User talk:Angiev1997

Welcome!

Hello, Angiev1997, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Alex floyd mayweather moore, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Velella ^{Velella Talk} 16:54, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Alex floyd mayweather moore"

A page you created, Alex floyd mayweather moore, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for biographies in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 16:54, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Gaël Clichy, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Yk³ talk ~ contrib 16:55, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Roger Federer. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Roger Federer was changed by Angiev1997 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.875835 on 2011-06-26T17:11:38+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:12, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Andy Murray, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Andy Murray was changed by Angiev1997 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.876957 on 2011-06-26T17:16:32+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:16, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Jim Bentley, you will be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Jim Bentley was changed by Angiev1997 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.970623 on 2011-06-26T17:18:40+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:18, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Icon of insanity

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Icon of insanity requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Fæ (talk) 21:26, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, it's not enough to be a real band - see WP:BAND for what a band need to have achieved before they can have a Wikipedia article. JohnCD (talk) 21:43, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vicetone

Hello Angiev1997,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Vicetone for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kges1901 (talk) 22:35, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Vicetone

Hello, Angiev1997,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Vicetone should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vicetone .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Kges1901 (talk) 09:18, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vicetone

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vicetone requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Drmies (talk) 20:59, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vicetone Comments

Hello Angiev1997. I am a Vicetone follower as you are and have noticed that you have posted comments on the article's talk page explaining why it should not be deleted. However, if we want to keep the page from being deleted, we must add comments at this page: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Vicetone, not the Vicetone's talk page since they will not see contending arguments there. One thing to keep in mind, though, when commenting is to explain your reasoning there while adding sources and information to the real article, since this is one of the reasons it is being nominated. For example, at the beginning of the article, where it says their DJ Mag Ranking, you can add information about their Facebook likes and Soundcloud plays, along with sources citing these, and you can also explain the significance of their DJ Mag ranking there as well. Once you've done that on the article, go to Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Vicetone and add a new entry with another contention using what you cited as a source. That way you can explain on there how notable they really are, while making sure to explain you added sources as well. Basically just make sure to put on the article, whatever you intend to argue at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Vicetone. Remember to add a new section like I did on Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Vicetone before you give your argument. You can use my entry on it as an example of how to do this. Best regards, The1stEditor 11:08, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all your help with the references and contributions and after looking at your page I can see you have tried on previous occasions to get Vicetone a Wikipedia page. I will try my best to add something as you say to this discussion but I really have no idea what I'm doing. Thanks again.