Jump to content

User talk:Angeldeb82/Archive 2016-2018

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Video game websites

I think you've been overreacting with a lot of websites going down. GameTrailers, Destructoid, The Guardian. They were all temporary stuff and whatnot. GamerPro64 01:53, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

I've mentioned this before but I feel like I have to mention once again not to overreact to when a website suddenly stops working. Then again, from my first post GameTrailers is dead. Funny things. GamerPro64 22:15, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Omikron: The Nomad Soul

Noticed your edits on the Omikron article. Interested in improving the page? GamerPro64 04:10, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello. I think I improved the page by limiting the reviewer scores to 10 on the Reception chart. Is that good enough? --Angeldeb82 (talk) 04:51, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
I'm not quite sure about having so many reviews for the PC version. Feels like there's more weight for the PC version than the Dreamcast version. GamerPro64 05:14, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Black & White (video game), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maxim. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

My edit on the Splinter Cell Chaos Theory article

I don't even remember making that edit, must have happened while browsing on my phone. Sorry about that. Eik Corell (talk) 12:48, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

That's okay. I forgive you. Just be careful next time, okay?--Angeldeb82 (talk) 14:57, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Layers of Fear Expansion

I saw your expansion of the game Naughty Bear, nice Job. I was wondering if you wouldn't mind expanding the article for the 2016 horror game Layers of Fear?--Paleface Jack (talk) 14:59, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 19 April

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:34, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

ESPN NBA Basketball (video game)

Do you mind actually adding some prose to reception sections that you butcher? At ESPN NBA Basketball (video game) for example, you replaced the preferred reception chart (see the featured articles) with one that contains redundant fields, an excessive amount of unnecessary publications, and crappy presentation. On top of that unexplained unproductiveness, you also outright erased the prose. When you decide to butcher reception sections, add a prose. I suggest adding prose to the articles you've already done this to and the articles you plan to do this to in the future. —DangerousJXD (talk) 21:48, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

One more thing, Metacritic is not a "video game review aggregator". It is a "review aggregation website". That is the most common term used. That or just "review aggregator". Metacritic is more than just video games. I'm not going to bother trying to persuade you to quit butchering reception sections. Just fix the ones you've already butchered. Or do nothing. I'm certainly not cleaning up after you. I don't care now. I'm done. —DangerousJXD (talk) 22:05, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 June 14#Front covers of Tales of Eternia

I invite you to the latest discussion about front covers of Tales of Eternia. Join the discussion. --George Ho (talk) 08:19, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tourist Trophy (video game), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spong. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

CVG and PALGN

Just letting you know that I checked both websites on the Wayback Machine just now and the archives on there work. Don't know why the robots.txt were removed but we're good now. GamerPro64 04:15, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

I see. And what about CiN Weekly? Is the robots.txt removed as well? --Angeldeb82 (talk) 15:02, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
Yes. GamerPro64 21:35, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi Angeldeb82, just a note that it's fine to repeat wikilinks to a work/publisher with multiple refs as long as the refs are consistent. Also see Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Titles#Major_works: "Online magazines, newspapers, and news sites with original content should generally be italicized" czar 21:29, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 7 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Splatterhouse Article

Hey, I noticed you recently improved and updated the article for Splatterhouse (2010 video game). Thanks for that, but I noticed some incorrect information you've added. You included information on a supposed iOS version of the game, however, no such version exists. The IPhone version is actually an updated port/enhancement of the 1988 original (Splatterhouse). As you can see in the original article under the Ports section, there is already some information on the iOS version. As such, the info you added to the 2010 reboot regarding a mobile version will have to be migrated to the article for the original game or deleted entirely. Spilia4 (talk) 05:57, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 22 October

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:

Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:16, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 September 1#Tales of Eternia

You edited Tales of Eternia in the past. I invite you to FFD discussion about the cover arts. --George Ho (talk) 04:29, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Talk:TimeSplitters (series)

You contributed to TimeSplitters, so I invite you to the RM discussion. --George Ho (talk) 05:33, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

I have removed content you added to the above article, as it appears to have been copied from http://www.filfre.net/2012/07/japanese-adventuring/, a copyright web page. All content you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. Please let me know if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 01:21, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Apologies about firefox article

Sorry about my edit, i didn't want to be annoying, i'm pretty new around here; Now I read the guidelines Wikioe (talk) 23:32, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

I understand. Just be careful when editing, okay? --Angeldeb82 (talk) 03:54, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Invisible Barnstar
For all the work you do adding in video game review scores. Many readers come to Wikipedia to find exactly that, review scores. Make no mistake, you are a valuable contributor to the video game wikiproject. Keep up the great work! TarkusAB 16:48, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Chrome Dev

Google Play website does not show the version number for Chrome Dev. I simply updated the version number and removed an inappropriate source (there's no way you can find the version number in Play Store), I don't know how that counts as vandalism and I have no idea why you reverted my edits. Thank you. Hayman30 (talk) 05:20, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

But in removing the Google Play website reference in the Beta and Dev Channels, you also remove the GoogleBlog reference! Please don't remove the GoogleBlog reference to the Beta Channel again, okay? --Angeldeb82 (talk) 15:12, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
It was my mistake, I didn't notice that it's the Google Blog reference. Glad that you fixed that for me, thank you. Hayman30 (talk) 13:03, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mosh (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Times They Are A-Changin'. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Chrome Canary

Please, I didn't forget to update the Android branch, it's just not updated yet when I was editing the page. You edited the 4 hours after I did, of course there's something changed. I'm not a careless editor, I check the CSV viewer every time I update the page. Thank you. Hayman30 (talk) 15:18, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

I understand. And you're welcome. --Angeldeb82 (talk) 18:02, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Lol you're still thinking that I'm forgetting it. I'm not, it hasn't been updated when I was checking the viewer. Desktop and Android Canary channels does not necessarily update at the same time. I'd appreciate it if you could stop accusing me of "forgetting" it. Thank you. Hayman30 (talk) 15:23, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
I understand. And I'm sorry for accusing you. I hope you will forgive me. --Angeldeb82 (talk) 16:13, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Unsourced reception

Hi there! I have been going through the list of unsourced video game articles, and making a list of articles that have reception sections, even though they have no citations. I figure it is pretty much always a bad idea to add a reception section if you are not going to use citations! I see you did some good work on Bit.Trip Complete and Conflict: Vietnam for example, so that they are no longer unsourced. My personal feeling is that an article which can be sourced, should be sourced rather than deleted! Any help you can provide in this ongoing effort would be great. 65.126.152.254 (talk) 14:30, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

For example, AFL Premiership 2005 had some unsourced material, likely OR, removed recently. Aidyn Chronicles: The First Mage also had some material removed which could possibly be sourced, while one citation was added, and on All-Star Baseball only a little bit was removed, while a few citations were added. Not sure if any of the removed material is sourceable, or worth sourcing, but better to remove unsourced reception material than to keep it there indefinitely. 65.126.152.254 (talk) 21:50, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Expanding reception sections for these WCW games.

Hey there! I have a favour to ask. Can you expand the reception section of theses WCW games: WCW Wrestling, WCW: The Main Event, WCW SuperBrawl Wrestling, WCW vs. the World, WCW vs. nWo: World Tour, WCW Nitro (video game), WCW/nWo Revenge and WCW Mayhem (video game) like you did with WCW/nWo Thunder and WCW Backstage Assault Neverrainy (talk) 05:24, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Angeldeb82. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mercenaries: Playground of Destruction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Contra (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Confused

Hello. While I do appreciate your expansion of an article here I would like to know why you removed italics from Metacritic, GameSpot and IGN, but left New Game Network italicized? Also, aren't they all websites? And if they are, shouldn't websites be italicized? Not to mention that in reception box both GameSpot and IGN are italicized.--Biografer (talk) 04:02, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

It kind of started to make sense: So, Metacritic and GameRankings aren't italicized in the article heading, neither is GameSpot, GameZone and/or IGN. But then why Destructoid is italicized in the heading? Its a website right?--Biografer (talk) 04:46, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Well, Polygon is the one that is italicized. Maybe you should ask the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games articles for such subjects like this one? --Angeldeb82 (talk) 05:24, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Well, I had spoken to the folks there, the consensus said that all of them should be italicized.--Biografer (talk) 21:29, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Okay, I see your point. I'll try that next time. --Angeldeb82 (talk) 00:10, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Well, I wont call it my point, its their point. My point would have been italicizing Metacritic and GameRankings solely on the purpose that they are websites. To me, it doesn't matter if its a publication or not. If its a website, its a website. Like, I can understand with YouTube being a service because it publishes videos from GameSpot, IGN, you name it. But Metacritic and GameRankings do not. They are just websites. However, if consensus says that you can't italicize them because they are services, fine with me. When it comes to references though, yes, do put |website=Metacritic|publisher=CBS Interactive. :)--Biografer (talk) 18:03, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft

Good morning I would like to ask for your help in editing the Draft Israel Lucas Gois the article is very good, could you help me put it on the air? I waited for return 

André Luiz nogari (talk) 13:40, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

"publisher" tags in citations

Just a quick note; I noticed that you like to italicise the parameter contents of |publisher= tags in citation templates, and this is not entirely wrong, but it does cause confusion with some bots who insist on removing those again. It would be more wise to simply convert these tags into |website= (ICYMI, |work= is a synonym for |website=), as it presents proper italic format without the need of manual markup. |publisher= should usually be used for the company that directly controls the website (e.g. CBS Interactive for GameSpot), but that is rarely used and I don't use it anymore either. I won't ask you to go around changing all tags, that would be a very unnecessary thing to do, but please be sure to keep it in mind if you stumble upon more such things in the future. Thanks! Lordtobi (✉) 06:59, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

The above messages concerns edits such as this recent one of yours. Lordtobi (✉) 08:37, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Computer Games Magazine

Hi Deb. First of all, thanks again for all your hard work adding reviews to VG articles—it's a huge help. That said, I noticed that you've removed a few reliable sources from articles I edited last year, specifically reviews from Computer Games Magazine. I've already re-added one (on Crusader Kings), but it seems that you've removed some others as well, including from Hearts of Iron. I'd like to ask why you did this, and whether it would be possible for you to undo this part of your changes. CGM was a highly respected magazine in its day, and there's a lot to be gained from linking its old reviews. It was a far more respected and long-running source than, for example, GameZone. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 06:55, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi Deb. I noticed that you removed another CGM review from Kohan: Immortal Sovereigns just now. I've re-added it, but I'd really appreciate it if you would stop removing these. If you'd like, there's a new parameter in {{Video game reviews}} dedicated to this magazine: just input CGM for its post-2000 reviews, and CGSP for pre-2000 reviews. Either way, thanks again for your hard work adding reviews to articles. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 03:58, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Magic of Andrew Lloyd Webber

Hello, Angeldeb82. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, The Magic of Andrew Lloyd Webber, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

  1. edit the page
  2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Hzh (talk) 23:12, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Hey

First of all, I'm talking about this.

Just so you know I was trying to help by adding the correct version number for the current Canary ring, but sadly I do not know where to get the correct V8 number nor the release date number.

But I though that leaving the previous version's release date would have also been wrong, so I changed it to at least be closer to what it was supposed to be; which was techically spreading misinformation, I'm sorry, I made a mistake on that part.

I don't usually do these kinds of comments, but I really don't like being called a vandalizer. Sorry.

Juhoran (talk) 18:27, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Yeah Debbie, you really need to forgive people for making mistakes. Don't leave comments like this saying that I "ignored" something. I wasn't aware of it, not ignored it, you're saying as if I'm doing it on purpose. We all make mistakes, you often do too, so please be less aggressive to people when they make mistakes. Also, please make sure you could distinguish between vandalism and good faith edits. Hayman30 (talk) 17:05, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
I'm sorry about this, and I'm sorry I was mad at you earlier. But I see your point. I'll try to do better next time, okay? --Angeldeb82 (talk) 18:05, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Your revert on Template:Timeline Mozilla Firefox

Please see a note at the bottom of the template.

Once you performed this revert Special:Diff/840384974, how about synchronizing this: Special:PermanentLink/840292342? --CiaPan (talk) 10:41, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Reference: https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/60.0esr/releasenotes/

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wreckateer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Major Nelson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Angeldeb82. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Scott Pilgrim vs. the World: The Game, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Major Nelson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Angeldeb82/Archive_2016-2018&oldid=1063698846"