User talk:Andrwsc/Archive 17

Archive 10

←

Archive 15

Archive 16

Archive 17

Olympic issue with editor

Thanks for your neutral help , but it seems the criteria that the IOC use in realtion to NOCs has been total missed by the other editor . Your example , Puerto Rico and Jnestorius example of Palestine - which isnt even recognised as a terriroty or political entity yet , I taught would show where the by-laws in the charter dont always flow with convention . He has edited the same phrase in the OCI page , I edited out and guess what , yep its back . I am not going to edit again until this issue is resolved - that would just create too much discussion on the one issue . Murry1975 (talk) 09:46, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

{{Infobox Country Olympics}}

Hi,

Now that the drama has died down a bit, do you mind unprotecting? I'm sure Headbomb can be persuaded to discuss any future controversial edits to the template on talk, and there's no history of disruption which really warrants protection at this time. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 10:16, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Guyana

Hi, can you update Template:Country data Guyana with this Flag of Guyana, I mean I can use {{flagicon|British Guiana}} but for example:

• {{flagathlete|[[Keevil Daly]]|GUY|1906}} ==> Keevil Daly (GUY),

it doesn't work for this template. Mohsen1248 (talk) 13:05, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

• • I found the solution, forget it. Mohsen1248 (talk) 13:33, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Moving Burma to Myanmar - ongoing poll

This is to let you know that an ongoing poll is taking place to move Burma to Myanmar. This note is going out to wikipedia members who have participated in Burma/Myanmar name changing polls in the past. It does not include banned members nor those with only ip addresses. Thank you. Fyunck(click) (talk) 19:26, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

French Algeria

Hi, any chance of creating {{Country data French Algeria}} (French flag) for use in the List of shipwrecks in 1939 article? Mjroots (talk) 10:18, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Lists of Russians

Per your comments here, would you care to comment at Wikipedia:Bot requests#Help removing a template. There is an editor who seems to believe we need this template at the bottom of every article about every Russian. Thank you. 198.175.175.57 (talk) 23:40, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 November 14#Template:Lists of Russians 198.102.153.2 (talk) 21:42, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Hidden sortability

Hey mate. I don't know if anyone has asked you this before, but is it feasible to have a hidden {{sort}} key written into templates like Template:Country data Republic of the Congo, so that they sort under "C" rather than "R" in wikitables? Nightw 05:27, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:FlagO

Template:FlagO has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:28, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Question about flag copyright

I was wondering if you could give me some advice. I was trying to create a country data template for Nassau County, New York. The flag is currently marked as fair use, but I'm not sure if that is the correct status because the flag has existed since 1899 (according to [1]). This would make the image essentially a faithful reproduction of something with an expired copyright. Do you know if this is a valid analysis in terms of how Wikipedia deals with flag copyrights? Thanks! Antony–22 (^talk⁄_contribs) 03:51, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

I went ahead and made a definitely-free version to replace the maybe-free one, just to be safe. I guess my question has been mooted, but I'm still curious as the copyright treatment of flags and seals seems to be wildly inconsistent within Wikipedia. Antony–22 (^talk⁄_contribs) 05:18, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Arkeia Software article

Dear Andrwsc,

About 1-2 months ago, this article had an advert template placed on it that I believe may no longer be necessary. I have since revised the article, removing (I hope) any unnecessary mentions of the company name, excessive product details, etc. When you have a chance, could you possibly look at the article and let me know if my changes have been sufficient to warrant removal of the template? Thank you!Michael Leeman (talk) 23:24, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

West Germany country data

Hi! Is it possible that you include the rugby union code ( | link alias-rugby union = Germany national rugby union team ) to the Template:Country data West Germany to avoid redirections? I'm asking you because the West Germany national rugby union team does not exist (it redirects to the Germany national rugby union team) and that template already has the codes for tennis, basketball, football, ice hockey, etc. Apart from the fact I can't edit it myself. Thank you in advance! Tibullus ^{call me} 13:04, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

MSU Interview

Dear Andrwsc,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the community HERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.

So a few things about the interviews:

• Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
• Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
• All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
• All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
• The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your name HERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk) 04:17, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Invitation to events: bot, template, and Gadget makers wanted

I thought you might want to know about some upcoming events where you can learn more about MediaWiki customization and development, extending functionality with JavaScript, the future of ResourceLoader and Gadgets, the new Lua templating system, how to best use the web API for bots, and various upcoming features and changes. We'd love to have power users, bot maintainers and writers, and template makers at these events so we can all learn from each other and chat about what needs doing.

Check out the Chennai event in March, the Berlin hackathon in June, the developers' days preceding Wikimania in July in Washington, DC, or any other of our events.

Best wishes! - Sumana Harihareswara, Wikimedia Foundation's Volunteer Development Coordinator. Please reply on my talk page, here or at mediawiki.org. Sumanah (talk) 22:13, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Virgin Islands at the 1984 Winter Olympics

A tag has been placed on Virgin Islands at the 1984 Winter Olympics, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

There was a mixup with the British Virgin Islands

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Intoronto1125TalkContributions 02:33, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

talk page use for Template:Country data Netherlands?

He Andrwsc/Ed17; the template is protected so that only admins can edit. Probably this is done to avoid too many changes on a very heavily used template. I suggest thus to use a bit of restraint in editing even if you are one of the few who can edit there.... L.tak (talk) 21:02, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Direct link

I just called somebody to help me to have a direct link in {{Country data Chile}} and {{Country data Australia}}, why it doesn't work? --Aleenf1 07:35, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Can you fix country data Chile and Australia course in {{fh}} template it is redirect links. Thanks! --Aleenf1 07:33, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Template:AI listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:AI. Since you had some involvement with the Template:AI redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Magioladitis (talk) 12:32, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

List of participating nations at the Winter Olympic Games — Koreans in pre-war Games for Japan

I see that you have been a massive contributor to this list. So I was wondering how you were aware of these participants born on the korean peninsula and if that needs to be in a footnote or something in the table ? --Migrant (talk) 13:18, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Got any opinion on this matter ? Regards --Migrant (talk) 01:34, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

I don't think it's necessary to add any footnote to that list. It's all about official representation by National Olympic Committees, not by ethnic nationality. The Korean Olympic Committee was not recognized by the IOC until 1948. I think the best place for that kind of information is in the prose text of the linked South Korea at the Olympics article, where it already is. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 16:32, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the answer. Which is in my opinion also a good solution of doing it properly. --Migrant (talk) 17:37, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

{{Country data}}

You have replaced File:Flag of None.svg with File:Flag placeholder.svg in the {{Country data}} template on 11 Januar 2011. What was the reason for this change? Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{WrestleMania XXVIII} _{The Undertaker 20–0} 16:21, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Flag of None is not a real flag, so having it visible as an icon is misleading for an encyclopedia. Flag placeholder has a transparent background, so nothing is visible in the unusual instances when {{flag}} etc. are used without parameters. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 18:46, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Hi Andrwsc, well, that doesn't make any sense to me. A transparent flag is no flag either! Why should I place a flag which has no background? Than I insert nothing (no flag) instead. The idea of the icon with the question mark is to show the user that there is an info missing (means: Can you help?). So some might start a research for info. The other thing is that there was no talk about changing. This is at least what I expect to a free and democratic encyclopedia. Looks to me that you've made a solitary decision and users are wondering about that. So when I want to show that a nationality which is unknown and want someone to research, I'm using now the Pic instead of the EMPTY Template. Sounds wired. --LezFraniak (talk) 14:18, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

This was discussed years ago at Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Icons. Without any kind of legend, readers will have to guess what that symbol means, and guessing is obviously a bad idea for an encyclopedia. Only editors who have encountered that image before will understand it's meaning. The use of a transparent image means that nothing will be seen on the web page or the printed page, which is a more desirable situation when a flag is unknown, or when editors accidentally or mistakenly use {{flagicon}} incorrectly without any parameter. Using File:Flag of None.svg violates the Manual of Style—a set of guidelines that was created by a "free and democratic" process. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 16:55, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

OK, I see. Not even easy to find. I still do not agree with it, but if it has gone through a free and democratic process I´m fine. I didn't want to reopen it. Armbrust and me were just wondering about the fact. We are still using it at the WP:de and no one its wondering about the question mark flag. But some people are smarter than others. So this talk is closed for me and can be deleted (no evidence for posterity) ;-) or archived. --LezFraniak (talk) 17:24, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

WP Olympics in the Signpost

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Olympics for a Signpost article to be published days before this year's opening ceremony. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. -Mabeenot (talk) 07:05, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Good article reassessment: Olympic sports

Olympic sports, an article that you may be interested in, has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the good article reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. --LauraHale (talk) 12:48, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Requested move of Côte d'Ivoire

There is currently a discussion on moving the article Côte d'Ivoire to Ivory Coast. You are being notified since you participated in a previous discussion on this topic. Please join the discussion here if you are interested. TDL (talk) 02:35, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Reuse of IOC country code: Effect on Template:FlagIOC and others

It is exceedingly likely that IOC intends to reuse the IOC country code IOA, but not the designation "Individual Olympic Athletes". Instead the athletes competing under the olympic flag will compete as "Independent Olympic Athletes". See active discussions with links to sources here and here. As you have worked with and protected Template:FlagIOC do you have any idea on how to fix this template, and other templates that use the IOC code as main input, so the correct designation will appear for both Individual and Independent Olympic Athletes. 88.88.160.158 (talk) 11:22, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

 Fixed in this edit — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 19:07, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

That works for Template:FlagIOC, but a previewed test at Independent Olympic Participants at the 2012 Summer Olympics still showed Individual Olympic Athletes for Template:Infobox country Olympics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.167.109.186 (talk) 20:29, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

 Fixed in this edit, which restored the infobox to its original design before an edit by Violetriga in October 2011. The header should not be linked; that's what the "(summary)" link further down in the infobox is used for. My fix also ensures that the infobox in Individual Olympic Athletes at the 2000 Summer Olympics still shows the correct name for IOA for that year. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 22:52, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. Everything seems to be working. 85.167.109.186 (talk) 06:12, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Request non-standard close of requested move discussion

Could you close this discussion for the reasons given in the comment timed 15:12, 21 July 2012 (UTC). See also comment by User:JoshMartini007 here. If you read the sources you will note that the current title is a factual error that should be fixed. 85.167.109.186 (talk) 15:22, 21 July 2012 (UTC) Updated: 20:26, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Template:Infobox country Olympics

Any idea why the infoboxes for 2012 aren't linking to the 2012 Summer Olympics medal table? This template business is beyond me... Thanks - Basement12 (T.C) 10:51, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

There's a code requirement for the existence of a 2012 Summer Olympics medal count page so that the infobox link to the medal table is active. All other medal table pages have a redirect from a "... medal count" page to their current name, which renders the link active in those cases, except for 2012. That requirement should be changed from "medal count" to "medal table". Parutakupiu (talk) 15:45, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Template:flaglink/core

I noticed that you were the creator and the main editor of Template:flaglink/core. Hopefully you can help me or direct me to the proper area. I am looking for a way to parameterize the link that accompanies the flag to change based on both the name of the sport and the year. Specifically, {{Bk|USA}} currently renders United States. However, I would like the generic link United States men's national basketball team to instead be changed to the year-specific team article, 2012 United States men's Olympic basketball team. Not sure if a brute force approach to just allow a user-specified link or a more generic solution that allows for a year prefix is best. Thanks in advance for your help.—Bagumba (talk) 17:50, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

That's not a common construct, so there's no template for that sort of thing. Just use {{flagdeco|USA}} [[2012 United States men's Olympic basketball team|United States]]. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 17:53, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

The ultimate brute force approach. Thanks!—Bagumba (talk) 18:41, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Well, it may not look elegant, but I can't think of another instance where national team articles exist for a specific year and a specific event. If the article name had started with "United States..." then you could use {{flaglink}} to simplify it somewhat, but "United States" appears in the middle of the article name. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 18:46, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

1960 United States men's Olympic basketball team, 1992 United States men's Olympic basketball team, 2008 United States men's Olympic basketball team are others, but you are right that they are more the exception than the rule.—Bagumba (talk) 19:30, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:FlagIOCmedalist

You have, I notice, been active on this template in the past. Could I draw your attention to the issues I have raised at the associated talk page. The removal of italics, I would hope, is not controversial: the triple indication of nationality certainly seems overkill to me, although it is also part of the related Template:FlagIOCathlete and Template:FlagIOCteam. I would suggest that in all three the trigramme is superfluous. Kevin McE (talk) 13:36, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Olympic medals by teams

If you get a moment I'd be interested to hear your views on Olympic medals by teams. I've started a discussion at WT:OLY. Thanks - Basement12 (T.C) 00:58, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:TeamMedalWinner

Template:TeamMedalWinner has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. DH85868993 (talk) 10:32, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

olympics history

Finland's Olympic committee was founded in 1907. Cyprus one was founded in 1974. But in Finland example are mentioned previous Olympic games from 1896 to 1904. Cyprus template start from 1980 olympics. so we should choice one of 2 solutions. we mention all of Olympics game to all of NOC or we remove games in which NOC wasn't participate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aight 2009 (talk • contribs) 07:18, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

The idea is that the list of Games in the infobox starts with their first appearance, and does not ignore any "gaps" — those are identified in an alternate font color. For nations that started close to the first Games in 1896, it is informative to clearly identify which Games were attended and which were not. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 07:22, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

RE: 2016 articles

Please learn to talk ina acivil manner if you want to get heard. You as k dont command per youre likings. The only articles are the one with current noteworthiness as the ones with dramatic changes. The article like the football has no credence at the moment and i did not add that. You can see th emultple sources on all the 3 articles i created! I suppose RS sources tdealing with the changes is crystal to you? please know what you cite. Your opinion of useless info shoudl then g to removing the redlinks on all the event articles in the 2012 olympics too. Be consistent and read REDLINKS. Lihaas (talk) 23:08, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Because it is not empty as you insinuated. wha tis known is lited and as time goes on more and more will be added. Note- only the IOC doesnt make the schedule, many sporting bodies have authoriy to do so oo (a la sailing). As said if its redundan tnow, then ALL the calendars are redundant. There is different data on this. See the table that lists the ates where possible. Sorry, it DOES have sources and is thus not crystal. please read before saying otherwise cause such edit summaries that are deceptive are not agfLihaas (talk) 04:53, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Where is the source that says there will be one (and only one) event final in sailing on August 21, one (and only one) event final in Athletics on the same day, etc.? We can make guesses about the 2016 schedule, but it has not been announced yet. Further discussion should continue at WT:WikiProject Olympics. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 05:00, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Taiwan country data

Could you please take a look at Template talk:Country data Republic of China#Edit request and Template talk:Country data Republic of China#Wrong link for historic ROC? I lack the sandbox knowhow. CMD (talk) 07:22, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Getting Wikimedians to the Olympic Games

Hi. I am part of an effort to get Wikimedians access to the 2016 Summer Olympics as accredited reporters and photographers. Part of this effort includes covering the 2012 Summer Paralympics. Two Wikimedians have credentials to attend these games as reporters through Wikimedia Australia. As English Wikipedia does not allow original reporting, this is largely through Wikinews with a project page found at Wikinews:Paralympic Games. If you are interested in helping to get Wikimedians to the next Summer Olympics,I'd encourage you to assist with Wikinews efforts, and also to work on all language 2012 Summer Paralympic Wikipedia articles before, during and after the Games to demonstrate a track record of success. Thank you. --LauraHale (talk) 05:02, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Correcting ROC template usage

Could only one of us work on that at the moment? I've encountered 2 edit conflicts already. GotR ^Talk 21:34, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

I'll be done shortly. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 21:35, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks much. GotR ^Talk 21:42, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

I think I'm done for today. I think we've got all instances of the 1912 flag updated, but I suspect there are hundreds of references to the ROC template (now linked to Taiwan) that will also need to be changed to link to the Republic of China (1912–1949) article instead. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 22:05, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Virgin Islands

Instead of doing grumpy, we better try to solve the problem. It isn't very helpful to break some articles to solve others. The link you gave to Virgin Islands at the 2012 Summer Olympics seems to work properly, although there is a problem at 2002 Winter Olympics. The problem I try to solve is a link to a disambiguation page at Template:Infobox Paralympics Virgin Islands. Somewhere someone made a mistake, but where and how can we solve that? The Banner _talk 23:40, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Hmmm, why do we have a template Template:Infobox Olympics Virgin Islands and a template Template:Infobox Paralympics Virgin Islands? Could we merge them? The Banner _talk 23:44, 20 August 2012 (UTC)bad idea

I just looked at 2002 Winter Olympics and only see the problem you just created with your revert (in the "Participating Nations" section). Please clarify exactly what problem(s) you are trying to fix, but in the meantime, please make no additional edits to the Country IOC alias ISV meta-template. Your "fix" is very disruptive to many articles. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 23:52, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

The point is that you have the British Virgin Islands and the United States Virgin Islands. To my opinion, many article incorrectly point to articles "Virgin Islands at ..." instead of "United States Virgin Islands at ...". Redirects or namechanges can fix this. The Banner _talk 23:56, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Changing the return value from the ISV meta-template does not create these redirects, but it certainly creates redlinks for articles that do not exist, so please stop editing that template until you know what the effects are. If you want to change the Olympic convention of the USVI team being called simply "Virgin Islands" at the Olympics (hence, our Wikipedia articles follow that naming convention), then discussion at WT:WikiProject Olympics would be prudent before boldly moving any pages. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 00:05, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Then please fix the link in Template:Infobox Paralympics Virgin Islands, where you now recreated the link to the disambiguation page Flag of the Virgin Islands. You can't create new problems to solve others. The basic problem, IMHO, is the incorrect linking to "Virgin Islands at ...". The Virgin Islands are not always the United States Virgin Islands, the British Virgin Islands also exist. I will slowly fix this pro-USA bias over the coming days (surely not tonight, as bedtime looms). I hope that not someone else of WikiProject Disambiguation will try to solve the problem. The Banner _talk 00:11, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

done, properly — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 01:36, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

If you know how to fix it, why didn't you do that the first time? But fixed = fixed, so case closed. The Banner _talk 17:20, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Because you didn't tell me what the problem was until this message. I can't read your mind. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 17:55, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

And yes, The British Virgin Islands take part in the Olympic Games: British Virgin Islands at the 2012 Summer Olympics. So sooner or later, it has to get fixed. The Banner _talk 00:20, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Moving Burma to Myanmar - ongoing poll

This is to let you know that an ongoing poll is taking place to move Burma to Myanmar. I know this happened just recently but no administrator would close these frequent rm's down, so here we go again. This note is going out to wikipedia members who have participated in Burma/Myanmar name changing polls in the past. It does not include banned members nor those with only ip addresses. Thank you. Fyunck(click) (talk) 20:11, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Country data Democratic Republic of the Congo

Hi I created Template:fbl, for african local national teams competitions (African Nations Championship) however I have problem with some countries like DR Congo because the template show the first team. Can u help please. Best regards. --Fayçal.09 (talk) 18:06, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

List of Australian Olympic medalists in swimming

List of Australian Olympic medalists in swimming has been nominated for today's featured lists. Since you are the second most active contributor I am letting you know.--Lucky102 (talk) 16:35, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Template:Infobox Olympics DR Congo

Hi, I was wondering if you could add Zaire information to this template? Currently, DR Congo's participation articles as Zaire use a generic template, and adding years 1984 through 1996 to COD's template doesn't bring up Zaire's flag or its NOC code. Jmj713 (talk) 22:02, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Template:Country data Habsburg Monarchy > flag|Habsburg Monarchy

Hi, on Template:Country data Habsburg Monarchy, the flag of the Habsburg Monarchy is
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Banner_of_the_Holy_Roman_Emperor_%28after_1400%29.svg
rather than the following one :
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Flag_of_the_Habsburg_Monarchy.svg&page=1
Could you please replace it ? Thanks Hippo75 (talk) 15:01, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Country data error

Hello, Andrwsc!

^{(Please see this talk page – one of the historical flags presented is wrong. I am turning to you because the} Country data Bulgaria template is red-protected, and you seem to have made the most changes to it in the past. Thank you in advance!)

Actually, I've read up on this and according to some documentation I found (in Bulgarian), the red CoA only lasted a couple of months in 1948, and it's unclear if it was ever added to the flag. So, actually, don't worry about changing the template for now. I'll research it further and get in touch again if I can find evidence for changes needing to be made. (I've opened up a discussion on the matter here) Thanks (and sorry)! BigSteve (talk) 13:56, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

ROC/TPE

Currently, Chinese Taipei at the Olympics is a mess. The IOC does not separate Taiwan's participation between Republic of China and Chinese Taipei. I think we should only have a combined infobox under Chinese Taipei with Republic of China asterisked, as with many others where NOCs were changed for the entity remained the same (Zaire, etc.). Then the medal tables should be combined as well. Jmj713 (talk) 19:16, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Palestinian National Authority

There's a dispute at Talk:Palestinian_National_Authority#Organization_or_Place.3F and Talk:Palestinian_National_Authority#Palestinian_Authority_-_an_organization_.28government.29_or_a_geopolitical_entity.3F to weather the PNA is a government (like the Government of Hong Kong and the Kurdistan Regional Government), or a geopolitical entity (a psychical location like like Hong Kong and Iraqi Kurdistan}. I'm telling you this because you seamed to express an opinion on this at Talk:Palestinian_National_Authority/Archive_1#Is_this_the_best_article_for_.22country.22_references.3F. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 06:35, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

French Guiana

Please can you add:

"| flag alias-football = Flag of French Guiana.svg" to the template:Country data French Guiana template below the flag alias-local line. TheBigJagielka (talk) 01:19, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Boxing at the Summer Olympics

Please help me fix the weight class table you created. I tried to move light-welterweight down and make welterweight bracket larger, but I just CANNOT understand how this complicated wiki table works. I've been trying to fix it for two hours, but it just doesn't have no system. Thanks --Novis-M (talk) 22:00, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Nordic skiing at the 2010 Winter Olympics for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nordic skiing at the 2010 Winter Olympics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nordic skiing at the 2010 Winter Olympics until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Intoronto1125TalkContributions 23:13, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Federated States of Micronesia vs. Micronesia

Hi Andrwsc, I have started a thread over at WT:OLY discussing the use of "Federated States of Micronesia" in Olympic-related articles. I would love your thoughts on the matter. Regards -- Ianblair23 (talk) 00:34, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of List of papabili in the 2013 papal conclave for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of papabili in the 2013 papal conclave is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of papabili in the 2013 papal conclave until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- --JamboQueen (talk) 17:29, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Template:Country data Burundi

Hello. I would like to request if you could add the 1962 variant. It is at the Flag of Burundi page, but not in the template. Thank you. Mas y mas (talk) 16:41, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Your input is requested

Greetings, Andrwsc! If we have not met, I'm AutomaticStrikeout. I've come here to ask you to take part in the survey at User:AutomaticStrikeout/Are admins interested in a RfB?. I am trying to gauge the general level of interest that administrators have in running for cratship, as well as pinpoint the factors that affect that interest level. Your input will be appreciated. Happy editing, AutomaticStrikeout (T • C • Sign AAPT) 02:09, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

{{Infobox Olympic event}}

Hi,

There's a request in to lower the protection on this template (perhaps to semi) while it's being updated to a modern codebase. As the protecting admin, would you be okay with that? Cheers. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 09:24, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

The template is protected for Wikipedia:High-risk templates reasons; it is transcluded on >3000 pages. I don't see the need to unprotect to make changes, since we have sandbox & test case mechanisms to try things out first, then {{edit protected}} when there is consensus to apply the new version.

But I'm not sure why the proposed changes are necessary. Certainly there are non-trivial changes to the rendered output:

• the horizontal rules within the infobox are gone (this helps separate the medalist section and especially the previous/next navigation section),
• the flag icons for the medal winners are no longer left-aligned,
• unnecessary bullet characters now appear before the flag icons for medal winners,
• when the longnames=yes parameter is used, the flag icons on the second line are no longer indented,
• the text size is slightly smaller.

I really do not like these changes (except for one: I like that the Venue/Date/etc. field labels are now left-aligned). The only reason for making them seems to be because of an objection to using direct HTML markup instead of the "modern" {{infobox}} meta-template helper. Is that really a problem? I note that many common infoboxes need (e.g. {{Infobox settlement}}) to use direct HTML markup to achieve their design goals (which may not be possible when using the meta-template). It is not mandatory that every infobox be implemented using {{infobox}}. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 17:48, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Template:Country data Unknown

Good day Mr. Administrator! I disagree that Template:Country data Unknown == Template:Country data none (although it probably should be moved to Template:Country data unknown), and I formally request that you undelete it. If you still believe that "" == "", then I would be happy to discuss it further in an appropriate TfD discussion. Thank you, Technical 13 (talk) 15:47, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Just use {{flagicon| }} (i.e. without any parameter) instead of {{flagicon|none}}. That produces a blank space, as shown between the two arrows below:

→←

About three years ago, that wiki markup used to render File:Flag of None.svg () but it was changed to File:Flag placeholder.svg because of a consensus discussion at WT:MOSFLAG (I believe) where it was agreed that "fake flags" shouldn't be used to represent unknowns, so it is better to display nothing instead. The current placeholder image is a transparent SVG without border, so it's even better than a white flag for that purpose (since the default page background color on Wikipedia is not pure white). But there is no country/province/city etc. in the world that has a big white question mark on a gray background for its flag, which is why the Manual of Style says not to use an invented image in the context of a flag. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 17:21, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

I think three years is enough time to revisit the idea. Having File:Flag of None.svg () is less obtrusive in tables in such where a flag image is missing than {{Expand section|date|reason=Missing flag}} is and informs people that there "should" be a flag there and if they can find one, please upload it or fix the template call so that it pulls the flag that belongs. Also, I see no reference of any discussions about using the File:Flag of None.svg placeholder as a note to inform other users that there should be a flag there and it needs to be updated anywhere on WT:MOSFLAG or its associated page WP:MOSFLAG. I would not be opposed to modifying to link to go to a documentation explaining why it is that image and what should be done to fix it to the correct flag that belongs there. Either way, I'm requesting a WP:DRV#Temporary_undeletion and an RfC to discuss it as I feel it is likely beyond the scope of something that just the two of us should figure out. Thank you, and note the code below that File:Flag placeholder.svg you referenced above isn't even used in this template as you think it is.

Code from Template:Country data none does not use File:Flag placeholder.svg

<noinclude>{{pp-template}}
This template is deliberately empty.  It is used when a default "nothing" value is needed in a parameterized use of [[Template:Flagicon]] etc.  For example, {{tlx|flagicon|none}} renders nothing, so <tt>none</tt> can be used as a default value for templates that use <tt>flagicon</tt> to optionally render a flag.

[[Category:Country data templates| none]]
</noinclude>

I look forward to discussing this further in an RfC (please mention me in the request so I can easily find it). Technical 13 (talk) 15:41, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

You misread my comment. I said that {{flagicon| }} (i.e. without any parameter) produces a blank space, whereas it used to produce the placeholder before it was changed about three years ago. What I didn't explicitly explain was that particular markup uses Template:Country data (in the same way that {{flagicon|none}} would use Template:Country data none) and the placeholder was used until January 2010, with the change based on this discussion. (My mistake, earlier I had thought it was discussed at WT:MOSICON, but it was at WT:WPFT.) I will participate in your RfC, but if you're requesting me to start it, I don't have time for that work, sorry. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 16:39, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

I think an RfC is overkill for this issue, so I've restored the template and nominated it for deletion at WP:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 May 8. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 17:50, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of current dependent territory leaders, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nakhitchevan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:12, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Template:Country data Republic of Ireland

The problem with Template:Country data Republic of Ireland including a shortname alias = Ireland was that because there is also a Template:Country data Ireland, it prevented the {{Navy|Republic of Ireland}} from coming out correct. Oddly, the problem seems not to want to reappear with your revert. Let's hope it stays this way. Urhixidur (talk) 17:43, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Perhaps you had an improper cached version? Unsure why that was the case...

Re: Georgia: Are altlink and altvar obsolete? Urhixidur (talk) 17:45, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

altlink is only necessary if the country data template is used by flag templates that render a suffix, such as {{fb}} for "Nation national football team" etc. The Georgia state template wouldn't need that, so it keeps the template cleaner by not including that line. Similarly, altvar is used in cases where the national team does not conform to the standard naming convention. See Template:flaglink/core to see how this works. So unless there is a link alias-football etc. in the template, it is extraneous to include altvar. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 22:51, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Palestine country data

Hi Andrwsc, an editor recently emailed me to express surprise at your edit to Palestine's country data. I must say I agree. While I'd really prefer a merge of State of Palestine and Palestinian territories, for now they're separate, and the latter has been the phrase favored over several requested moves of Palestine topics. See, for example, Talk:Prostitution in the Palestinian territories. If the parent articles were to be merged, I wouldn't oppose the "State of Palestine" title, however. Following WP:BRD, I've gone ahead with the R, so here's the D. What do you think? We could also open up discussion on the template's talk page. --BDD (talk) 21:33, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

My rationale is that State of Palestine is the most appropriate target article when used with a flag icon. We already have Template:Country data State of Palestine, Template:Country data Palestinian territories and Template:Country data Palestinian National Authority in use for articles that explicitly use those terms:

• {{flag|State of Palestine}} → State of Palestine
• {{flag|Palestinian territories}} → Palestinian territories
• {{flag|Palestinian National Authority}} → Palestinian National Authority

So really, the question is which of these three is the best target for when {{flag|Palestine}} is used in an article. And perhaps there is another question—which is the correct template to use in a specific context? For example, Bethlehem is listed as a twin city in the Grenoble article, with a link to Palestinian Authority. Is that the best choice? I would think either of the other two is better. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 19:00, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Since December 2012, UN and ISO relate by "Palestine" to State of Palestine [2], and most international organizations and countries follow; Palestinian government in Ramallah also refers to itself as "State of Palestine" (see President decree,Prime Minister's new logo. The designation of "State of Palestine" replaced both "Palestinian Authority" and "Palestinian territories, Occupied" (also "Palestinian-controlled territories"), which are now obsolete terms; they can of course continue referring to the Palestinian Authority between 1993-2012.Greyshark09 (talk) 20:52, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Part of the problem is that ideally, the country article should just be at Palestine (we could displace the current occupant to Palestine (region)). I went ahead and proposed the merge of State of Palestine and Palestinian territories, so if that's successful, the country data issue neatly resolves itself in favor of whichever title is chosen. If that doesn't happen (and I'm not especially hopeful), I'm not sure I still feel so strongly about this. As long as the template can display different names, it's not a huge deal. --BDD (talk) 21:11, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Hey Andrwsc

I'm sending you this because you've made quite a few edits to the template namespace in the past couple of months. If I've got this wrong, or if I haven't but you're not interested in my request, don't worry; this is the only notice I'm sending out on the subject :).

So, as you know (or should know - we sent out a centralnotice and several watchlist notices) we're planning to deploy the VisualEditor on Monday, 1 July, as the default editor. For those of us who prefer markup editing, fear not; we'll still be able to use the markup editor, which isn't going anywhere.

What's important here, though, is that the VisualEditor features an interactive template inspector; you click an icon on a template and it shows you the parameters, the contents of those fields, and human-readable parameter names, along with descriptions of what each parameter does. Personally, I find this pretty awesome, and from Monday it's going to be heavily used, since, as said, the VisualEditor will become the default.

The thing that generates the human-readable names and descriptions is a small JSON data structure, loaded through an extension called TemplateData. I'm reaching out to you in the hopes that you'd be willing and able to put some time into adding TemplateData to high-profile templates. It's pretty easy to understand (heck, if I can write it, anyone can) and you can find a guide here, along with a list of prominent templates, although I suspect we can all hazard a guess as to high-profile templates that would benefit from this. Hopefully you're willing to give it a try; the more TemplateData sections get added, the better the interface can be. If you run into any problems, drop a note on the Feedback page.

Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 21:21, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Template:Country flag IOC alias MSR|

could you create Template:Country flag IOC alias MSR for Montserrat at the 2013 World Championships in Athletics? these are simple templates like Template:Country flag IOC alias MEX, and should only need one flag image, since this is one of the first years. 174.56.57.138 (talk) 21:43, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2012 FIRS Women's Roller Hockey World Cup may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• |15 Nov 2012 21:00|{{rhw|ARG}}|0|'''{{rhw|POR}}]'''|'''2'''

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:02, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Country data Wales

Can you add the Flag of Saint David? RobiH (talk) 19:01, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Why? The image is not used in icon form in any single mainspace article. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 22:36, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Country Data Estonia

Can you add the Naval Jack? RobiH (talk) 19:02, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

No. The WP:MILHIST and WP:SHIPS convention is to use naval ensigns, not jacks, for flag icons. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 22:36, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Country Data Greenland

Can you add the Achen Greenland Flag Proposal? The decline was very close. RobiH (talk) 19:04, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Why? The flag is merely a proposal with no official status, and the image is not used in icom form on any single mainspace article. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 22:36, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Cascadia Nation Football Team

You say Cascadia is not a nation so cant be a national team. Neither is Quebec or Catalonia. Can you change those as well? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.191.84.39 (talk) 16:37, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Arabian Gulf rugby union team

The topic not controversial any longer, I hope. Article edited once this year; never been edited for two years. The last disruption was two years ago. --George Ho (talk) 07:23, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Criterion of country templates

Hi Andrwsc, I am wondering which countries (or territories) are appropriate for the list of inline templates linking country articles. I did find Bonaire on the list of FIFA country codes#Non-FIFA member codes. It is said in the paragraph that Bonaire is not a FIFA member but the code BOE is used in some particular cases. So would you please give me some advice on whether a country should enter the list? If necessary, I will delete the page of zh:Template:BOE I created on the Chinese language Wikipedia. Thanks, Earth Resident (talk) 12:03, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Chinese Wikipedia is completely independent, so you can do whatever you want there. As for the Bonaire code, it might be useful to add Template:Country data BOE as a redirect to Template:Country data Bonaire, if it is needed for football match results since {{fb|BOE}} might be desired as an alternative to {{fb|Bonaire}}. But there is no reason to create {{BOE}} since there is no ISO 3166-1 alpha-3 code for Bonaire, and that code would only ever be used in a football (non-FIFA) context where Template:fb would be used to render the flag instead. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 16:19, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Arabian Gulf rugby union team

I am sure that no trouble would occur again, as it happened two years ago. But if unprotection is too soon, how about pending changes instead to allow IPs to edit? --George Ho (talk) 18:52, 7 November 2013 (UTC)