has to talk about his contributions, and what does this have to do with this thread?". Regards. --Anna Lincoln (talk) 08:51, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Editor Review

Hello! I responded to your concerns on my editor review page.

If it is not expected for reviewers to respond to reviewees, you can ignore this message. :) I'm not very familiar with the review process, so if this is not good form, please let me know.

Thanks deeply,

La Pianista ^{(T•C•S•R)} 19:29, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Hi! I read your comments two days ago and I agree with them. I think it's okay to reply to the reviewers, as some people do for example on their RfA process. You're welcome! --Anna Lincoln (talk) 07:23, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the Welcome & A question

Thanks first and forth most for the welcome, you seem to have a lot of these thank yous on your talk page and you definitely deserve them. =] I would like to ask if there is a page where people have the list of those ' This user... ' signs, since I notice that most people have collections full of them. And I had to wonder where they get them.

Thanks!--Nebula Wolf (talk) 16:39, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Hi, Nebula. The list of userboxes that you can add to your userpage is at the bottom of this page: WP:UBX. Have fun choosing among them! --Anna Lincoln (talk) 16:46, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Uh... oh yes, thanks!

Hi there Anna. This is just a very, very, VERY late thank you for the welcome you left on my talk page a while back. I have been gnoming around a bit since then and have come to realise that people actually talk to each other here. Lovely. :) All the best to you. Audionaut (talk) 17:02, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

No problem! There's no need to answer messages inmediately. Regards. --Anna Lincoln (talk) 08:19, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Querida amiga, te pide una ayuda lingüística para Lola Pagnani.¡Gracias querida amiga!

Querida amiga, te pide una ayuda lingüística para Lola Pagnani, te he visto en ti a la persona justa, primero porque eres una mujer, y las mujeres tienen luego cierto estilo porque entiendes bien mucho más al alemán y el inglés de yo. En todo caso yo corresponderé el favor con alguien de los dialectos italianos que conozco: véneto, milanés, calabrés, siciliano, piamontés y napolitano. En la espera de una tuya cierta respuesta te doy mis saludos y los agradecimientos. ¡Gracias querida amiga!--Lodewijk Vadacchino (talk) 20:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Translation: Dear friend, you are asked to help linguistically with Lola Pagnani, I have seen the fair person in you, first because you are a woman, and women have a certain style, then because you understand German and English much more than me. In any case I shall reply the favor with some of the Italian dialects that I know: Veneto, Milan, Calabrian, Sicily, Naples and Piedmont. In the hopes of a reply I give you some greetings and thanks. Thank you dear friend! --Lodewijk Vadacchino

First of all, I advise you to speak in English, so that everybody can understand our conversation, because we are in the English Wikipedia. Secondly, thank you very much for the kind words you devoted to me, I am glad to help wherever I can. Thirdly, I don't know Lola Pagnani enough to contribute substantially to the article, but I can make small grammatical fixes if I find mistakes. I Hope to see you soon. --Anna Lincoln (talk) 08:48, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

I thank you for the kind answer and the kind courtesy, to good to make! When need the dialects also do!--Lodewijk Vadacchino (talk) 12:41, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5